|
|
09-10-2011, 02:18 PM
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fairport, New York
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 154
Liked 3,461 Times in 489 Posts
|
|
Finally got a 1988 Model 625-2
I was very fortunate to acquire a 1988 Model 625 45 acp yesterday, after several years of searching for one. The gun is in about 99% condition, and came with Pachmayr grips, 4 half moon clips, cleaning kit and original Model 625 one piece flip box. The grips I replaced the Pachmayr grips with are Ahrends "Cordia" wood round butt combat style. They fit the gun perfectly. I plan to get a "Lobo" holster for this as well.
|
09-10-2011, 02:20 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 164
Likes: 5
Liked 334 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Very nice! I'm jealous.
|
09-10-2011, 03:53 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 4,783
Likes: 3,299
Liked 4,966 Times in 1,952 Posts
|
|
Congrats. Nice.
|
09-10-2011, 05:43 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ask the NSA
Posts: 2,208
Likes: 111
Liked 119 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
Very hard to come by and pricey. Probably the reason one's not in my safe.
Nice score on a beautful revolver! Grips improve it's looks big time. Which Lobo model are you buying for it? I like a crossdraw or shoulder holster for longer barreled revolvers.
__________________
V/R
Roger / SG
|
09-10-2011, 07:05 PM
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 4,862
Likes: 739
Liked 3,277 Times in 1,282 Posts
|
|
These came with Pachmayr finger grooved "Gripper" grips, so don't throw them away! I bought mine new in March of 1989, and have been happy with it ever since. I paid $430.31 out-the-door, which was likely retail at the time. My guess is you paid a bit more for your excellent example!
|
09-10-2011, 07:34 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Florida,South,hell.
Posts: 2,642
Likes: 143
Liked 2,502 Times in 368 Posts
|
|
Welcome to the club.
There is no better large caliber revolver than the 625 in my opinion.
Yours looks to be a dandy.
I've got a picture to add to your thread if I may,, until you can get yours
to the range.
Regards
Allen Frame
__________________
NRA cert.instructor&R.S.O.
|
09-10-2011, 09:51 PM
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fairport, New York
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 154
Liked 3,461 Times in 489 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sportsterguy
Very hard to come by and pricey. Probably the reason one's not in my safe.
Nice score on a beautful revolver! Grips improve it's looks big time. Which Lobo model are you buying for it? I like a crossdraw or shoulder holster for longer barreled revolvers.
|
Thank you for the compliment. I plan to buy two black open top pancake style holsters for the Model 625, and my new PC Model 627 2 5/8". They seem to be the best quality and style for both revolvers.
|
09-10-2011, 10:12 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Seattle, WA area
Posts: 35
Likes: 6
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Congratulations on finding a fine revolver! I found one just like it back in May. Mine shoots great at 25 yards but I have been having a terrible time finding a load that shoots well at 50 yards.
So far, the only bullet that shoots well at 50 is the Hensley and Gibbs #78. A friend gave me some he casted out of Linotype and they weighed in at 204 grains (Lyman #2 weights 215 grains). This will shoot 2.5 inch 10-shot groups at 50 yards. I have tried the H&G 68 at 185 and 200 grains and so far, no luck!
I want to shoot this revolver in the bullseye matches and must have a load that shoots under 3 inches at 50. Any ideas?
My Model 625-6 shoots like a dream at 50. I'm hoping this one will too.
Bill \
|
09-10-2011, 10:46 PM
|
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Central South Carolina
Posts: 7,212
Likes: 6,581
Liked 12,384 Times in 2,811 Posts
|
|
Well,I sold mine here a year or so ago. Another case of severe seller's remorse. You're gonna like it! Congrats.
f.t.
__________________
South Carolina-God's country
|
09-11-2011, 01:48 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 1
Liked 450 Times in 116 Posts
|
|
Your going to love it. I really enjoy mine.
|
09-11-2011, 10:21 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 119
Likes: 1
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Congratualtions on your find, I have one exactly like it I bought in early 1989 while I was stationed in Long Beach, Ca. I wish I had known they made them in 4" and 3" I would have bought one of each! One of the negatives of spending too much time out at sea!
Last edited by skipr77; 09-11-2011 at 10:29 AM.
|
09-11-2011, 12:10 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Posts: 967
Likes: 217
Liked 609 Times in 246 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allen-frame
There is no better large caliber revolver than the 625 in my opinion.
Regards
Allen Frame
|
Always gratifying when you find "the load", eh? ;=]
__________________
Regards - GCF
|
09-11-2011, 02:18 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: up-state SC
Posts: 759
Likes: 134
Liked 90 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
CruizerBill, You might want to try some Vihtavuori N 310 powder in your gun. This loading data I got from Dave at the Sierra Bullet Tech line back several years ago. I know if you go to a burning rate chart this powder looks too fast for this application. At least I thought so.
I have fired several hundred rounds of this at 3.4 grains with a home cast Lyman #452460 which ideally weighs 200 grains but will vary depending on the alloy. The kicker is that I have fired it in a Kimber Gold Match and Les Baer PII. I haven't fired it in a revolver but if it produces the same level of accuracy in a 625 as it does in the autos, it would certainly be worth a little experimentation.
You might want to call those guys at the Sierra Tech Line and verify the data for yourself and there may even be some more specialized data for the revolver. Those guys seem to have their fingers on the pulse of current competetion shooting and they will shoot straight with you.
Dave said the range was 3.2 grains on the low end (starting load) to 3.7 grains on the top. He said to tune in two tenths grain increments.I followed his instructions and found the best accuracy in both guns at 3.4 grains. I have lost my chronograph data but if I rember correctly it was about 750 to 800 fps. Don't quote those figures as gospel, just measure the speed yourself if you decide to try.
|
09-11-2011, 03:54 PM
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 4,862
Likes: 739
Liked 3,277 Times in 1,282 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by skipr77
Congratualtions on your find, I have one exactly like it I bought in early 1989 while I was stationed in Long Beach, Ca. I wish I had known they made them in 4" and 3" I would have bought one of each! One of the negatives of spending too much time out at sea!
|
There weren't any 3 and 4 inch 625's until the Model 625-2. All of the Model 625-2's were 5 inchers.
|
09-11-2011, 04:43 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 164
Likes: 5
Liked 334 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BUFF
There weren't any 3 and 4 inch 625's until the Model 625-2. All of the Model 625-2's were 5 inchers.
|
Are you sure about that? SKU 100923 is a 3" "Model of 1989" and SKU 100925 is a 4" "Model of 1989". I thought both were 625-2 models, but SCSW isn't crystal clear about that.
|
09-11-2011, 04:48 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NH
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 657
Liked 439 Times in 206 Posts
|
|
That's a beauty! Great find. Congratulations, and have fun shooting it.
|
09-11-2011, 05:45 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 16
Liked 255 Times in 143 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 47D
Are you sure about that? SKU 100923 is a 3" "Model of 1989" and SKU 100925 is a 4" "Model of 1989". I thought both were 625-2 models, but SCSW isn't crystal clear about that.
|
I believe Buff is correct that all -2's were 5". The 1989 barrel marking was carried over into the 90's but I believe the -3's came out in 89 not 90. I know of 4 BEN prefix -3's two 3" and two 4" SN range from BEN03xx to BEN55xx.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-12-2011, 12:21 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 143
Likes: 365
Liked 61 Times in 37 Posts
|
|
Had one once. It loved 185 gr. Sierras with 700X. Didn't know what I had back then and foolishly traded it.
__________________
Joshua 1:9
82nd Airborne
|
09-12-2011, 11:07 AM
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 4,862
Likes: 739
Liked 3,277 Times in 1,282 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 47D
Are you sure about that? SKU 100923 is a 3" "Model of 1989" and SKU 100925 is a 4" "Model of 1989". I thought both were 625-2 models, but SCSW isn't crystal clear about that.
|
I mis-typed. The 4 and 3 inch guns are Model 625-3 and were marked Model of 1989, while the Model 625-2 only came with a 5 inch barrel as a Model 625-2, Model of 1988.
|
09-12-2011, 01:38 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne Florida USA
Posts: 271
Likes: 17
Liked 51 Times in 30 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 47D
Are you sure about that? SKU 100923 is a 3" "Model of 1989" and SKU 100925 is a 4" "Model of 1989". I thought both were 625-2 models, but SCSW isn't crystal clear about that.
|
To add to your post...
Although my 925-2, "Model of 1988", is still in the air, the seller told me the sku on the box is 100921..
|
09-13-2011, 08:08 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 164
Likes: 5
Liked 334 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mack
I believe Buff is correct that all -2's were 5". The 1989 barrel marking was carried over into the 90's but I believe the -3's came out in 89 not 90. I know of 4 BEN prefix -3's two 3" and two 4" SN range from BEN03xx to BEN55xx.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BUFF
I mis-typed. The 4 and 3 inch guns are Model 625-3 and were marked Model of 1989, while the Model 625-2 only came with a 5 inch barrel as a Model 625-2, Model of 1988.
|
Thanks for clearing that up, guys!
|
09-13-2011, 11:13 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Seattle, WA area
Posts: 35
Likes: 6
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe in SC
CruizerBill, You might want to try some Vihtavuori N 310 powder in your gun. This loading data I got from Dave at the Sierra Bullet Tech line back several years ago. I know if you go to a burning rate chart this powder looks too fast for this application. At least I thought so.
I have fired several hundred rounds of this at 3.4 grains with a home cast Lyman #452460 which ideally weighs 200 grains but will vary depending on the alloy. The kicker is that I have fired it in a Kimber Gold Match and Les Baer PII. I haven't fired it in a revolver but if it produces the same level of accuracy in a 625 as it does in the autos, it would certainly be worth a little experimentation.
You might want to call those guys at the Sierra Tech Line and verify the data for yourself and there may even be some more specialized data for the revolver. Those guys seem to have their fingers on the pulse of current competetion shooting and they will shoot straight with you.
Dave said the range was 3.2 grains on the low end (starting load) to 3.7 grains on the top. He said to tune in two tenths grain increments.I followed his instructions and found the best accuracy in both guns at 3.4 grains. I have lost my chronograph data but if I rember correctly it was about 750 to 800 fps. Don't quote those figures as gospel, just measure the speed yourself if you decide to try.
|
Thanks Joe, I'll give it a try! I really need this gun to shoot well at 50. My 625-6 does 2.5 inches for 10 shots no problem.
|
|
Tags
|
627, ahrends, bullseye, chronograph, crossdraw, grooved, hensley, kimber, model 625, pachmayr, round butt, scsw |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|