Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-11-2019, 05:34 PM
oink oink is offline
Member
60-1 +P 60-1 +P 60-1 +P 60-1 +P 60-1 +P  
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Southern FL, East side.
Posts: 2,297
Likes: 2,331
Liked 3,030 Times in 1,261 Posts
Default 60-1 +P

I thought my model 60 was a no dash as it shows no dash. Inside the crane it just says MOD.60.

Well I called S&W support to find out if my gun would shoot +Ps safely. I was informed it was a 1983 -1. That would be around when I bought it (new). It turns out it's not old enough to be a no dash. OK, I don't care but interesting I guess.

As for the +Ps, the guy (Dave) said he could guarantee it would work once but they weren't guaranteed to work with +Ps. He advised that there have been some metallurgical changes since then.

That kinda disappoints me as I was wanting to find newer type ammo for it and do some practice with the new ammo. All of the good new ammo seems to be +P rated.

I have shot a few +Ps through it in the past but not many. Being stainless steel I'd of thought it was probably OK but I guess not. So, I guess I'll have to stick with my mild loads or not practice much with them but carry +Ps.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-11-2019, 06:01 PM
kaaskop49 kaaskop49 is offline
Member
60-1 +P 60-1 +P 60-1 +P 60-1 +P 60-1 +P  
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Demon-class planet
Posts: 7,403
Likes: 29,169
Liked 8,461 Times in 3,772 Posts
Default

Everyone seems to have an opinion on this matter but few seem to have any facts (Hi, Dave! ). IIRC, somewhere there is a sticky on +P usage but I may be incorrect. My understanding is that steel frame revolvers with a model number are safe to us with +P ammunition. I do not hesitate to use +P in such revolvers for practice, qualification, or carry.

Kaaskop49
Shield #5103
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 01-11-2019, 06:25 PM
murphydog's Avatar
murphydog murphydog is offline
Moderator
60-1 +P 60-1 +P 60-1 +P 60-1 +P 60-1 +P  
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,913
Likes: 993
Liked 19,049 Times in 9,316 Posts
Default

Well, where do we start...

A model 60 made in 1983 is a...wait for it...model 60. The 60-1 of that era is a 2" Target sighted version, made in 1985. In 1988 (after 23 years), the model 60 was replaced by the 60-3.

The official factory line is that no model 60 earlier than the -7 is "+ P rated". They are being cautious by telling you a 25 year old gun for which they have no history and cannot examine is not safe, which makes sense. The factory used to post any steel K or N frame model stamped gun was safe for .38 + P, and newer "J Magnum" frames are also +P approved.

That said, occasional + P use in a "non-approved" sound model 60 is fine. The extra cost and recoil convinces most that it is not necessary except to check function and zero. Hope this is helpful.
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #4  
Old 01-11-2019, 07:00 PM
oink oink is offline
Member
60-1 +P 60-1 +P 60-1 +P 60-1 +P 60-1 +P  
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Southern FL, East side.
Posts: 2,297
Likes: 2,331
Liked 3,030 Times in 1,261 Posts
Default

OK, thanks. I gather "Dave" didn't know his stuff that well. The SN is ABH98XX if that helps. I don't actually remember what year I bought it but it would have been 80s. Any of you experts care to help out with the year?

Maybe I'll just keep the ammo I have in it. I'm not even sure what it is but it doesn't say +P. The range officer gave me about 15 rounds of what he called light stuff. It's Speer with a big ole hollow point. Might be Gold Dot but no gold dot. I think it was the same stuff I qualified with. It isn't "hot" in the steel model 60 at all. It shoots point of aim at any distance I'm concerned about with it.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-11-2019, 07:31 PM
Texas Star Texas Star is offline
US Veteran
Absent Comrade
60-1 +P 60-1 +P  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,361
Likes: 24,260
Liked 16,154 Times in 7,408 Posts
Default

A factory spokeswoman told me that M-60-4 is Plus P approved and had new metallurgy over older guns.

Actually, writer Jeff Cooper used to fire some really hot handloads in his older M-60, as did a CIA operative named Harry Archer, who wrote a few articles in, Gunfacts about 1970. I know Jeff's load, but won't publish it, as I think it may be marginally too hot. Continued extensive use would surely lead to premature cylinder endshake. He cited a muzzle velocity of 1,000 FPS. From his snub!

I doubt he fired that load much. Probably just to see how it shot, and then for carry.

Plus P ammo varies. That by most firms is mild by standards used by Buffalo Bore and Underwood. DO NOT use Plus P Plus in a .38! It was intended only for use in .357's owned by police who were forbidden to use .357 ammo for political reasons.

S&W reps told me this stuff wore K-framed .357's as badly as, or worse, than did the hot 125 grain Magnum ammo.

Last edited by Texas Star; 01-11-2019 at 07:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-11-2019, 08:57 PM
old bear's Avatar
old bear old bear is offline
US Veteran
60-1 +P 60-1 +P 60-1 +P 60-1 +P 60-1 +P  
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: R.T. P, area NC
Posts: 9,720
Likes: 29,606
Liked 23,026 Times in 5,793 Posts
Default

I purchased my one and only M-60 in 1975. Carried it as my back up and off duity for years. I put thousands of Hot rounds through it, including 110Gr. Super-Vel (Sp) ammo through it. Never had a problem..

Is shooting extra hot ammo necessary, not really but it's nice to know you can.
__________________
Always Stay Strong!
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #7  
Old 01-11-2019, 09:06 PM
elm_creek_smith's Avatar
elm_creek_smith elm_creek_smith is offline
US Veteran
60-1 +P 60-1 +P 60-1 +P 60-1 +P 60-1 +P  
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Tulsa County
Posts: 2,413
Likes: 1,644
Liked 3,135 Times in 1,146 Posts
Default

I asked Jeff Cooper about swapping my 3 inch Model 36 for the then new 3 inch Charter Bulldog .44. He said he wasn't impressed by the Bulldog and recommended a blistering .38 load with a 158 grain SWC over quite a load of Unique (not saying how much). After trying the Colonel's load, I made the swap to the Bulldog!

Sent from my XT1710-02 using Tapatalk
__________________
CPT, Armor (Ret)
Luke 22:36
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #8  
Old 01-11-2019, 09:45 PM
murphydog's Avatar
murphydog murphydog is offline
Moderator
60-1 +P 60-1 +P 60-1 +P 60-1 +P 60-1 +P  
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,913
Likes: 993
Liked 19,049 Times in 9,316 Posts
Default

Prefix ABH is from late 1982, so a 1983 purchase makes sense.
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-11-2019, 11:10 PM
oink oink is offline
Member
60-1 +P 60-1 +P 60-1 +P 60-1 +P 60-1 +P  
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Southern FL, East side.
Posts: 2,297
Likes: 2,331
Liked 3,030 Times in 1,261 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by murphydog View Post
Prefix ABH is from late 1982, so a 1983 purchase makes sense.
OK, thanks a lot. Sounds about right. And am I correct then in understanding it really is a no-dash as indicated inside the crane?

I had a stainless CA 38 before that but the one I had would lock up as soon as you fired a few rounds so I dumped it and paid up for the Smith. I still may try a Bulldog 44 someday.

The Smith has been a reliable gun and went through many qualifications in years past but I don't really use it much now. It usually is loaded with shot shells as a less lethal option so I don't have to shoot to kill. Don't panic! Just kidding. I get rattle snakes and cottonmouths on occasion and my model 60 with my hand loaded shells using the Speer caps work great at 5' to 6'. A speedloader of the HPs stay with it.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #10  
Old 01-12-2019, 12:30 AM
Pisgah Pisgah is offline
Member
60-1 +P  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 3,450
Likes: 37
Liked 5,435 Times in 1,762 Posts
Default

The +P bugabear is way overrated. Back in the '50's, Elmer Keith fired thousands of .38-44 rounds through a Chief's Special. These were way more than +P, closer to a .357 Mag, and the little revolver showed no damage or even noticeable wear.

Remember, if you ask them S&W will tell you not to fire .38 target wadcutter loads in a Model 36 if they're handloads. If it doesn't have ".38 +P" stamped on the barrel, they're going to say "No" to +P, but their answer has nothing to do with safety.
__________________
Pisgah
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #11  
Old 01-12-2019, 07:08 PM
AZretired's Avatar
AZretired AZretired is offline
Member
60-1 +P 60-1 +P 60-1 +P 60-1 +P 60-1 +P  
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Mexico & Arizona
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 735
Liked 1,460 Times in 644 Posts
Default

I had a M-60 I bought new in 1977 and carried off-duty and as a backup until I traded it for a new M-640 in the late 90's. My standard carry load was the +P 158 LSWCHP and I put hundreds of rounds through my M-60 and it was just as tight the day I sold as the day I bought it.
__________________
Support your Police, & NRA
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:04 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)