|
|
08-31-2011, 10:23 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,047
Likes: 53
Liked 234 Times in 147 Posts
|
|
Lockless Conceal Carry Options?
I'm not one who normally has an issue with the lock. Sure, given the choice I'll go without it. Since there are conceal carry options without it and I think that's the one time it matters some, I'd like to consider all my no-lock options.
So, what are my no-lock carry options? I'm looking to pocket carry.
I know the 642 can come no-lock.
Not sure about the 442. It doesn't appear the 4/638 has the no lock option.
What else?
Much thanks in advance!
|
08-31-2011, 11:49 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Colorado Rocky Mountains
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 631
Liked 109 Times in 52 Posts
|
|
Any S&W revolver made before 2001 will be lockless. In J frames this would include, but not limited to:
M36, M37, M38, M40, M42, M49, M60, M640, M642, M442, .....The list goes on and on.
__________________
Formerly know as Lucky Derby
|
08-31-2011, 12:03 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 107
Liked 456 Times in 205 Posts
|
|
642 no lock or 442 no lock would be at the top of my list. You can also get Pro series versions of either model, which are cut for moon clips and have no locks.
|
08-31-2011, 01:31 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 164
Likes: 5
Liked 334 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Last edited by 47D; 08-31-2011 at 01:38 PM.
Reason: Oops! 632 Carry Comp does have a lock.
|
08-31-2011, 01:46 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,814
Likes: 4,242
Liked 15,220 Times in 4,166 Posts
|
|
While I realize this is a S&W site you may want to consider the Colt Cobra .38. Available on the used market these are 6 shot D frame Colts about the same size and weight as the Js mentioned above.
I own and carry a couple of the Js, but my favorite is my 1968 Cobra w/a bobbed hammer. Just something to think about . . .
|
08-31-2011, 02:18 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Pittsburgh Pa.
Posts: 124
Likes: 11
Liked 10 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
colt 1903 hammerless- no lock
__________________
The absence of pain is...death
|
08-31-2011, 02:39 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,047
Likes: 53
Liked 234 Times in 147 Posts
|
|
Thanks for all the replies. I probably should have mentioned that I was mostly interested in new. I wouldn't have a problem with used, but I would prefer to just be able to buy one readily available.
47D thanks for the great post.
I do like the idea of the 638, being able to see where the hammer for some reason is comforting. I do wonder if that's really worth much, and whether it's at all worth the risk of lint becoming a problem after a decade of use.
|
08-31-2011, 03:01 PM
|
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: GSO NC
Posts: 6,106
Likes: 23,604
Liked 13,198 Times in 2,860 Posts
|
|
I went with a clean used 640-1. Very nice little revolver.
I'm also a big fan of the Colt Cobra. Good luck with your search! Regards 18DAI.
|
09-01-2011, 01:55 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,301
Likes: 4
Liked 1,025 Times in 510 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gr7070
< snip > I do like the idea of the 638, being able to see where the hammer for some reason is comforting. I do wonder if that's really worth much, and whether it's at all worth the risk of lint becoming a problem after a decade of use.
|
I've had a model 49 for years, and although I don't carry it much, I've never had a lint problem with it. There are no paths into the innards of the gun when the hammer is down (as it will be when it's carried) and any lint that might collect behind the hammer spur (between the "ears" of the frame) is easily visible. Now if you carry it for a decade and never clean out the hammer path you might well have a lint problem, but a quick blow on any dust you may see behind the hammer from time to time will keep things clean enough for reliable operation.
Personally I see and feel no difference in double action shooting between my 49 and my "hammerless" 442 (except for the extra weight of the all steel 49.) But it is fun to be able to cock the hammer and fire carefully aimed single action shots at longer distances. I was at the range today, introducing a friend's wife to the joys of shooting. At one point I moved back 25 yards from a rack of 6" plates and let fly with the snubbies. I could hit pretty well with the 442, but got more hits easier with the 49 when I cocked it.
|
09-01-2011, 07:58 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Pittsburgh Pa.
Posts: 124
Likes: 11
Liked 10 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gr7070
Thanks for all the replies. I probably should have mentioned that I was mostly interested in new. I wouldn't have a problem with used, but I would prefer to just be able to buy one readily available.
47D thanks for the great post.
I do like the idea of the 638, being able to see where the hammer for some reason is comforting. I do wonder if that's really worth much, and whether it's at all worth the risk of lint becoming a problem after a decade of use.
|
forget about the lock its a non issue, the new guns lock or no lock are excellent do to CNC machining and Superior metallurgy
__________________
The absence of pain is...death
Last edited by geneboy; 09-01-2011 at 10:48 AM.
|
09-01-2011, 09:12 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Middle GAWGA
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Model 37.... Enough said...
But then again I don't a locked S&W...
__________________
One gun is never enough...
|
09-01-2011, 10:17 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Elliston, VA
Posts: 649
Likes: 136
Liked 95 Times in 61 Posts
|
|
27-2 3 inch
|
09-01-2011, 11:47 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 164
Likes: 5
Liked 334 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gr7070
I'm looking to pocket carry
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by VaRecon
27-2 3 inch
|
You must have some big pockets!
|
09-01-2011, 04:49 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Northeast Texas
Posts: 2,861
Likes: 921
Liked 1,326 Times in 723 Posts
|
|
For me it's not an issue with the lock. After reading this same discussion all over this forum, I went with a 36 in good, but not great, condition that I picked up for under $300. I wanted something in steel vs. alloy. The 36 I picked up cost less than half that of a new one and many on the forum would argue that it's a better gun - it certainly locks up tighter than any of the 'other' brands I handled.
So, IMHO, it's about price and quality, not the lock.
I just put the Pachmayr Compacs on it for carry yesterday - I don't want to tear up the original diamond, serialized, wood grips that came on it. They had to order a DeSantis pocket holster for me. So I'll be good to go in a few days.
__________________
But then, what do I know?
|
09-01-2011, 06:32 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 377
Likes: 489
Liked 168 Times in 67 Posts
|
|
My Carry Guns
These are the guns I carry. M638 w/ a Barami Hip Grip and my M649 in an Galco Ankle Glove. I removed the lock in my M638 and trplaced it with "The Plug".
|
09-01-2011, 07:17 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The free state of PA
Posts: 5,224
Likes: 5,721
Liked 8,584 Times in 2,782 Posts
|
|
If looking at new no lock pistols, the big consideration is price. The 442 and 642 are fairly cost efficient, while the others listed are priced significantly higher.
|
|
Tags
|
340, 340pd, 442, 640, 642, colt, crimson, desantis, galco, hammerless, lock, m60, model 37, model 40, model 42, model 60, pachmayr, sig arms |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
Conceal carry
|
Xvegasmedic |
Smith & Wesson SD & Sigma Pistols |
19 |
11-19-2016 05:38 PM |
How not to conceal carry
|
ladder13 |
Concealed Carry & Self Defense |
18 |
07-18-2015 01:08 PM |
conceal carry
|
eholland |
S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present |
17 |
04-13-2015 11:21 AM |
nc conceal carry
|
MAXIMUS1968 |
Concealed Carry & Self Defense |
4 |
05-22-2012 08:49 PM |
Conceal Carry
|
TBJK |
Smith & Wesson SD & Sigma Pistols |
22 |
08-06-2010 12:49 PM |
|