Why no Airweights with a Ti cylinder?

Advertise With Us

		Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present
Why no Airweights with a Ti cylinder?

Forum

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers

Thread Tools

Display Modes

02-01-2011, 03:09 PM

allglock

Banned

Join Date: Nov 2001

Location: Se. Pa.

Posts: 1,330

Likes: 67

Liked 81 Times in 50 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by ronnie gore

they do, 342, 337.

They are Expensive Scandium.... 442 is just cheap alloy.
With the 442s going for $389 now, whats another $25-$50 or so for a Ti cyl.?
I was just wondering if the Ti cyl. doesn't mate well with the cheaper alloy? (maybe the extra vibration of the Ti Cyl. could cause the alloy frame to crack)? Just a thought....

Last edited by allglock; 02-01-2011 at 03:12 PM.

Tags

327, 340, 442, 637, 640, 642, airlite, airweight, brownells, colt, gunsmith, l frame, lock, saa, scandium, titanium

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
Terms of Service

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Airweights	photoman	S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present	4	02-08-2012 05:49 PM
Airweights	M&PStrapped	S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present	6	06-13-2011 11:19 PM
M12 vs J Airweights	ENGINE18	Concealed Carry & Self Defense	16	08-14-2010 04:52 PM
model 37 airweights dob's	ketap	S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980	1	10-05-2009 10:15 PM
S&W airweights	imjin138	S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980	17	09-08-2009 10:13 AM

smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security

smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:49 PM.