|
|
07-31-2012, 10:30 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Somewhere in Wisconsin
Posts: 211
Likes: 352
Liked 44 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Next purchase: 29 or 629. Your thoughts?
Hi all,
I am always looking for a way to expand my S&W collection. Currently in the process of purchasing a 625, thinking my next one will be a 29 P&R, or a 629, with no IL.
Looking for one in 95% or better condition and plan to shoot it/use for hunting. Thinking 6/6.5" barrel.
Dumb question (since my SCSW is still on its way from Amazon), were there ever any P&R 629s?
What would be a reasonable price in your corner of the country for either one of those?
__________________
NRA Certified Pistol Inst.
|
07-31-2012, 10:37 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The wet side of Oregon
Posts: 6,292
Likes: 8,819
Liked 7,785 Times in 2,377 Posts
|
|
The original 629 was pinned and recessed.
The 1982 -1 iteration eliminated these features and changed cylinder length slightly.
For a "user" 44 magnum, P&R makes no difference whatsoever, IMHO (purists screaming here).
While the stainless finish will hold up better with rough usage, personally, I'd get whichever one I could get the best deal on.
Better deals are usually for the non-P&R models.
FWIW, my favorite 44 magnum just happens to be a 4" -3.
My $0.03, YMMV!
__________________
-jwk-
US Army '72-'95
|
07-31-2012, 10:39 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Somewhere in Wisconsin
Posts: 211
Likes: 352
Liked 44 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TAROMAN
The original 629 was pinned and recessed.
The 1982 -1 iteration eliminated these features and changed cylinder length slightly.
For a "user" 44 magnum, P&R makes no difference whatsoever, IMHO (purists screaming here).
While the stainless finish will hold up better with rough usage, personally, I'd get whichever one I could get the best deal on.
Better deals are usually for the non-P&R models.
FWIW, my favorite 44 magnum just happens to be a 4" -3.
My $0.03, YMMV!
|
Thanks for the input. My overall plan is to find a decent pre-lock one...it'd just be nice to have P&R because it's more aesthetically pleasing to me, even though I only have one P&R in my somewhat small S&W collection.
Your mention of stainless vs. blued makes sense. Heck, maybe I'll just have to get one of each
__________________
NRA Certified Pistol Inst.
|
07-31-2012, 10:45 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Midcoast Maine
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 2,055
Liked 2,195 Times in 601 Posts
|
|
I'm a big fan of 29's and 629's myself. They did make some P&R 629's but they are the no dash versions. According to the SCSW when Smith went to the -1's in 1982 the pin and counterbore were eliminated.
As far as 29 versus 629, I myself think a blued gun is a work of art, but the guns I use the most for hunting and competition are all stainless. I tend to think of stainless guns as more of a tool.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-31-2012, 10:59 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 18,773
Likes: 6,048
Liked 5,762 Times in 1,992 Posts
|
|
Either will do you fine and if it's for hunting and you are willing to buy a 6 inch or Maybe ? an 8 3/8 inch they did make a P&R version of the 629 with the 8 3/8 inch which harder to find because it's rarer.
6 inch 629 no dash
8 3/8 inch 629 no dash
Last edited by fyimo; 07-31-2012 at 11:02 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-31-2012, 11:05 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Anchorage, AK USA
Posts: 397
Likes: 4
Liked 52 Times in 34 Posts
|
|
S&W 629-4 4 inch
__________________
T. Johnson
|
08-01-2012, 09:25 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
|
|
I found and bought an unfired 1980 p&r 629 no dash 6" stainless boxed and papered for $825 and it is now my favorite gun ever. I bought it to shoot and took it out this weekend for the first time. All I can say is these guns are nothing but amazing. If you can find one in good condition you will never regrete it. Mine is the crown jewel of all my guns.
Last edited by drover; 08-01-2012 at 09:28 AM.
|
08-01-2012, 11:43 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Utah
Posts: 187
Likes: 50
Liked 98 Times in 55 Posts
|
|
Of course the greatest part of the 29 vs. 629 dilemma is your proposed solution of having both. While I collect the blued P&R Smiths, if I'm going up someplace where my perceived position at the top of the food chain may be contested, my companion is a 6" 629-1. Nobody in those places seems to care that it's not P&R'd.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-01-2012, 11:55 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Hot Springs, Arkansas
Posts: 649
Likes: 293
Liked 570 Times in 198 Posts
|
|
My Smith 44's are all stainless guns, just my personal preference.
For a hunting gun, I urge you to find a 29/629 Classic with a 6.5 inch barrel. I have used the one below to kill a few Texas wild hogs.
I have also used the 629 Mountain Gun with it's Crimson Trace laser grip to kill hogs. But that may not be legal where you are.
Left side top to bottom, no locks on any of them.
629 Classic 6.5 inch
629 Classic 5 inch
629 Mountain Gun
629 Mountain Revolver
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-02-2012, 07:32 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Somewhere in Wisconsin
Posts: 211
Likes: 352
Liked 44 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Thanks for the advice so far, everyone. One I saw a year ago (and am kicking myself for passing up) was a S&W 629 Classic with the 5" barrel at a local shop for around $700. Regret not buying it, but I didn't have the money at the time.
__________________
NRA Certified Pistol Inst.
|
08-02-2012, 10:50 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 1,759
Likes: 2,572
Liked 2,697 Times in 607 Posts
|
|
"Next purchase: 29 or 629. Your thoughts?"
Yes...you need both!
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|