|
|
01-24-2020, 01:33 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sacramento, California
Posts: 471
Likes: 988
Liked 1,390 Times in 161 Posts
|
|
Another Smolt...
My latest project; just picked it up from my smith today. A 6" Smolt built on a 66-2:
And a pic with the rest of the family, a blued 4" Smolt and 4" stainless Couger:
|
The Following 37 Users Like Post:
|
22hipower, 29aholic, 9mmsubgun-m11, AzShooter, CajunBass, colt_saa, Delta Rose, Fishinfool, fleabus101, Frank46, gdogs, GeoJelly, gumpys, joeymfd, JohnRippert, K Frame Keith, krsmith58, LPD256, medic15al, Mike, SC Hunter, muddocktor, Nathan510, Nedroe, Nightowl, OldChief, Old_Cop, Papaw, Protocall_Design, robertrwalsh, series guy, Sevens, stansdds, t4terrific, Thin Man, walkinghorse, WC145, wood714 |
01-24-2020, 04:47 AM
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,361
Likes: 24,260
Liked 16,157 Times in 7,409 Posts
|
|
Do they really shoot any better than with original barrels?
I owned two Pythons that were very accurate, but no more so than my M-27 and M-28 Smiths.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-24-2020, 05:37 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 573
Liked 631 Times in 300 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Star
Do they really shoot any better than with original barrels?
I owned two Pythons that were very accurate, but no more so than my M-27 and M-28 Smiths.
|
Ditto was just hype back when someone decided to put the two together. I owned one and have plenty of prelock performance center guns that outshoot my smython and even few 27s and early 19 no dash. Don't get me wrong cool and all but was just hype. Anyways OP you have several nice ones there definitely digging that blued 4 inch.
Eric
Sent from my LG-H910 using Tapatalk
Last edited by gumpys; 01-24-2020 at 07:27 AM.
Reason: 9
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-24-2020, 07:13 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: WV
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 412
Liked 2,863 Times in 1,271 Posts
|
|
Double ditto ( if there is such a thing). I’m not bashing your gun in anyway. I think it’s very neat. It’s just the Pythons I’ve owned didn’t seem any more accurate on average than the S&W’s I’ve had.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-24-2020, 07:20 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Illinois
Posts: 240
Likes: 802
Liked 510 Times in 155 Posts
|
|
Why? I don’t get it.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-24-2020, 07:37 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: A Burb of the Burgh
Posts: 14,812
Likes: 1,701
Liked 19,932 Times in 8,811 Posts
|
|
That 4" Blue gun is SWEEEeeeeeeet!!!!!!!!!!
Back in the day ..... "the word was" that the Python bore had a slight tapper... which improved it's accuracy. Besides; pre-Lframes it looks so cool
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-24-2020, 10:26 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Idaho
Posts: 675
Likes: 963
Liked 802 Times in 267 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BAM-BAM
That 4" Blue gun is SWEEEeeeeeeet!!!!!!!!!!
Back in the day ..... "the word was" that the Python bore had a slight tapper... which improved it's accuracy.
|
As well as a faster twist.
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-24-2020, 11:09 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Pike County PA
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 1,778
Liked 2,037 Times in 650 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Struckat
Why? I don’t get it.
|
Two valid reasons jump to mind:
1. He wanted to
2. They're beautiful
|
The Following 9 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-24-2020, 08:35 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Illinois
Posts: 240
Likes: 802
Liked 510 Times in 155 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by K Frame Keith
Two valid reasons jump to mind:
1. He wanted to
2. They're beautiful
|
Thanks, but Green Frog answered a little more effectively.
|
01-24-2020, 09:52 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Central VA
Posts: 8,685
Likes: 1,583
Liked 9,478 Times in 4,248 Posts
|
|
Prior to the arrival of the 586/686 the only way to get a heavy barrel on your competition gun (think PPC, Bianchi Cup, & Bowling Pin Revolver Matches) was to use a custom barrel or do a semi-custom installation of a Colt Python barrel with full under lug and vent rib. That seems to have been the impetus for introducing the under lugged barrels into the S&W lines, but while competitive shooters were waiting for that to happen...
Current trends in competition have emphasized the use of bottom feeders, but that doesn’t make these heavy barreled custom revolvers any less cool, just perhaps a little less current.
Froggie
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-24-2020, 10:32 AM
|
Vendor
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Kansas City area
Posts: 6,230
Likes: 55,446
Liked 13,734 Times in 4,323 Posts
|
|
It's the best of both worlds. The vent rib barrel on a Smith action.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-24-2020, 11:02 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Black Hills
Posts: 3,057
Likes: 17,225
Liked 10,147 Times in 2,106 Posts
|
|
I concur with Protocall, best of both worlds.
Especially the 4"!
I had a 6" Python for years, did not like the Colt DA, trigger staging, and the 6" barrel did not balance for me, but the SA was nice.
Nice collection! 🙂
__________________
Wherever my mind isn't
Jim
|
01-24-2020, 11:09 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Black Hills
Posts: 3,057
Likes: 17,225
Liked 10,147 Times in 2,106 Posts
|
|
On the conversion is the Python barrel required to be flattened In the frame as it is done on a factory 66?
__________________
Wherever my mind isn't
Jim
|
01-24-2020, 11:15 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cedaredge Co.
Posts: 2,307
Likes: 11
Liked 2,783 Times in 991 Posts
|
|
Very nice but I want a 5" Pre 27.
|
01-24-2020, 11:58 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 2,637
Liked 1,588 Times in 713 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marshal tom
Very nice but I want a 5" Pre 27.
|
I’d rather have a 5” pre 27 also.
__________________
Pine_Worker
Ex-LEO, NRA Life
|
01-24-2020, 02:10 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sacramento, California
Posts: 471
Likes: 988
Liked 1,390 Times in 161 Posts
|
|
I get it, these aren't for everyone. But personally, I love 'em. I have a couple of 27s, a 5" and 8 3/8", and a 4" 28 and they all shoot great. But for me, in my hands, the Smolt is a much better shooter. I get the smooth tunable action of the K frame with the weight, tighter and faster twist of the Python barrel. The balance is also perfect for me. I've had Pythons over the years and other than the looks, never really cared for them (I had one that went out of time after the first cylinder of ammo, that was the last one I owned!). The 4" gun was built on a 2" Model 15 that I bought back in 1981. Didn't get the 2" barrel with a square butt thing and the balance was weird (for me), so I never shot. Had the Smolt conversion done with a super tune about 15 years ago, and it's now the most accurate revolver I've ever shot. I know some think I'm desecrating an S&W by having the conversion done, but hey, my gun, my money. I'm looking at another 2" square butt Model 15 for a 3" Smolt conversion; should also be a great shooter. Anyway, thanks for the comments.
Last edited by D1911; 01-24-2020 at 02:12 PM.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-24-2020, 02:30 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,380
Likes: 6,515
Liked 13,425 Times in 3,120 Posts
|
|
I love it!
Seems like by the time you buy the barrel and pay for the smith work, it would cost about what the new 2020 Pythons cost?
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-24-2020, 03:07 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sacramento, California
Posts: 471
Likes: 988
Liked 1,390 Times in 161 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wood714
I love it!
Seems like by the time you buy the barrel and pay for the smith work, it would cost about what the new 2020 Pythons cost?
|
Close, a few hundred dollars cheaper for this one (that includes the price of the donor gun). Unfortunately, NOS or clean Python barrels aren't cheap anymore.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-24-2020, 03:28 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 4,106
Likes: 14,444
Liked 3,764 Times in 1,784 Posts
|
|
I have a Smython...
...which I acquired via internet auction(I purposely have forgotten how much it cost). I wanted it to see for myself how it ran and shot. Mine was built on a Model 19 round butt frame with a short ejector rod. A friend swapped my short rod for a normal length for a 4" barrel which helps clear 38 Special brass during IDPA COFs. The interesting fact about the Python barrel is there are no markings whatsoever on it but "looks" Python. My supposition is Colt was willing to sell unfinished Python barrels to gunsmiths working on these conversions. By doing so, the gunsmith avoids having a Python revolver w/o a barrel in his inventory.
I also own a 4" Python bright stainless gun I bought 30 years ago which I shot extensively back when Pythons were just expensive revolvers. The S&W action is far preferable to the Python for fast action shooting. Pythons which actually get used have various quirks. Mine developed minor burrs on the bolt and breech-face where the bolt engages the cylinder for lock-up. Those burrs completely froze the action...the gun was uncockable/unshootable. Since Colt revolversmiths are both scarce and pricey, I followed my Kuhnhausen manual and fixed it myself with only a minor bit of filing. Reassembling a Python is a challenge which is another reason S&Ws are preferred by many.
__________________
Bob.
SWCA 1821
|
01-24-2020, 03:50 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Florence, Alabama, USA
Posts: 2,370
Likes: 40
Liked 1,433 Times in 788 Posts
|
|
How are yours threaded? I have read of several approaches.
Smolts are kewl and all, but Smith used to make some full lug K38s. I dare say a 6" could be found, but the 4" version is rare. Too bad, I think it would have a great DA balance and still be lighter than a 686.
|
01-24-2020, 07:40 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sacramento, California
Posts: 471
Likes: 988
Liked 1,390 Times in 161 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Watson
How are yours threaded? I have read of several approaches.
Smolts are kewl and all, but Smith used to make some full lug K38s. I dare say a 6" could be found, but the 4" version is rare. Too bad, I think it would have a great DA balance and still be lighter than a 686.
|
No idea how the barrels are threaded. Pretty sure it's some kind of gunsmith voodoo. This Smolt, as well as the Couger in the picture was built by Craig Maraviov in Woodland, CA. Craig worked for Bill Davis many years ago when these conversions were popular. The blued 4" Smolt was built by Mark Kearns, who also worked for Bill Davis.
|
01-24-2020, 05:43 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 3,449
Liked 11,368 Times in 1,323 Posts
|
|
Fantastic looking guns, congrats
|
01-24-2020, 05:54 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 2,637
Liked 1,588 Times in 713 Posts
|
|
Well, I disagree. I think it ruins the classic look of a classic revolver, Just my opinion.
__________________
Pine_Worker
Ex-LEO, NRA Life
|
01-24-2020, 07:42 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sacramento, California
Posts: 471
Likes: 988
Liked 1,390 Times in 161 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pine_Worker
Well, I disagree. I think it ruins the classic look of a classic revolver, Just my opinion.
|
Like I said, not for everyone. I personally think it ads to the classic lines of the gun by using parts from two classic revolvers. Just my opinion...
|
01-24-2020, 07:00 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Central PA
Posts: 4,568
Likes: 8,235
Liked 11,469 Times in 3,030 Posts
|
|
Nice, I like them. Back in the day, before the L frames, I seen a couple guys that had them for PPC use. Claimed the muzzle heavy balance resulted in quicker recoil recovery. I had my doubts, after all, it's usually just .38 spl. in that game. Tried one guys "Smolt", and recovery did seem a little quicker, and the front sight seemed to hang a little steadier. I bought one of the first 4 inch L frames to hit the shelves, and did quite well with it in PPC.
Larry
|
01-24-2020, 11:01 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Central VA
Posts: 8,685
Likes: 1,583
Liked 9,478 Times in 4,248 Posts
|
|
"... a little more effectively"? I thought I was being at least eloquent.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
SMOLT
|
JohnRippert |
S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 |
7 |
03-24-2019 12:12 AM |
Just a 19-4 Smolt
|
spencerhut |
S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 |
24 |
03-01-2017 09:57 PM |
686 Smolt
|
D1911 |
S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present |
18 |
01-15-2017 05:21 PM |
Mod 28 Smolt
|
dek |
S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 |
11 |
08-29-2009 02:10 PM |
|