Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Rifles and Shotguns > Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22

Notices

Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22 Dedicated to the Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-21-2012, 09:16 PM
rraisley rraisley is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 672
Likes: 3
Liked 230 Times in 149 Posts
Default Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22

I've had my 15-22 for just over a week, and have only gotten to shoot it twice: Indoors with 175 rounds, had one failure of some time but not sure what kind.

Today, at an outdoor range, shot 350 rounds. Seemed reliable for the first 200 or so, then started getting more failure to ejects. Seemed to get worse toward the end, with maybe 6-8 in total. I remember a post here from someone who had a similar problem, and got a new ejector from S&W. With my new MOE, I don't know that that is required, but it makes me wonder.

I'm using Federal Champion copper-plated 1260 fps 36 grain rounds.

Should I be checking something in particular? I was very surprised that the trigger still fired the FP, even when the slide was no where near being in battery(!?). Usually the shells were sideways, but one or two were on end. Also, usually, a new bullet had already fed into the chamber, but the ejecting shell kept the slide from moving all the way forward.

Anyhow, it did occur as the gun got dirtier; should I be concerned? What should I do/check?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-21-2012, 11:10 PM
thacheese thacheese is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Southern CT
Posts: 431
Likes: 30
Liked 34 Times in 27 Posts
Default

if your rifle is firing oob send it back, you probably have spring issues.

this is a safety issue.

Last edited by thacheese; 05-21-2012 at 11:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-21-2012, 11:13 PM
rraisley rraisley is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 672
Likes: 3
Liked 230 Times in 149 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thacheese View Post
if your rifle is firing oob send it back, you probably have spring issues.
Well, at this point, I don't know if it's firing "oob", whatever that means. That's why I'm posting here. If it's adjustment, or dirt, or whatever, I don't want to send it back. Anyhow, people here will know much better than I what to expect, and what to do.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-21-2012, 11:20 PM
Alk8944 Alk8944 is offline
Suspended
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sandy Utah
Posts: 8,747
Likes: 1,590
Liked 8,916 Times in 3,555 Posts
Default

Did you, just by chance, think of cleaning the gun???????

Several hundred rounds of .22 rimfire and you are having extraction/ejection issues? What do you think will happen if you don't clean and lubricate it?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-21-2012, 11:24 PM
ragingyeti's Avatar
ragingyeti ragingyeti is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 327
Likes: 4
Liked 51 Times in 24 Posts
Default

Oob means "out of battery" meaning your rifle fires without the round being in the chamber and the bolt not fully closed. I do not think this is happening to you. You are having failure to eject issues, where rounds aren't fully coming out of the rifle in time.

I think your rifle might just be new and dirty. Clean it well, and keep shooting so everything breaks in. If the problem persists send it to Smith and Wesson for repair.

And BTW, if the bolt is not fully closed, all AR15 triggers will still function. But since the bolt is not seated properly, it is unlikely a round would go off.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #6  
Old 05-21-2012, 11:27 PM
thacheese thacheese is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Southern CT
Posts: 431
Likes: 30
Liked 34 Times in 27 Posts
Default

you need to clarify what you posted. the fp should not be moving if the bolt isn't closed.

Last edited by thacheese; 05-21-2012 at 11:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-21-2012, 11:35 PM
copper06 copper06 is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Parma, Ohio, USA
Posts: 71
Likes: 24
Liked 18 Times in 10 Posts
Default

Did you thoroughly clean AND lubricate it before your first session?

Did you thoroughly clean AND lubricate it before your second session?

Once the gang has answers to these questions I'm sure they can help you a lot better.

Using factory magazines? Tried different brands of ammo to see if symptoms change?

Good luck!
__________________
Live For Today Not Tomorrow
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-21-2012, 11:38 PM
thacheese thacheese is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Southern CT
Posts: 431
Likes: 30
Liked 34 Times in 27 Posts
Default

provided it was cleaned and lubed properly you should be able to go through 500-1000 rounds of federal bulk with no issues. is the face of the bolt caked up at all?

you could also clean it really well and try another brand of ammo. while it isn't the case for me, some have said they had issues with federal. you could have a picky rifle.

Last edited by thacheese; 05-21-2012 at 11:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-22-2012, 08:40 AM
davevt48732 davevt48732 is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Default

It was new and dirty. Mine had the same symptoms. Every 300 rounds or so I just pull the bolt assembly, give it a quick wipe down and then spray it with some rem oil. Do this for a bit as it breaks in and you will be fine.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-22-2012, 09:52 AM
rraisley rraisley is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 672
Likes: 3
Liked 230 Times in 149 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alk8944 View Post
Did you, just by chance, think of cleaning the gun???????

Several hundred rounds of .22 rimfire and you are having extraction/ejection issues? What do you think will happen if you don't clean and lubricate it?
So, you're saying that if I want to go to the range to shoot 300-350 rounds, I have to take my cleaning kit with me? If so, this gun is more finicky than others I've shot.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #11  
Old 05-22-2012, 09:54 AM
rraisley rraisley is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 672
Likes: 3
Liked 230 Times in 149 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by copper06 View Post
Did you thoroughly clean AND lubricate it before your first session?
Yes.
Quote:
Did you thoroughly clean AND lubricate it before your second session?
Yes
Quote:
Once the gang has answers to these questions I'm sure they can help you a lot better.
I guess I assumed people would know that I cleaned a new gun, and cleaned after shooting each time.
Quote:
Using factory magazines? Tried different brands of ammo to see if symptoms change?
Only the included 25 round mag at this time.
Quote:
Good luck!
Thank you. ;-)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-22-2012, 10:00 AM
rraisley rraisley is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 672
Likes: 3
Liked 230 Times in 149 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ragingyeti View Post
Oob means "out of battery" meaning your rifle fires without the round being in the chamber and the bolt not fully closed. I do not think this is happening to you. You are having failure to eject issues, where rounds aren't fully coming out of the rifle in time.
Correct, some rounds have failed to eject. But while in that position (empty shell preventing the bolt from going all the way forward), the firing pin definitely will spring forward when the trigger is pulled. When this happens, it feels just like a dud round (trigger pulls, gun goes click, no bang), until I check and then remove the shell. If I don't pull the slide back all the way (sorry about the pistol terminology - this is my first rifle) before continuing, the gun won't fire, as the firing pin is not cocked. That is the main thing that surprised me: that the gun will fire without being fully in battery.
Quote:
I think your rifle might just be new and dirty. Clean it well, and keep shooting so everything breaks in. If the problem persists send it to Smith and Wesson for repair.
I definitely will. Just wondered if I should do anything else.
Quote:
And BTW, if the bolt is not fully closed, all AR15 triggers will still function. But since the bolt is not seated properly, it is unlikely a round would go off.
Ah, okay, didn't know that. Good to know. On any pistol I have, the trigger will not function until the slide is completely in battery. That makes me feel better. Still surprised, but better. ;-)
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-22-2012, 10:03 AM
rraisley rraisley is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 672
Likes: 3
Liked 230 Times in 149 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by davevt48732 View Post
It was new and dirty. Mine had the same symptoms. Every 300 rounds or so I just pull the bolt assembly, give it a quick wipe down and then spray it with some rem oil. Do this for a bit as it breaks in and you will be fine.
Mine was new, but not dirty. Well, okay, if you mean after 300 rounds it was dirty, then yeah, I'd agree. (See how the Internet can lead to misconceptions: I thought by your first sentence you were accusing me of shooting it new without even cleaning and oiling it. Then after your other text, I realize you're just saying it's still a new gun, and was dirty after shooting. So yeah, pulling the bolt assembly, wiping a bit and adding oil, every 300 rounds or so, isn't a bad idea.)

Good advice; thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-22-2012, 10:07 AM
rraisley rraisley is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 672
Likes: 3
Liked 230 Times in 149 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thacheese View Post
provided it was cleaned and lubed properly you should be able to go through 500-1000 rounds of federal bulk with no issues.
See, that's what /I/ though.
Quote:
Is the face of the bolt caked up at all?
No, it wasn't bad.
Quote:
you could also clean it really well and try another brand of ammo. while it isn't the case for me, some have said they had issues with federal. you could have a picky rifle.
Well, Federal is the most recommended brand in the instruction manual. I'd shoot the cheap CCI stuff, but don't like shooting supersonic lead, preferring jacketed. And I have over a thousand rounds of it. But certainly if the problem persists, I'll try that.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-22-2012, 12:06 PM
thacheese thacheese is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Southern CT
Posts: 431
Likes: 30
Liked 34 Times in 27 Posts
Default

there are winchester bulks (555/m-22) CCI tactical, or mini mags, as well as other brands... Even with the mini mags in 100rd packs, a few hundred rounds shouldn't be more than $20. I would recommend trying something else if only for testing purposes. I would only avoid the specific ones listed to not use in the book.


Quote:
Originally Posted by rraisley View Post
See, that's what /I/ though.

No, it wasn't bad.

Well, Federal is the most recommended brand in the instruction manual. I'd shoot the cheap CCI stuff, but don't like shooting supersonic lead, preferring jacketed. And I have over a thousand rounds of it. But certainly if the problem persists, I'll try that.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-22-2012, 04:05 PM
GMC man GMC man is offline
US Veteran
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NC
Posts: 592
Likes: 751
Liked 305 Times in 193 Posts
Default

I had some problems with mine when I first got it I call it the NGS new gun syndrome after about 500 rounds it got better and has been great it just needed to be broke in everything was to stiff.

I would say after a box (550) if it doesnt improve get it looked at by a gunsmith or call S & W.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-22-2012, 04:59 PM
Foxone Foxone is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 137
Likes: 3
Liked 39 Times in 18 Posts
Default

I had the same. Try tuning your ejector, make sure it runs JUST snug to the bolt but not rubbing. This solved my issues, I went from a clean gun with 2 out of a mag FTE to running 4 mags without a single FTE.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-22-2012, 05:03 PM
rraisley rraisley is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 672
Likes: 3
Liked 230 Times in 149 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxone View Post
I had the same. Try tuning your ejector, make sure it runs JUST snug to the bolt but not rubbing. This solved my issues, I went from a clean gun with 2 out of a mag FTE to running 4 mags without a single FTE.
How do I go about tuning or adjusting it?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-23-2012, 11:48 AM
Foxone Foxone is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 137
Likes: 3
Liked 39 Times in 18 Posts
Default

Very carefully bend it, it does not take much, and you dont want to be bending it back and forth. Baby steps till it just sits off the bolt. Take the upper off the rifle so you can cycle the bolt and watch the ejector, make sure your tweaking the EJECTOR, not the EXTRACTOR. Mine came from the factory screwed up, and since I fixed it, it runs so well I went ahead and made an SBR out of it. Of course, make sure your extractor is grabbing also, I like to use fired shells because that simulates a distorted shell as it would be after being fired, any extractor will pull a fresh round.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-23-2012, 12:13 PM
rraisley rraisley is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 672
Likes: 3
Liked 230 Times in 149 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxone View Post
Very carefully bend it, it does not take much, and you dont want to be bending it back and forth. Baby steps till it just sits off the bolt. Take the upper off the rifle so you can cycle the bolt and watch the ejector, make sure your tweaking the EJECTOR, not the EXTRACTOR. Mine came from the factory screwed up, and since I fixed it, it runs so well I went ahead and made an SBR out of it. Of course, make sure your extractor is grabbing also, I like to use fired shells because that simulates a distorted shell as it would be after being fired, any extractor will pull a fresh round.
Uh, I hate to ask this, but is the EJECTOR the part that sticks out beside the barrel, and is not mounted on the bolt? (I searched for a parts breakdown, but couldn't find one.) And if so, I can see how it could be easily bent (snagged on a bore snake, for example). But I have no idea how or what direction to bend it to make it better.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 05-23-2012, 12:31 PM
rraisley rraisley is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 672
Likes: 3
Liked 230 Times in 149 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxone View Post
Very carefully bend it, it does not take much, and you dont want to be bending it back and forth. Baby steps till it just sits off the bolt...
There's a video I found that I think is showing what you're talking about. It's not clear, but I think I get the idea:

Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22 Ejector (Extractor) Fix - YouTube
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-23-2012, 12:50 PM
Foxone Foxone is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 137
Likes: 3
Liked 39 Times in 18 Posts
Default

Yep, thats the piece. You want it to just barely NOT touch the bolt, the dry cycling a round by hand, you will see how to the ejector needs to hit the empty shell.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-18-2012, 05:42 PM
rraisley rraisley is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 672
Likes: 3
Liked 230 Times in 149 Posts
Default

Okay, using the above information, I bent slightly the ejector to have it run closely to the bolt, and went shooting for the first time after mods last week. I had bought 3 new S&W 25-round mags, in addition to the one that came with the gun, and was using Federal Classic and Federal American Eagle, 36 gr copper jacketed hollow point about equally (hard to buy copper non-hollow point for any decent price).

I got probably an average of 3 or 4 failure-to-ejects with each mag, about equal with each of the ammo types used. Hideous and embarrassing, as my friend, running a much-maligned H&K Umarex, had not one single problem. The problem seemed to get better, the more I shot, and toward the end of about 500 rounds usually got through a mag without a FTE, but not always.

I had cleaned and lubricated, properly I believe, prior to going to the range, using M-Pro cleaner and lube. I may have lubed heavier than necessary (not saying I did, saying I may have), as the dealer I purchased from said they liked to run wet, which I have read here is not true.

I've now tried cleaning/lubing with Eezox, which basically runs dry after cleaning, to see if that helps, but haven't shot that way yet. Now, I only have roughly 1,000 rounds through the gun so far, but I'm sure you'll all agree that this is rather atrocious performance (and far from typical, based on what I've read).

I saw no difference with any of the magazines, the only tendency being to less FTE's the more I shot, leading me to the possible overlubrication as a possibility.

Any other thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-18-2012, 05:57 PM
Foxone Foxone is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 137
Likes: 3
Liked 39 Times in 18 Posts
Default

Geez, I dunno. I reassembled my SBR last week, took it out, shot 350 rounds without any issues at all. I run it DRY. I put a drop of clp on the rails where it slides on the bolt and thats it. I know you said it was clean, so I wont harp on that, just make sure there isnt a bunch of crud packed inside the ejector hook. How does it function if you cycle a round by hand? does the round stick at all in the chamber?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 06-18-2012, 06:02 PM
rraisley rraisley is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 672
Likes: 3
Liked 230 Times in 149 Posts
Default

No crud anywhere. I didn't cycle a round by hand, so not sure about that (tried that when diagnosing a feeding problem on my Hi-Standard, and ended up with a bullet in my den floor, an irate wife, a red face and almost an end to shooting). The FTE's can end up perpendicular to the bore and flattened, or parallel. It wasn't /dry/, as I said. But I wouldn't have thought a little too much lube (if that's it) would have caused this.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-19-2012, 12:51 AM
Aceman58 Aceman58 is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Concord California
Posts: 570
Likes: 1
Liked 81 Times in 49 Posts
Default

One of the things I do on a new rifle or handgun.. I clean it first with Hopp #9, very very light oil... wipe down dry.. Why, breaking in the weapon with all of its moving parts. It needs to seat itself, let the metal rub and wear itself, break that sucker in is what I'm saying. After about 500 rounds, then clean again, oil, wipe down dry again and do another 500. Then clean and oil her with oil or Tretra Lube or any one of the good gun oils. I do that with all my rifles as well as handguns and never have issues with them.. Good luck.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 06-19-2012, 11:26 AM
DelFuego DelFuego is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Somewhere in California
Posts: 547
Likes: 69
Liked 378 Times in 165 Posts
Default

I was having your issue too with the Federal Bulk packs. I've since switched to CCI Blazer and Winchester M-22 bulk packs and have not had any problems. I've shot over 4,000 rounds through mine over the last two months.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 06-19-2012, 11:33 AM
rraisley rraisley is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 672
Likes: 3
Liked 230 Times in 149 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DelFuego View Post
I was having your issue too with the Federal Bulk packs. I've since switched to CCI Blazer and Winchester M-22 bulk packs and have not had any problems. I've shot over 4,000 rounds through mine over the last two months.
With Failures to Eject? I guess I might have expected more dud rounds or less accuracy, but I'm surprised that the round type would make a difference as to whether it ejects or not. Not saying it doesn't, just that I'm surprised.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 06-19-2012, 05:13 PM
Erno86 Erno86 is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Marriottsville, Maryland
Posts: 263
Likes: 215
Liked 239 Times in 120 Posts
Default

May I suggest that you stick with the CCI Blazer 525 bulk round packs if your looking for accuracy and economy as in my "Best Buy."

Federal...has to much velocity deviation in its rounds, which makes it have failure to eject and accuracy problems. Same goes for the Winchester M-22's, in which I was extremely disapointed in its function and accuracy in my 22 dedicated upper's.

Last edited by Erno86; 06-19-2012 at 05:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 06-19-2012, 09:33 PM
rraisley rraisley is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 672
Likes: 3
Liked 230 Times in 149 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erno86 View Post
May I suggest that you stick with the CCI Blazer 525 bulk round packs if your looking for accuracy and economy as in my "Best Buy."
I won't use solid lead supersonic rounds. That was beaten into me from my pistol days, and hasn't fallen out yet. I might change my mind in the future, but for now, I feel I need copper jacketed to prevent lead buildup.
Quote:
Federal...has to much velocity deviation in its rounds, which makes it have failure to eject and accuracy problems. Same goes for the Winchester M-22's, in which I was extremely disappointed in its function and accuracy in my 22 dedicated upper's.
I'm very surprised that velocity deviation could cause a failure to eject, when much larger differences between ammo types and manufacturers does not. But I won't say it can't.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 06-20-2012, 10:23 AM
Plumbago Plumbago is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Liked 45 Times in 32 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=rraisley;136572276]I won't use solid lead supersonic rounds. That was beaten into me from my pistol days, and hasn't fallen out yet. I might change my mind in the future, but for now, I feel I need copper jacketed to prevent lead buildup.

This is so wrong! Teach the old dog new tricks....and try some other ammo variations....it's time to move into the 21 century.....best regards Plum
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 06-20-2012, 01:06 PM
Majorlk's Avatar
Majorlk Majorlk is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Naugatuck, CT
Posts: 5,819
Likes: 5,480
Liked 4,286 Times in 2,238 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rraisley View Post
I won't use solid lead supersonic rounds. That was beaten into me from my pistol days, and hasn't fallen out yet. I might change my mind in the future, but for now, I feel I need copper jacketed to prevent lead buildup.
Modern lead .22 bullets are all lubricated to one degree or another. Winchester uses their lubaloy technology and other manufacturers use something similar, or at least a wax coating. Leading is nowhere near the problem it was even 20 years ago.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 06-20-2012, 02:57 PM
rraisley rraisley is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 672
Likes: 3
Liked 230 Times in 149 Posts
Default

UPDATE:

Went shooting today, firing 225 rounds of Federal Champion bulk and 225 rounds of CCI AR Tactical. I had cleaned the gun last time with Eezox, wiping all excess off, and added no other lubricant. The resultant failure to ejects were:

Federal: 11 FTE
CCI: 6 FTE

So, CCI was better than Federal by almost 2:1, but even 6 FTEs in 225 rounds is IMHO way too much.

More concerning, one round when fired felt different after feeding, so I checked the bolt and saw that the bolt had not gone into battery, but was about 1/8" to 1/10" out of battery. Thank goodness I didn't pull the trigger! I ejected it, removed the mag, and inserted it back in manually. It didn't go in the full way. Releasing the slide ended up with it again 1/8" to 1/10" out of battery. I thought at the time it was one of the Federals (wanting to blame the cheaper bulk ammo), but kept the round for measuring and realized after I got home it was one of the CCIs.

I've measured the case and bullet of the round that would not go into battery, as well as others, and found that while the cases seem about the same, the bullet diameter of the round that would not go into battery was about 0.004" larger in diameter (0.227"+ vs 0.223"). And I really do NOT like the idea that the 15-22 would have fired the round that far out of battery. That bothers the hell out of me (and would have done more than that, had I fired it).

So, I've lubed with a quality lube, not over-lubed, tried quality ammo, and still have a problem. 17 FTEs in 450 rounds is not acceptable to me. Time to contact S&W?
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 06-20-2012, 03:11 PM
Gopher Slayer's Avatar
Gopher Slayer Gopher Slayer is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington/Montana
Posts: 999
Likes: 475
Liked 608 Times in 322 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rraisley View Post
UPDATE:

Went shooting today, firing 225 rounds of Federal Champion bulk and 225 rounds of CCI AR Tactical. I had cleaned the gun last time with Eezox, wiping all excess off, and added no other lubricant. The resultant failure to ejects were:

Federal: 11 FTE
CCI: 6 FTE

So, CCI was better than Federal by almost 2:1, but even 6 FTEs in 225 rounds is IMHO way too much.

More concerning, one round when fired felt different after feeding, so I checked the bolt and saw that the bolt had not gone into battery, but was about 1/8" to 1/10" out of battery. Thank goodness I didn't pull the trigger! I ejected it, removed the mag, and inserted it back in manually. It didn't go in the full way. Releasing the slide ended up with it again 1/8" to 1/10" out of battery. I thought at the time it was one of the Federals (wanting to blame the cheaper bulk ammo), but kept the round for measuring and realized after I got home it was one of the CCIs.

I've measured the case and bullet of the round that would not go into battery, as well as others, and found that while the cases seem about the same, the bullet diameter of the round that would not go into battery was about 0.004" larger in diameter (0.227"+ vs 0.223"). And I really do NOT like the idea that the 15-22 would have fired the round that far out of battery. That bothers the hell out of me (and would have done more than that, had I fired it).

So, I've lubed with a quality lube, not over-lubed, tried quality ammo, and still have a problem. 17 FTEs in 450 rounds is not acceptable to me. Time to contact S&W?

Definitely. That really sucks man. They will take care of you, but still...
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 06-20-2012, 03:25 PM
rraisley rraisley is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 672
Likes: 3
Liked 230 Times in 149 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gopher Slayer View Post
Definitely. That really sucks man. They will take care of you, but still...
So, just got off the phone with S&W. The fellow in service told me he felt that 17 FTE in 450 rounds was an acceptable number for a .22! REALLY??? If they feel that is acceptable, then what reason is there to even send it back? He suggested I try CCI SUBSONIC! (despite the fact that the manual says to use absolutely NO subsonic). Do they know what they're doing there??

Sorry, this has me a little hot. I'm beginning to think this was a huge mistake, as I can definitely say I do not enjoy shooting this gun.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 06-20-2012, 03:44 PM
bobbydachin's Avatar
bobbydachin bobbydachin is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Miami. FL
Posts: 15
Likes: 9
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Wow, your xp is a bit unsettling. I was just over worrying about oob issues with the 15-22. On the good side I have heard nothing but good things about S&W customer service. Sorry brother
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 06-20-2012, 03:50 PM
rraisley rraisley is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 672
Likes: 3
Liked 230 Times in 149 Posts
Default

Yeah, I consider the whole thing unsettling. While I'm shooting my 15-22, the fellow with me shot equal rounds on his Colt AR-style and M&P, and other than 1 light strike on the Colt had zero problems. This is downright embarrassing. I just wish I hadn't bought $600 worth of accessories for this gun before I knew about its reliability (or lack of same). Mind you, I know most people here are thrilled with their 15-22s, but mine is headed for the back of the closet.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 06-20-2012, 03:53 PM
copper06 copper06 is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Parma, Ohio, USA
Posts: 71
Likes: 24
Liked 18 Times in 10 Posts
Default

Good quality pictures of the various parts mentioned by several posters so they can possibly help determine if you've overlooked something?

Also take a camera to the range with you when next you go so you can take some pictures of the stoppages you're encountering to help diagnose those.

I can relate to it sucking but empower yourself in trying to fix the issue(s). Speaking to only one customer service rep. is not the end all/be all.

I'd try the pictures, do some more research, try some other ammo and yes, call S&W back. Get a name, date, time you called as in our day and age, you have to keep a paper trail.

I'd be willing to bet dollars to donuts that the pictures alone will help solve some or most of the problems. It's worth a shot!
__________________
Live For Today Not Tomorrow
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 06-20-2012, 04:40 PM
Erno86 Erno86 is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Marriottsville, Maryland
Posts: 263
Likes: 215
Liked 239 Times in 120 Posts
Default

I would tend to agree with the S&W service man --- that you only had 6 FTE's from the CCI's --- is acceptable. The Federal's... with only 11 FTE's --- is also acceptable. It is a blowback gun, and bulk ammo is not made perfect with every round. You have a good feel for the rifle --- when you felt that the bolt did not fully go into battery with the rifle.
It is the OOB's that scare me. I would try to not have many people stand near the ejection port, or your hand on the magazine below the magazine well if an OOB goes off. How far, and how fast, does bits of brass fly from the ejection port from an OOB premature detonation from a 22 rifle or pistol?
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 06-20-2012, 05:27 PM
hkyplr hkyplr is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Johnstown, CO
Posts: 211
Likes: 85
Liked 75 Times in 52 Posts
Default

I would agree with rraisley, that is too many FTE's. I just shot about 315 rounds mix of Federal Champion bulk and CCI Blazer with 1 FTF and that is all. I think I can count on one hand the amount of Failures I have had in the approx 2,000 rounds I have put through this rifle, all "cheap" ammo, with none of them being FTE.
Just my $.02
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 06-20-2012, 05:30 PM
Foxone Foxone is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 137
Likes: 3
Liked 39 Times in 18 Posts
Default

I dont agree with the failures rates. Like I said, 350 rounds downrange last Friday, not one issue. It can be done, its something small, I wish I had that gun here to look at.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 06-20-2012, 06:37 PM
Majorlk's Avatar
Majorlk Majorlk is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Naugatuck, CT
Posts: 5,819
Likes: 5,480
Liked 4,286 Times in 2,238 Posts
Default

The rifle need to go to S&W. It's just that simple.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #43  
Old 06-20-2012, 06:43 PM
JaPes's Avatar
JaPes JaPes is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: NW Suburbs, Illinois
Posts: 4,013
Likes: 3,272
Liked 3,961 Times in 1,871 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Majorlk View Post
The rifle need to go to S&W. It's just that simple.
Agreed. The OP did everything prudent to address the issue on his own. At this point, make use of the best feature of a S&W firearm: the 1 year warranty/limited lifetime service warranty.
__________________
-John
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #44  
Old 06-20-2012, 06:50 PM
Gopher Slayer's Avatar
Gopher Slayer Gopher Slayer is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington/Montana
Posts: 999
Likes: 475
Liked 608 Times in 322 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Majorlk View Post
The rifle need to go to S&W. It's just that simple.
This

And don't take no for an answer. I would have told that guy off, and then asked to speak to his manager or a real enthusiast. In the last two boxes of 500 round Blazer bulk (not 525 value pack) I haven't had a single issue. That shows how it can be, and how it should be.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 06-20-2012, 07:05 PM
DelFuego DelFuego is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Somewhere in California
Posts: 547
Likes: 69
Liked 378 Times in 165 Posts
Default

I think I am going to stick with the CCI Blazers for some time because they do not cause me any problems. I just bought 3,000 of them from Palmetto State Armory for less than $100 including shipping and tax.

As for your issue, I would believe that there is something wrong and you shouldn't take no for an answer fron S&W.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 06-21-2012, 01:41 PM
rraisley rraisley is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 672
Likes: 3
Liked 230 Times in 149 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by copper06 View Post
Good quality pictures of the various parts mentioned by several posters so they can possibly help determine if you've overlooked something?

Also take a camera to the range with you when next you go so you can take some pictures of the stoppages you're encountering to help diagnose those.
I'm not going to the range with this gun any more, at least until or if S&W "fixes" it. I consider it unreliable and unsafe. But I took a bunch of pictures of the parts, hoping someone can spot something. I would have preferred them inline with this post, with explanations, but that takes a lot of room so figured I'd just upload them. UPDATE: Since I can only load a max of 5 pics, I went back to doing them inline:

This shows the ejector (I'm in the middle of cleaning, so don't get too hung up on that). Figured it was the main thing you'd want to be looking at:


The bolt looks like the corner contacting the hammer is rusty and misshapen; that's apparently a reflection, because it's all rounded nicely and smooth.






This attempts to show the top of the ejector; I see no wear on it to indicate it's been hitting anything.

This pic shows that the ejector is parallel with the ejection slot, and hopefully the bolt. Not sure if it should be, though.

These show the ejector close to the bolt, as recommended.



The barrel and spring in the background are from my M&P 9C, so obviously have nothing to do with this.


I tried to measure the distance between the top of the ejector and the bottom of the bolt where it slides, but have no way of doing it. To me, it is the last thing that could be wrong. It seems like it should be a bit higher, to hit the ejecting shell better, but it is pretty parallel, so I don't know. I estimate about 0.05" clearance between the top of the ejector and the bolt, but that's just a guess.

Anyhow, there it is, in all its ugly glory. I'd love to hear I have something backwards or that the ejector needs bent up to work right. But I'm not holding my breath.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 06-21-2012, 02:39 PM
DelFuego DelFuego is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Somewhere in California
Posts: 547
Likes: 69
Liked 378 Times in 165 Posts
Default

I just took mine apart to compare it to yours and I don't see anything obvious. Any other comments?
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 06-21-2012, 05:46 PM
Erno86 Erno86 is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Marriottsville, Maryland
Posts: 263
Likes: 215
Liked 239 Times in 120 Posts
Default

I'm not an expert on this subject, but your extractor looks a bit dirty. May I suggest that you get a powerful degreaser {if you have not already}, while wearing eyepro, and spray behind the extractor housing groove. See if the extractor has spring tension. Or... just remove the whole extractor and clean it --- and look and see if the extractor spring is broken or seated properly.

Last edited by Erno86; 06-21-2012 at 05:52 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 06-21-2012, 06:16 PM
Majorlk's Avatar
Majorlk Majorlk is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Naugatuck, CT
Posts: 5,819
Likes: 5,480
Liked 4,286 Times in 2,238 Posts
Default

Based solely on the photographs, the bolt and everything associated with it seems clean and in proper order. The tiny bit of residue around the extractor is meaningless. Other than the ejector being slightly separated from the body of the bolt, I don't see anything wrong there, either. On mine, there is virtually no gap between the bolt body and the ejector.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 06-21-2012, 08:57 PM
rraisley rraisley is offline
Member
Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22 Failures to Eject with (Pretty) New 15-22  
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 672
Likes: 3
Liked 230 Times in 149 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Majorlk View Post
Based solely on the photographs, the bolt and everything associated with it seems clean and in proper order. The tiny bit of residue around the extractor is meaningless. Other than the ejector being slightly separated from the body of the bolt, I don't see anything wrong there, either. On mine, there is virtually no gap between the bolt body and the ejector.
The extractor is free and moves fine, and the spring works. When you mention that on your 15-22, there is virtually no gap between the bolt body and the ejector, do you mean horizontally (which I have adjusted to be as close as possible) or vertically (where I definitely do have a gap, and it does seem to me a bit low compared to the bore)?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2 Shield 9's, no failures ghoffman Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols 2 09-27-2015 03:09 PM
search failures Cpo1944 The Lounge 11 07-18-2013 10:37 PM
Pretty pretty pretty 1905 M&P new to me Docneeley S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 13 02-20-2013 09:57 PM
Failures to Feed Ronbars Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22 2 02-13-2012 12:04 PM
Firing Pin Failures....MIM!!!??? Ultima-Ratio S&W-Smithing 54 02-14-2009 11:29 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:35 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)