|
|
11-22-2014, 05:35 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kent, United Kingdom
Posts: 93
Likes: 58
Liked 54 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
SFPD Authenticity Query
Good Evening,
A while ago, I acquired a S&W Model 28 Highway Patrolman with an SFPD stamp on it. If a request was made for its history from the Smith & Wesson factory, would they reveal whether it was previously Police owned?
Regards, Lee
|
11-22-2014, 05:38 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Washington State
Posts: 7,475
Likes: 14,587
Liked 9,314 Times in 3,723 Posts
|
|
I doubt they can do more than the original delivery information. I am also not sure if SFPD necessarily means San Francisco.
__________________
NHI, 10-8.
|
11-22-2014, 06:19 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kent, United Kingdom
Posts: 93
Likes: 58
Liked 54 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Does this photo of the stamp help to put it into better context?
I wondered whether Smith & Wesson would reveal their sales (even today) to police departments???
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-22-2014, 06:33 PM
|
Suspended
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sandy Utah
Posts: 8,747
Likes: 1,590
Liked 8,916 Times in 3,555 Posts
|
|
The only authentic San Francisco P.D. guns I have seen were Model 58s. They had the SFPD engraved on the L side of the frame under the thumbpiece. It was pantograph engraving as done for trophies, and the size of the font varied. Probably the person doing the engraving decided the size at the time, and variation was probably dependent on when a specific batch of guns was bought. I have not seen an SFPD gun with hand stamping as yours has.
As Doug M stated, there is no guarantee this is San Francisco. Could be Santa Fe, San Filipe, South Fremont, Spanish Fork, or any of several others.
Last edited by Alk8944; 11-22-2014 at 06:38 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-22-2014, 06:53 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,685
Likes: 2,473
Liked 5,898 Times in 1,224 Posts
|
|
San Francisco did indeed issue the Highway Patrolman & that looks like a factory marking. It could ,as other posters suggested, be other cities with the same initials. But, everything appears correct to be one of the San Francisco model 28s.Congrats on a nice find!
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-22-2014, 07:12 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kent, United Kingdom
Posts: 93
Likes: 58
Liked 54 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by policerevolvercollector
San Francisco did indeed issue the Highway Patrolman & that looks like a factory marking. It could ,as other posters suggested, be other cities with the same initials. But, everything appears correct to be one of the San Francisco model 28s.Congrats on a nice find!
|
Thanks for the information. Forgot to mention it is a 4 inch barrel variant; did SFPD issue them in this size? When you say factory markings, are you suggesting these stamps were carried-out by S&W themselves?
|
11-23-2014, 12:36 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,685
Likes: 2,473
Liked 5,898 Times in 1,224 Posts
|
|
Yes. The S.F.P.D. marking is consistent with many other factory markings that I've seen.
Just curious...... Are you still in the U.K.?
|
11-23-2014, 01:41 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 320
Likes: 40
Liked 267 Times in 75 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by brainflood
Does this photo of the stamp help to put it into better context?
I wondered whether Smith & Wesson would reveal their sales (even today) to police departments???
|
I joined the San Francisco Police Department in 1980- I was issued a 4" M28 as my service revolver. The 'S.F.P.D" marking is not factory. Our Range Staff used hammer and punch to mark the guns. I wanted to trade my 4" for a 6"- I went to the range, looked through the vault and saw the most beautiful polished M27. When I inquired about the 27, I was told that it was a confiscation. I traded my ugly matte finish M28 and never looked back. The stamping on the 27 was identical to the markings in your photo.
As a side, when we converted to semi-autos in the 90's, we were allowed to purchase our duty revolvers for $125.
Cheers,
Mike
|
11-23-2014, 07:16 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Rochester, NH USA
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 1,636
Liked 4,918 Times in 1,706 Posts
|
|
Mike...how about a picture of your 27!!!!
Bob
|
11-23-2014, 07:26 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kent, United Kingdom
Posts: 93
Likes: 58
Liked 54 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Varangi
I joined the San Francisco Police Department in 1980- I was issued a 4" M28 as my service revolver. The 'S.F.P.D" marking is not factory. Our Range Staff used hammer and punch to mark the guns. I wanted to trade my 4" for a 6"- I went to the range, looked through the vault and saw the most beautiful polished M27. When I inquired about the 27, I was told that it was a confiscation. I traded my ugly matte finish M28 and never looked back. The stamping on the 27 was identical to the markings in your photo.
As a side, when we converted to semi-autos in the 90's, we were allowed to purchase our duty revolvers for $125.
Cheers,
Mike
|
Thanks for the confirmation Mike. With all the conjecture around other PDs having the same letters in their names, has there ever been confusion over the identity of such police guns in the past?
$125 for a 27 sounds like a great deal. Ditto - any pictures?
|
11-23-2014, 07:28 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kent, United Kingdom
Posts: 93
Likes: 58
Liked 54 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by policerevolvercollector
Yes. The S.F.P.D. marking is consistent with many other factory markings that I've seen.
Just curious...... Are you still in the U.K.?
|
Yes I am...
|
11-23-2014, 01:26 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Washington State
Posts: 7,475
Likes: 14,587
Liked 9,314 Times in 3,723 Posts
|
|
Are you allowed to keep that functional?
__________________
NHI, 10-8.
|
11-23-2014, 02:08 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kent, United Kingdom
Posts: 93
Likes: 58
Liked 54 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug M.
Are you allowed to keep that functional?
|
To own a working revolver such as this falls under our Section 5 firearms legislation. The gun had to be de-activated to own it!
|
11-23-2014, 03:34 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Texas Gulf Coast
Posts: 378
Likes: 6
Liked 36 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by brainflood
To own a working revolver such as this falls under our Section 5 firearms legislation. The gun had to be de-activated to own it!
|
I'm not very familiar with U.K. gun laws. Does deactivated mean something permanent like welding or something less extreme?
In the early '70 I attended several bullseye matches in the L.A. area and two of the top shooters were from SFPD. One of them wore a 4" HP in a shoulder holster under a "hippie" jacket. I only saw it out of the holster once and I don't remember how it was marked, but in pretty sure it was property marked.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk
|
11-23-2014, 04:13 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kent, United Kingdom
Posts: 93
Likes: 58
Liked 54 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas1941
I'm not very familiar with U.K. gun laws. Does deactivated mean something permanent like welding or something less extreme?
|
Hi Texas1941, best see for yourself:
http://www.gov.uk/government/uploads...earms-2010.pdf
Our de-act laws render the guns unable to fire via the cutting and welding of internal components. I shoot with a local club, so we can fire handgun varieties such as the Taurus Long Barrel Revolver under our Section 1 laws.
|
11-23-2014, 05:38 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Texas Gulf Coast
Posts: 378
Likes: 6
Liked 36 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by brainflood
Hi Texas1941, best see for yourself:
http://www.gov.uk/government/uploads...earms-2010.pdf
Our de-act laws render the guns unable to fire via the cutting and welding of internal components. I shoot with a local club, so we can fire handgun varieties such as the Taurus Long Barrel Revolver under our Section 1 laws.
|
Thanks for the link. When they say "deactivated" they really mean it. It seems a pity but the law binds us all (or at least it should).
Texas has its share of pointless and inconsistent weapons laws. As far as I know, we are the only state in the Union that has no legal form of open carry. And I can walk out the door with as many handguns as I can conceal. But if I have a dirk, dagger, impact weapon, Bowie knife, sword, or tommahawk I'm jailhouse bound. Worse, these terms are either loosely defined or not at all, leaving it up to the police on the streets to decide what's legal.
Thanks for the photo. I know the guys that collect police firearms will appreciate it.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk
|
11-23-2014, 06:02 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kent, United Kingdom
Posts: 93
Likes: 58
Liked 54 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas1941
Thanks for the link. When they say "deactivated" they really mean it. It seems a pity but the law binds us all (or at least it should).
Texas has its share of pointless and inconsistent weapons laws. As far as I know, we are the only state in the Union that has no legal form of open carry. And I can walk out the door with as many handguns as I can conceal. But if I have a dirk, dagger, impact weapon, Bowie knife, sword, or tommahawk I'm jailhouse bound. Worse, these terms are either loosely defined or not at all, leaving it up to the police on the streets to decide what's legal.
Thanks for the photo. I know the guys that collect police firearms will appreciate it.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk
|
I'm amazed at what you've just said about weapon possession in Texas! Not keen on the "on-the-spot" justice being delivered by officers!
I'll get some decent photos taken next weekend and put them on the Ultimate 27 thread unless there's a special one for ex-police firearms?
Last edited by brainflood; 11-23-2014 at 06:06 PM.
|
11-23-2014, 06:57 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: A Burb of the Burgh
Posts: 14,792
Likes: 1,673
Liked 19,897 Times in 8,797 Posts
|
|
I thought all the SFPD guns were 6" Model 29s??????????
OK guess there were some 4" Pythons............ but those were later IIRC!
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-23-2014, 09:00 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,644
Likes: 242
Liked 29,159 Times in 14,099 Posts
|
|
"Texas has its share of pointless and inconsistent weapons laws. As far as I know, we are the only state in the Union that has no legal form of open carry. And I can walk out the door with as many handguns as I can conceal. But if I have a dirk, dagger, impact weapon, Bowie knife, sword, or tommahawk I'm jailhouse bound. Worse, these terms are either loosely defined or not at all, leaving it up to the police on the streets to decide what's legal."
But it's better than what it used to be. Not too long ago, it was illegal in Texas to carry a handgun in your car unless you were traveling outside the county of your residence. The definition of "traveling" was very nebulous - did it require an overnight stay outside your county or not? What happens if you are somehow caught inside your own county while heading out of the county? In fact, the reason I got my CCW permit was purely because of that Texas law, as CCW permit holders could always have a handgun in their car anywhere. The same law did not apply to long guns. Fortunately it was revoked some years ago, but prosecutors in some of the big cities fought very hard to keep it in place as a "crime fighting" tool.
Last edited by DWalt; 11-23-2014 at 09:06 PM.
|
11-23-2014, 10:54 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Washington State
Posts: 7,475
Likes: 14,587
Liked 9,314 Times in 3,723 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas1941
Texas has its share of pointless and inconsistent weapons laws. As far as I know, we are the only state in the Union that has no legal form of open carry. And I can walk out the door with as many handguns as I can conceal. But if I have a dirk, dagger, impact weapon, Bowie knife, sword, or tommahawk I'm jailhouse bound. Worse, these terms are either loosely defined or not at all, leaving it up to the police on the streets to decide what's legal.
|
*
Every state has some cockamamie laws about lots of things. I suspect that at least some of those terms are leftovers from a time when their meanings were more likely to be known, but now it would take a litigation poopfest to address the ambiguities.
__________________
NHI, 10-8.
|
11-24-2014, 02:33 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Texas Gulf Coast
Posts: 378
Likes: 6
Liked 36 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug M.
*
Every state has some cockamamie laws about lots of things. I suspect that at least some of those terms are leftovers from a time when their meanings were more likely to be known, but now it would take a litigation poopfest to address the ambiguities.
|
That's pretty much what happened in Texas. In 1995 I worked with a group pushing for the CHL law. We had thought that we might get a revision of the whole weapons statute, or at least some better definitions. We soon realised that if we opened that can of worms we would likely get nothing. If nothing else there was a time factor as the Legislature meets for only 120 days every other year. There was an opening to pass a bill in '95 but it well could have been gone in '97. We took what we could get and were very happy with it. And in the process added another layer to the weapons laws.
If you looked at the link provided by the OP you saw a textbook example of a well crafted statute. Getting something that well executed out of the Texas leg happens on occasion but it's not common. It's just the nature of the beast.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk
|
11-24-2014, 09:22 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 770
Likes: 207
Liked 1,108 Times in 292 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BAM-BAM
I thought all the SFPD guns were 6" Model 29s??????????
OK guess there were some 4" Pythons............ but those were later IIRC!
|
Nice. I heard they switched to Pythons because Lt. Briggs thought they were better for his traffic cops.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-24-2014, 12:23 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 320
Likes: 40
Liked 267 Times in 75 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BAM-BAM
I thought all the SFPD guns were 6" Model 29s??????????
OK guess there were some 4" Pythons............ but those were later IIRC!
|
In the early 70's, we switched from M58's to M28's. Later, specialized units like the Solo's (Motorcycles) were issued M66's. We has a cast of characters who carried back-ups- everything from 44 Deringers to 6" 44mags in shoulder holsters. We had M19- 2" for inspectors and plainclothes. We also absorbed specialized weapons for specific uses. Bad guys had better equipment than we did. Upon conviction, we'd seize M-59's, shotguns, AR's,Uzi's. We had a no single action policy so no 1911's.
Last edited by Varangi; 11-24-2014 at 12:41 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-24-2014, 12:33 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 320
Likes: 40
Liked 267 Times in 75 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by brainflood
Thanks for the confirmation Mike. With all the conjecture around other PDs having the same letters in their names, has there ever been confusion over the identity of such police guns in the past?
$125 for a 27 sounds like a great deal. Ditto - any pictures?
|
No, I had to turn mine in. I did not buy mine when I could- crazy divorce. Then, one of our guns showed up at a crime-scene- no more private sales. All PD guns are returned to factory, traded for new guns or destroyed.
Our 1st semi-auto issue were Beretta 40cal.. Junk- Made a deal w/ Sig- Beretta's were given to Sig for recycling. Now department is armed w/ P226's and some smaller framed guns for smaller hands and special people who need smaller guns.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-24-2014, 12:36 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 906
Likes: 1,362
Liked 2,349 Times in 462 Posts
|
|
With respect to getting a factory letter to support the SFPD connection. You would likely find the revolver was shipped to S&W's west coast distributor Cheshire & Perez and from there to San Francisco. My department also used S&W's - Models 15 and 66. They all came from the distributor.
|
11-24-2014, 02:27 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: A Burb of the Burgh
Posts: 14,792
Likes: 1,673
Liked 19,897 Times in 8,797 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Varangi
In the early 70's, we switched from M58's to M28's. Later, specialized units like the Solo's (Motorcycles) were issued M66's. We has a cast of characters who carried back-ups- everything from 44 Deringers to 6" 44mags in shoulder holsters. We had M19- 2" for inspectors and plainclothes. We also absorbed specialized weapons for specific uses. Bad guys had better equipment than we did. Upon conviction, we'd seize M-59's, shotguns, AR's,Uzi's. We had a no single action policy so no 1911's.
|
Brainflood ..... with a serial # we can give you an approximate date that it was shipped......see if it dates to the 70s ........ would be an easy first step.
Varangi....... did the Dept. add the "SFPD" to the 28s issued?
Varangi.......I know... that you know...... I was making a joke! LOL
Last edited by BAM-BAM; 11-24-2014 at 02:29 PM.
|
11-25-2014, 11:00 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kent, United Kingdom
Posts: 93
Likes: 58
Liked 54 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BAM-BAM
Brainflood ..... with a serial # we can give you an approximate date that it was shipped......see if it dates to the 70s ........ would be an easy first step.
Varangi....... did the Dept. add the "SFPD" to the 28s issued?
Varangi.......I know... that you know...... I was making a joke! LOL
|
When I'm back home at the weekend, I'll get the serial and a couple of decent photos of the revolver to share. What I can tell you is that gun came to the UK by way of Germany (it wears a number of German proof marks).
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|