|
03-29-2011, 06:51 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Hebron,N.Y.
Posts: 398
Likes: 207
Liked 157 Times in 52 Posts
|
|
Why do so many people look askance at a +$500 22LR revolver?
Yet these same people would not question a .357 revolver for +$500 or more. Would I be incorrect in assuming that production cost for a 22LR should be the same as any other caliber produced? Certainly performance is not lacking, in that 22lrs certainly are very accurate, yet many think of a 22lr caliber hand gun as "cheaply" made. What's with that?
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
Tags
|
1911, 22lr, 317, 617, 650, 940, airweight, anschutz, browning, bull barrel, colt, k-22, k-frame, k22, kimber, lock, m17, model 17, model 39, model 41, model 63, rimfire, ruger, taurus |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:41 AM.