Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-04-2018, 08:53 AM
Cal44 Cal44 is offline
Member
43C Durability 43C Durability 43C Durability 43C Durability 43C Durability  
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Northern California
Posts: 3,580
Likes: 5,504
Liked 6,439 Times in 1,869 Posts
Default 43C Durability

Curious about the durability of the Aluminum cylinder.

I know Smith has offered Al cylinders in the past without success.

Did they get it right this time?

I'd use the gun to practice and improve trigger control on light weight revolvers.

So I'll shoot it quite a bit and don't want to wear it out.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-04-2018, 09:14 AM
Zipdog Zipdog is offline
Member
43C Durability 43C Durability 43C Durability 43C Durability 43C Durability  
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 983
Likes: 1,236
Liked 987 Times in 404 Posts
Default

It shoots 22 LR right? The cylinder could be made of pot metal and would hold up. Nothing to worry about except the price people are asking for the 43C.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-04-2018, 09:36 AM
Pisgah Pisgah is offline
Member
43C Durability  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 3,458
Likes: 38
Liked 5,455 Times in 1,771 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zipdog View Post
It shoots 22 LR right? The cylinder could be made of pot metal and would hold up. Nothing to worry about except the price people are asking for the 43C.
Well, since the .22 LR has a chamber pressure of 24,000 psi, substantially higher than the .38 Special at 17,000 psi, I don't think it's necessarily nothing to worry about. I know, S&W would not use the aluminum cylinder if they didn't think it was sufficient; then again, they do things like use scandium and aluminum frames, which supposedly are 100% up to the job -- and yet they have to put the cheesy little "blast shield" over the barrel-cylinder gap so the frame won't erode, which indicates to me that compromises are tolerated when ultra-light weight is the objective. While their lightweight revolvers are tough little beasts, they can't hold a candle to the all-steel versions when it comes to sheer durability.
__________________
Pisgah
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
29 durability mjack S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 5 03-05-2015 01:22 AM
Durability of a 642 skrazo S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 10 01-23-2014 06:43 PM
SD 40's durability? BlackRanger Smith & Wesson SD & Sigma Pistols 5 02-18-2012 10:46 PM
317 durability? rbstern S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 4 11-12-2011 05:49 PM
M&P Durability BUSHPILOT267 Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols 9 09-21-2009 09:44 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:48 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)