Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


View Poll Results: which barrel
5in full lug 38 57.58%
6in half lug 12 18.18%
6.5in full lug 16 24.24%
Voters: 66. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-26-2014, 11:15 AM
Bigeclipse Bigeclipse is offline
Member
which 629 which 629 which 629 which 629 which 629  
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default which 629

5 full lug, 6 half, 6.5 full.

80% range gun 20% hunting. never hunted with pistol so may only do it once. priorities:
1. looks/resale...what do most people tend to buy these days of these 3
2. shootability for range and hunting. balance and such.
3. are they all drilled and tapped...I will most likely only shoot open sights but like the flexibilty.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-26-2014, 11:23 AM
jglsprings's Avatar
jglsprings jglsprings is offline
Member
which 629 which 629 which 629 which 629 which 629  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 307
Likes: 494
Liked 325 Times in 93 Posts
Default

5" Full lug.

Why?

I don't have one of those and looks.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 02-26-2014, 12:59 PM
Bigeclipse Bigeclipse is offline
Member
which 629 which 629 which 629 which 629 which 629  
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

i must be weird because I think if its stainless it needs to be full lug because the stainless already makes it look modern and so does the full lug but if blued it should be half lug to keep that older rustic look.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-26-2014, 01:45 PM
DR505's Avatar
DR505 DR505 is offline
US Veteran
which 629 which 629 which 629 which 629 which 629  
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Idaho
Posts: 4,388
Likes: 3,375
Liked 8,474 Times in 2,310 Posts
Default

For hunting with iron sights I would opt for the longest sight radius.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-26-2014, 01:48 PM
b_san's Avatar
b_san b_san is offline
Member
which 629 which 629 which 629 which 629 which 629  
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: MN
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 1,523
Liked 1,534 Times in 588 Posts
Default

A 2 5/8" PC... er wait not on the list... how about a 6" competition weighted, no... uhm a 7.5" light hunter?? Sorry those are the only 629s I own. But I'm considering adding the new L frame m69.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-26-2014, 03:29 PM
Bigeclipse Bigeclipse is offline
Member
which 629 which 629 which 629 which 629 which 629  
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

I found out they are all drilled and tapped so that is no longer my concern. now its down to looks vs use. again...this will mainly a range gub that I may hunt with...ill try it once and if I love handgun hunting...would probably end up buying a dedicated hunting pistol. would the 5incher be ok to say 50 yards on whitetail? how much more will an extra inch do for sight picture. Im leaning towards the five full lug or the 6 half lug. I don't think I want the 6.5 full lug
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-26-2014, 04:11 PM
b_san's Avatar
b_san b_san is offline
Member
which 629 which 629 which 629 which 629 which 629  
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: MN
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 1,523
Liked 1,534 Times in 588 Posts
Default

But seriously have you looked at one of these?

uploadfromtaptalk1393445300176.jpg

629 Light Hunter, it's 7.5" but balances very nicely and is a smooth shooting gun. Comes with a removable optic rail that mounts to the barrel, I added the grips. Cheers on whatever you decide.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #8  
Old 02-26-2014, 04:40 PM
AveragEd AveragEd is offline
Member
which 629 which 629 which 629 which 629 which 629  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Enola, Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 596
Liked 2,634 Times in 1,144 Posts
Default

I have all three of the 629s you are considering.



My preference is the 5" full-lug but they are a tad hard to find in pre-lock, pre-MIM form, especially in a Classic DX like mine, for the DX version was only made in that barrel length in 1992. That combination seems to have almost perfect balance and just hangs nicely in the hand while being heavy enough to be comfortable to shoot with heavier loads. It is my hunting revolver.

The 6-1/2" full-lug is muzzle-heavy for some people but my son prefers that one over the other two. The 6" half-lug is my paper-punching favorite and if not for the fact that the gun is no longer made, I would have that darned colored ramp front sight replaced with a black Patridge, which is the preferred target front sight. I already replaced the rear sight with a Millet.

I imagine you will receive numerous votes for each one. You are asking a question that relies heavily upon personal preference for its answer.

Ed
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
  #9  
Old 02-26-2014, 05:29 PM
CWH44300 CWH44300 is offline
Member
which 629 which 629 which 629 which 629 which 629  
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Maine
Posts: 3,072
Likes: 25,443
Liked 5,810 Times in 1,287 Posts
Default

I'd go with the 5" also if you get hooked on handgunning deer, you can add a longer barrel deer gun. I've got all the lengths except the sub 4" guns. I'm going to hunt with a 7.5" PC gun this year, last year I carried a scoped super blackhawk. My favorite plinker is a standard 4" gun. Good luck with your new shooter.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-26-2014, 07:56 PM
Bigeclipse Bigeclipse is offline
Member
which 629 which 629 which 629 which 629 which 629  
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

I'm pretty sure ill end up with the 5in as it seems like a good compromise for range time with an occasional hunt. If I do get heavy into pistol hunting I can then get something else and still have this as a beautiful range gun. Any other opinions out there?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-27-2014, 12:49 AM
.45mtngun .45mtngun is offline
US Veteran
which 629 which 629  
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: CO
Posts: 248
Likes: 401
Liked 124 Times in 78 Posts
Default

I have a 4" 586 and when i posted about it the majority of the guys remarked that they liked it better than the 6" version. For me the 4" balances beauitfully in the hand for off hand shooting. The 6" 586's i have handled before i got mine felt way too muzzle heavy. Again,this is only a personal opinion. As the one poster said, it could be hard to fined in the pre-lock version if that makes a difference to you. Enjoy what ever you chose!
Jim
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-27-2014, 10:20 AM
Kenneth L. Walters Kenneth L. Walters is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Flagstaff, Arizona USA
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times in 8 Posts
Default

Buy them all. I have two six inchers, three with a 7.5 inch, and one each with 8 3/8 and 12. My next will be the new 4.25 L frame.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #13  
Old 02-27-2014, 11:40 AM
varmint243 varmint243 is offline
Member
which 629 which 629 which 629 which 629 which 629  
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 516
Likes: 16
Liked 372 Times in 176 Posts
Default

I want a 6" full underlug, non-fluted cylinder, factory D&T
I have a earlier one with no underlug and have never really enjoyed it like I should have, even shooting "light specials"
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-27-2014, 02:06 PM
JimZ1006 JimZ1006 is offline
Member
which 629 which 629 which 629 which 629 which 629  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: South Central CO
Posts: 61
Likes: 81
Liked 31 Times in 9 Posts
Default

I have a 6" 629-3 full underlug Classic Hunter with the unfluted cylinder. I really like the added weight it has with the full lug and the recoil even with hot reloads is pretty manageable and the longer sight picture makes it very accurate even for an old fart like me with not so good eyes!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-27-2014, 02:20 PM
Maximumbob54's Avatar
Maximumbob54 Maximumbob54 is offline
Member
which 629 which 629 which 629 which 629 which 629  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,200
Likes: 9,079
Liked 1,921 Times in 1,043 Posts
Default

Not my greatest shooting that day but still decent for my wobbling grip:



The X frame grip is oogly to an extreme but I can rocket through a full box of ammo and it doesn't feel like a truck ran over my hands.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #16  
Old 03-27-2014, 11:41 AM
smousefam5 smousefam5 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Nikiski, Alaska
Posts: 154
Likes: 23
Liked 35 Times in 15 Posts
Default

If it is not a dedicated hunting gun I vote 5". I have both the 5 and 6.5" full lug versions. To me the 5 feels so much better and handles so much better in the field.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-28-2014, 08:20 PM
RIDE-RED 350r's Avatar
RIDE-RED 350r RIDE-RED 350r is offline
Member
which 629 which 629 which 629 which 629 which 629  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Blossvale NY
Posts: 1,295
Likes: 3,964
Liked 950 Times in 427 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jglsprings View Post
5" Full lug.

Why?

I don't have one of those and looks.

Took the words right out of my mouth.

I voted 5". I already have the 6.5" and now I really want to add the 5" to my family... It looks proportionally like a 4" L-frame. But I do really enjoy my 6.5" and have no regrets about it whatsoever.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-29-2014, 01:44 AM
NE450No2 NE450No2 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 7
Liked 469 Times in 278 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigeclipse View Post
5 full lug, 6 half, 6.5 full.

80% range gun 20% hunting. never hunted with pistol so may only do it once. priorities:
1. looks/resale...what do most people tend to buy these days of these 3
2. shootability for range and hunting. balance and such.
3. are they all drilled and tapped...I will most likely only shoot open sights but like the flexibilty.
From what you have stated, I would go with the 6.5" full lug.

It will be the softest shooting of the trio.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-29-2014, 02:09 AM
J. R. WEEMS J. R. WEEMS is offline
Member
which 629 which 629 which 629 which 629 which 629  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA
Posts: 3,355
Likes: 4,437
Liked 4,434 Times in 1,463 Posts
Thumbs up

I only have this early no dash 6" version-- 629 a good hog gun at that-

Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #20  
Old 03-29-2014, 02:22 AM
A10's Avatar
A10 A10 is offline
SWCA Member
which 629 which 629 which 629 which 629 which 629  
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sadly, Seattle WA
Posts: 10,678
Likes: 23,209
Liked 10,480 Times in 4,352 Posts
Default

I've had all three barrel lengths in various configurations and the 5" seems to be the best handling
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 20140325_203424.jpg (112.7 KB, 7 views)
__________________
Even older, even crankier....
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:14 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)