|
|
04-14-2012, 09:18 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
617 and newbie
Hello all.Im a newbie here on the forum but Im glad I found it as I have learned a lot. I dont have a lot of S-W right now but Im working on it. My current inventory is a 29-2 and a Model 41 and I have the itch for a 17 or a 617. My question is,does the current model 617 hold a candle to the older stuff? Would I be better off as far as quality/value to look for an earlier model? It seems anymore that companies are more concerned with the bottom line and not quality and I was hoping this wasnt the case with S-W.Any inputs or thoughts appreciated.Travis
|
04-14-2012, 09:31 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Holland, Europe
Posts: 539
Likes: 12
Liked 576 Times in 120 Posts
|
|
Personal I would go for the older ones. I don't care for a lock in my gun and I find the inner parts nicer made. But as long as you don't look inside than that is not important.
A 6" is quite heavy, If you could find a 4" I would go for that.
|
04-14-2012, 09:39 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: ohio
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 1,026
Liked 869 Times in 311 Posts
|
|
go for a no-lock you will have better resale if you ever need to sell it
|
04-14-2012, 09:40 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 4,898
Likes: 3,296
Liked 4,963 Times in 1,951 Posts
|
|
Welcome to the forum and you're right, it's a wonderful site with an abundance of info and good people. It sounds like you've got some nice specimens in you 29 and 41
I can't honestly answer as I don't buy or even look at the newer revolvers unless it's one heckuva deal.
I've read posts about canted barrels, etc. on 617's but only hearsay to me.
Not to start or even fuel the lock v. no-lock debate but until S&W removes them or shows a valid reason for them, I'm not interested in their current line of revolvers that have them. Now their government model autos are some of the nicest avialable IMO.
|
04-14-2012, 09:45 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 1,548
Likes: 54
Liked 1,140 Times in 364 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeroenw114
Personal I would go for the older ones. I don't care for a lock in my gun and I find the inner parts nicer made. But as long as you don't look inside than that is not important.
A 6" is quite heavy, If you could find a 4" I would go for that.
|
I don't think the model 17 is available in 4".
|
04-14-2012, 09:45 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 4,898
Likes: 3,296
Liked 4,963 Times in 1,951 Posts
|
|
I might add in reply to your question, buy new... leaves more of the older stuff for me.
|
04-14-2012, 09:47 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 4,898
Likes: 3,296
Liked 4,963 Times in 1,951 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Florida Guy
I don't think the model 17 is available in 4".
|
I think you're right. Model 18's are being produced in 4".
|
04-14-2012, 10:13 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 185
Liked 214 Times in 72 Posts
|
|
First off welcome to the forum. In my opinion, if you can find one, a model 18 or the model 17 would be my choice. The 617 is ok but it is a typical modern day revolver. Its no way as nice to shoot as a model 18 or 17. The only advantage of a 617 is round count. Plus the 617 looks like a L frame 686. To me that is to bulky for a 22 LR revolver.
This is opinion only.
Good luck,
Howard
|
04-14-2012, 10:21 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Albany, OR
Posts: 458
Likes: 6
Liked 58 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
I have the 4" 617, the 18-3 and the 17-3. All are fine revolvers. The 617 needed a Wolff spring kit and a bit of polishing the innards to make the trigger as nice as the older guns. My friend bought the 6" 617. He likes the longer sight radius, but the gun is nose heavy.
The 617s are set up for optics, so if you are thinking about that go 617.
17-3 & 18-3
617 with Burris Fastfire II red dot
|
04-14-2012, 10:37 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 396
Liked 828 Times in 274 Posts
|
|
Welcome to the forum. I like the older guns and don't own anything newer than about 1992, but that's strictly a matter of personal preference. Obviously, many folks own current production S&W's or the company wouldn't still be in business. However, there have been several recent reports of quality control issues with the newer guns, many of them involving the 617's. These days an older 617 in good condition will generally cost quite a bit more than a new in the box current model. Likewise, older K-22's and model 17's in nice condition, especially those with original box and papers, fetch a high price.
Many folks here, myself included, are big fans of S&W .22 revolvers. My favorites are this K-22 from 1948 and this 617 no dash from 1989.
|
04-14-2012, 10:41 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 4,898
Likes: 3,296
Liked 4,963 Times in 1,951 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by robctwo
I have the 4" 617, the 18-3 and the 17-3.
|
Not to hijack but what grips are those, Ahrends?
|
04-14-2012, 10:43 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In The Woods Of S.C.
Posts: 8,921
Likes: 14,075
Liked 13,775 Times in 4,993 Posts
|
|
The 4" 617's are nice. Mine shoots just as good as my older 17's & 18's.
Buy a 617.......You won't be disappointed.
__________________
S&W Accumulator
|
04-14-2012, 11:12 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,426
Likes: 1,108
Liked 5,154 Times in 1,581 Posts
|
|
IMHO, older is better than new when it comes to S&W revolvers. Fit and finish are better, and there are enough of them around so you can avoid locks and quality control problems.
|
04-14-2012, 12:26 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Thanks for the advice fellows. Im leaning towards a 617 and a 617-1.Both of them have the combat stocks and I like the look/feel of them.As far as the full lug goes,Ive owned a 686 and it didnt seem to bother me,it seems as though the extra weight made it easier to shoot if that makes any sense.If I could find an earlier 17 with a pinned barrel I would be interested in that as well but I think the stainless versions maybe more user friendly as far as showing wear,etc. Forgot to add I have a 629 classic with the PP,a little loud but fun to shoot.Thanks again,Travis
|
04-14-2012, 12:40 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: New England
Posts: 4,189
Likes: 3,543
Liked 3,996 Times in 1,627 Posts
|
|
Welcome to the forum, Travis. Search for a 617 W/O the lock, in a length and round capacity that suits you. AVOID the 617-2 with aluminum cylinder. Pay the higher price if you must for the one you like. You will be glad that you bought it, each and every time you handle it, and the cost will soon be forgotten. The revolver will appreciate in value over time, and will always be worth more than you paid for it. The 4 inch 10 shot models seem to be the most popular. The stainless steel weapons can be maintained like new cosmetically with little effort after many thousands of rounds fired or years of holster carry. This is IMPOSSIBLE with a blued weapon, which will show it's age in finish loss from handling, repeated cleaning, or holster carry.......
__________________
'Nam 1968-69.DAV,VFW,NRA Inst.
Last edited by one eye joe; 04-14-2012 at 12:45 PM.
|
04-15-2012, 12:28 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Albany, OR
Posts: 458
Likes: 6
Liked 58 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
I goofed on the 617 when I pm'd. those are moradillo.
Here it is with the black/silve dymondwood. Ahrends retro combat
|
04-16-2012, 08:55 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 235
Likes: 69
Liked 87 Times in 53 Posts
|
|
Last year I bought a 617-6 (6 inch barrel) and an old Model 17 (no dash), and I find I shoot the 617 better. I grew up shooting heavy barreled target autos, so I like the full lug 617.
While I too would have preferred a no lock version of the 617, the problem is the often long search in finding one (I prefer to buy my guns in person.) To me, the lock is a non-issue. I prefer shooting to shopping! Good Luck!
kas
|
04-16-2012, 09:51 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Maine
Posts: 3,065
Likes: 24,910
Liked 5,784 Times in 1,280 Posts
|
|
same here , if you can look at the gun before you buy to check for any QC problems you should be all set , I have 8-10 new current production smiths and I'm happy with all of them , on a 22 shooter that could see a ton of use you might want that lifetime warranty someday down the road , good luck - for a me any 22 I have will be shot a bunch by me and the kids so I'd go new
|
04-16-2012, 10:14 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 2,260
Likes: 2
Liked 116 Times in 85 Posts
|
|
Welcome to the forum!
I have several of the older blued K-22's which I shoot quite regularly but I really enjoy using my 4 inch 10 shot 617. I have put more than 10,000 rounds through my 617 with lock and have not experienced a single issue. When I look down the sights I do not see the lock.
If you are interested in cosmetics get an early blued model otherwise the current 617 will be a lot of fun to shoot.
|
|
Tags
|
617, 629, 686, ahrends, k-22, l frame, lock, model 17, model 41, smith & wesson, smith and wesson |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|