|
|
11-14-2014, 01:34 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 1,323
Likes: 176
Liked 1,435 Times in 420 Posts
|
|
Model 10-5 D Prefix ??
Is a 10-5 with a D prefix serial number possible? The Catalog says D prefix began in 1967 but it also says that the -6 began in 1962. I know with S&W there was no wasted parts and that stuff was used out of order but is this 5+ year cross over even possible?
|
11-14-2014, 01:36 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,264
Likes: 1,080
Liked 19,309 Times in 9,431 Posts
|
|
The 10-5 (standard barrel) and -6 (bull barrel) were both produced at the same time, and both had the D prefix after 1967.
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-14-2014, 04:53 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,887
Likes: 254
Liked 29,545 Times in 14,251 Posts
|
|
The D prefix was used from 1968 into 1977, and even afterwards using digits in front of the D.
D1 – D90,000…………….....1968
D90,001 – D330,000……..1969 -70
D330,001 – D420,000……1971 – Early 72
D420,001 – D510,000……Late 1972 – Early 73
D510,001 – D659,901……Late 1973 – Early 1974
D659.902 – D75000……...Late 1974 – Early 1975
D750,001 – D870,000……Late 1975 – Early 1976
D870,001 – D999,999……Late 1976 – Early 1977
2D00001 - 2D80,000…….1977
2D80,001 – 3D99,999……1978
4D00001 – 6D10,000…….1979
6D10,0001 – 7D10,000.…1980
7D10,001 – 9D44,500…...1981
9D44,501 – 17D8,900….…1982
17D8,901 – 21D0883……..1983
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-14-2014, 05:29 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,002
Likes: 5,169
Liked 19,378 Times in 6,956 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flundertaker
The Catalog says D prefix began in 1967 but it also says that the -6 began in 1962. I know with S&W there was no wasted parts and that stuff was used out of order but is this 5+ year cross over even possible?
|
The key here is what Alan mentioned. The -6 did not replace the -5. They were two different lines that were manufactured concurrently.
The -5 was replaced by the -7 in 1977.
The -6 was replaced by the -8 in 1977.
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318
|
11-14-2014, 05:33 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 1,323
Likes: 176
Liked 1,435 Times in 420 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JP@AK
The key here is what Alan mentioned. The -6 did not replace the -5. They were two different lines that were manufactured concurrently.
The -5 was replaced by the -7 in 1977.
The -6 was replaced by the -8 in 1977.
|
Ok. I got it. I thought it was a replacement. Thank you for the clarification.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk
|
11-14-2014, 05:41 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,887
Likes: 254
Liked 29,545 Times in 14,251 Posts
|
|
These are the changes through 10-8. Note the differences between heavy barrel and standard barrel changes:
10-1 (1959): heavy barrel
10-2 (1961): change extractor rod thread for standard barrel
10-3 (1961): change extractor rod thread for heavy barrel, change front sight width from 1/10" to 1/8"
10-4 (1962): eliminate trigger-guard screw on standard barrel frame
10-5 (1962): change sight width from 1/10" to 1/8" for standard barrel
10-6 (1962): eliminate trigger-guard screw on heavy-barrel frame
10-7 (1977): change gas ring from yoke to cylinder for standard barrel
10-8 (1977): change gas ring from yoke to cylinder for heavy barrel
|
11-11-2018, 05:30 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: above ground, under water
Posts: 776
Likes: 755
Liked 629 Times in 272 Posts
|
|
Can a mdl 10-5 serial# d140xxx have a 5” pencil/tapered barrel from the factory?
Thanks
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-11-2018, 05:57 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Washington State
Posts: 7,533
Likes: 14,742
Liked 9,427 Times in 3,759 Posts
|
|
Pretty sure it can. There was a period during which the 5" barrels were pretty common.
__________________
NHI, 10-8.
|
11-11-2018, 06:03 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: above ground, under water
Posts: 776
Likes: 755
Liked 629 Times in 272 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug M.
Pretty sure it can. There was a period during which the 5" barrels were pretty common.
|
Today, are they sought after?
And what value would a 10-5 5” with no pitting but blue thinning with original grips have?
|
11-11-2018, 08:19 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,456
Likes: 91,126
Liked 25,163 Times in 8,604 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by notsofast
Today, are they sought after?
And what value would a 10-5 5” with no pitting but blue thinning with original grips have?
|
$275-$400, depending on location. I like 5" barreled revolvers. I might pay $25-$50 more for one, over the price of a 4".
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
|
11-11-2018, 11:46 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 457
Likes: 25
Liked 583 Times in 227 Posts
|
|
The problem with the model 10 is that they were a popular police issue revolver. There are many police trade ins selling for prices way lower than than other S&W's. Same with the model 64's which were the stainless version. Check GunBrokers prices.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|