|
|
03-09-2024, 05:03 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2024
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Opinions on Model 14 with 8-3/8th barrel
I am considering purchasing a 70's era model 14-3, with the 8-3/8th barrel. I think it would make for a really fun range gun, however I have never handled a revolver with this particular barrel length.
I have some concerns about the gun being too muzzle heavy, and/or too heavy in general. I have a 4-inch barrel GP100 which weighs 38 oz. After a long range session, it starts to feel really heavy. I'm hoping the model 14 with long barrel isn't much heavier than this.
Is the 14-3 very muzzle heavy with the 8-3/8th barrel?
Thanks,
|
03-09-2024, 05:34 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,858
Likes: 9,476
Liked 14,862 Times in 5,053 Posts
|
|
I find it not at all muzzle heavy.
Obviously, this is a very subjective thing. However let me say it this way… I feel like my 6-inch Model 686 is outrageously muzzle heavy and just plain GANGLY by the end of a 50-round box.
My 8-3/8” Model 14-3 feels svelte in comparison.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-09-2024, 05:37 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 4,684
Likes: 19,020
Liked 4,190 Times in 1,865 Posts
|
|
Expect the 8.375" barrel to be heavier. IIRC, the 6" K22, K32, and K38s were all manufactured to be 38 ounces. In this manner, the target revolvers were the same approximate empty weight as a 1911 Gold Cup.
__________________
Judge control not gun control!
Last edited by lrrifleman; 03-09-2024 at 05:39 PM.
Reason: Additional information
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-09-2024, 05:51 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2024
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Thanks for the replies. If the 6 inch version is 38 oz, would a good guesstimate be a few ounces more for the 8-3/8th version? 42ish oz. maybe? I guess the partial underlug helps keep it from being too muzzle heavy.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-09-2024, 06:00 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,260
Likes: 22
Liked 5,581 Times in 1,955 Posts
|
|
When I search for new Smiths to add to my collection 8 3/8" is ALL I look for.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-09-2024, 06:03 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth
Posts: 4,246
Likes: 8,101
Liked 12,225 Times in 2,779 Posts
|
|
I don't have a 8 3/8 14 but I do have that barrel length in 48s, 27s, 29s, 57s and perhaps a few others. I don't think you'll find the 14 to be muzzle heavy, I use to hunt woodchucks with one of my 27s decades ago. The only thing I didn't like, and wouldn't today either, is carrying that barrel length in the field, which I assume won't be an issue for you using it at the range. Enjoy it.
Jeff
SWCA #1457
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-09-2024, 06:25 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NE IL but I'm from Ohio
Posts: 2,077
Likes: 117
Liked 3,089 Times in 895 Posts
|
|
I had an 8 3/8" Mod 14 many years ago. I could never warm up to the long barrel. It just didn't feel right in my hand. I found I liked 4" N-frames and 6" Masterpieces better.
__________________
Sceva
OGCA SWCA NRA
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-09-2024, 06:29 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Midcoast Maine
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 2,055
Liked 2,195 Times in 601 Posts
|
|
I'm a big fan of the long tubes, I have several including a 14 and I think they're great. They balance fine and the long sight radius makes them easier to shoot. I don't know if I can say that it's my favorite barrel length, but they're right up there!
Last edited by madmikeb; 03-09-2024 at 06:30 PM.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-09-2024, 07:03 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Arizona
Posts: 492
Likes: 384
Liked 2,244 Times in 377 Posts
|
|
As others have said they are difficult to carry afield in a holster but they make awesome range guns. Mine does not feel muzzle heavy at all and it only gets shot classic one-hand bullseye style.
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-09-2024, 07:17 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SE USA
Posts: 2,475
Likes: 4,494
Liked 1,932 Times in 875 Posts
|
|
99% Model 14 with long tube at decent price is coming home.
97% Model 14 with 6" tube at decent price? The condition outranks the length to me.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-09-2024, 09:14 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Coastal virginia
Posts: 5,129
Likes: 2,136
Liked 10,494 Times in 3,293 Posts
|
|
Most of my collection are long barrels and I love them
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-09-2024, 09:52 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 1,403
Likes: 1,354
Liked 3,196 Times in 899 Posts
|
|
I just picked up a 99% 14-4 8-3/8’s last week. I’ve not had a chance to shoot it thanks to rain but will have it at the range Monday. I also have a 6” 14 and the longer barrel doesn’t feel any more front heavy than the 6”. To me the balance feels very natural.
I owned and shot quite a bit with a 10.5” Ruger Super Blackhawk. The barrel was a little long for my needs but as far as balance it was very well balanced as well.
Edit: The grips on my 6” had to go. I need to make a new photo of it with the new target grips.
Last edited by .38SuperMan; 03-09-2024 at 09:57 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-10-2024, 02:37 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Ohio valley
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 3,604
Liked 4,200 Times in 1,419 Posts
|
|
Nothing wrong with 8-3/8 s guns.
I have a few and like them.
I find no advantage in Accuracy ,
There may be a slight advantage to
long range shooting from a rest do to
Sight Radius.
|
03-10-2024, 02:46 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,725
Likes: 1,606
Liked 6,324 Times in 2,300 Posts
|
|
I shot one quite a bit and did not have a problem. I had an 8 3/8 Model 17 to match. I did have a problem with 8" Pythons and heavy barrel Dan Wessons. Way too heavy even for my younger self.
My problem with them is they just don't fit well in most range bags which seem to be barely able to handle 6" revolvers these days. That ended up being a bigger deal than I thought it would. To me. If that doesn't bother you I don't think you'll have a problem.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-10-2024, 04:58 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montana
Posts: 419
Likes: 1,959
Liked 550 Times in 226 Posts
|
|
Have 3 long barreled guns, a model 14-4, a model 57 no dash, and a model 29-3 silhouette . Love the 8 3/8" and notice no real muzzle heaviness or general heftiness with any of them.... Actually prefer them to shorter barreled guns .
|
03-10-2024, 05:28 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Denver area
Posts: 6,252
Likes: 20,294
Liked 13,119 Times in 4,179 Posts
|
|
I think of revolvers as handguns for field work.
I have no use for a Kframe 22 with a 8 7/8” barrel: it’s simply too large for field use. It fine for range use where you’re only carrying it from your car to the firing line, but lugging it around in the field for 8-12 hours isn’t something that interests me.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-10-2024, 05:31 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,260
Likes: 22
Liked 5,581 Times in 1,955 Posts
|
|
Just had another thought. I also have a Ruger Single Six in 9 1/2" and that's also one of my favorites.
|
03-10-2024, 05:32 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,346
Likes: 124
Liked 1,656 Times in 641 Posts
|
|
8 3/8ths
The only revolver I shoot in 8 3/8s is my M 29. I don't consider the barrel length to be a hindrance.
SWCA 892
|
03-10-2024, 05:36 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,260
Likes: 22
Liked 5,581 Times in 1,955 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rpg
I think of revolvers as handguns for field work.
I have no use for a Kframe 22 with a 8 7/8” barrel: it’s simply too large for field use. It fine for range use where you’re only carrying it from your car to the firing line, but lugging it around in the field for 8-12 hours isn’t something that interests me.
|
One of my deer guns is a Ruger .45 Colt Blackhawk with a 7 1/2" barrel. To add insult to injury It also has a 4x Scope on it (not a dinky red dot, but a "real" scope). No real holsters available, so I bought some leather and made my own shoulder holster.
I lug it around day after day and don't even think about it. In contrast, my buddy will only carry plastic with negligible recoil.
Different strokes for different folks.
|
03-11-2024, 05:21 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Enola, Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,369
Likes: 592
Liked 2,597 Times in 1,132 Posts
|
|
Back in the mid-1970s, I stumbled upon a new 8-3/8" Model 14 and bought it for the sum of $144.95. I wanted it for hunting groundhogs on my wife's parents' farm but it shot so flat with 110-grain JHP bullets that I sent it back to S&W. They changed the rear sight blade for me and it was a fun gun for hunting those critters.
Ed
|
03-13-2024, 12:57 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Hillsdale, Mi.
Posts: 7,502
Likes: 7,046
Liked 7,090 Times in 2,944 Posts
|
|
My 14-3 is a shortie, 6". Plenty accurate though! I once had a Model 10 with 8+3/8 barrel. {was a PPC gun} Did not hang on to it long. Bob
|
03-19-2024, 01:50 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 383
Liked 988 Times in 535 Posts
|
|
I had a long barrel 14-3. It was beautiful and accurate, but I did prefer the balance of my 6" 17-3 and would likely have kept the 14-3 if it had a 6" barrel.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|