Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-01-2024, 12:42 AM
Timeshares's Avatar
Timeshares Timeshares is offline
Member
43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues  
Join Date: May 2024
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default 43c Reliability Issues

Hey all!

Made an account to post about my experiences so far with a brand new 43c. I've owned a pile of Smith J-Frames, with a 351c and 43c being the most recent ones to acquire. I write for a website, and wanted to test these two revolvers out as part of an ongoing pocket gun series that I've been working on over the last two years. Both guns were purchased brand new, and had no external signs of wear.

The 351c works great, despite some glaring QC issues, however, the 43c does not work. On 2/8 of the chambers, the gun will not fire. I've been able to replicate this with live ammo, snapcaps, and no ammo. Yes, I know that you cannot dryfire the 43c, and I have not been doing so. However, I have notated the two chambers that do not work, and can replicate the issue regardless of ammo being in the gun.

I'm baffled by this issue, as my online research has not turned anything up on this specific issue. I've got a video of this, which I will link below.

https://youtu.be/DWn4MYrLpDo?si=HEjRwudjdvg3B01P

This is a shame, as this will both delay my testing of the gun, but also reinforce the mentality of Smith's bad revolver QC as of late. At least my 351c works, even if Smith forgot to put half of their logo on the gun.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #2  
Old 05-01-2024, 05:23 AM
Well Armed Well Armed is offline
Member
43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues  
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 1,467
Liked 1,291 Times in 511 Posts
Default

Join the club lol.... Send it back. Don't "monkey around" with it. There has been A LOT, and I mean, A LOT of post pertaining to a plethora of different issues out the box with S&W J-frames lately....

I think being a publicly trades company, they care more about pushing out 2 or so million handguns a year and profits more so than they care about Q/C....

Last edited by Well Armed; 05-01-2024 at 05:25 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-01-2024, 07:24 AM
stansdds stansdds is offline
Member
43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 9,461
Likes: 22,345
Liked 12,999 Times in 5,858 Posts
Default

It's a new S&W, you paid for the warranty, send it back. It's sad that S&W seems to have adopted the policy of making the purchaser the QC inspector.
__________________
VCDL, GOA, NRA
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #4  
Old 05-01-2024, 08:30 AM
petepeterson's Avatar
petepeterson petepeterson is offline
Member
43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,206
Likes: 6,621
Liked 5,218 Times in 2,015 Posts
Default

Mine went back thrice.
After the third trip, I took it out of the box, and got through three full cylinders without a hitch.
Next time out, 3 clicks out of eight. Disappointed to say the least.
I've named her "Sybil."
__________________
Because of the metric system?
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #5  
Old 05-01-2024, 09:11 AM
Rodan's Avatar
Rodan Rodan is offline
SWCA Member
43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues  
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Southern AZ
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 4,421
Liked 7,574 Times in 1,443 Posts
Default

Many, many threads here on the 43C and failures to fire.

Although the basic J frame design has been around for a long time, IMHO S&W screwed something up with the design of the 43C. Too many problems to be just a QC issue.
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
  #6  
Old 05-01-2024, 09:21 AM
petepeterson's Avatar
petepeterson petepeterson is offline
Member
43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,206
Likes: 6,621
Liked 5,218 Times in 2,015 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rodan View Post
Many, many threads here on the 43C and failures to fire.

Although the basic J frame design has been around for a long time, IMHO S&W screwed something up with the design of the 43C. Too many problems to be just a QC issue.
My thoughts exactly. And the 351s seem to run pretty well.

When I got mine back the only original part left was the frame. And I'm still not sure it's right. It's very difficult to lock up the cylinder when closing it. That gun is tighter than....well...it's tight!
__________________
Because of the metric system?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-01-2024, 09:43 AM
chase45 chase45 is offline
Member
43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues  
Join Date: Apr 2024
Posts: 33
Likes: 1
Liked 111 Times in 13 Posts
Default

Was it like that out of the box or did it develop after the first range trip? For what its worth my 617 leads quickly with cheap bulk .22. Itll get on the front of the cylinder and forcing cone. With the cheap bulk double action becomes inoperable in short order on a few cylinders as fouling accumulates. CCI seems much cleaner and less leading. Also better ignition.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-01-2024, 10:24 AM
jcs266's Avatar
jcs266 jcs266 is offline
Member
43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues  
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Rural mtns of So Cal
Posts: 543
Likes: 850
Liked 742 Times in 322 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by petepeterson View Post
Mine went back thrice.
After the third trip, I took it out of the box, and got through three full cylinders without a hitch.
Next time out, 3 clicks out of eight. Disappointed to say the least.
I've named her "Sybil."
This rises to the level of INCOMPETENCE. Discontinue the model until they can produce one that actually does not malfunction about 30% of the time. I hear these reports OVER AND OVER again on the rimfire J-Frames.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #9  
Old 05-01-2024, 11:08 AM
Protocall_Design Protocall_Design is offline
Vendor
43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues  
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Kansas City area
Posts: 6,550
Likes: 61,979
Liked 14,805 Times in 4,590 Posts
Default

Is the trigger going all the way back on the ones that don't fire, or does it stop a little short once the cylinder locks up?

If it stops short on those chambers, then those ratchets are too wide, not allowing the hand to go on past and not releasing the hammer from the trigger. You can watch this with the sideplate off, looking through the back of the hand window. You should remove the mainspring and hammer to cycle the action for this test.
__________________
protocalldesign.com

Last edited by Protocall_Design; 05-01-2024 at 11:13 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-01-2024, 11:12 AM
Timeshares's Avatar
Timeshares Timeshares is offline
Member
43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues  
Join Date: May 2024
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chase45 View Post
Was it like that out of the box or did it develop after the first range trip? For what its worth my 617 leads quickly with cheap bulk .22. Itll get on the front of the cylinder and forcing cone. With the cheap bulk double action becomes inoperable in short order on a few cylinders as fouling accumulates. CCI seems much cleaner and less leading. Also better ignition.
Chase, it was like this on the first cylinder. I was shooting .22 Punch, which has been extremely reliable in my other .22 revolvers and autoloaders. I can replicate the issue with the gun empty, or with snapcaps. Gun was spotlessly clean when I began shooting yesterday. Only got about 23 rounds through it before I decided to test my 351c.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-01-2024, 11:15 AM
Timeshares's Avatar
Timeshares Timeshares is offline
Member
43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues  
Join Date: May 2024
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Protocall_Design View Post
Is the trigger going all the way back on the ones that don't fire, or does it stop a little short once the cylinder locks up?

It does not go to full travel. It stops short by about half an inch. I do get lockup, and it indexes properly aligned with the forcing cone.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #12  
Old 05-01-2024, 11:23 AM
Well Armed Well Armed is offline
Member
43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues  
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 1,467
Liked 1,291 Times in 511 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rodan View Post
Many, many threads here on the 43C and failures to fire.

Although the basic J frame design has been around for a long time, IMHO S&W screwed something up with the design of the 43C. Too many problems to be just a QC issue.
The threads aren't just about the 43c. The new Ultimate Carry and other S&W aluminum frame J-frames seem to be problematic as well. I'm not seeing anything about the 340(PD) or steel frame J-frames, but that maybe due to the fact that S&W sells less of them.

I was actually looking to buy a 43C while S&W had the rebate that just ended yesterday. I decided because I've seen a lot of reports of light primer strikes.

Last edited by Well Armed; 05-01-2024 at 11:25 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #13  
Old 05-01-2024, 12:08 PM
chase45 chase45 is offline
Member
43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues  
Join Date: Apr 2024
Posts: 33
Likes: 1
Liked 111 Times in 13 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Timeshares View Post
Chase, it was like this on the first cylinder. I was shooting .22 Punch, which has been extremely reliable in my other .22 revolvers and autoloaders. I can replicate the issue with the gun empty, or with snapcaps. Gun was spotlessly clean when I began shooting yesterday. Only got about 23 rounds through it before I decided to test my 351c.
Gotcha yeah sounds like you may have a timing issue going on. Just wanted to mention my 617 to ensure it wasnt something like that as once leaded on the front of the cylinder it will do it loaded or empty until brushed. Im honestly probably going to keep a SS brush in my bag just so I can plow through the rest of my bulk pack.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-29-2024, 05:07 PM
BEEBEE BEEBEE is offline
Member
43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues  
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 35
Likes: 8
Liked 25 Times in 16 Posts
Default

This is my rachet condition new in the box unfired. It is on the way back to S&W. This in on a 351c
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_3243.jpg (44.5 KB, 53 views)
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #15  
Old 05-29-2024, 05:33 PM
Old cop Old cop is offline
US Veteran
43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,886
Likes: 4,314
Liked 15,398 Times in 4,224 Posts
Default

I was thinking about purchasing a 43C but will hold onto my $$ for now. Thx for the heads-up.
__________________
Old Cop
LEO (Ret.)
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #16  
Old 05-30-2024, 06:32 AM
stansdds stansdds is offline
Member
43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 9,461
Likes: 22,345
Liked 12,999 Times in 5,858 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BEEBEE View Post
This is my rachet condition new in the box unfired. It is on the way back to S&W. This in on a 351c
That looks like... well... looks like poor quality control, that's most family-friendly thing I can say.
__________________
VCDL, GOA, NRA
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #17  
Old 05-30-2024, 07:10 PM
Wee Hooker Wee Hooker is offline
Member
43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues  
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New England, USA
Posts: 4,489
Likes: 3,119
Liked 4,349 Times in 1,623 Posts
Default

Wow, I should have caught this thread earlier before I bought my new 43C.
1) won't extract any brand MT at all without a good rap on the ejector rod,
2) the Cyl sticks badly when you try to swing it out.
3) Shoots an honest 3" left at 15'

This is easily the lowest quality SW this revolver junkie has purchased ever .
It's at the mothership now. Been there for 3 weeks.
__________________
Dave
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #18  
Old 05-30-2024, 10:03 PM
413Maxwedge's Avatar
413Maxwedge 413Maxwedge is offline
Member
43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues  
Join Date: Nov 2023
Posts: 109
Likes: 96
Liked 194 Times in 62 Posts
Default

Wee Hooker, I am sorry for your poor QC experience with your 43C. But I want to point out that normally, only bad experiences get brought up on forums. For every "bad" revolver you hear about, there were 1000 good ones that nobody bothered to complain about.

My 43C has been flawless in fit, finish and performance. My 13yo can shoot 8 rounds in a 3" circle every time from 25' (he's a much better target shooter than me). I don't mean to take away from your troubles.... But MY 43C has been excellent. The kid got his range qualification (and membership) at our gun club with it, and the few times the wife shot it it was easy and painless. This eased her mind since it normally rests in her office.
__________________
NRA Certified Shotgun Instr.

Last edited by 413Maxwedge; 05-30-2024 at 10:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #19  
Old 10-12-2024, 10:50 PM
Model 15-4ever Model 15-4ever is online now
Member
43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: East Coast
Posts: 496
Likes: 809
Liked 988 Times in 294 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 413Maxwedge View Post
...
My 43C has been flawless in fit, finish and performance...
At Smith & Wesson, even a broken clock is right twice a day.
__________________
Retired LE Instructor/Armorer
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #20  
Old 10-13-2024, 07:38 AM
JackM JackM is offline
Member
43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues 43c Reliability Issues  
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SW FL
Posts: 292
Likes: 88
Liked 404 Times in 150 Posts
Default

My brand-new 43C went back twice: the first time to correct the fact that a ramped barrel shroud (correctly marked) had been factory-installed, not the proper flat one, the second time to deal with the excessive leading that developed now that I had a gun that didn’t shoot nearly a foot low at ten yards. Mine did have misfires at first, but after several hundred rounds, and a few cleaning sessions, that has diminished significantly. Simply put, the chambers are now smoother and the rounds chamber completely. Extraction has also improved. I think that in their quest to lighten and smooth the trigger pull, S&W has gone a little too far since 22s are so hard to ignite. Every single misfire I experienced fired on the second try, the first hit possibly using up energy seating the round.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
M41 reliability issues with standard velocity ammo Dave Lively Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 14 03-23-2019 02:45 AM
M&P9 2.0 5” break in period and reliability issues? Dr. Marneaus Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols 27 03-10-2018 10:13 AM
39-2 Reliability NovaJoe Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 8 04-03-2015 09:10 PM
Does removing ILS cause any potential mechanical/reliability issues? MN2944 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 5 02-14-2014 01:04 PM
4516: any reliability issues due to its size? (i.e. 1911 vs. officers ACP) Malpasowildlifer Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 10 02-25-2012 09:58 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:40 AM.


© 2000-2024 smith-wessonforum.com All rights reserved worldwide.
Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)