I've been interested in a 4"-5" 45 ACP or so for some time now. I picked up a 25-9 8-3/8 in 45 Colt along the way, and I am somewhat familiar with the cylinder throat issues on older varieties. I like revolvers and I like the round. I've toyed with the idea of having a cylinder reamed for moon clips but I can't find a cylinder. S&W won't send one-they want to 'smith it onto the gun, which is one option, I guess. I prefer not to ship the gun and it adds to the cost. A 325 Thunder Ranch caught my eye at the lgs ($1225), then a 625-8 JM at another LGS ($915). Both have stout d/a triggers compared to my 25-9. In the process of looking into owners' experiences, it seems the accuracy is a bit hit-or-miss. This seems like a lot to pay for a gun that may not be all that accurate. I have been shooting Pythons for 20 years and I have been spoiled by the easily achieved one-hole accuracy. What is my best chance to pick up an accurate revolver? Am I better to have S&W fit a new cylinder to my 25-9 and then have it or the original one reamed for $150? While we are on the subject, does anyone use full or button-nose wadcutters in 45 Colt or 45 ACP with any success. I ask simply because they are available and I shoot DEWC in my 38 revolvers.

Try to find a nice, used, 625 Model of 1989. I have one with the more common 5" barrel and it is a tack driver. Others report similar findings. They can be found for less than the cost of the new guns you're looking at. Though you may have to be patient, in waiting for one to show up on the market. Owners tend to hold onto them (for good reason).

Will it have a particular dash number? EDIT-appears 625-3 was first version, said to be few made. I saw a 625-6 1989 4" listed on GP, and a 3" with dash not noted.

For trade in the classifides

http://smith-wessonforum.com/guns-sa...p-1-155-a.html

__________________
Take my advice Im not using it

I own and shoot a number of S&W 25's and 625's, in 45 LC and 45 acp. I have shot all of mine in my ransom rest and they will all shoot much tighter groups clamped into my ransom than I am capable of holding. I also shoot full wadcutters in my 45 colt, using a Mihec mould, that will throw a solid full wadcutter or a HBWC. I use a Saeco 225 gr WC for my 45 acp's. I size the acp's to .452 and the 45 colt's to .454. Photo's are of a batch I cast a couple of weeks ago, waiting to be sized and lubed.
Over a charge of Bullseye, they will cut a nice tight group of big full caliber holes.

Attached Images

	IMG_1038.JPG (131.7 KB, 174 views)
	IMG_1041.JPG (119.6 KB, 189 views)

They look like shiny little oil drums! How did you decide on .454 for the 45 colt?

That is what my particular S&W 25's 45 LC throats measure out at. 452's drop right through them, .454's will hang and need a nudge to clear. I am a big fan of full wadcutter's, I also throw the same bullet's in 44's, 41's and 38 / 357's. You are correct about them being " oil drums", you could write a note on the face of them. Or draw a .

loc n load, just a taper crimp on those?

__________________
Take my advice Im not using it

I don't know all of the dash numbers off hand. Mine is a -4 and I love it.

My 625-6 is a good shooter. Better than me. Here, I am holding the gun in my hands and resting the strong hand on a sandbag. My eyes are not so good, so I can't see the sight picture and the target clearly at the same time. On this target, I used prescription glasses so I could see the sights better, but the target is a fuzzy black blur.
Still, the vertical stringing suggests that the variation was my fault, not the gun's.
Years ago, I competed in bowling pin shooting with this gun and did quite well (until my eyes went to heck).

Attached Images

M625 ammo comparison 1.jpg (65.5 KB, 136 views)

Here is my one hole maker 625-2. Model of 1988. I highly recommend the -2 if you can find one.

Attached Images

20151022_205632 (Copy).jpg (51.6 KB, 64 views)

__________________
Dan
Ps 96 SWCA 2930 SWHF 524

I have a 625-4 that is the mirror image of the photo in post #9, except mine is far dirtier! The is a recent thread just on 625-4's about minor differences in hammers, triggers, & ect. These are Series of 1989 and every one shoots very well. I stated that mine is the most accurate revolver I have owned in 41 or 42 years. That is from over 50 S&W's and 250 others. I also have a 1917 Brazilian Contract revolver in 45 ACP that is a very fine shooter. I have noticed it prefers cast 230 RN to cast 185 SWC. The 625-4 likes every cast bullet it shoots. Prefered powders have been Bullseye and WW231. Ivan

Why is the revolver in 45acp so popular?
I hate the thought of moon clips. Why can't the properly headspace it from the rim like the 1911 does?

In most cases, the moon clips are a convenience for fast loading and unloading. The chambers do have edges for each round to heaadspace on. But the 45ACP has no rim for the extractor to grab. So without moon clips, you have to lift each empty case out with your fingernail. This is OK at the range. It would be a real problem in combat.

Here is my 625-8 PC with a target that I shot. Target was shot @ 50 feet one handed. 10 shots, 5 shots at a time. This revolver is more accurate that I am.

I have the S&W M325 TR 45acp. I find the gun to be very accurate. The moon clips are great. You load all the clips at home (13) and when you get to the range you are all set. You can load them at the range with the loader again. I will get some more moon clips so i don't have to load them at the range.

Short answer is: a slight roll crimp when seated almost flush.
These are long heavy bullets, the full WC weighing in at 283 gr.'s and the HBWC weighing in at 238 gr. When I first started loading these, I wanted to load with Bullseye, and I could not find any data for 45 colt wadcutter, for bullseye or otherwise.
So, I seated the wadcutters to the same depths as my 250 gr SWC's, dropped the same bullseye charge I use to duplicate 45 HB in my 45 acp's, seated the solid wadcutter to the same depth as my SWC's, roll crimped into a lube groove ( these were quite accurate loaded in this manner). After ascertaining that I wasn't going to have any pressure issues with that combination, I seated the wadcutter's almost fully and used a gentle roll crimp.
I have bumped up my bullseye charge a 1/2 grain from where I started and I run the solid 283 grer's at an avg of 810 fps, the HBWC at around 850 fps. Bullets, seated almost flush with a slight roll crimp.
These loads are very accurate, I have shot pepper poppers with them at 25 and 50 yds, and this big flat face bullet simply slams pepper poppers down. These are cast from WW's, so they are fairly hard.
A lot to be said for mass.

I got it, Im gonna buy a mold. Do you have a mold number for the two

__________________
Take my advice Im not using it

They need to design a umbrella type extractor that opens sideways as the extractor moves out.

I have a 625-6 Model of 1989 with a 5" barrel and a 625-8 JM Special with a 4" barrel. Either of them will shoot well under an inch at 25 yards from a rest.

My target load is a Mihec H&G #68 (200 gr. SWC) ahead of 4.0 grs. Of Bullseye or equivalent. This bullet can be driven to 1000 fps with an appropriate powder charge.

I use mostly auto rim cases but also use ACP cases with either steel or Rimz polymer full moon clips.

I have personally checked several other 625-8's and they all have perfect throats for .452 cast bullets.

Dale53

fired cases pretty much fall out of my 1917 when fired without moon clips...

__________________
Robert
SWCA #2906, SWHF #760

I am sorry to hear about your eyes. Is it anything a Merit optical aid might help? I use mine to make my red dots crisp. (no grape clusters) It is a great aid in keeping my iron sights clear.

I'm guessing you haven't shot one. Maybe if you give up your zipcode, someone here will let you shoot theirs.

I have to give you a thumbs up for your signature. And I want to thank all the posters for the great flow of information. It is enlightening.

Attached Images

enlightenment.jpg (5.1 KB, 79 views)

I searched for a model of 1988 or 1989 and had no luck at a price I was willing to spend... found a five inch non-JM 625-8 and it is far more accurate than I am...

I have not been looking hard, but a new 625-8 JM can be had a bit over $800. The 325 about $1050. I'll keep an eye out for an older one cheaper then the 625-8 JM.

Both my 325sc and 1917 have demonstrated great accuracy.

Try some RIMZ poly moon clips. No tools needed for loading or unloading. Since my 625JM is a range gun, that is what I prefer. I do have metal clips, and a de-mooner tool though. Bob

+1 for RIMZ Poly moon clips. I only use the steel and demooner for my self defense loads. All my target ball ammo I use the poly moon clips and they are amazing.

__________________
I am what I am.

Groo here
With moonclip loaders and bulk clips from Ranch Products
it is easy to load all your ammo at home and pickup all the brass to take
back.

I picked up a 625-4 Model of 1989 yesterday. One of my bucket list guns. YAY!!

I have a 5" model 625 that I used to shoot in IDPA before they went down to 4" maximum. It may be the most accurate handgun I own. It is way more accurate than I can hold.

Because God gave us 45 AR cartridges to work with. Easy to keep separate and friends with 1911's won't shoot them up on you.

What, no pictures? Bob

Shot my 625 JM yesterday and very happy with the accuracy. No reloads, factory 230 gr ball. Kicked like a mule. Terry had his 25-2 forever and never used moon clips, just tilts it and the cases fall out. Larry

A local SW PA member has graciously invited me to his club to shoot his 625 (and perhaps something else). He also was kind enough to point out a LGS with a 625 on the shelf. Thanks Mark. Notably, nobody has mentioned the idea of converting the 25-9 to 45 ACP. The consensus is "buy a gun". I get it. Bananaman and Otreb have mentioned the 325 TR. I'm interested in comments on recoil with standard target loadings. What would that be-800-850 fps? I load 200g for my 1911.

Groo here I have a "few" the 25/325/625 revolver is most accurate,
easy to feed, and except for 38spec more is known about loads then
any round.

[QUOTE=Ivan the Butcher;138964031]I have a 625-4 that is the mirror image of the photo in post #9, except mine is far dirtier!

I love that model and it is what I'm currently looking for, 625 4" but whats up with the matte finish? it does seem to stay dirty with the black powder stains, does it ever come back to factory look once is cleaned? Stains don't seem to stick to Chrome right?

pittpa,

I have the M325TR and do not find the recoil that bad even with hot loads. It's more comfortable that a M-686 with factory 158 grain 357 loads. With USGI hardball, it's just fun to shoot and with revolver only loads, recoil is stiff but nothing like shooting 357's in a J frame!

I had purchased a 625-8 4" JM, I like revolvers so getting one in 45acp was a nice side to my 1911. I sold my 625-8, I eventually regretted that move. Recently I got lucky and picked up a wonderful 625-4 in 5" Model of 1989 with case colored trigger and hammer, not all are like this though with the case coloring.
I prefer the sight radius of the 5" barrel, helpful for my eyes and I do use a Merit Optical aid to overcome the inconvenience of trifocals. The Merit Optical has been a wonderful tool for me to see my front sight and increase the sharpness of the target, great product!

I don't think accuracy has ever been an issue with the 625's, they all seem to shoot excellent in 3" 4" and 5" models.

I shoot a lot of 200gr Extreme plated SWC's out of it, great combo for my gun/powders. Oh, it's really nice not to have to chase brass too
Get one, you will be glad you did!
Karl

I was able to shoot 2 625, one 45 colt and one 45 ACP, as well as a 627 and a custom 327 mag on a blue K Frame 357 platform. These guns all were obviously capable of one-hole accuracy; we were shooting them offhand at 53'. I've no doubt what they would do benched. Mark told me that he uses only Titegroup. He did a fine job smoothing the internal components and put in some trigger rebound springs, and the actions were all excellent. As soon as you pulled the hammer back you could just tell, it was so smooth. I'm sold on these N frame 45 ACP, or any 4" N frame for that matter. Luckily I'm in no hurry, as I've managed to get my 25-9 shooting tight.