Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980

S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 3-Screw PINNED Barrel SWING-OUT Cylinder Hand Ejectors WITH Model Numbers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-19-2009, 04:30 PM
Slow Slow is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I just acquired a mint condition 15-3 DOB 1969. I want to carry this for defensive purposes and was curious if you folks recommend shooting +P. If I can, what are the recommendations? If it is not advisable then what are your recommendations. I can reload but prefer factory for defense unless overwhelming opinion is otherwise.
__________________
Brett Byers
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-19-2009, 04:46 PM
Doug.38PR Doug.38PR is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Backwoods Louisiana
Posts: 763
Likes: 210
Liked 285 Times in 113 Posts
Default

Mine is made in 1971 and I shoot +P ammo through it all the time (when I can afford it of course).
I got it straight from S&W that any K frame revolver made after 1956 (when they went from model names to model numbers, in your case: Combat Masterpiece to Model 15) is safe for +P. A lot of guys in here will shoot it through old M&Ps made back in the 30s and 40s.
It is safe for you. BUT a steady died will cause the gun to wear faster than normal use of standard .38s just because it is that much more pressure and velocity. Likely if it ever does shoot loose all you will have to do is have the cylinder tightened.
Shoot and carry +Ps all you want. I even have a thread going on in here talking about Buffalo Bore's near magnum level +P velocity loads (which has faster velocity but equal pressure of average +P factory loads)

As for ammo recommendations, I suggest Remington's .38 Spl+P 158 gr. Lead Semiwadcutter Hollowpoint (LHP) also known as "The FBI Load"
I would also recommend looking at www.buffalobore.com and getting their version of this round for a backup reload in case you need something a little closer to a .357 magnum in power.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-19-2009, 05:31 PM
MaineProbation MaineProbation is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: State of Maine
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Just to set your mind at ease: The difference between standard .38 special and +P .38 special is much less than the difference between any .38 special and .357 magnum. Contrary to some popular belief, a .38 special +P is no where near .357 magnum pressures. I have personally chronographed .38 special +P loads which were not as fast as corresponding bullet weights .38 special standard loads from back in the 1960's when fired in the same revolver. When our department was using Model 15 2" snubs for our officers, we used to buy lead semi-wadcutter 158 grain .38 reloads loaded to +P levels. So we used +P for both training and duty and never saw any excess wear or pressure problems.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-19-2009, 05:44 PM
Doug.38PR Doug.38PR is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Backwoods Louisiana
Posts: 763
Likes: 210
Liked 285 Times in 113 Posts
Default

Quote:
I have personally chronographed .38 special +P loads which were not as fast as corresponding bullet weights .38 special standard loads from back in the 1960's when fired in the same revolver.
Were those acually standard .38 Spl or were they "Hi-Speed" or "Hi-Velocity"? I have a few boxes of those from the 60s that the guy who sold them to me were cocked at 950 ft per second out of a 4 inch barrel. A tad higher than modern +P of the same barrel lenght and bullet weight.
I've heard some say that "38 Spl standard back then was equal to +P today" and then others who respond "no that's not true"
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-19-2009, 06:03 PM
MaineProbation MaineProbation is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: State of Maine
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

These were standard factory .38 specials with 158 grain lead bullets. Back in the 1960's, the ammo makers were still making a 150 grain .38 special for the .38/44 revolvers. These were really hot, generally running around 1050 ft per second out of a 4 inch.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-19-2009, 06:32 PM
Doug.38PR Doug.38PR is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Backwoods Louisiana
Posts: 763
Likes: 210
Liked 285 Times in 113 Posts
Default

Amazing. That's even slower than the modern Buffalo Bore 158 grain that I reference above. They are clocked at close to 1200 ft per second.

http://www.buffalobore.com/ind...product_detail&p=108

But then buffalo bore is safely within +P parameters using a more modern powder forumula that doesn't generate +P+ pressures
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-19-2009, 07:28 PM
dewidmt dewidmt is offline
Member
Ammo choices for 15-3  4"  
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 134
Likes: 4
Liked 120 Times in 15 Posts
Default

When I carry a 4" K-frame, the load is Federal's 158gr LSWC +P Nyclad load. I also use it in my Model 60 and 442 J-frames.....
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-20-2009, 05:33 AM
redlevel's Avatar
redlevel redlevel is offline
Member
Ammo choices for 15-3  4" Ammo choices for 15-3  4" Ammo choices for 15-3  4" Ammo choices for 15-3  4" Ammo choices for 15-3  4"  
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: GA
Posts: 5,699
Likes: 8,051
Liked 12,731 Times in 2,419 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Slow:
I just acquired a mint condition 15-3 DOB 1969. I want to carry this for defensive purposes
Plus-P will be fine in your gun. However, if I had a truly mint 15-3, I would take it to the range every now and then, but keep it in the safe otherwise. Down here, we tend to sweat a lot, and the humidity tends to run very high for about 6 to 8 months. It is almost impossible to keep a gun you carry regularly in pristine condition without at least wiping it down five or six times a day. Others will disagree with me and say to carry the gun, because that is what God and Smith & Wesson intended. They are correct to a certain extent, but when I get hold of one like that, I tend to try to keep it "near mint."

Now, if it actually does have a little holster wear, and a well-defined turn line, then go for it. It isn't a collector gun at all in that shape, and good care will keep it useful doing what it was intended to do for a lifetime.
__________________
Georgia On My Mind
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-20-2009, 08:39 PM
Doug.38PR Doug.38PR is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Backwoods Louisiana
Posts: 763
Likes: 210
Liked 285 Times in 113 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by MaineProbation:
These were standard factory .38 specials with 158 grain lead bullets. Back in the 1960's, the ammo makers were still making a 150 grain .38 special for the .38/44 revolvers. These were really hot, generally running around 1050 ft per second out of a 4 inch.
Okay, I have conflicting figures here from Bill Jordon's 1965 book No Second Place Winners.

He clocks standard .38 Spl 158 gr at 855 ft per second out of a 6 inch barrel
Then he clocks .38 Spl 158 gr Hi Speed at 1,085 ft per second out of a 6 inch barrel.

You are clocking even higher out of a 4 inch

These figures are lower than what you have clocked during the same time period. Are you sure those were standard 38 Spl? Can you offer any explaination?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
357 magnum, 442, combat masterpiece, jordon, k frame, k-frame, masterpiece, model 15, model 60, remington, wadcutter


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
S&W SD40 VE ammo choices Varthrias Smith & Wesson SD & Sigma Pistols 12 04-25-2017 07:24 PM
Ammo choices, please rate otis24 Ammo 12 12-22-2015 02:13 PM
Ammo Choices for 44 Magnum Bigman S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 14 06-19-2013 10:56 PM
317 Ammo choices Snowwolfe S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 2 05-02-2012 01:23 PM
.380 ammo choices erickg Ammo 32 01-24-2009 06:13 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:42 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)