Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 02-01-2011, 02:04 PM
allglock allglock is offline
Banned
Why no Airweights with a Ti cylinder? Why no Airweights with a Ti cylinder? Why no Airweights with a Ti cylinder? Why no Airweights with a Ti cylinder? Why no Airweights with a Ti cylinder?  
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Se. Pa.
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 67
Liked 81 Times in 50 Posts
Default Why no Airweights with a Ti cylinder?

Why doesnt S&W offer Aiweight J-frames with a Ti cyl.? It would cut 2 ozs. I believe? I want to put a Ti Cyl. in my 442, but figured I would ask the question before I did it.
Reply With Quote
 

Tags
327, 340, 442, 637, 640, 642, airlite, airweight, brownells, colt, gunsmith, l frame, lock, saa, scandium, titanium


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Airweights photoman S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 4 02-08-2012 05:49 PM
Airweights M&PStrapped S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 6 06-13-2011 11:19 PM
M12 vs J Airweights ENGINE18 Concealed Carry & Self Defense 16 08-14-2010 04:52 PM
model 37 airweights dob's ketap S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 1 10-05-2009 10:15 PM
S&W airweights imjin138 S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 17 09-08-2009 10:13 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:46 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)