|
|
09-15-2019, 01:42 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 469
Liked 2,087 Times in 731 Posts
|
|
Damn a Model 442
Shot mine today, with moderate .38 Special. Damn, did it kick. Enough so it turned me off for it as a carry gun. I've got better, much better carry OS (Oh S***) guns, and was disappointed at the recoil which at anything than belly range, would make follow up shots impossible. I'm not a good enough pistolero to deal with that punishing recoil.
I carried a model 38 for years as a last-ditch gun, but shot it very seldom. Can't remember recoil, but it's hard to remember pain. The 38 was a fine BUG, easily a pocket gun when I was toting a 1911.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-15-2019, 01:48 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Old Dominion
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 2,667
Liked 1,471 Times in 607 Posts
|
|
They're both Airweight J frame 38s. Doesn't seem like they would be very different. I've got a Bodyguard Airweight (pre-Model 38) and recoil is quite manageable.
__________________
SWCA 3563
10mm aficionado
|
09-15-2019, 02:17 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 469
Liked 2,087 Times in 731 Posts
|
|
You're right. The difference is I never fired the 38 airweight at more than 3 yards, if that. I can't remember firing it at all, but this was the SOP for BUGs so I must have. I may have fired it SA.
It's been a long time since I carried the 38, and memory fades. Back then, we were limited both by cost and by availability, on what was on the market. Lots of failure BUGs, not in serious situations, can't remember most of them, but the AMC Backup was one dramatic failure. Carried a .25 Jetfire back when that was the smallest pistol available, lots of cops did, then got the Smith 38. It was a PD gun, didn't cost me anything, but I had to turn it in eventually. A very handy confidence booster that would fit in my front pocket, a feeling of security in there, but I relied on my 1911 for all work and can't remember ever pulling the 38 but once, as a UC when a 1911 couldn't be carried. Surprising, how relatively easy it was to carry a 1911 in most situations back then.
Last edited by Gene L; 09-15-2019 at 02:19 AM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-15-2019, 04:53 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Davidson County, NC
Posts: 2,119
Likes: 7,824
Liked 4,140 Times in 1,416 Posts
|
|
Changing grips on my 442 turned it from “I hate firing this” to “Wish I’d brought another box”.
|
The Following 11 Users Like Post:
|
andyo5, gnystrom, HardToHandle, Jessie, JohnRippert, kaaskop49, lkabug, MJB, R*E, snubbyfan, wetdog1911 |
09-15-2019, 06:18 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 1,403
Likes: 1,354
Liked 3,197 Times in 900 Posts
|
|
I really disliked the one I had for the same reason and sold it. I went back to my 640 no dash and the additional weight made it much more pleasant to shoot As mentioned above I even changed the grips to all rubber but still couldn’t deal with it.
Last edited by .38SuperMan; 09-15-2019 at 06:28 AM.
|
09-15-2019, 07:27 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 1,291
Liked 2,291 Times in 778 Posts
|
|
Where I worked you had to qualify with your back up/off duty firearm the same as your duty handgun.
Carried a 642/442PC for the most of my career as a second handgun and had to work to be proficient with it, especially at the 25 yard line.
Yes it has a little sting but the trade off was well worth it.
Of course not knowing the OP's time frame of when he carried the Model 38, I still find it concerning that there was no further of a qualification than the 3 yard line. Ah the good old days.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-15-2019, 07:49 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Austin, AR
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 1,621
Liked 2,425 Times in 750 Posts
|
|
I'm sorry the 442 doesn't work for you. I've shot and carried my 642 for almost 20 years as an on-duty BUG and occasional off-duty carry. It takes some effort but they are far more capable than many give them credit for.
|
09-15-2019, 08:03 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: bootheel of Missouri
Posts: 16,895
Likes: 6,993
Liked 28,135 Times in 8,918 Posts
|
|
I've got a 442 in the rotation, and I'll agree, the felt recoil can be pretty stiff. I load mine with Hornady Critical Defense 110 grain, but I'll practice some with the old Yankee Gov't Speer 147 Grain +P+ stuff so I won't be taken aback by the Hornady recoil . . .
__________________
Wisdom comes thru fear . . .
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-15-2019, 08:06 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: PA
Posts: 14
Likes: 3
Liked 11 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Feed the Airweights wadcutters, much more managable.
YouTube
Last edited by crabshack; 09-15-2019 at 08:37 AM.
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-15-2019, 09:54 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 681
Likes: 7,902
Liked 924 Times in 416 Posts
|
|
I was kinda lucky in a sense, my very first J frame was a pristine M49 (the all steel version of your M38). I hadn't even owned a revolver in over 30 years, being a 1911 fan.
The second was a M442-1 after seeing the FFL's carry piece. The difference in weight was just under 8oz. THEN, I started watching vids of the various J frames being fired and quickly realized that those extra ounces in the all steel guns would make a world of difference with my "arthur" riddled hands, the very reason I had to put my 1911s aside.
I did get one more airweight, a M43C in .22lr, but also got 2 more .38spls, another M49 in nickel and a M60 in stainless and another .22lr, a M34, all with the 2" bbls and all steel.
Might be a bit heavier to tote, but I also shouldn't be limited to 1 or 2 cylinders for practice from recoil pain.
Rob
|
09-15-2019, 10:13 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 455
Likes: 168
Liked 433 Times in 166 Posts
|
|
Grips that fit make a big difference. I have a 2.5” 44 magnum 5 shooter that I shoot very well because the grips just fit my hand so well. I shoot that little Taurus better than many of my larger less powerful guns...because it fits.
Find grips that fit you.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-15-2019, 10:15 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 4,035
Likes: 3,246
Liked 3,863 Times in 1,968 Posts
|
|
They can certainly be a handful. I have a set of rubber Pachmayers on my 442 and while some folks ask why anyone would put a larger set on a small framed gun, it fits my hand well and it helps absorb recoil.
__________________
Some Might Say.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-15-2019, 10:31 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 11,956
Likes: 10,147
Liked 10,132 Times in 4,802 Posts
|
|
Gosh, I’m a self-acknowledged recoil sissy and a 442 doesn’t bother me. I’ll admit I shoot more wadcutters and light SWC handloads in all of my .38s than I do +P type stuff, but even when I do occasionally fire the hotter stuff for practice the shape of the 442 grip seems a little easier on me than that of a normal Chief’s Special. I use Hogue Bantams on the 442. I agree with others. Before you decommission the 442, try some different stocks.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-15-2019, 10:37 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Central Virginia
Posts: 178
Likes: 461
Liked 434 Times in 124 Posts
|
|
That's the main reason I bought a Ruger Sp101 stubby. The trigger pull isn't as nice as a Smith, but the recoil from +Ps is more manageable.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-15-2019, 11:18 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Demon-class planet
Posts: 7,403
Likes: 29,169
Liked 8,461 Times in 3,772 Posts
|
|
attn OP
Would a pair of weight-lifting gloves, for example, help with recoil on the range? I use them due to nerve damage in the web of my right hand. Or would limiting yourself to standard velocity service loads (SWC bullet preferred) do the trick? I would hate to give up what has become essentially THE gold standard in pocket/CCW revolvers.
I've previously mentioned a former poster who wrote of carrying a Model 37 Airweight with target wadcutter ammunition. He said WCs enabled him to make fast, accurate follow-up shots. This is not a person I would care to mug!
Kaaskop49
Shield #5103
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-15-2019, 12:38 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 469
Liked 2,087 Times in 731 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 326MOD10
Where I worked you had to qualify with your back up/off duty firearm the same as your duty handgun.
Carried a 642/442PC for the most of my career as a second handgun and had to work to be proficient with it, especially at the 25 yard line.
Yes it has a little sting but the trade off was well worth it.
Of course not knowing the OP's time frame of when he carried the Model 38, I still find it concerning that there was no further of a qualification than the 3 yard line. Ah the good old days.
|
There was no qualification course for BU weapons back in the early 80s where I worked. In fact, I don't think a BU was authorized, although most carried some kind. I may have shot it at 25, just don't remember.
|
09-15-2019, 12:51 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: The Flint Hills - Kansas
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 2,378
Liked 3,368 Times in 684 Posts
|
|
I bought a 642 back in 2010. Don't know if the new Airweights still come with those tiny boot grips or not. My hands are not overly large, but not small either. I do have very long fingers. Those boot grips gave me absolutely no place for my pinky finger. Standard loads were almost manageable, +P loads was worse than shooting one of my .44 mags.
I ended up getting Hogue Tamer grips for this gun. They made an amazing difference. Standard loads are now very easy to handle, and the +P, while very snappy, are manageable. The Tamer grips are larger in circumference and totally wrap around the grip frame. They also provide a good solid place for my pinky.
The downside is that they almost cancel the gun as a pocket gun. That doesn't really concern me, as I dislike pocket carry of any type of gun. Mine usually goes in a cross draw holster. Rarely, I will put it in a Nemesis pocket holster. It can work that way, but I still don't care for it.
For an additional $30, they would be worth a try.
__________________
SWCA 3297 SWHF 583
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-15-2019, 01:10 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Posts: 2,370
Likes: 497
Liked 943 Times in 518 Posts
|
|
I have a M340 with the Hogue Tamer grip. It still fits into my jeans pocket.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-15-2019, 01:36 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Northern California
Posts: 965
Likes: 1,023
Liked 1,281 Times in 407 Posts
|
|
Gene L,
If you are willing to try the 442 again, try shooting it with Federal 110grn
Hydra-Shock JHP Low-Recoil ammo.
It might make a difference.
__________________
Ken
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-15-2019, 01:56 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Denver area
Posts: 6,255
Likes: 20,296
Liked 13,124 Times in 4,180 Posts
|
|
The airweight j frames are the most difficult handguns to master, IMHO.
Rubber grips (or other over sized grips) help a great deal, but ruin their pocket carry-ability: the primary reason for these guns.
I’ve used M38’s in the pocket for almost 50 years using factory magnas with a Tyler T which makes standard velocity 158 gr swc ammo quite pleasant. 148 gr wc target ammo is also a great choice for sd and makes these guns a pleasure to shoot.
The mistake lots of folks make is insisting on using +p and/or the latest gee whiz ammo.
These folks have been hornswaggled by the ammo manufacturers and internet warriors into imagining that the $1 per shot stuff actually works in a tiny, light revolver.
|
09-15-2019, 02:08 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 469
Liked 2,087 Times in 731 Posts
|
|
The 442 came with big rubber grips. I'm sure they helped, but muzzle flip was considerable. I'll try the 110 gr. Hydra-shock bullets...I like everything on the gun except the recoil. Getting wimpish in my old age.
|
09-15-2019, 02:14 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 3,022
Likes: 17,488
Liked 9,257 Times in 2,274 Posts
|
|
I fired my 640-1 with full .357 loads once... once.
__________________
Isaiah 41:10
Last edited by SC_Mike; 09-15-2019 at 02:16 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-15-2019, 02:36 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Washington State
Posts: 7,477
Likes: 14,598
Liked 9,314 Times in 3,723 Posts
|
|
I have had light J frames. I dislike them, and find them worse to shoot with most ammo than my 296. They are also harder to shoot well than any other platform due to ergonomics. The only ammo I would seriously consider using in a light (or most any other) J frame is a good quality hard cast target wadcutter, or maybe standard velocity 158 grain SWC. What you want is a flat front and decent penetration.
FOR ME, even when unpleasant to shoot due to the ammo and configuration combination, I prefer a good quality small auto-pistol for deep concealment in circumstances in which appearing conspicuously unarmed is of value. I have a Glock 33 in a Kramer pocket holster that works well in both dress clothes and cargo pants. It is not even close to fun to shoot, but better than a light J. I put XS Big Dot sights on it, and I have qualified with it out to the 25.
My new Shield w/RDS is likely to be the new belt gun once tested, due to my vision. With a good holster (Dale Fricke) and belt, I should be good to go in most circumstances.
__________________
NHI, 10-8.
|
09-15-2019, 03:39 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 207
Likes: 216
Liked 138 Times in 76 Posts
|
|
Grips make all the difference. I have Pachmayer compact pro grips on my 442 and it tamed the little beast.
Pachmayr Compac Grips S&W J-Frame Round Butt Rubber Black
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-15-2019, 04:25 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 332
Liked 1,906 Times in 523 Posts
|
|
I got rid of my snubbie (S&W 638). Recoil and short sight radius were the main issues. I replaced it with a semi-auto Ruger Security 9 Compact. Longer sight radius, 10+1 and more power with less recoil. Add to that the price per round is much less.
Last edited by Backlighting; 09-15-2019 at 08:32 PM.
|
09-15-2019, 06:13 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Western Pennsylvania
Posts: 528
Likes: 767
Liked 1,173 Times in 279 Posts
|
|
This is the softest shooting combo I've found for my 442. Pachmayr Compac grips and Federal Micro HST .38+P. Feels like mild load .38s and grips help with muzzle flip. Downside is grips aren't the best for pocket carry.
__________________
M60 442 642 637 686 686+ 629
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-15-2019, 07:39 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: metro Phoenix
Posts: 3,196
Likes: 16,432
Liked 3,964 Times in 1,605 Posts
|
|
Just throwing a different philosophy in here...
Some guns are strictly "all other options have run out" guns. An Airweight revolver has the added title of "I'm too old to carry something heavier today" guns. I would shoot them once in a great while - or maybe even just once, to verify point of aim - and put it in the rotation box for appropriate occasions. Not gonna shoot it all the time, especially not every range trip. Heck, not even every year. (And that's the good part: leave a revolver in the box for a day or ten years, it's still gonna shoot.) As long as it's available for those times when it's the best option to be my last option. See what I'm sayin'? Thanks!
|
09-15-2019, 08:55 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Central VA
Posts: 2,535
Likes: 3,774
Liked 4,332 Times in 1,548 Posts
|
|
Seems to me that, as I age, recoil is becoming less manageable. Sure like my 63 and 617.
__________________
Foster Positivity.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|