|
|
05-01-2024, 12:42 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2024
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
43c Reliability Issues
Hey all!
Made an account to post about my experiences so far with a brand new 43c. I've owned a pile of Smith J-Frames, with a 351c and 43c being the most recent ones to acquire. I write for a website, and wanted to test these two revolvers out as part of an ongoing pocket gun series that I've been working on over the last two years. Both guns were purchased brand new, and had no external signs of wear.
The 351c works great, despite some glaring QC issues, however, the 43c does not work. On 2/8 of the chambers, the gun will not fire. I've been able to replicate this with live ammo, snapcaps, and no ammo. Yes, I know that you cannot dryfire the 43c, and I have not been doing so. However, I have notated the two chambers that do not work, and can replicate the issue regardless of ammo being in the gun.
I'm baffled by this issue, as my online research has not turned anything up on this specific issue. I've got a video of this, which I will link below.
https://youtu.be/DWn4MYrLpDo?si=HEjRwudjdvg3B01P
This is a shame, as this will both delay my testing of the gun, but also reinforce the mentality of Smith's bad revolver QC as of late. At least my 351c works, even if Smith forgot to put half of their logo on the gun.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-01-2024, 05:23 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 1,467
Liked 1,291 Times in 511 Posts
|
|
Join the club lol.... Send it back. Don't "monkey around" with it. There has been A LOT, and I mean, A LOT of post pertaining to a plethora of different issues out the box with S&W J-frames lately....
I think being a publicly trades company, they care more about pushing out 2 or so million handguns a year and profits more so than they care about Q/C....
Last edited by Well Armed; 05-01-2024 at 05:25 AM.
|
The Following 8 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-01-2024, 07:24 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 9,461
Likes: 22,345
Liked 12,999 Times in 5,858 Posts
|
|
It's a new S&W, you paid for the warranty, send it back. It's sad that S&W seems to have adopted the policy of making the purchaser the QC inspector.
__________________
VCDL, GOA, NRA
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-01-2024, 08:30 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,206
Likes: 6,621
Liked 5,218 Times in 2,015 Posts
|
|
Mine went back thrice.
After the third trip, I took it out of the box, and got through three full cylinders without a hitch.
Next time out, 3 clicks out of eight. Disappointed to say the least.
I've named her "Sybil."
__________________
Because of the metric system?
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-01-2024, 09:11 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Southern AZ
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 4,421
Liked 7,574 Times in 1,443 Posts
|
|
Many, many threads here on the 43C and failures to fire.
Although the basic J frame design has been around for a long time, IMHO S&W screwed something up with the design of the 43C. Too many problems to be just a QC issue.
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-01-2024, 09:21 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,206
Likes: 6,621
Liked 5,218 Times in 2,015 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rodan
Many, many threads here on the 43C and failures to fire.
Although the basic J frame design has been around for a long time, IMHO S&W screwed something up with the design of the 43C. Too many problems to be just a QC issue.
|
My thoughts exactly. And the 351s seem to run pretty well.
When I got mine back the only original part left was the frame. And I'm still not sure it's right. It's very difficult to lock up the cylinder when closing it. That gun is tighter than....well...it's tight!
__________________
Because of the metric system?
|
05-01-2024, 09:43 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2024
Posts: 33
Likes: 1
Liked 111 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Was it like that out of the box or did it develop after the first range trip? For what its worth my 617 leads quickly with cheap bulk .22. Itll get on the front of the cylinder and forcing cone. With the cheap bulk double action becomes inoperable in short order on a few cylinders as fouling accumulates. CCI seems much cleaner and less leading. Also better ignition.
|
05-01-2024, 10:24 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Rural mtns of So Cal
Posts: 543
Likes: 850
Liked 742 Times in 322 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by petepeterson
Mine went back thrice.
After the third trip, I took it out of the box, and got through three full cylinders without a hitch.
Next time out, 3 clicks out of eight. Disappointed to say the least.
I've named her "Sybil."
|
This rises to the level of INCOMPETENCE. Discontinue the model until they can produce one that actually does not malfunction about 30% of the time. I hear these reports OVER AND OVER again on the rimfire J-Frames.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-01-2024, 11:08 AM
|
Vendor
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Kansas City area
Posts: 6,550
Likes: 61,979
Liked 14,805 Times in 4,590 Posts
|
|
Is the trigger going all the way back on the ones that don't fire, or does it stop a little short once the cylinder locks up?
If it stops short on those chambers, then those ratchets are too wide, not allowing the hand to go on past and not releasing the hammer from the trigger. You can watch this with the sideplate off, looking through the back of the hand window. You should remove the mainspring and hammer to cycle the action for this test.
Last edited by Protocall_Design; 05-01-2024 at 11:13 AM.
|
05-01-2024, 11:12 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2024
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chase45
Was it like that out of the box or did it develop after the first range trip? For what its worth my 617 leads quickly with cheap bulk .22. Itll get on the front of the cylinder and forcing cone. With the cheap bulk double action becomes inoperable in short order on a few cylinders as fouling accumulates. CCI seems much cleaner and less leading. Also better ignition.
|
Chase, it was like this on the first cylinder. I was shooting .22 Punch, which has been extremely reliable in my other .22 revolvers and autoloaders. I can replicate the issue with the gun empty, or with snapcaps. Gun was spotlessly clean when I began shooting yesterday. Only got about 23 rounds through it before I decided to test my 351c.
|
05-01-2024, 11:15 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2024
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Protocall_Design
Is the trigger going all the way back on the ones that don't fire, or does it stop a little short once the cylinder locks up?
|
It does not go to full travel. It stops short by about half an inch. I do get lockup, and it indexes properly aligned with the forcing cone.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-01-2024, 11:23 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 1,467
Liked 1,291 Times in 511 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rodan
Many, many threads here on the 43C and failures to fire.
Although the basic J frame design has been around for a long time, IMHO S&W screwed something up with the design of the 43C. Too many problems to be just a QC issue.
|
The threads aren't just about the 43c. The new Ultimate Carry and other S&W aluminum frame J-frames seem to be problematic as well. I'm not seeing anything about the 340(PD) or steel frame J-frames, but that maybe due to the fact that S&W sells less of them.
I was actually looking to buy a 43C while S&W had the rebate that just ended yesterday. I decided because I've seen a lot of reports of light primer strikes.
Last edited by Well Armed; 05-01-2024 at 11:25 AM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-01-2024, 12:08 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2024
Posts: 33
Likes: 1
Liked 111 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timeshares
Chase, it was like this on the first cylinder. I was shooting .22 Punch, which has been extremely reliable in my other .22 revolvers and autoloaders. I can replicate the issue with the gun empty, or with snapcaps. Gun was spotlessly clean when I began shooting yesterday. Only got about 23 rounds through it before I decided to test my 351c.
|
Gotcha yeah sounds like you may have a timing issue going on. Just wanted to mention my 617 to ensure it wasnt something like that as once leaded on the front of the cylinder it will do it loaded or empty until brushed. Im honestly probably going to keep a SS brush in my bag just so I can plow through the rest of my bulk pack.
|
05-29-2024, 05:07 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 35
Likes: 8
Liked 25 Times in 16 Posts
|
|
This is my rachet condition new in the box unfired. It is on the way back to S&W. This in on a 351c
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-29-2024, 05:33 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,886
Likes: 4,314
Liked 15,398 Times in 4,224 Posts
|
|
I was thinking about purchasing a 43C but will hold onto my $$ for now. Thx for the heads-up.
__________________
Old Cop
LEO (Ret.)
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-30-2024, 06:32 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 9,461
Likes: 22,345
Liked 12,999 Times in 5,858 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BEEBEE
This is my rachet condition new in the box unfired. It is on the way back to S&W. This in on a 351c
|
That looks like... well... looks like poor quality control, that's most family-friendly thing I can say.
__________________
VCDL, GOA, NRA
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-30-2024, 07:10 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New England, USA
Posts: 4,489
Likes: 3,119
Liked 4,349 Times in 1,623 Posts
|
|
Wow, I should have caught this thread earlier before I bought my new 43C.
1) won't extract any brand MT at all without a good rap on the ejector rod,
2) the Cyl sticks badly when you try to swing it out.
3) Shoots an honest 3" left at 15'
This is easily the lowest quality SW this revolver junkie has purchased ever .
It's at the mothership now. Been there for 3 weeks.
__________________
Dave
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-30-2024, 10:03 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2023
Posts: 109
Likes: 96
Liked 194 Times in 62 Posts
|
|
Wee Hooker, I am sorry for your poor QC experience with your 43C. But I want to point out that normally, only bad experiences get brought up on forums. For every "bad" revolver you hear about, there were 1000 good ones that nobody bothered to complain about.
My 43C has been flawless in fit, finish and performance. My 13yo can shoot 8 rounds in a 3" circle every time from 25' (he's a much better target shooter than me). I don't mean to take away from your troubles.... But MY 43C has been excellent. The kid got his range qualification (and membership) at our gun club with it, and the few times the wife shot it it was easy and painless. This eased her mind since it normally rests in her office.
__________________
NRA Certified Shotgun Instr.
Last edited by 413Maxwedge; 05-30-2024 at 10:04 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
10-12-2024, 10:50 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: East Coast
Posts: 496
Likes: 809
Liked 988 Times in 294 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 413Maxwedge
...
My 43C has been flawless in fit, finish and performance...
|
At Smith & Wesson, even a broken clock is right twice a day.
__________________
Retired LE Instructor/Armorer
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-13-2024, 07:38 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SW FL
Posts: 292
Likes: 88
Liked 404 Times in 150 Posts
|
|
My brand-new 43C went back twice: the first time to correct the fact that a ramped barrel shroud (correctly marked) had been factory-installed, not the proper flat one, the second time to deal with the excessive leading that developed now that I had a gun that didn’t shoot nearly a foot low at ten yards. Mine did have misfires at first, but after several hundred rounds, and a few cleaning sessions, that has diminished significantly. Simply put, the chambers are now smoother and the rounds chamber completely. Extraction has also improved. I think that in their quest to lighten and smooth the trigger pull, S&W has gone a little too far since 22s are so hard to ignite. Every single misfire I experienced fired on the second try, the first hit possibly using up energy seating the round.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|