Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 02-06-2017, 09:01 PM
rwt1405's Avatar
rwt1405 rwt1405 is offline
SWCA Member
Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation  
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,305
Likes: 14,958
Liked 2,549 Times in 1,145 Posts
Default

I think you made a great choice!

I wish you good luck with it!
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 02-07-2017, 11:39 AM
GCF GCF is offline
Member
Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Posts: 967
Likes: 217
Liked 609 Times in 246 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertoDeNuevoMexico View Post
... I went with a Model 60 Pro 3" barrel.

I'm looking for a good OWB open carry holster with a thumb break and possibly covered trigger guard, if anybody knows of a good one.

At the range (actually an arroyo out on BLM land) the Model 60 3" is surprisingly accurate. Shooting .38 Specials was a breeze. Then .38 Spl +p had slightly more kick but very manageable. But shooting .357 magnums on a chilly day, no gloves, was downright uncomfortable, especially with these factory wooden grips. Don't get me wrong, the wood grips looks nice, but don't do much to soften the jolt. For now I'm going to hike loaded with .38 Spl +Ps while the bears are still hibernating, but I'm thinking about changing the grips. I'm considering the S&W synthetic J-Frame grips that they put on some of their J-frames at the factory, and also the Hogue and Pachmyr, so if you have any recommendations, please fire away.

Thanks again.
Nice choice on the M60.

You might check out Andrews Custom Leather. I use his suede lined "Saddle Style" belt rigs, for my 2 1/8" M640-1, & my 3" M65-3. Very innovative design, & top notch construction. Mine are both adjustable tension hold, but he does offer thumb break. Conceals well, very secure, & fast presentation. Hands down, the most comfortable OWB holsters, that I own.

Andrews Custom Leather

Magnum J frame grips? For belt holster carry, I really like the Hogue Centennial Tamers (1 pic attached) - on my M640. Ergonomically superior - to the extreme! Only problem, I'm thinking they may NOT work w/ an exposed hammer.

Come to think about it, I've got a set of grips (2 pics attached) that came w/ my 640. They are marked j frame / round butt. Not sure of the manufacturer, but the previous owner said they were Italian (Sile maybe?), & that he put them on to shoot magnums. Solid grips, in good shape - & extras for me. PM if interested.

A lot of guys make disparaging comments about Pachmayr's, but if you can find an older set (better quality I think) that fit your revolver, I'm pretty sure they will soak up the sting - from those magnum loads.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 640-1.13.jpg (266.2 KB, 21 views)
File Type: jpg 640-1.01.jpg (79.3 KB, 21 views)
File Type: jpg 640-1.02.jpg (68.9 KB, 20 views)
__________________
Regards - GCF

Last edited by GCF; 02-07-2017 at 12:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 02-07-2017, 11:40 AM
Lobster Picnic Lobster Picnic is offline
Member
Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation  
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 383
Liked 988 Times in 535 Posts
Default

Uncle Mikes Combat grips are thought to be among the best J-frame grips for shooting comfort. They used to come standard on the 3" Model 60. The current S&W synthetic grips are similar but a little stickier than the Uncle Mikes.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 02-07-2017, 12:05 PM
Neumann Neumann is offline
Member
Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation  
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 30
Liked 700 Times in 392 Posts
Default

I think you would want a big bore for potential defense against bears of any size. That distills down to .44 Magnum. Hopefully you can compromise on weight and barrel length.

My recommendation would be a 329 PD. With a 4" barrel, scandium frame and titanium cylinder, it weighs 25 oz. It is not a gun you would use a lot on the range - the recoil is brutal with magnum loads. In a crisis, however, you may get only one shot, and .44 Magnum is more likely to count. If the threat level is low, you can shoot .44 Special all day and still write your name without assistance.

The good thing is the 329PD is not rare. You can even find them, used, almost like new, for reasons which the foregoing paragraph should make clear.

I carry a 3" 629 in those environments, which weighs 44 oz. The 329PD feels like a toy by comparison. I am not an "extreme" hiker, and above 10,000 feet I move as little as possible and stay hydrated. However I carry what makes me feel comfortable, including a 20# camera kit.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #55  
Old 02-07-2017, 01:39 PM
PR24's Avatar
PR24 PR24 is offline
Member
Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation  
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Sunny AZ
Posts: 603
Likes: 185
Liked 693 Times in 292 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Edmo View Post
If you are looking for a lightweight 3" revolver chambered in 38 Special +P, I'll echo several posters above and recommend the Ruger LCRx 3".

I know this is a S&W forum, but they quit making a lightweight 3" revolver around 2000. The Ruger is currently available in stores. It doesn't have the aesthetic lines of a S&W, but it can be had for under $500.

I bought mine to fill the same requirements as the OP... I wanted a lightweight "kit" gun for backpacking.

Lightweight (15.7 oz); 3" barrel gives a longer sight radius and increased velocity over a snubbie; good adjustable sights allow you to accurately aim the gun and adjust them to a variety of loads; and 38+P is powerful enough to protect the OP against the threats in his woods and can take small game if needed.

Maybe S&W will bring back their 337 someday, however until then Ruger is the only one making a gun to these specs.

On Edit: Ruger has a lightweight leather Mitch Rosen belt holster for this revolver. Recommended...

Edmo

Agreed don't spend time and money chasing down out of production models. The 3 inch Ruger LCR is a fine choice. Likewise, you can get many different aftermarket front sights that are user changeable. As one poster said the biggest threat you're likely going to face is a zombie tweeker or angry mutt over some of the native residents. Unless you are carrying something big bore then bear spray is a better option for the larger carnivores. Keep the gun for the smaller threats. I know that ounces equal pounds and pounds equal pain when hiking but you do have to have a shootable gun. Take a look at Hillpeople Gear chest pouches. They are a great way to carry a firearm up on your chest; concealed & off your waist. Its separate from your backpack.

Last edited by PR24; 02-07-2017 at 01:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 02-07-2017, 02:00 PM
Triggernosis Triggernosis is offline
Member
Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation  
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wilson, NC
Posts: 1,288
Likes: 464
Liked 823 Times in 375 Posts
Default

Guys, did you read? He's already made his choice - a 3" stainless Model 60.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 02-07-2017, 02:03 PM
Triggernosis Triggernosis is offline
Member
Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation  
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wilson, NC
Posts: 1,288
Likes: 464
Liked 823 Times in 375 Posts
Default

Roberto,
For OWB carry I'm a fan of off-the-shelf Bianchi holsters, either a Shadow or 5BH - both with thumb-breaks.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 02-09-2017, 02:31 AM
Bat Guano Bat Guano is offline
Member
Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation  
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 3,259
Likes: 1,224
Liked 2,526 Times in 1,043 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Star View Post
Makes a lot of sense, and I love my M-66-3 four-inch. But this guy specifically wants a small, light .38, & he is walking, carrying a heavy load, and wants minimum weight.
That Model 19 is awfully good. I have had both the 60-4 and the .357 version (60-10?), in that order. I got some ridiculously high velocities out of that .357 J frame (1350 with 125 gr. JHPs in a 3" barrel!) but could never get a decent DA on it. Recoil was stout but tolerable with the rubber banana stocks. Went back to the .38 Special 60-4 which had a very nice DA pull.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 02-09-2017, 04:05 PM
photoman's Avatar
photoman photoman is offline
Member
Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation Lightweight 3" revolver recommendation  
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Great State of Texas
Posts: 5,057
Likes: 524
Liked 1,909 Times in 788 Posts
Default

The 3" Model 60 in .357 Magnum is a fine gun, but as you've already discovered, they are mostly unusable in .357 Magnum and the wood grips are not very practical.

My recommendation is a day late and a dollar short but the Ruger LCRx 3" would've been a much better purchase. The factory grips are excellent and no need in paying for a Magnum when you will be using .38 Specials anyway.

Grab A Gun has them for $379.
__________________
Centennial Every Day
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 02-09-2017, 05:37 PM
Farmer17 Farmer17 is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 5,228
Likes: 1,138
Liked 6,634 Times in 2,469 Posts
Default

Man, those Ruger polymer revolvers may be good but they are sure butt ugly. A .40 S&W Shield might be what I would pick under the above stated circumstances.

Last edited by Farmer17; 02-09-2017 at 05:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
j frame, kit gun, revolver


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
REVOLVER, LIGHTWEIGHT, M13 NOTREDAME S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 6 02-10-2013 09:01 PM
Any info on old M13 Lightweight Revolver Furee65 S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 9 03-13-2012 03:48 PM
Revolver, Lightweight, M13 Ltlbear S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 12 03-11-2012 10:03 PM
Help - lightweight revolver M13 k3v1nm S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 15 07-30-2011 05:06 AM
FS - Revolver Lightweight M13 k3v1nm GUNS - For Sale or Trade 1 12-02-2010 01:22 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:22 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)