|
|
|
03-28-2011, 09:01 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Berks County, PA
Posts: 623
Likes: 351
Liked 359 Times in 139 Posts
|
|
What's wrong with a Highway Patrolman? Cheaper than buying an L frame and modifying it...
mark
__________________
Liberals made the USA
|
03-28-2011, 09:21 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 358
Likes: 2
Liked 111 Times in 41 Posts
|
|
I don't get why there is such animosity toward the idea of customizing a "run-of-the-mill" 686, but this same forum "ooh's and ahh's: over Mr Boman's (beautiful) reworking of a much more scarce 38/44.
|
03-28-2011, 09:28 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southern Indiana
Posts: 4,517
Likes: 2,811
Liked 4,156 Times in 1,126 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PMRet
Forum member bdGreen owns a few examples of the Ashland 617's, perhaps he will happen along and post some pictures for those who haven't seen them.
|
I'm not Bruce (bdGreen) and don't have his depth of knowledge by a long shot but I do have 2 of the 116 Ashland Shooter Supply 6 inch 617's.
I even put a set of diamond grips on one for a shot ...
I wish they'd do another run of these in 4 & 6 inch.
GF
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-28-2011, 12:41 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Kentucky, USA
Posts: 7,407
Likes: 2,830
Liked 6,261 Times in 2,170 Posts
|
|
OK, Frakes, you're holding out on us again!
I think a poster above hit on the answer. The vast majority of buyers don't know or care. Many folks prefer the cleaner lines and lighter weight. Once a gun has been fired a few thousand times, a long since modification has no bearing on resale value. Its just as likely the modification will cause an increase in value as a decrease.
__________________
Dick Burg
|
03-28-2011, 12:57 PM
|
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 751
Likes: 83
Liked 142 Times in 54 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BUFF
There were small numbers of Model 617's without the lug, in both 4 and 6 inch lengths, made in 1991 for Ashland Shooters Supply. There is a picture of one in SCS&W III. I always wanted a 4 incher without the full underlug on the barrel like that but never have run across one for sale.
I came close to having a Model 18 barrel Armaloyed or Metalifed and screwing it onto a regular Model 617. Then I thought, instead of that much trouble, maybe I should have a regular Model 18 Armaloyed or Metalifed or have some other electroless nickel finish applied. These look just like stainless, behave as stainless.
The full length barrel underlug is often way too much of a good thing and losing that underlug, just leaving a Combat Magnum-style ejector rod shroud, would make me pry open my wallet to own such guns.
|
I've read a little about the small run of half-lug 617's from the early 90's and have enviously seen the photos. From what I can tell, they are pretty hard to find for sale and command some pretty healthy premiums...if you'd even be able to find one. With that in mind, it seems like it wouldn't be too crazy of an idea to buy a 4" 617 and send it off to get the lug removed. Your idea about hard-chroming a Model 18 sounds like a viable option too. I know I want a half-lug 4" K-frame .22, but am looking for the ease of maintenance associated with SS. It may "ruin" the resale value of a M617 or a M18, but .22's are usually something you're more prone to hold on to...so the resale value wouldn't be an issue to me.
Decisions, decisions
|
03-28-2011, 12:58 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,200
Likes: 9,079
Liked 1,921 Times in 1,043 Posts
|
|
This is still a reason I am passively looking for a 686 MG if I ever buy a 686. I would even buy a 620 before a 686. Now if I ever did find a half lug 686 then it would be credit card devil time.
|
03-28-2011, 06:22 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 6,932
Likes: 179
Liked 4,319 Times in 2,117 Posts
|
|
You guys are a BAD BAD influence. Every time I look at my 6 1/2 inch 610-3 all I think about is how much better it would look, and how much better it would balance, with a semi lugged barrel. Now I can see that at some point I'll be having a carbide half rounding bit ground to the proper radius and spending a weekend or two on one of the Bridgeports at work.
As for the effect on it's value, I don't care one little bit about that, I don't ever plan on selling my 610. Heck, if I could find 4 inch 610 I've been considering building a 3 1/2 610 with all of the window dressing of a Registered Magnum. We have 2 CnC mills at work and with a bit of programming it'd only take a weekend to reprofile the barrel to a tapered barrel that matched that on the RM. Then another bit of programing and another weekend to cross hatch the top strap and barrel rib. Finish it up by progamming the CnC to engrave the logo and caliber on the barrel and after a full polish the end result would look like a factory prototype.
|
03-28-2011, 09:41 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Henderson, Nevada
Posts: 176
Likes: 175
Liked 88 Times in 33 Posts
|
|
Full versus Half Lug Barrels
I assume by the time this is read to the finish, half the readers will be PO'd.
When I read comments from members who downgrade anybody who modifies "THEIR" gun or guns, I want to puke. I sure don't believe I have the right to criticize anyone for taking their property and doing with it, what they decide.
I might not do the same modification or think it is either pleasing to eye or necessarily functional, but again, I'm sure that some of what I've had done would be looked at the same way by others.
Around 1995, I purchased two Model 610 no dash 10mm revolvers with 5" barrels and additional two model 686-3's.
I then proceeded to have modifications done to both of the model 610's and also had the 686's modified by having 5" 10mm barrels installed, cylinder rechambered for 40S&W and had the chambers recessed, Checkered top straps and barrels on all four guns, trigger work on all four guns, ball detents installed on all four and some other minor work. You might ask why. BECAUSE I wanted it done.
For those commenters that talk about re-sale value, I don't know anyone who when buying a current factory produce is also thinking about re-sale value at that time.
As for the collectors, I can understand them wanting what they collect being what they want to collect and in and of the conditions they want. What/how would they like for commenters to talk down either what they collect or the conditions the collector decided on.
Just my 2 cents worth, by the way, with Obama and the Feds. that 2 cents will shortly be worth 1 cent.
Semper Fi
baldeagle8888
P.S.
ALL four revolvers had the full lug barrels reduced to half lugs.
Last edited by baldeagle8888; 03-28-2011 at 09:45 PM.
Reason: Added P.S. information
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-29-2011, 10:29 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 1,956
Likes: 414
Liked 838 Times in 276 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by baldeagle8888
Around 1995, I purchased two Model 610 no dash 10mm revolvers with 5" barrels and additional two model 686-3's.
I then proceeded to have modifications done to both of the model 610's and also had the 686's modified by having 5" 10mm barrels installed, cylinder rechambered for 40S&W and had the chambers recessed, Checkered top straps and barrels on all four guns, trigger work on all four guns, ball detents installed on all four and some other minor work.
P.S.
ALL four revolvers had the full lug barrels reduced to half lugs.
|
I (and I bet a lot of others) would love to see some pictures!
|
03-29-2011, 12:09 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Henderson, Nevada
Posts: 176
Likes: 175
Liked 88 Times in 33 Posts
|
|
I am in the process of taking pictures and will post later today.
Thanks for asking for pictures.
baldeagle8888
|
03-29-2011, 01:03 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Central New Mexico
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 1,179
Liked 1,116 Times in 409 Posts
|
|
I have 6 inch M586's and they are a tad barrel heavy.
The photo of the M686-6 that Bullseye Smith has produced appears to be the special run made by S&W?? or someone else. I handled one in a gunshop and really liked the balance.
I think the barrel length was 5 inches.
If someone couldn't find one I think cutting down a 6 incher woul dbe a viable alternative if it was not too expensive.
I am considering buying a 4 inch M686 (no lock) and having it cut to 3 inches and roundbutted.
There was a special run of M586's and M686's that were made so but are quite rare.
__________________
Have guns...will shoot'em.
|
03-30-2011, 07:03 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Interesting thread. Modifying guns may be more of a reflection of the owners attitude about life. I have reached the age where I have decided to quit reading about custom guns and have some made. My current project is converting a mint Old Model Single-Six into a 41 Special. I am not getting any younger and there are better investments for the future if that is really your.goal. I see nothing wrong with putting a gun away as safe queen but it is important not to lose sight of the purpose of the gun and its role in the 2nd Amendment.
|
03-30-2011, 12:34 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Henderson, Nevada
Posts: 176
Likes: 175
Liked 88 Times in 33 Posts
|
|
Here are the pictures of my model 610 & 686 as modified.
Hope these photo's come through.
Pictures by baldeagle8888 - Photobucket
|
04-05-2011, 04:20 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Westville Grove, NJ
Posts: 232
Likes: 57
Liked 173 Times in 60 Posts
|
|
Full Lug conversion
Thanks for the photos Baldeagle. I'll have something to show the local smith to have my 6 inch 617 "cleanedup". Thanks again Frank Jr.
|
04-05-2011, 04:53 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Henderson, Nevada
Posts: 176
Likes: 175
Liked 88 Times in 33 Posts
|
|
To NAVY FRANK:
Just be careful and try not to screw up the LOCKING BOLT SETUP by removing to much of the underlug which you should remove and determine what is required to maintain.
baldeagle8888
|
04-05-2011, 07:15 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
baldeagle,
Very, very cool. I really like this idea on a 686.
All your pictures seem to be from the top and back. Is there any chance of you taking some pictures from the front and bottom to show the work better?
|
04-05-2011, 07:55 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 2,164
Likes: 2
Liked 117 Times in 85 Posts
|
|
In the 6 inch version of the SD&W686 with full underlug the forward weight is too much for my taste. I have seen some 6 inch 686 which have had this issue remedied by tastefully grinding off ma portion of the underlug to create a profie similar to some of the N-framed and L-framed PC guns. Unfortunately I did not take note of who performed the conversion.I shoot L-framed 4 inchers with full underlugs but prefer the 6 inchers without the full underlug.
|
04-06-2011, 04:13 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Westville Grove, NJ
Posts: 232
Likes: 57
Liked 173 Times in 60 Posts
|
|
Off Lug
Thanks for the heads up. My plan is to have the smith profile the barrel to the N frame barrel profile and not remove the metal to profile it like a 17. Thanks again. Frank Jr.
|
04-07-2011, 09:02 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Henderson, Nevada
Posts: 176
Likes: 175
Liked 88 Times in 33 Posts
|
|
Here are some additional photo's that I promised.
If you look carefully, there are also a few pictures of my Model 646 in 40S&W. As can be seen, S&W moved the cylinder forward (toward barrel) by around .05"/.06" versus the standard 686 and the cylinder material was changed to Titanium versus Stainless Steel. I believe these two changes permitted the required strength for the 40S&W conversion since there is "ONLY" a very thin chamber wall thickness, less then .02" at the cylinder lock recess location. I also believe the reason for the cylinder being moved forward was to place the thicker cartridge web area behind the lock recess.
Also note on the model 686, my conversion to 40S&W and the "N" frame 10mm barrel, the misalignment of the ejector rod and the locking bolt hole which is due to the difference between the "L" and "N" frame chamber rotating dimension as I noted on a earlier post.
Pictures by baldeagle8888 - Photobucket
baldagle8888
|
04-07-2011, 10:22 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,321
Likes: 10,450
Liked 6,099 Times in 1,249 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhvaughan2
I don't get why there is such animosity toward the idea of customizing a "run-of-the-mill" 686, but this same forum "ooh's and ahh's: over Mr Boman's (beautiful) reworking of a much more scarce 38/44.
|
Just a single example of "forum hypocracy" which runs rampant through most all firearms forums.
I've never owed an L-Frame simply because of the wretched full lug. Don't like its looks or its balance. I'd consider purchase of a well done conversion to a factory-appearing ejector rod shroud.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-07-2011, 12:31 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: WV
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 556
Liked 4,669 Times in 1,055 Posts
|
|
I like the idea that a gun modified like that will turn up on a table at a gun show in 2026 with the seller breathlessly relating how it's a rare variation from the factory and only 25 of them were made for an elite black ops team of boy scouts who used them to assassinate insurgents in the Malaysian jungle. And he'll sell this jewel for only 20,000 Ameros . . . .
|
04-07-2011, 01:07 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,321
Likes: 10,450
Liked 6,099 Times in 1,249 Posts
|
|
Heh...heh! Ameros!
That sounds like some valuable wampum.
|
04-08-2011, 12:58 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Aiken, SC
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 16
Liked 203 Times in 87 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by baldeagle8888
Around 1995, I purchased two Model 610 no dash 10mm revolvers with 5" barrels and additional two model 686-3's.
I then proceeded to have modifications done to both of the model 610's and also had the 686's modified by having 5" 10mm barrels installed, cylinder rechambered for 40S&W and had the chambers recessed, Checkered top straps and barrels on all four guns, trigger work on all four guns, ball detents installed on all four and some other minor work.
|
bald eagle,
My only concern about the .40 S&W conversion would be the strength of a steel L-frame cylinder in that caliber. When S&W built the 646, they went to a titanium cylinder because they felt a steel one would be insufficient for the .40's chamber pressure, considering cylinder wall thickness.
Other than that, they sound like great looking guns.
Buck
|
04-08-2011, 01:45 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Henderson, Nevada
Posts: 176
Likes: 175
Liked 88 Times in 33 Posts
|
|
Buck,
I posted yesterday about that very issue.
I have not fired either o the 686's that I had modified to 40S&W. That is the problem that a Stainless Steel cylinder has.
Buck, send me an email to [email protected] and I'll send you something that might wet your appetite.
Paul
|
04-08-2011, 08:43 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Northern Rockies
Posts: 100
Likes: 28
Liked 79 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
I'm rather turned off by the lugs myself. I've considered grinding the lug off my 586, but it still isnt quite the same as the contour on a 19 or N frame. To me, the lugged guns are about the most unattractive ones Smith ever made. Guess it's just personal preference.
Couple people mentioned 586 mountain guns, I didnt know there was such a version, or did I just get crossed up with the 686's? Anyone have a picture of a blued L frame mountain? I'd swap barrels before I'd grind one down. Think I'd prefer a 27 or 28 to the L tho.
I'm also on the side of, do whatever you want to your own gun. My old 29 had a few things done to it, but nobody complains when I've posted pics. I beveled the front edge of the cylinder, ground the target hammer to a service size spur, and reshaped the grips. I vastly prefer it in that form than how it came from the factory. Any view of its value will be after I'm gone.
|
04-10-2011, 07:20 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Down East Maine
Posts: 997
Likes: 1,169
Liked 1,791 Times in 473 Posts
|
|
Ha!
Quote:
Guys, these are tools, not religious artifacts
|
+1
Chortle! Good one.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-10-2011, 10:26 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Idaho
Posts: 45
Likes: 3
Liked 77 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
This is all a very interesting thread, as I have several 686's and have been thinking for quite awhile to do this very modification to one of them. While I love the 686s and find them to be the most accurate handguns of any type that I have ever owned, the full lug makes it a bit tiresome to carry all day long. These days I spend a lot more time hiking in the wilds than I do at the range, so carry weight is very important. The 6" barrel is perfect for sight radius and max velocity, but the lug is unnecessary for my purposes.
The question is, whom do I send my pistol to to get this done? I saw Cylinder & Slide mentioned earlier. Anybody else that I can entrust my 686 to that comes recommended? One reason I want to chose a gunsmith very carefully is that a few years back I was talking to a master gunsmith about this mod and he said it needs to be done VERY carefully because if it's rushed, it can overheat the barrel and ruin the accuracy. A little metal needs to be milled off then wait for it to cool, then a little more, etc.. This is very laborious so a not-so-good gunsmith may be tempted to do a hack job.
By the way, I carry my 6" 686 for protection against bears, mountain lions, and 2-legged meth monsters up here in Idaho, and feel is it about perfect. Sure a .44 mag would be good too, but I just don't want to carry all that weight. I want max velocity out of my 686 so I won't go shorter than 6".
Any recommendations for a good gunsmith would be much appreciated.
Last edited by locogringo; 07-10-2011 at 12:39 PM.
|
07-10-2011, 11:29 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 505
Likes: 18
Liked 111 Times in 59 Posts
|
|
SB's rework of that 6" barreled 617 is perhaps the best example of doing this mod. Plenty of 6" 617's made, and most anyone that has handled that barrel length would agree that it is barrel heavy. I'm sure plenty of 686 owners with a muzzle heavy 6" barrel would like a better balancing option. You have a few more choices, as Smith made a few runs of 5" barrelled guns in both half-lug and full-lug versions of the 686. These balance perfectly for me. Then you always can look for a 686-MG......aesthetically one of the nicest looking revolvers that Smith has produced. From an economic point of view, you are probably better off selling a gun you don't like and put the proceeds toward one than is more to your liking. If you modify a gun and don't like it, you will probably not be happy with the price when you sell it.
|
07-10-2011, 12:18 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
This is the best thread I've read so far! I hate full lug revolvers, hate them! Either do a barrel like the Model 19 or the 10 and be done with it.
|
07-15-2011, 01:29 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Idaho
Posts: 45
Likes: 3
Liked 77 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
I talked with Cylinder & Slide and they are going to do the work for me for $250. They say they know how to do it one little bit at a time in order to preserve the accuracy. They will copy the Model 66 6" barrel lug style. When I get it back (4 month wait time), I'll post pictures.
Does it enhance the collector value of the revolver and will I ever see this money out of this revolver? No. Do I care? No. Does this make it more practical for my own personal use? Hell yes.
|
07-16-2011, 10:43 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Montana
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 568
Liked 588 Times in 187 Posts
|
|
I have been away from this forum for a while since summer has made other demads of my time. This is the most heated thread I have seen on this forum.
locogringo, I definaltely want to see the work when done. I too dislike the full lug barrel and see no sense in it at all. I have several stainless full lug models and do not care for the full lug on them. I carry my 629 in 5" for woods protection and wish it was a half lug gun and it does make more sense and it less weight. My Ruger Redhawk is a half lug gun but weighs A LOT more than the 629.
Keep us posted and by the way where is Cylinder & Slide located?
John
|
07-16-2011, 11:18 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: RE-tired in Texas
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 239
Liked 2,182 Times in 645 Posts
|
|
There are good reasons for having a heavier barrel/full lug, in fast D/A shooting helps hold the muzzle down,and in fine target work it holds the barrel steadier even if you slap the trigger,like bull barrel PPC revolvers.I know that the 90s 14-5/14-6's are shooting machines.
Almost all calibers/ frame sizes come with or without a barrel lug ,except L frames( excluding the few newer models they have had out in the last few years) .
So if you hate em,why buy one,or buy one and modify it or buy another barrel and modify that one and your good to go, if you want to return it to original later.
Ive seen some modified 686's and they looked good. Pay for what you want then be proud of being different.
|
07-17-2011, 02:41 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: KC, MO
Posts: 76
Likes: 1
Liked 7 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Keep us posted and by the way where is Cylinder & Slide located?
|
Cylinder and Slide is located in Fremont, Nebraska.
Cylinder & Slide Inc
__________________
NRA Patron
MSSA Life Member
|
07-17-2011, 01:10 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 106
Likes: 1
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
My 617 4" had a full lug, which I ground down to a taper, and finished it up to match the rest of the gun.
With a belt sander, and a lot of care, and then hand sanded with progressively finer grit.
Last edited by Alx; 07-17-2011 at 01:14 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-17-2011, 04:21 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Montana
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 568
Liked 588 Times in 187 Posts
|
|
I like it!
John
|
07-17-2011, 11:11 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,229
Likes: 1,311
Liked 2,488 Times in 716 Posts
|
|
ALX, that came out looking good, did you get a before and after weight? I (gasp) am thinking of doing this with my 16-4 that I am converting to .327 federal.
|
07-17-2011, 11:26 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 529
Likes: 1
Liked 53 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
I've been wanting a model 610 but hate the lug too. What I really want is the Mountain Revolver profile. Think I might start looking for one again and have Cylinder and Slide work their magic on it. I'll bet Mag-Na-Port would do it too.
|
07-17-2011, 11:34 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Posts: 2,369
Likes: 497
Liked 945 Times in 518 Posts
|
|
I would not do it on a 357 Magnum revolver. The purpose of the full underlug is to reduce the shock of recoil, which is considerable with 357 Magnum loads. The underlug is actually a blessing, assuming that you are more of a shooter than a looker. For a carry gun it would be OK, so long as you don't plan to shoot it much with full power loads.
Models 19, 66, 27, and 28 are (or were) available without the full underlug.
I had a Model 620 for awhile, but sold it because with full power loads it beat the hell out of my hand.
I replaced it with a 4" 686 no-dash.
Last edited by andyo5; 07-17-2011 at 11:45 PM.
|
07-18-2011, 12:42 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 106
Likes: 1
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Here is the original thread where I previously posted this lug reduction.
Partial lug on 617
|
07-18-2011, 08:11 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 809
Likes: 5
Liked 73 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
I'll do it for you for $50 plus shipping. I am a custom knifemaker but do lots of pistol and revolver work too. I have some pics of my work if you want to see it.
Matt
www.cucchiaraknives.com
|
07-18-2011, 08:20 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: DUNNELLON, FLORIDA USA
Posts: 11,170
Likes: 1,695
Liked 16,450 Times in 4,284 Posts
|
|
In 2003/2004 a forum member did this and posted photos.
The finished product looked good.
|
07-18-2011, 09:10 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 11,988
Likes: 10,299
Liked 10,305 Times in 4,891 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by locogringo
I talked with Cylinder & Slide and they are going to do the work for me for $250...
Does it enhance the collector value of the revolver and will I ever see this money out of this revolver? No. Do I care? No...
|
Cookie-cutter guns are fine and I like to look at Doc44's beautiful guns as much as anyone, but as the poster said, the current crop hardly qualifies as some sort of religious artifact. I think there is also a lot of interest in an S&W (to me, at least) that has been carefully modified to suit a purpose and received corresponding use by its owner. I'll be pleased to see your revolver when it is done and hear your shooting results. So don't forget to post the pics and info.
The barrel is probably not going to look like a 66 barrel because the 686 barrel does not have a lot of taper, so it will be somewhere between what it is now and a big 66-looking barrel - but it should be just fine.
As to cost, good work is never cheap. If you are going to do a project like this, it should be done carefully, by someone with an eye for such things. People spend $250 on worthless junk like cokes or french fries in a year. It's just money. At least your modified gun won't be clogging your arteries.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-30-2011, 11:22 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 106
Likes: 1
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Can we find the link to that other old thread anymore ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmyj
In 2003/2004 a forum member did this and posted photos.
The finished product looked good.
|
I'd like to find those posted photos mentioned, and any of the info.
But as of yet no success in searching.
|
10-22-2012, 09:31 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
|
|
This thread got me thinking about cutting lug my 6" 617-6 that I bought couple years ago. I don't have CNC at home, so I just did it with handsaw, file, sandpaper and dremel.
I kinda liked the result, so I decided also polish it, replace hummer and grips .
Here is how it looks now:
img1.jpg
ALX_3568_RQ.jpg
ALX_3569.JPG
ALX_3588.JPG
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
10-24-2012, 09:33 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: kamloops, bc
Posts: 2,609
Likes: 6,616
Liked 3,098 Times in 1,176 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sorits
This thread got me thinking about cutting lug my 6" 617-6 that I bought couple years ago. I don't have CNC at home, so I just did it with handsaw, file, sandpaper and dremel.
I kinda liked the result, so I decided also polish it, replace hummer and grips .
Here is how it looks now:
Attachment 89274
Attachment 89275
Attachment 89276
Attachment 89277
|
you are a brave man! i couldnt attack one of my pieces with a hacksaw..no way thats a $950 gun new!. my media is wood, but its tough to make a decent gun out of wood..
i would say you havent diminished the value of that 617 one cent . i would buy it
|
01-25-2013, 02:18 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 49
Liked 721 Times in 369 Posts
|
|
Sorry double post
Steve
Last edited by S.B.; 01-25-2013 at 02:21 PM.
|
01-25-2013, 02:32 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Family ranch in Texas
Posts: 470
Likes: 6
Liked 167 Times in 119 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CajunBass
I'm pretty sure that "collectors" would indeed turn their noses up at such an animal, but I'll bet the average Joe looking for a .357 Smith & Wesson wouldn't know or care if the barrel lug has been ground/machined off.
(IMHO).
|
I suspect you're right about that, Cajun.
|
01-25-2013, 03:54 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The wet side of Oregon
Posts: 6,297
Likes: 8,847
Liked 7,791 Times in 2,379 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sorits
This thread got me thinking about cutting lug my 6" 617-6 that I bought couple years ago. I don't have CNC at home, so I just did it with handsaw, file, sandpaper and dremel.
I kinda liked the result, so I decided also polish it, replace hummer and grips .Here is how it looks now:
|
I'd say its a 100% improvement, especially with a 6" barrel.
For one like that I could even overlook the IL (I think!)
__________________
-jwk-
US Army '72-'95
|
04-25-2016, 06:06 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Near Roanoke VA
Posts: 1,732
Likes: 1,025
Liked 2,683 Times in 960 Posts
|
|
Well, for everyone that posted the desire of S&W to make a less than full lug 617,,,,
S&W finally did it,,,
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-25-2016, 07:45 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Montana
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 568
Liked 588 Times in 187 Posts
|
|
Well time has passed since I last saw this thread. I have taken a gunsmithing course and a Smith & Wesson armourer's class. I have made two half lug guns in the mean time and going to do a third.
I made my 686 no dash into a half lug 5" and it is by far my all time favorite handgun ever. And I have had a lot of handguns in my 40 plus years of buying and trading for guns.
I also put a 5" barrel on my 629-3 square butt and made it a half lug too. I love it. I am going to do the same to a second 629-3 square butt that I bought a 5" barrel for.
A hack saw to cut the lug off, a good file to profile it, a dremel tool to profile the full lug to half lug and a stone to smooth it up and emery cloth to finish the job. I must say I wore out one hack saw blade and used another to cut the lugs off with. That stainless steel is very hard!!
This second 629 is going to half to have the barrel set back as the gap is just a tad too big so that will take some lathe work. The 686 and first 629 barrel/cylinder gaps were very tight and I had to slightly remove some of the forcing cone to make the gap large enough so shooting lead bullets would cause problems.
Oh and I bought a 629 Mountain Gun!
John
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
|
|
Tags
|
581, 586, 610, 617, 629, 686, ejector, gunsmith, highway patrolman, jovino, k-frame, k22, l frame, lock, model 625, model 65, model 66, model 686, mountain gun, patrolman, recessed, round butt, ruger, shroud, smith and wesson |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|