The S&W Model 24 .44 Special Revolvers...

Joined
Jan 24, 2007
Messages
10,358
Reaction score
51,940
Location
Arizona
As usual, this is a draft of a future article that I'd like to run by you. Comments welcome.

John

The S&W Model 24 .44 Special Revolvers

SampW_MODELS_24-1280_zpsvpbsizop.jpg


For those who know me, it’s no secret that I’m a great fan of the .44 Special cartridge, and for many of the revolvers that have chambered it over the years. The .44 Special is intrinsically accurate, easy to reload to virtually any power level, and with factory ammunition, way easier on the hand than its .44 Magnum offspring. It allows lighter handguns than are needed for the Magnum. Since 1955, .44 Magnum revolvers have become popular not only for their power, but also because they can also handle the older and milder .44 Special. For guys and gals in my age bracket, it’s not unusual for us to shoot more Specials than Magnums in those guns to protect aging wrists and elbows. But one then has to put up with guns made more robust and heavier than are really needed. And so, the lighter guns for the .44 Special have become rarer – and more sought after!

Some history is in order here. The .44 Smith & Wesson Special cartridge came into being in September, 1907. It was simply a slightly elongated version of the older .44 Russian, designed to hold more powder. But inexplicably, the ammunition companies kept the newer cartridge loaded to the same specifications as the older one – a disappointment for many who saw the potential of the Special. Reloaders, on the other hand, found that the Special could be souped-up to impressive power levels, and still fired with relative safety. It was discovered that a 250-grain cast semiwadcutter bullet could be propelled at maximum velocities hovering around 1200 feet per second. In the middle 1930s, the new .357 Magnum was heralded as the most powerful handgun cartridge. Not true by quite a margin for reloaders, who showed that a specially-loaded .44 Special could have not only higher energy, but an edge in accuracy as well. A group of .44 Special reloaders called themselves the “.44 associates” in the 1930s, swapping loading data and routinely referring to the vaunted .357 Magnum in derogatory terms!

When the .44 Magnum cartridge was introduced in 1955, it turned out that it had only a slightly-lengthened .44 Special case. The purpose of that was not to allow greater powder capacity, but simply to keep .44 Magnums from being inserted into older .44 Special chambers. For most folks, the factory-loaded .44 Magnum has way more power and recoil than is needed, and the revolvers chambered for it are unnecessarily bulky and heavy. Like Goldilocks, they will often find that .44 Special guns are “just right.”

The first Smith & Wesson revolver chambered for the .44 Special came out in 1907 as the New Century Triple Lock. Today it’s a prime collector’s item – hard to find and very expensive. Elmer Keith, legendary gun writer, worked up some heavy .44 Special loads for use in this handgun, but damaged it doing so. He later warned not to use his loads in the early guns that lacked proper cylinder heat treating. The Triple Lock’s successor was the Second Model Hand Ejector. It lacked an ejector rod shroud and the third cylinder lock. It’s also nearly extinct and practically unobtainable today. A 1926 model with an ejector rod shroud was made from that year up until World War II, and manufacture of it then resumed from 1946 to 1948. In 1950, the “1950 Target Model .44” was offered. It was considered the finest of all the .44 Special S&W revolvers up to that time. It had a newer short-cocking action, and sported a tapered 6.5” barrel with a target-style Patridge front sight to go with the great post-war micrometer rear sight. A few were made with 4” barrels that were equipped with ramped (Baughman) front sights. A few specially-made 5” barreled guns have been noticed. All of these guns had ejector rod shrouds.

When S&W assigned model numbers to all of their handguns in 1957, these revolvers became the Model 24. There was a Model 21 with fixed sights and shrouded ejector rod, previously known as the Model of 1950 .44 Military. These were offered from 1950 to 1966 with about 1,200 made.

Unfortunately, with the dominance of the Model 29 .44 Magnum and the need for large N-frames to produce the .357 Magnum Models 27 and 28, the Model 24 got short shrift in both demand and production. It was discontinued in 1966, to the dismay of those who prized it. In that year, this fine revolver’s final price was $95. In 1982, collectors and shooters were paying in the range of $600 to $800 when they occasionally found one or more in excellent condition. Gunsmiths were converting .357 Magnum Model 27s and Model 28s to .44 Specials to meet demand. A number of gun writers, including Skeeter Skelton (whose writings I treasure), were pressuring S&W to re-introduce the Model 24. And then Smith and Wesson responded!

In 1983, S&W began to manufacture the “Model 24-3 1950 Target” revolvers. These were nearly identical to the original Model 24, but incorporated a non-pinned barrel, a 3-screw sideplate and eliminated the screw in front of the trigger guard. In 1983 and 1984, 2,625 were manufactured with 4” barrels and 4,875 with 6.5” barrels. Front sights on each were the same as the originals. The introductory price was $391. The revolvers pictured here show these two main variations. The top one with the 6.5” barrel was shipped in April 1984, and the lower one with the 4” barrel left the factory in March of the same year. Smith & Wesson also included original parts sheets for the Model 1950 Target in the boxes with each of these guns. Interestingly, some of the first guns made were crafted with available Model 29 frames and older Model 24 barrels. The first 100 of the new “dash 3” handguns made were factory engraved and had smooth walnut stocks. Twenty-five of these were nickel finished and engraved.

A 3”-barreled variation of the 24-3 was made for Lew Horton Distributors in 1984 and 1985. These had round butts, smooth “combat” stocks, red-ramp front sights and white outline rear sights. It’s been reported that 5,000 of these were made, 1,000 of which were provided with black holsters. Some commemorative .44 Special revolvers were made as the “Through the line” variation of the “Twelve Revolvers” series. These were designated as the 24-4 models. In 2001, a 4-screw-frame Performance Center Heritage Series model became the Model 24-5. In 2006, 250 3”-barreled guns were made in blue and the same number in nickel for Lew Horton Distributors. These Model 24-6s had square butts with diamond-checkered regular magna rosewood stocks.

A “Thunder Ranch” Model 21 with a 4” barrel also appeared in 2006. Stainless steel revolvers designated as the Model 624 were produced from 1985 to 1988 as the “Model of 1985 Target Stainless.” Both 4” and 6.5”-barreled variations were made. Five thousand 3”-barreled stainless round-butt 624s were specially manufactured for Lew Horton Distributors.

Alas, no current .44 Specials are being made at Smith & Wesson. While many consider the .44 Special to be obsolete, a dedicated cadre of aficionados still hunger for and occasionally find long-sought-after revolvers that chamber this round. As before in the early 1980s, asking prices are continuing to rise for these quality revolvers, and are usually, if grudgingly, paid.

Today, all of the wonderful S&W .44 Specials continue to be in high demand with shooters and collectors. Pre-owned Model 24s, in particular, continue to be snapped up at gun shows and dealers whenever they come on the market. They have been proved to be a highly desirable combination of accuracy, comfortable weight and extensive range of power. Classics all.

(c) 2016 JLM
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
Have you ever considered writing for a hobby? :D That was an excellent write up of the 44 spl history. Makes me wanna go buy another one. There were 250 each blued and nickel 24-6 models made in 2006 for Lew Horton Dist. I'm lucky enough to own one of the blued models.


 
Last edited:
Have you ever considered writing for a hobby? :D That was an excellent write up of the 44 spl history. Makes me wanna go buy another one. There were 250 each blued and nickel 24-6 models made in 2006 for Lew Horton Dist. I'm lucky enough to own one of the blued models.

Thanks for the info and the pictures! You evidently have a pretty rare gun there, and in great shape, too. I put that info in the OP.

John
 
John:

As usual, a great article!! I only have one 44 special, a second model, without the ejector rod shroud, and believe it or not, was my first Smith and Wesson!! A gift from my then wife back in about 1972. It's kind of rough, but she had seen me admiring it at my favorite gun store. She managed to squirrel away the necessary $80.00 and I found it under the Christmas tree. One of the few times I've really been surprised. Someone had modified the front sight, and it has a little bore pitting, and some surface rust, but is really a sweet shooting gun.

Best Regards, Les
 
John:

As usual, a great article!! I only have one 44 special, a second model, without the ejector rod shroud, and believe it or not, was my first Smith and Wesson!! A gift from my then wife back in about 1972. It's kind of rough, but she had seen me admiring it at my favorite gun store. She managed to squirrel away the necessary $80.00 and I found it under the Christmas tree. One of the few times I've really been surprised. Someone had modified the front sight, and it has a little bore pitting, and some surface rust, but is really a sweet shooting gun.

Best Regards, Les

Les.b, how about a few pictures, please?
 
I purchased the last S&W m24 6 1/2" barrel, in the nickel finish, with the loc my dealer had. Why I purchased a 44 special revolver I don't have a clue. I was volnerable at the moment and the nickel blinded me, I lost control at this m24 being the last brand new one. But my quest for nickel S&W n frame revolvers continues. Missing a few. The n frames in nickel with a 6" barrel and 6 1/2" barrel gets my juices flowing.
 
Last edited:
I know from your prior article previews "Comments welcome." means you welcome nit picking, so here goes. While Elmer did some energetic load development in a Tripple Lock he damaged the revolver doing so. He wrote his loads should not be used in early N frames that do not have heat treated cylinders. Remember, the first heat treating of S&W cylinders was done to 1917s at the insistence of the army. Even modern heat treated cylinders are the weak link in the chain. S&W cylinders permanently distort at lower pressure than any other part.

Near the end it begs for briefly mentioning that four .44 Special L frame models were made but did not last long. In their enthusiastic .44 Special articles gun writers rarely if ever mentioned that S&Ws chambered for the cartridge NEVER did sell well. I own 4 so you can't blame me for it but the fact is the total number of .44 Specials S&W made is minute compared to the number of .38s and .357s they've sold. Their relative scarcity is a big part of their appeal to collectors and reloaders.

Nit picking aside, over all it's a great article!
 
I know from your prior article previews "Comments welcome." means you welcome nit picking, so here goes. While Elmer did some energetic load development in a Tripple Lock he damaged the revolver doing so. He wrote his loads should not be used in early N frames that do not have heat treated cylinders. Remember, the first heat treating of S&W cylinders was done to 1917s at the insistence of the army. Even modern heat treated cylinders are the weak link in the chain. S&W cylinders permanently distort at lower pressure than any other part.

Near the end it begs for briefly mentioning that four .44 Special L frame models were made but did not last long. In their enthusiastic .44 Special articles gun writers rarely if ever mentioned that S&Ws chambered for the cartridge NEVER did sell well. I own 4 so you can't blame me for it but the fact is the total number of .44 Specials S&W made is minute compared to the number of .38s and .357s they've sold. Their relative scarcity is a big part of their appeal to collectors and reloaders.

Nit picking aside, over all it's a great article!

Good info here on Keith's experimenting with heavy loads in the early triple locks. I'm mentioning that in the OP. As for the L-frames, my space limitations preclude that side info - I'll have to stick to the Model 24-related N-frames. The overwhelming numbers of .38 and .357 sales are well known, and probably go without saying - also would drive me over my space limitations.

I appreciate the info - nit-picking is just fine!

John
 
John, Excellent article. I have a Thunder Ranch 44 Spl. and love it. Might want to mention that particular choice for Thunder Ranch. They sure respected that cartridge and that is not distant history. Be well.
 
Since you've squeezed in the Thunder Ranch Model 21 you may as well mention its predecessor, the Model 1950 Military and Police .44 Special. The SCSW writes approximately 1,200 were made with possibly fewer than 20 model number marked revolvers manufactured 1958-1963! Apparently M&P .44 Specials lingered in S&W's vault. Model 21s were not dropped from the catalog until 1966. Obviously the big city PDs were not buyers. They are expensive collector revolvers.
 
Since you've squeezed in the Thunder Ranch Model 21 you may as well mention its predecessor, the Model 1950 Military and Police .44 Special. The SCSW writes approximately 1,200 were made with possibly fewer than 20 model number marked revolvers manufactured 1958-1963! Apparently M&P .44 Specials lingered in S&W's vault. Model 21s were not dropped from the catalog until 1966. Obviously the big city PDs were not buyers. They are expensive collector revolvers.

Thanks for the reminder. That was actually the the Model 1950 .44 Military, which became the Model 21 in 1957. I crammed that item into the text, which will probably make my editor upset that I blew the word count so badly on this one!

John
 
Nice article! There's something about the Model 24 that's "just right." I have a 3", 4" and a 6 1/2" The 3" is the result of a Guns and Ammo article which spurred me into buying one. I just had to have it! I bought the 4" and 6 1/2" since I liked the 3" so well. I remember thinking the 4" and 6 1/2" should be kept unfired. I figured they'd be collectors' items one day. The heck with my heirs; I wasted no time is shooting them! I've had over 30 years of enjoyment from them. So what if they're "used." I'll not sell them. Ever.
 
Back
Top