|
|
02-25-2010, 02:24 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: California
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Bushnell Trophy 1x32 MP vs Barska 1x30 IR
Can't decide on which to put on my 15-22. What do you guys think? Pros, cons? There design's are some what similiar. I would like to get a Primary Arms Red Dot but they have been sold out for a while and there is no ETA when they will be back in stock. Pictures if you have these mounted would be great.
Thanks
Bushnell Trophy 1x32 MP
$149-179
Barska 1x30 IR
$90-100
Last edited by idbstyler; 02-25-2010 at 02:29 AM.
|
02-25-2010, 08:25 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Arlington, Texas
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
i like them both. what i don't understand is why is a scope that is just a red dot and no magnification so bulky?
|
02-25-2010, 09:33 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14,661
Likes: 7,937
Liked 20,623 Times in 5,958 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by idbstyler
Can't decide on which to put on my 15-22. What do you guys think? Pros, cons? There design's are some what similiar. I would like to get a Primary Arms Red Dot but they have been sold out for a while and there is no ETA when they will be back in stock. Pictures if you have these mounted would be great.
Thanks
Bushnell Trophy 1x32 MP
$149-179
Barska 1x30 IR
$90-100
|
Aside from the performance of the optics, what is the mounted distance from top of rail to center of scope?
|
02-25-2010, 11:23 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
1.5" i believe. My Bushnell 1x32 cowitnesses perfectly without the need of a riser. I run it on one of my 223 ARs. I actually prefer the T over my . optics. I like the options between red and green and the 10 different intensity settings.
It is large and bulky, and it mounts over my delta ring since the mount takes up several rail slots.
Ignore the low quality of this blackberry phone photo.
Mounted on my M&P15 ORC:
Through it on my 15-22:
__________________
Cliff Rock
|
02-25-2010, 11:42 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14,661
Likes: 7,937
Liked 20,623 Times in 5,958 Posts
|
|
Okay.. so the Bushnell = 1.5'' and co-witness fine. I wonder about the Barska cuz the pics appear much taller.
|
02-25-2010, 01:54 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: California
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I've been trying to find out more info on them but there websites are not very helpful. They both have very good reviews though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChattanoogaPhil
Aside from the performance of the optics, what is the mounted distance from top of rail to center of scope?
|
|
02-25-2010, 03:00 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Truly unlimited eye relief:
3'-4' away with my blackberry:
__________________
Cliff Rock
Last edited by hotnanas; 02-25-2010 at 03:03 PM.
|
02-25-2010, 08:29 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: California
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Do you notice it being very heavy?
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotnanas
Truly unlimited eye relief:
3'-4' away with my blackberry:
|
|
02-25-2010, 11:41 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
not at all.
__________________
Cliff Rock
|
02-26-2010, 02:02 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
I've got the Bushnell as well and I really like it. I've used a Barska red dot before (not the 1x30 IR you are considering) but I like the T-dot of the Bushnell much better than the plan red dot that my Barska had. I find target acquisition to be faster and easier with it.
I don't find it to be too heavy or large. It cowitnesses well with the Magpul MBUS sights I have. It also feels well built and is very solid.
Here are a few pictures of my 15-22... not the most recent pics but you'll get some additional views of it at least.
|
02-26-2010, 04:16 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
...once upon a time, not long ago, amazon had the bushnell for $80...
__________________
Cliff Rock
|
02-26-2010, 04:22 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
yeah, amazon's prices jump around a lot - sometimes they have great deals.
|
02-26-2010, 06:40 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14,661
Likes: 7,937
Liked 20,623 Times in 5,958 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by idbstyler
I've been trying to find out more info on them but there websites are not very helpful. They both have very good reviews though.
|
Here's a couple reviews. One guy said it was great and co-witness with his M4 sights just fine (so that explains the height question). The other guy said the scope sucks.
Reviews for Barska 1x30 IR M16 Electro Sight AC10984 Riflescope Rifle scope - View or add your review!
|
02-26-2010, 08:09 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: California
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Yea I think I'm going to go with the Bushnell. I've heard nothing but good reviews from it. I like the look of it and I also Like the T with the red dot.
|
02-26-2010, 10:25 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
I don't know if the one you were looking at was different but my Bushnell has red and green settings. Not sure if there is perhaps an older model where one of them only has red... but I really dig the option of using green for lower light conditions as I think it works a lot better in those circumstances.
If there are two models you may want to look for the red/green model as it's nice to be able to choose according to the conditions.
|
02-27-2010, 05:39 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Valdez, Alaska, USA
Posts: 648
Likes: 535
Liked 176 Times in 78 Posts
|
|
FWIW, I had two of the bushnells. I liked the first so well I bought a second but it had a canted reticle. Apparently this was a problem with some of the early version IIs with the backup sight on top. If you can check to make sure the reticle is straight I would go for the Bushnell. They are a little heavy but for range or hunting it's a nice unit.
|
02-27-2010, 01:18 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
I'll bite. What purpose/advantage is there with a Green dot? (Just curious.)
-- Chuck
|
02-27-2010, 01:27 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Greensburg , PA
Posts: 2,160
Likes: 60
Liked 503 Times in 239 Posts
|
|
Green is for night, but a lot of good a green reticule will do, without Night Vision
I think a green dot, green hairs etc, would be great for dusk, sun is starting to go down, switch to green. During the heat of the day, Green isn't even visible so, red it is!
|
02-27-2010, 04:01 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
my only dislike for the sight is that I always leave it on after I play with it. Battery life is now tested to more than 36 hours (3 overnighters at 12 hours a piece...not including any range/practice time) and still going strong.
I am guessing it would be in my best interest to hit up CVS for some backup batteries.
__________________
Cliff Rock
|
02-27-2010, 09:27 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Yep, it's just as Brett said. Green does work a lot better, in my opinion, as it starts to get darker out. I've used it at dusk several times and I really like it. It seems sharper in low light conditions than the red did simply because the red can appear too bright. However red is MUCH better for daylight conditions as you can barely see the green even on its brightest setting.
|
02-28-2010, 01:51 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
also, just a thought...
another flaw is the backup sights mounted ontop of the bushnell. They are not adjustable. I honestly haven't shot using them, but they definitely do not line up with what I aim at with my irons or holo.
but in reality...why would I ever need backup-backup sights?
__________________
Cliff Rock
|
02-28-2010, 01:45 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Not only are they non-adjustable... but they are rather thick and blocky. They really obscures whatever you are shooting at so I wouldn't have any great expectation for precision shooting with them. Next time I'm at the range I'm going to throw up a big target and shoot with them to see where it places the bullet. Perhaps they would be good for quick, close quarters shots?
Otherwise yeah, I don't really see the point of them if not for something like that.
|
05-05-2010, 11:22 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Buddy of mine just got the Barska and loves it. He hasn't had any problems so far. Reticle is clear and crisp. Got a great deal at the Cabelas website.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|