|
|
|
03-28-2011, 11:17 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Ejector disassembly
I got my cylinder a few days ago. I can't get my apart. Any tips?
|
03-29-2011, 06:12 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,077
Likes: 12,319
Liked 20,919 Times in 8,729 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nj2656
I got my cylinder a few days ago. I can't get my apart. Any tips?
|
Remember it's a backwards thread (left hand). Remove cylinder and yoke from the gun as an assembly.
Clamp the knurled ejector rod in a well padded vise (I like wood blocks lined with thick leather), but don't crush it, it's hollow.
Place three empty shell casings in three chambers and turn the cylinder by hand clockwise when looking at the primers.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
02-19-2014, 02:55 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Springfield, MA
Posts: 157
Likes: 110
Liked 58 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Got to resurrect this thread. I have a model 642 that I want to put on a diet. Any sources for a .38 Ti cylinder? Numrich is sold out, and they are north of $100 anyplace else I have looked.
|
02-19-2014, 07:18 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,077
Likes: 12,319
Liked 20,919 Times in 8,729 Posts
|
|
Just about any new S&W cylinder is going to be in the $100 range.
Your best bet is to do a search for a "parts kit" on Gunbroker. These are confiscated guns that have been destroyed by law enforcement. They usually include all the parts less the frame and can be won in the $30 to $70 range. And you can sell the remaining parts to recoup some of the cost.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-25-2016, 11:54 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: SoCal land of stupid gun
Posts: 84
Likes: 18
Liked 130 Times in 39 Posts
|
|
re-resurecting this thread
can't find a 38sp titanium cylinder
__________________
John Hermesmeyer USMC9296
|
11-20-2016, 11:14 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 350
Likes: 129
Liked 308 Times in 122 Posts
|
|
No where?? Also interested in this swap now as well
|
11-21-2016, 12:11 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Maine
Posts: 3,288
Likes: 3,076
Liked 3,831 Times in 852 Posts
|
|
They've been sold out for years, like 940 cyls. Keep an eye out in the classifieds here and also on ebay and hopefully you'll run across one.
I think all of the old stock of Ti cyls has been pretty much depleted now. I ordered a Ti .41 mag cyl from Numrich's the other day for an M28 conversion project but that's the last caliber they had in stock.
And, since everybody else posted pics... This is my 360J convertible, the original steel cylinder has been rechambered to 9x23 and cut for moonclips so it'll shoot 9mm, .38ACP, .38 Super, 356TSW, 9mm Largo, etc., and it's had a Ti .38spl cyl fitted to it as well.
__________________
Don't kiss smiling dogs!
Last edited by WC145; 11-21-2016 at 12:19 AM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-22-2016, 11:31 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 5,915
Liked 7,359 Times in 1,271 Posts
|
|
Very nice conversion.
Also, glad to see my old thread popping up
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-21-2018, 11:25 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
I've been lurking this post...had to revive it. I was initially hesitant being that I'll be doing this on my every day back up revolver, but the thought of lightening my load out is too apealing to pass up. I'm plan on ordering a Ti cylinder once I find one...thanks for this post.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-21-2018, 05:34 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 322
Likes: 144
Liked 474 Times in 196 Posts
|
|
Hens teeth
The titanium 38 cylinders are no longer made..only .357. I've looked extensively and they seem to be extinct.
|
05-21-2018, 06:04 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NOVA
Posts: 1,396
Likes: 5,724
Liked 1,403 Times in 585 Posts
|
|
I have been assuming - prolly wrongly - that the .357 Ti cylinders on Midway will fit a 442 ... at least per the Midway reviews. Still available with a 4-month old 642 review.
Smith & Wesson Cylinder Assembly S&W J-Frame 357 Mag - MPN: 229390000
|
05-21-2018, 06:35 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,004
Likes: 259
Liked 637 Times in 318 Posts
|
|
I haven't installed the .357 titanium cylinder, but as long as you're putting it in a post 1996 J-Magnum size frame it should work.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-21-2018, 08:03 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 464
Liked 1,606 Times in 538 Posts
|
|
I put Ti cylinders on my M&P 340 and 442. When you make the change hold each cylinder in you hands to compare how light the Ti cylinder really is. My friends were amazed how much of a difference there was.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
10-10-2021, 09:03 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 384
Likes: 135
Liked 392 Times in 165 Posts
|
|
I've got 6 of the titanium .357 cylinders fitted to my three 637-2 Airweights. The work great and make the pistol noticeably lighter.
|
07-28-2022, 02:52 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2022
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
I recently performed this switch on my 442, which came with a cylinder cut for moon clips. I used the original ratchet, which is slightly thinner than the ratchet that came with the new cylinder, which was not cut for moon clips. Will this cause any issues?
I was hoping to avoid timing issues by using the original ratchet like others have done. The switch seems to have worked perfectly, but I haven't tested it at the range yet and likely won't unless I get a thumbs up or two.
|
07-29-2022, 03:12 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 350
Likes: 129
Liked 308 Times in 122 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ULLA!
I recently performed this switch on my 442, which came with a cylinder cut for moon clips. I used the original ratchet, which is slightly thinner than the ratchet that came with the new cylinder, which was not cut for moon clips. Will this cause any issues?
I was hoping to avoid timing issues by using the original ratchet like others have done. The switch seems to have worked perfectly, but I haven't tested it at the range yet and likely won't unless I get a thumbs up or two.
|
First time I have heard of someone using the ratchet from a moon clip cut cylinder on the standard cylinder, of course it being titanium as well. What does it look like? Pics???
I am thinking it should not matter, just that it is timed right. Test firing it should not be a problem as long as it is timed. I say, fire it and see if the casings eject the same as a standard ratchet/cylinder combo. I am thinking it should work just fine.. But you need to fire it to verify as long as you feel comfortable knowing it is timed correctly. Sorry for the long repeated banter...
|
07-30-2022, 04:52 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2022
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eagle1*
First time I have heard of someone using the ratchet from a moon clip cut cylinder on the standard cylinder, of course it being titanium as well. What does it look like? Pics???
I am thinking it should not matter, just that it is timed right. Test firing it should not be a problem as long as it is timed. I say, fire it and see if the casings eject the same as a standard ratchet/cylinder combo. I am thinking it should work just fine.. But you need to fire it to verify as long as you feel comfortable knowing it is timed correctly. Sorry for the long repeated banter...
|
Thank you so much for the response. Here is a photo of the titanium cylinder with the ratchet from the moon clip cylinder.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-06-2023, 01:07 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: LI, NY
Posts: 873
Likes: 4,788
Liked 2,841 Times in 567 Posts
|
|
I recently acquired a spotless 442-1 for a literal song and a dance at the LGS I work p/t at…
At the recommendation of Ryan, NCBeagle, I purchased a Ti cylinder and made the retrofit with the carbon steel cylinder of the 442. I used the existing extractor, center pin and springs with the Ti cylinder and in dry firing the timing is spot on! Weight of the pistol (empty) is 12.3 oz and fully loaded with short barrel GD rounds 14.6 oz. My GLOCK 42 fully loaded with 68 grain Underwood XD rounds weight 16.006 oz.
I prefer pocket carry with small PD pistols and find the 442 with its rounded edges carries easier and prints less compared to the G42 (both carried in A Holster Kydex pocket holsters.)
__________________
Stay Safe...
jd SWCA #3276
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-07-2023, 10:36 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 5,915
Liked 7,359 Times in 1,271 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by demkofour
I recently acquired a spotless 442-1 for a literal song and a dance at the LGS I work p/t at…
At the recommendation of Ryan, NCBeagle, I purchased a Ti cylinder and made the retrofit with the carbon steel cylinder of the 442. I used the existing extractor, center pin and springs with the Ti cylinder and in dry firing the timing is spot on! Weight of the pistol (empty) is 12.3 oz and fully loaded with short barrel GD rounds 14.6 oz. My GLOCK 42 fully loaded with 68 grain Underwood XD rounds weight 16.006 oz.
I prefer pocket carry with small PD pistols and find the 442 with its rounded edges carries easier and prints less compared to the G42 (both carried in A Holster Kydex pocket holsters.)
|
Glad to hear that it worked well. I is a great modification, if you can find the cylinder. good stuff
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-07-2023, 11:52 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 154
Likes: 10
Liked 129 Times in 61 Posts
|
|
I have been happy with the swap, as well. I think the cylinders are around 140 now, but still available - fit the current j frame size. Excellent weight savings.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-08-2023, 09:53 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 772
Likes: 838
Liked 1,370 Times in 511 Posts
|
|
My 642-1 weighs 12 ounces exactly with the titanium cylinder and altamont rosewood boot grips. With Uncle Mike's rubber boot grips, the weight jumps to 12.9 ounces.
|
08-08-2023, 10:32 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: RE-tired in Texas
Posts: 1,351
Likes: 249
Liked 2,223 Times in 657 Posts
|
|
Got this one back in the day from the S/W rep when they were just coming out. 165 was his price with the armorer discount. Carried it for years before the small autos came around. Still held onto it. Believe me meant to be carried a lot and shot a little.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
|
Tags
|
340, 442, 642, 940, ahrends, airlite, airweight, brownells, cartridge, centennial, concealed, ejector, grooved, gunsmith, hogue, leather, lock, performance center, scandium, screwdriver, sig arms, smith-wessonforum.com, snubnose, titanium |
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|