Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-06-2012, 02:19 PM
S&WCarrier S&WCarrier is offline
Member
Possible problem with my S&W .38 BG Possible problem with my S&W .38 BG Possible problem with my S&W .38 BG Possible problem with my S&W .38 BG Possible problem with my S&W .38 BG  
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 12
Likes: 2
Liked 5 Times in 1 Post
Exclamation Possible problem with my S&W .38 BG

I noticed something while cleaning the S&W BG .38 revolver. After cleaning it up and closing the cylinder and squeezing the trigger and cycling the cylinder I noticed that the first trigger pull did not advance the rotation to the next chamber. I tried the process again. Normal rotation of the cylinder; well normal like a "Colt" anyway. (The cylinder on the BG rotates CW and not CCW). Anyway, I tried it several more times and the same thing, everything normal. Then one more time of opening and closing the cylinder, and the thing does it again, but this time I pull the trigger again and it advances to the next chamber and so on for a few more trigger pulls. I open the cylinder up and put my finger over the firing pin and squeeze the trigger, the sting is quite unmistakeable, it's working just fine.. I did this several times with the same result. Which brings me to my question.

If ya load the revolver up and it closes on a live round, but when you squeeze the trigger the cylinder doesn't rotate, although it does fire the round already chambered, would that bother you? Again, like I said, it never fails to rotate the cylinder on the second trigger pull, and to the best of my knowledge, it still strikes the the firing pin and would fire the round in the chamber at the time of the trigger pull.

I've put 250 rounds through it in the last week and it never had a light strike or misfire, yet I was easily able to mimic the static cylinder several times in dry fire. I guess my biggest question/concern on it is this. The couple of searches I found on anything remotely similar to it where folks called S&W. The folks were told it was normal for it to work that way. What do you revolver guys think?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-06-2012, 04:13 PM
photoman's Avatar
photoman photoman is offline
Member
Possible problem with my S&W .38 BG Possible problem with my S&W .38 BG Possible problem with my S&W .38 BG Possible problem with my S&W .38 BG Possible problem with my S&W .38 BG  
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Great State of Texas
Posts: 5,057
Likes: 524
Liked 1,916 Times in 788 Posts
Default

What do I think? I think I don't like the BG38 so I buy Airweights. The information you've given is just another reason I don't like the BG38. Darn shame too as I think there is an advantage to the "plastic" pocket revolver. That being, the polymer frame reduces felt recoil.
__________________
Centennial Every Day
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-06-2012, 04:52 PM
S&WCarrier S&WCarrier is offline
Member
Possible problem with my S&W .38 BG Possible problem with my S&W .38 BG Possible problem with my S&W .38 BG Possible problem with my S&W .38 BG Possible problem with my S&W .38 BG  
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 12
Likes: 2
Liked 5 Times in 1 Post
Default

Yeah, I like the airweights too. I have a couple myself. My 638 is my constant companion. Just thought that this being a S&W forum and the BG being out for a couple of years now might be a good place to look for some info on a possible problem... Maybe I should try the Taurus forum instead..


Hah!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-06-2012, 05:07 PM
Will Carry's Avatar
Will Carry Will Carry is offline
Member
Possible problem with my S&W .38 BG Possible problem with my S&W .38 BG Possible problem with my S&W .38 BG Possible problem with my S&W .38 BG Possible problem with my S&W .38 BG  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 762
Likes: 410
Liked 599 Times in 239 Posts
Default

I have yet to bite the plastic revolver hook. Although I have not heard many bad things about them, I still can't compel myself to buy one.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-06-2012, 06:58 PM
mag318's Avatar
mag318 mag318 is offline
US Veteran
Possible problem with my S&W .38 BG Possible problem with my S&W .38 BG Possible problem with my S&W .38 BG Possible problem with my S&W .38 BG Possible problem with my S&W .38 BG  
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 22
Liked 1,359 Times in 451 Posts
Default

No problem, just be sure to index the cylinder when you close it. By that I mean just simply turn the cylinder slightly until you here the ratchet in the frame click into the rear of the cylinder. I've got well over 1000 rounds through mine and it has been a good revolver. When you index the cylinder you will hear an audible click, then you're good to go. A lot of S&W purist don't like this revolver as it's such a departure from the traditional J frame. I own several J frames but this is the one I carry everyday.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
bg38, ccw, colt, departure, j frame, polymer, s&w, taurus


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My first Smith, trigger problem. Need advice. 10/23 Problem solved. ccjcc81 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 91 12-19-2015 07:09 PM
Rear sight blade problem-IGNORE, Problem Solved dnonac S&W-Smithing 0 05-09-2013 08:55 AM
New 422 mag problem ydennekb Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 4 11-05-2012 11:00 PM
Magazine Problem or Rifle Problem?? JackPineSavage Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22 9 04-02-2010 10:17 AM
is this a mag problem? 4506 problem 45calibre Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 7 12-05-2008 03:41 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:09 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)