|
|
10-12-2011, 09:54 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Liked 101 Times in 60 Posts
|
|
Mod 36 Flatlatch year and +P?
Came across a Mod. 36 flatlatch, fair condition metal, mechanics seem fine. Serial in low 43,000 area - anyone know the year made?
Is this guy approved for +P ammo?
Also has a very tall "O" stamped under the serial inside the crane, and a little "3" well off to the side. These mean anything special?
Thanks.
|
10-13-2011, 09:36 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,809
Likes: 18,573
Liked 22,434 Times in 8,279 Posts
|
|
Any Model marked S&W should be fine for +P. FYI, I have S/N 40744X, which was shipped Nov. 1965, also a flat latch. Would guess yours to be from around 67.
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
|
10-13-2011, 09:58 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,936
Likes: 511
Liked 1,972 Times in 508 Posts
|
|
Something doesn't compute here. Is the gun actually marked "Mod. 36" or not? If it is, either there's a a "J" prefix or an extra digit missing in that reported serial number.
__________________
SWCA #590
"Colligo ergo sum"
|
10-13-2011, 10:38 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Liked 101 Times in 60 Posts
|
|
Definitely marked as a Model 36 and barrel marked Smith and Wesson, with the almost sideways curly "and" symbol. There is no J on the serial noted on the crane but may be one on the butt - I'll have to check. Square butt. Gun looks like all other 36's to me. Serial 43300 area if I recall.
|
10-13-2011, 10:49 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,936
Likes: 511
Liked 1,972 Times in 508 Posts
|
|
If you're reporting the five digit serial number inside the crane, that is almost certainly not the serial number, but rather an assembly number. It is irrelevant to identifying or dating your revolver.
__________________
SWCA #590
"Colligo ergo sum"
Last edited by Goony; 10-13-2011 at 11:38 AM.
|
10-13-2011, 11:12 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: western north carolina
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 0
Liked 165 Times in 62 Posts
|
|
goony has nailed it. that is just a soft assembly number. you need the serial number off the butt.
|
10-13-2011, 03:49 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Liked 101 Times in 60 Posts
|
|
I'll have a look and reply when I get home... thanks for the help...
|
10-13-2011, 08:53 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Liked 101 Times in 60 Posts
|
|
It right at 402500, no letters...
|
10-13-2011, 08:56 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,936
Likes: 511
Liked 1,972 Times in 508 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tacotime
It right at 402500, no letters...
|
Probably shipped in 1965.
__________________
SWCA #590
"Colligo ergo sum"
|
10-13-2011, 09:36 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Liked 101 Times in 60 Posts
|
|
Thanks... should it be okay for +P?
|
10-13-2011, 09:52 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: GA
Posts: 5,699
Likes: 8,050
Liked 12,731 Times in 2,419 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert L Wells
I'm glad that the correct era for the gun has been established. I still would not fire +P loads in it. I mean, why?
|
Because BB +P 158 grain soft lead semi-wc hp with gas check at 1000fps from a two inch barrel makes the j-frame a very viable self defense gun. I fired 5 rounds from 4 yards to make sure they printed to poa. I carry 5 rounds in the revolver, firing them and changing to fresh every six months or so. That adds up to 10-15 rounds of the hot BB +p per year. That isn't going to break my wrist, my gun, or my pocketbook. They are actually not that unpleasant to shoot.
__________________
Georgia On My Mind
|
10-13-2011, 10:01 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Liked 101 Times in 60 Posts
|
|
I think Ayoob was happy with +P rounds in the .38 if I recall. I wouldn't be plinking with them, but if the chips are down, I prefer +P.
Any technical reason this gun shouldn't use them?
|
10-13-2011, 10:56 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,352
Likes: 10,450
Liked 6,095 Times in 1,249 Posts
|
|
I have fired a small amount of Winchester +P 158 grain ammo in my low 4-digit Chief's Special from March of 1952 with no obvious ill effects. The revolver won't be shot with large piles of the ammo but a dab for sight verification is no big deal.
Except for Buffalo Bore, therun-of-the-mill +P158 grain lead SWC load (which is the best .38 Special +P choice in my view) isn't such a fearsome cartridge.
|
10-14-2011, 07:40 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Liked 101 Times in 60 Posts
|
|
That was what I meant, the 10 rounds a year of +P plus them for carry only. Just wanted to be sure there was no disaster warning for a 36 from 1965.
That said, no hollow point on the SWC? I was thinking Ayoob liked the 125 SWCHP +P, but maybe I remember wrong?
I suppose the 125 is a little easier on the frame than the 158?
|
10-14-2011, 09:10 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Northern Minnesota
Posts: 1,726
Likes: 569
Liked 1,235 Times in 475 Posts
|
|
A while back, before S&W rated their J-frames for +P, LAPD's duty load was a +P for .38s. All J-frames got shot (some extensively) with +P ammo. S&W was aware of this (the LAPD Armory was usually in weekly contact over various issues with Springfield), but never commented negatively. There was interest by S&W over wear issues, though, which is accelerated by frequent +P use. Go ahead and use +P in your gun; I wouldn't practice daily with it, though. Small guns are made to be carried much and shot less. It's also easier on your hand.
Bob
This was a reply by OIF2 on my thread asking the same question of a 36 made in 1976. A call to Smith and Wesson informed me to probably not shoot +P ammo, but as this and all the other replies state, a few are probably not going to hurt anything. I carry +P Rangers in mine, but practice with non +P loads.
__________________
Endeavor to persevere. <><
|
10-14-2011, 10:08 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Liked 101 Times in 60 Posts
|
|
I think that is the right approach.
Good info. Always like to know what PD experience was. I wonder if Fastbolt is still on the forum - he had a lot of armorer experience. Like to know what he thinks but I bet it is the same.
Not sure if I will go with the 125 or 158 grainers. Kinda think the 110 are too light.
Last edited by tacotime; 10-14-2011 at 10:10 AM.
|
10-18-2011, 10:09 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Liked 101 Times in 60 Posts
|
|
This old guy shoots well and is tight. A little beaten, with character. The +P might be more felt in the 37, but hardly different for the heavier 36.
Curiously, I fired a factory 158 lead semi-spitzer into a hardwood (very hard dried red-oak) stump and the penetration was that the bullet base was even with the wood surface. I fired the +P JHP next to it and the penetration was identical.
I have no qualms about the occasional +P use anymore, not from the stump but from the strength of the frame.
|
10-18-2011, 10:18 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,472
Likes: 807
Liked 3,064 Times in 1,016 Posts
|
|
Like a lot of people here when it comes to J Frames I tend to carry +P but practice with target loads. As long as POI is the same I don't think it matters.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|