Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > S&W-Smithing

Notices

S&W-Smithing Maintenance, Repair, and Enhancement of Smith & Wesson and Other Firearms.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-20-2009, 12:15 PM
m75rlg's Avatar
m75rlg m75rlg is offline
US Veteran
End shake questions End shake questions End shake questions End shake questions End shake questions  
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Center of North Carolina
Posts: 473
Likes: 366
Liked 542 Times in 159 Posts
Question End shake questions

I have a simple cylinder end shake question.

I have two 29-3s. One in which the cylinder endshake goes from a max of .007" when the cylinder is held toward the recoil shield, and will pinch a .0015" guage when pushed toward the forcing cone. Without the guage, it appears the cylinder will contact the lower edge of the forcing cone.

The other has a max of .011 forcing cone / cylinder gap to nearly making contact with the forcing cone, pinching the .0015 guage.

I've tightened the yoke retaining screw on the first one, which was lose, and solved the yoke end shake that was present before making the measurements above.

I've never done this, but have read the info on the board about endshake and looked at the Midway video of installing end shake bearings.

My questions are, if I understand it correctly, the end shake bearing will move the cylinder back toward the recoil shield. Is that correct?

If that is correct, should I buy .002 bearings and install 2 or 3, or would I be better off to buy .004 bearings and just use one? I don't want the forcing cone to cylinder gap to get out of specs, and in your opinion would this approach improve the revolvers?

Thanks in advance.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-20-2009, 03:56 PM
OKFC05 OKFC05 is offline
Member
End shake questions End shake questions  
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 8,161
Likes: 3,623
Liked 5,211 Times in 2,174 Posts
Default

Well, I'd square off the end with the cutter tool, so the actual amount you need is unknown until you get into it. So a tool, plus a packet of each shim thickness to do it right.

Or let someone with the proper tools and experience do it for you.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-20-2009, 04:18 PM
jaybar jaybar is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

"..... the cylinder endshake goes from a max of .007" when the cylinder is held toward the recoil shield, and will pinch a .0015" guage when pushed toward the forcing cone. Without the guage, it appears the cylinder will contact the lower edge of the forcing cone. "

A little vocabulary lesson first: endshake is the total movement of the cylinder. Cylinder gap is that space between the cylinder and the barrel that you measure with a feeler gauge. You calculate endshake by subtracting the difference between the cylinder gaps when the cylinder is held all the way back and when it is pushed all the way forward. Sounds like the endshake in the description above is .007.

You shouldn't try to get the endshake down to zero. If you do you'll likely get a binding of the cylinder where the ratchet is being forcibly pressed against the recoil shield. You should leave about .001"-.002" endshake in to allow for free rotation of the cylinder. Having said that, you will probably need to use more than 1 washer to take up the endshake ( 1- .004" plus 1 -.002" or 3 - .002"). I've not seen any difference in operation when using one .004" or 2 .002"
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-20-2009, 06:40 PM
texagun's Avatar
texagun texagun is offline
Member
End shake questions End shake questions End shake questions End shake questions End shake questions  
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Texas
Posts: 426
Likes: 11
Liked 392 Times in 90 Posts
Default

I fixed the endshake in a Model 686 with endshake bearings purchased from Brownell's. The 1st time I tried it, I used 2 bearings and they bound up and I had to remove them. Then I just used one bearing and it has worked fine for the last 2 years. I would recommend using only one bearing in lieu of using 2 or 3 together.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-20-2009, 07:32 PM
haggis haggis is offline
Absent Comrade
End shake questions End shake questions End shake questions End shake questions End shake questions  
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Aiken, SC
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 16
Liked 203 Times in 87 Posts
Default

The second gun may have a B/C gap problem when you fix the endshake. You'll have about 0.010" B/C with 0.001" endshake. That's getting to be a bit much, although it should still be functional, as long as the bore and chambers line up. Just watch for spitting from the B/C gap.

If you need to use multiple shims, be sure to lubricate them well (Break-Free works well).

Buck
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-20-2009, 10:17 PM
m75rlg's Avatar
m75rlg m75rlg is offline
US Veteran
End shake questions End shake questions End shake questions End shake questions End shake questions  
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Center of North Carolina
Posts: 473
Likes: 366
Liked 542 Times in 159 Posts
Default

Thanks for the info and advice. ("Cylinder gap" - got that.)

Right now, running this over in my mind, it sounds like a plan might be to use one .004 bearing in the first revolver, and two .004 in the second. That would leave .003 endshake in each revolver. Would that sound accecptable?

You know, the funny thing is the revolver with .011 endshake suprised me because I thought it felt tighter than the 1st one. Neither has shown any tendency to spit or shave lead. I shoot mostly jacketed soft points in a hunting load over H110.

OKFC05, what are you talking about "cutting"? Are you speaking of trueing up the yoke or the forcing cone?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-20-2009, 10:33 PM
stevieboy stevieboy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 0
Liked 40 Times in 25 Posts
Default

This is probably a dumb question but is a small amount of endshake something that needs to be corrected if there's no lead shaving and the gun is accurate? Only one of my Smith revolvers locks up completely tightly. The others all show a small amount of fore-aft play, some more than others, with lockup. I've never worried about it because they're all extremely accurate and show no signs of lead shaving. Am I wrong about that?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-20-2009, 11:20 PM
haggis haggis is offline
Absent Comrade
End shake questions End shake questions End shake questions End shake questions End shake questions  
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Aiken, SC
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 16
Liked 203 Times in 87 Posts
Default

No dumb questions if you need to know something. Factory specs on endshake are 0.001" (+0.001", -0.000") - maximum of .002". As endshake grows, the end of the cylinder yoke takes an increased pounding during firing, the yoke end wears, and endshake increases further. Heavy loads exacerbate this, as do a large number of normal loads.

I've seen many guns with 0.003"-0.004" endshake that work perfectly. I probably wouldn't worry about it until it gets to this level. For S&W revolvers it's such an easy fix that there's no reason to let it get past this point. Endshake on Colts is much more difficult to fix without some rather specialized tools.


Buck
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-21-2009, 08:34 AM
Carl Williams Carl Williams is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Robbins, NC, USA
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Smile

M75RLG,
I have been reading this thread with a great deal of interest:

1. I also have an S&W M29 (dash2) w/8 and 3/8" barrel along with two other N=frames (M57 (dash nothing) and a 25-5. I have reloaded ammo for 40 years..
2. I believe we live close together (I live just south of the Asheboro, NC. zoo, in "Pottery country").
3. I am also a Veteran (Air Force in the mid sixties, 3 yrs in Germany).
This is where I whetted my appetite for firearms (M-61 Vulcan 20mm rotary cannon on the F-105D and F. I was a Offensive Weapons Control Systems technician/36th TAC Fighter wing, Bitburg Germany).

If interested, we might meet and compare notes on our N frames, spec's, etc. I have a few precision measuring tools, also. I am retired, so I have time, but no money, no job, no stress and no sex! Just let me know.

Best Regards,
Carl
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-21-2009, 08:53 AM
OKFC05 OKFC05 is offline
Member
End shake questions End shake questions  
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 8,161
Likes: 3,623
Liked 5,211 Times in 2,174 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by m75rlg View Post
Thanks for the info and advice. ("Cylinder gap" - got that.)

OKFC05, what are you talking about "cutting"? Are you speaking of trueing up the yoke or the forcing cone?
YOKE FACING REAMER
Mfr:POWER CUSTOM
Price:$46.92

Squares Rear Face Of Yoke Barrel
Eliminating manufacturing variations is the secret to a good revolver tune-up. Toward this end, the Ron Power Yoke Reamer lets you make sure that the rear bearing area of the yoke is absolutely square to the yoke barrel. Once everything's square, it's easy to eliminate cylinder endshake using the Power Cylinder Endshake Bearings. Reamer pilot fits the yoke I.D. on S&W K, L and N frames, Ruger Speed and Security Six.

BROWNELLS : POWER CUSTOM : YOKE FACING REAMER - World's Largest Supplier of Firearm Accessories, Gun Parts and Gunsmithing Tools
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-21-2009, 03:10 PM
m75rlg's Avatar
m75rlg m75rlg is offline
US Veteran
End shake questions End shake questions End shake questions End shake questions End shake questions  
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Center of North Carolina
Posts: 473
Likes: 366
Liked 542 Times in 159 Posts
Default

Thanks, OKFC05.


Carl,
Did you get the PM I sent?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
686, brownells, endshake, m29, model 29, model 686, ruger, sig arms


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
End Shake what is it?? Buzzsaw S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 3 05-30-2016 09:30 PM
S&W 69--end shake wolverine S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 7 01-19-2015 11:54 AM
Newbie questions - end shake / spitting lead trashy S&W-Smithing 6 06-22-2013 08:19 PM
End Shake? catdad S&W-Smithing 4 12-27-2008 09:21 AM
end shake unclepood S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 4 09-30-2008 04:22 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:23 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)