Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 11-24-2011, 01:07 PM
C/O's Avatar
C/O C/O is offline
US Veteran
The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60  
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 568
Likes: 29
Liked 79 Times in 31 Posts
Default

What a shame.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 11-25-2011, 03:19 PM
mkk41 mkk41 is offline
Banned
The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60  
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: South East , PA . USA
Posts: 5,027
Likes: 485
Liked 1,610 Times in 884 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1sgpierce View Post
I use Unique and each load was hand weighed and measured, and I inspect each filled case with a flashlight to avoid overcharge or undercharge issues. I won't give the particular load data, but it came out of the Lyman manual. The interesting thing was that I fired two rounds out of my 77/357 to check it out before trying it in the model 60.
The Lyman manual lists loads for bullets cast in Lyman molds. I've pointed out several times that ya just can't go by weight as many bullets have more of a shank and when seated , leave less room in the case than other bullets of the same weight , possibly resulting in a compressed charge. Even Lyman bullets of the same weight , but different design have different data. Medium to fast powders don't respond well to compressed loads.

I'm not seeing a 125gr .357 cast bullet in my Lyman book.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 11-26-2011, 03:19 PM
1sgpierce 1sgpierce is offline
Member
The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60  
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Central Utah
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkk41 View Post
The Lyman manual lists loads for bullets cast in Lyman molds. I've pointed out several times that ya just can't go by weight as many bullets have more of a shank and when seated , leave less room in the case than other bullets of the same weight , possibly resulting in a compressed charge. Even Lyman bullets of the same weight , but different design have different data. Medium to fast powders don't respond well to compressed loads.

I'm not seeing a 125gr .357 cast bullet in my Lyman book.
I have Lyman manuals 45,47 and 49 and the earlier ones show a 125 grain cast load, but in this case it was a load for a 110 grain bullet, then I substituted some 125 grain bullets. While the load shot fine in my Ruger 77/357 it was too hot for the Model 60. The point of this thread is to always follow proper reloading practices, and smith makes a stout revolver even in the J frame series.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 02-05-2024, 12:13 AM
jrog100 jrog100 is offline
Member
The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60  
Join Date: Oct 2023
Posts: 31
Likes: 10
Liked 20 Times in 11 Posts
Default

stoopid costs money. thanks for the pix but all reloaders know how imortant load data is. glad you're ok
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 02-05-2024, 12:25 AM
RMFnLA RMFnLA is offline
Member
The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60  
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 649
Likes: 513
Liked 677 Times in 307 Posts
Default

As a long time gunsmith I’ve seen lots of blown up revolvers but none had a cylinder split in half like that.

Virtually all were split only at the chamber that fired, and they all had the top strap blown off.

I also cannot accept an additional 15 grains of bullet weight would cause this, especially since cast bullets generate lower pressures than jacket ones.

Just doesn’t add up.
__________________
Richard
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 02-05-2024, 10:25 AM
max503's Avatar
max503 max503 is offline
Member
The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60  
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: So. Illinois
Posts: 2,740
Likes: 1,505
Liked 3,493 Times in 1,513 Posts
Default

Thank you for posting this. Accidents happen. It is a good reminder to us all.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 02-05-2024, 11:34 AM
Yaworski's Avatar
Yaworski Yaworski is offline
Member
The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60  
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 876
Likes: 202
Liked 1,188 Times in 473 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fishslayer View Post
My first thought was that it was a name you might find on a "no fly" list!
He has written about the issues that his name has caused while flying with guns.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 02-05-2024, 12:17 PM
rays44 rays44 is offline
Member
The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60  
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: NJ
Posts: 201
Likes: 57
Liked 181 Times in 92 Posts
Default

I think I have the answer.
You're a diligent and careful re-loader. No mistake should have been made, but the revolver suffered catastrophic damage. You pulled the remaining rounds and they were fine. You could have inspected the round fired in the rifle for excessive pressure, but you probably wouldn't have found anything. The load was not too hot as it was a published load under max. The 125gr cast bullet was not the problem as it shot fine in the rifle and you didn't notice an unusual blast or recoil compared to other rounds.
IMO, the remaining rounds you pulled were fine because they were not overcharged. I believe that you inadvertently double charged only 1 round, perhaps when you switched bullets. It got passed you. An honest mistake and not all that uncommon when a catastrophe happens.
The revolver blew up for a reason and there are no other variables to explain it (not .38 spec crud ring, not seating depth, not loading at or over max published loads, not barrel obstruction, etc).
You sound like a good guy and I'm glad you're ok.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 02-05-2024, 12:21 PM
BE Mike's Avatar
BE Mike BE Mike is offline
Member
The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60  
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,721
Likes: 2,471
Liked 3,697 Times in 1,582 Posts
Default

I've only seen, in person, a revolver in this condition. It was a 4" Taurus that had been shot with 148 gr. wadcutter reloads and Bullseye powder. Nobody was injured and the person who made the reloads (a good buddy) swore up and down that it wasn't a double charge and I'm sure that he THOUGHT so. I have a S&W model 60-10 that I feel comfortable shooting with full house 158 gr. factory .357 ammo. I've shot a box of 50 factory loads out of it at one shooting session.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 02-05-2024, 01:29 PM
murphydog's Avatar
murphydog murphydog is offline
Moderator
The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60  
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,783
Likes: 1,424
Liked 20,109 Times in 9,746 Posts
Default

Guys, this post is 12+ years old and the OP hasn’t been online here for almost 2 years, so scolding him probably won’t help.
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220

Last edited by Tom S.; 02-06-2024 at 09:08 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #61  
Old 02-05-2024, 01:37 PM
moosedog's Avatar
moosedog moosedog is online now
SWCA Member
The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60  
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 7,720
Likes: 12,455
Liked 14,480 Times in 3,478 Posts
Default

Glad that you weren't hurt. If you got any more of those loads, I'd like to give a few to my brother-in-law.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 02-05-2024, 01:40 PM
TLflag TLflag is offline
SWCA Member
The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60  
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Flagstaff, Arizona
Posts: 157
Likes: 801
Liked 122 Times in 59 Posts
Default

A double load of 2.7 Bullseye caused my Model 60 to do the same thing. I sent it to the factory with a BIG letter of it was my fault, and they allowed me a new gun at Police price. Now that was in the good old days, but I'm sure that wouldn't work today.
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 02-05-2024, 01:50 PM
OFT II's Avatar
OFT II OFT II is offline
Member
The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60  
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Odessa, Texas
Posts: 3,233
Likes: 4,081
Liked 3,721 Times in 1,476 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by murphydog View Post
Guys, this post is 2+ years old and the OP hasn’t been online here for almost 2 years, so scolding him probably won’t help.
Better check your math. This post goes back to 2011.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #64  
Old 02-06-2024, 09:10 AM
Tom S.'s Avatar
Tom S. Tom S. is offline
Moderator
The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60  
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 18,908
Likes: 8,596
Liked 18,520 Times in 6,013 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OFT II View Post
Better check your math. This post goes back to 2011.
Just a typo - it's fixed. And just for the record, technically 12 years 2+ years is it not?
__________________
So many S&W's, so few funds!!

Last edited by Tom S.; 02-06-2024 at 09:11 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #65  
Old 02-06-2024, 12:35 PM
TIMETRIPPER TIMETRIPPER is offline
Member
The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60  
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 1,601
Liked 1,959 Times in 790 Posts
Default

Yes, an old post, but one worth revisiting. My money is on a double charge in one case.

I load all my ammo on single stage presses. When I drop a powder charge into a case, I visually check the powder level in the case, then seat a bullet in it before placing it back into the cartridge tray. It's the best way I know of to avoid a double charge. Plus it reduces the number of times a case is handled during reloading. Think about it, you are not going to pick up a case with a bullet seated to drop a powder charge in it. But if you charge all of your cases before seating the bullet then it does become possible to double charge a case.

John
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 02-06-2024, 01:55 PM
BE Mike's Avatar
BE Mike BE Mike is offline
Member
The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60  
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,721
Likes: 2,471
Liked 3,697 Times in 1,582 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TIMETRIPPER View Post
Yes, an old post, but one worth revisiting. My money is on a double charge in one case.

I load all my ammo on single stage presses. When I drop a powder charge into a case, I visually check the powder level in the case, then seat a bullet in it before placing it back into the cartridge tray. It's the best way I know of to avoid a double charge. Plus it reduces the number of times a case is handled during reloading. Think about it, you are not going to pick up a case with a bullet seated to drop a powder charge in it. But if you charge all of your cases before seating the bullet then it does become possible to double charge a case.

John
Another good way to avoid a double charge is to use a progressive press with a powder check die. I love my Dillon 650!
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 02-06-2024, 04:40 PM
Dvus Dvus is offline
Member
The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60 The 500 dollar paperweight Model 60  
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 936
Likes: 24
Liked 2,163 Times in 546 Posts
Default

Looks like a quick fix with a hydraulic shop press and a new cylinder.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
340pd, 357 magnum, 380, 38spl, colt, engraved, j frame, k frame, m60, model 17, model 19, model 27, model 60, n-frame, primer, rcbs, remington, ruger, scandium, shroud, sideplate, sig arms, smith and wesson, titanium, wadcutter

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Model 12 Airweight "paperweight" bigwagon S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 37 03-25-2015 04:47 PM
I know have a 52-2 paperweight..... smithrjd Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 18 08-22-2013 07:53 PM
The 500 dollar paperweight model 60 1sgpierce Reloading 8 11-21-2011 07:52 PM
maybe just a paperweight Douglas Jr. S&W Antiques 12 09-08-2010 12:04 PM
S&W 4006 paperweight Grinder Smith & Wesson Knives & Collectables 3 07-17-2009 04:37 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:42 AM.


© 2000-2024 smith-wessonforum.com All rights reserved worldwide.
Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)