Need Your Advice about Possible (or Impossible) First 15-22 Purchase

giants1

Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2021
Messages
267
Reaction score
76
Hi,

I'm new to AR-15s and newer on the M&P Sport Forum. This is my first post here. Since you don't know me, I wanted to give you background and context for my question, which otherwise might be mis-perceived as off-putting.

I'm looking for guns for home defense, indoors and ideally barricated until (or if?) the cops come. Based on the way my house is set up, home defense encounters would be between 2-7 yards. Right now, my primary is a Glock 17, thanks in part to the 30 day wait law between gun purchases here. I've perused the other forum and talked to several people who know more than me. My assessment is to have an AR-15 as a primary weapon, the Glock as back up.

I'm in California, where .22LR pistols, all ammo, and most guns are in short supply. Plus, we can only buy ammo from stores, i.e. no on-line shipments of ammo. I'm limited to 10 round mags, too.

I'm excited that I just bought, and am sitting out, the Kalifornia background check on my Sport ii, due for pick up on 9/14/21 (due to having to wait 30 days after the Glock purchase).
Ammo prices are crazy and, paradoxically, I can get .223/5.56 easier than .22LR. However, the .22LR is 50-80% cheaper than the .223, depending on what little is available.

I was hoping to work on certain skills economically by buying a 15-22 and setting it up exactly as my Sport ii, eg quick release sling. I've researched and took delivery of accessories, eg sling, bore sight, front iron site adjustment tool, and M-Lok freefloating handguards. All I need is the rifle :)

However, I can't find the 15-22 in stores and one store, appointment only, won't even return my messages! My LGS said that the 15-22 is actually banned and is otherwise lacking my enthusiasm about S&W M&Ps (though they reluctantly sold me the Sport ii, trying to upsell me to a 2x more expensive JP Enterprises).

They have an HK 416 in .22LR (made by Umarex), proprietary and hard to find mags (not as bad as the 15-22s) and has only a 1 year warranty for $429. For $595, they have a Tippmann M4-22 Elite, which has a lifetime warranty, really nice features (eg 5150 barrel), and proprietary mags. Today, I held both guns and they felt comfortable (collapsible/adjusting stocks are legal on .22LR ARs, but not the Sport ii, and I have long arms).

I like the idea of lifetime warranties (most of my power and hand tools and aftermarket car parts are and manufacturers probably have my photo on their targets, LOL), and that was a significant reason I bought the Sport ii.

Both the HK and Tippman have good on-line reviews.

Of course, they have the venerable Ruger 10/22, for about $300, but that would be a different set-up from the AR-15 that I'm trying to emulate.

The other option is to do the CMMG .22LR conversion kit. They offer a lifetime warranty, have good on-line reviews, and would cost about $250, including mags. That set up would almost perfectly emulate my Sport ii, sans the recoil and easier clean up. However, that rig seems fussy about ammo, at least anecdotally. The on-line owner's manual just says to avoid sub-sonic rounds.

Any thoughts on the HK and Tippmann .22LRs?

I'm also apprehensive about the .22LR, because I've read about how dirty they make the guns and squibs. I just read the ammo section of the 15-22's on-line owner manual, which wasn't really helpful (in the past, they apparently made specific ammo recommendations). I use only store-bought ammo compatible with my guns (e.g. buying 55-62 grain for my 1:9" twist Sport ii) when I owned guns in a prior life, cleaned them after every outing to the range. I also read on other forums lots of defects with CCIs last year, which I can't find here for the life of me.

I bought a Hoppe Bore Snake and have a cleaning kit and gun cleaner in hand.

Over the past few weeks, the only .22LR that I could find, and which I quickly bought are: Federal Champion (blue box), 40 grain, lead, round nose, 1,200 FPS; and Norma TAC-22, 40 grain, 1,100 fps.

Can you help address the cleaning and ammo quality issues, possibly recommending what might be good?

Finally, a police acquaintance in a different part of Kalifornia suggested that I use a Ruger Mini-14 for home defense, because that would look less aggressive than an AR-15 to a jury or district attorney. By the way, where I live, the Castle Doctrine and stand your ground apply.
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
Home defense gun!

Did you ever give any thought to a pump action, either 12 or 20 ga shotgun. Perfect for the short distance that you would be shooting in your home, you might even be able to buy a used Remington 870. I don't know the laws in CA but you might not be as restricted legally either.
 
I wouldn't use a rimfire for home defense. They're great for plinking and target shooting. Not reliable enough as a defensive weapon.

Thanks. Just to be clear, the M&P 15 Sport ii in .223/5.56 will be my primary weapon, Glock 17 in 9 mm back up.

The 15-22, HK, or Tippmann would be for training for the Sport ii and to save money on shooting the Sport ii.
 
Thanks. I have. Remington 870s are REALLY hard to find out here, as are Mini-14s. While I and my neighbors live in stucco buildings, I am concerned with over-penetration of #00 (based upon another thread in the Sport forum). I've also had handgun training in the distant past and was a pretty good shot.
 
OK , * If * I am comprehending you plans & inquiries , you have already aquired a G17 , and are pending on your purchase of M&P Sport ll . You current inquiries are regarding an understudy .22lr AR- 15 shaped firearm . If that's close :

G17 is perfectly servicable in stock form .

M&P Sport ll is generally adaquate budget entry level AR .

A .22lr understudy rifle is a good concept , plus all the uses for a .22 rimfire generally . Either of your choices would be adaquate. All .22lr is dirty to a degree . During the present ammunition crunch , and maximum output to keep up with demand , all mfg are putting quanity over QC for rimfire ammo . Use what you can get , and don't overly obsess . If it gets dirty , clean it . If it malfunctions occasionally , well you're practicing on the range , not defending your self .

AR-15 are very versatile , but specifically for defense accross the room at 5yds, I favor the shotgun . 870 are in short supply ? Lots of other viable pump shotgun options , starting with Mossberg .

At 5 yards , in SoCal where burglars and home invaders probably won't be wearing 5 layers of heavy clothes under a Carhart or leather jacket , 4 Buck will be adaquate if wall penetration is concern .

Is .22lr rifle or a shotgun highest priority for next aquisitions ? You'll have to decide for yourself .

*****************

And Welcome !
 
R/E your .22lr choices. First off, is the M&P 15/22 actually illegal in CA? Don't know CA law, but I think a "neutered" version is available?

The H&K 416 .22 is actually made by Walther for H&K. I have the same basic gun made by Walther, only it is the Colt stamped version of the M4 carbine.

Mine is as well made as these guns go, accurate, and reliable. Magazines marked for the Colt M4 .22 rimfire will also fit the H&K.

I have shot a couple different AR's equipped with the CMMG .22 kit, and they functioned well.

In real life, if you ever have to shoot someone in self defense, you will be judged on whether your actions were justified or not, not on the "style" of gun you used.

I am unfamiliar with the Tippman version.

Larry
 
Hi,

I'm new to AR-15s and newer on the M&P Sport Forum. This is my first post here. Since you don't know me, I wanted to give you background and context for my question, which otherwise might be mis-perceived as off-putting.

I'm looking for guns for home defense, indoors and ideally barricated until (or if?) the cops come. Based on the way my house is set up, home defense encounters would be between 2-7 yards. Right now, my primary is a Glock 17, thanks in part to the 30 day wait law between gun purchases here. I've perused the other forum and talked to several people who know more than me. My assessment is to have an AR-15 as a primary weapon, the Glock as back up.

I'm in California, where .22LR pistols, all ammo, and most guns are in short supply. Plus, we can only buy ammo from stores, i.e. no on-line shipments of ammo. I'm limited to 10 round mags, too.

I'm excited that I just bought, and am sitting out, the Kalifornia background check on my Sport ii, due for pick up on 9/14/21 (due to having to wait 30 days after the Glock purchase).
Ammo prices are crazy and, paradoxically, I can get .223/5.56 easier than .22LR. However, the .22LR is 50-80% cheaper than the .223, depending on what little is available.

I was hoping to work on certain skills economically by buying a 15-22 and setting it up exactly as my Sport ii, eg quick release sling. I've researched and took delivery of accessories, eg sling, bore sight, front iron site adjustment tool, and M-Lok freefloating handguards. All I need is the rifle :)

However, I can't find the 15-22 in stores and one store, appointment only, won't even return my messages! My LGS said that the 15-22 is actually banned and is otherwise lacking my enthusiasm about S&W M&Ps (though they reluctantly sold me the Sport ii, trying to upsell me to a 2x more expensive JP Enterprises).

They have an HK 416 in .22LR (made by Umarex), proprietary and hard to find mags (not as bad as the 15-22s) and has only a 1 year warranty for $429. For $595, they have a Tippmann M4-22 Elite, which has a lifetime warranty, really nice features (eg 5150 barrel), and proprietary mags. Today, I held both guns and they felt comfortable (collapsible/adjusting stocks are legal on .22LR ARs, but not the Sport ii, and I have long arms).

I like the idea of lifetime warranties (most of my power and hand tools and aftermarket car parts are and manufacturers probably have my photo on their targets, LOL), and that was a significant reason I bought the Sport ii.

Both the HK and Tippman have good on-line reviews.

Of course, they have the venerable Ruger 10/22, for about $300, but that would be a different set-up from the AR-15 that I'm trying to emulate.

The other option is to do the CMMG .22LR conversion kit. They offer a lifetime warranty, have good on-line reviews, and would cost about $250, including mags. That set up would almost perfectly emulate my Sport ii, sans the recoil and easier clean up. However, that rig seems fussy about ammo, at least anecdotally. The on-line owner's manual just says to avoid sub-sonic rounds.

Any thoughts on the HK and Tippmann .22LRs?

I'm also apprehensive about the .22LR, because I've read about how dirty they make the guns and squibs. I just read the ammo section of the 15-22's on-line owner manual, which wasn't really helpful (in the past, they apparently made specific ammo recommendations). I use only store-bought ammo compatible with my guns (e.g. buying 55-62 grain for my 1:9" twist Sport ii) when I owned guns in a prior life, cleaned them after every outing to the range. I also read on other forums lots of defects with CCIs last year, which I can't find here for the life of me.

I bought a Hoppe Bore Snake and have a cleaning kit and gun cleaner in hand.

Over the past few weeks, the only .22LR that I could find, and which I quickly bought are: Federal Champion (blue box), 40 grain, lead, round nose, 1,200 FPS; and Norma TAC-22, 40 grain, 1,100 fps.

Can you help address the cleaning and ammo quality issues, possibly recommending what might be good?

Finally, a police acquaintance in a different part of Kalifornia suggested that I use a Ruger Mini-14 for home defense, because that would look less aggressive than an AR-15 to a jury or district attorney. By the way, where I live, the Castle Doctrine and stand your ground apply.

For guns in California "Turners Outdoorsman" is about the only game in town. Check their website. If it's legal in this state they will sell it.
Yes the S&W AR15-22 is for sale here with the red-dot for $499.00

Currently sold out so back order and just wait for it. It's a fine weapon and mine shoots everything I feed it in spite of the factory recommendations. The few failures to fire I get will all fire if loaded back up. Chalk that up to normal Rim fire stuff.

Big 5 for ammo. Federal blue 800 round boxes of .22lr are currently in stock @ $84.00 a box. We haven't seen rimfire for 16 months in any shape or form so snag more now is my advice.

Rimfire is dirty but I was taught to clean a weapon after it's been fired so that is a no brainer.

At current centerfire ammo cost I'm taking the rimfires to the range most of the time now.

Bob 459
 
For me, waaay too much to read.

If you have a choice larger than .22lr for home defense, keep the 22 for fun, small game, etc.

Glock 17 will serve you very well in most any home defense situation.

Train, train, train. As doable and affordable, nothing beats live-fire training both for accuracy and fundamentals plus assorted scenarios. If need be, dry firing, going pew, pew, pew works well.

Can't recall if the 17 has a rail. Surely. If so, install a decent light and learn it well. Bouncing the beam, casting shadows, all that.

This will likely start something but just ignore. If possible, get a laser / light combo. Visible lasers are super in low/no-light. No sighting the target in, etc. Put the dot on the target and commence firing. Of course your sights are good too. Just saying it's a great option.

Your 17 all the way for multiple reasons. Good luck.

Reread: AR15 is invaluable but again I highly recommend the 17 or a short stock 12 gauge if available.*

*;)
 
For guns in California "Turners Outdoorsman" is about the only game in town. Check their website. If it's legal in this state they will sell it.
Yes the S&W AR15-22 is for sale here with the red-dot for $499.00

Currently sold out so back order and just wait for it. It's a fine weapon and mine shoots everything I feed it in spite of the factory recommendations. The few failures to fire I get will all fire if loaded back up. Chalk that up to normal Rim fire stuff.

Big 5 for ammo. Federal blue 800 round boxes of .22lr are currently in stock @ $84.00 a box. We haven't seen rimfire for 16 months in any shape or form so snag more now is my advice.

Rimfire is dirty but I was taught to clean a weapon after it's been fired so that is a no brainer.

At current centerfire ammo cost I'm taking the rimfires to the range most of the time now.

Bob 459

Thanks.

Turner's is a two hour drive each way for me, but I will check their website.

I see the Big 5 listing for the Federal Champion. It's lead and I don't think it's copper-plated. Would using that ammo really foul up my gun?

Thanks
 
As an under study firearm I would go with either the 15-22 or Tippmann. Both mimic the controls of its bigger brother perfectly. The Hk's bolt hold open paddle doesn't function and is only there for looks. Also everything on the Hk is proprietary where the 15-22 and Tippmann can be modified to a degree. The 15-22 has more aftermarket support then the other 2.

I owned all 3, I still have several 15-22's and Tippmanns. The Hk was promptly sold off since it didn't meet my needs.
 
For me, waaay too much to read.

If you have a choice larger than .22lr for home defense, keep the 22 for fun, small game, etc.

Glock 17 will serve you very well in most any home defense situation.

Train, train, train. As doable and affordable, nothing beats live-fire training both for accuracy and fundamentals plus assorted scenarios. If need be, dry firing, going pew, pew, pew works well.

Can't recall if the 17 has a rail. Surely. If so, install a decent light and learn it well. Bouncing the beam, casting shadows, all that.

This will likely start something but just ignore. If possible, get a laser / light combo. Visible lasers are super in low/no-light. No sighting the target in, etc. Put the dot on the target and commence firing. Of course your sights are good too. Just saying it's a great option.

Your 17 all the way for multiple reasons. Good luck.

Reread: AR15 is invaluable but again I highly recommend the 17 or a short stock 12 gauge if available.*

*;)

Thanks. What are the reasons that you recommend the Glock 17 over the AR-15 for home defense?
 
As an under study firearm I would go with either the 15-22 or Tippmann. Both mimic the controls of its bigger brother perfectly. The Hk's bolt hold open paddle doesn't function and is only there for looks. Also everything on the Hk is proprietary where the 15-22 and Tippmann can be modified to a degree. The 15-22 has more aftermarket support then the other 2.

I owned all 3, I still have several 15-22's and Tippmanns. The Hk was promptly sold off since it didn't meet my needs.

Thanks.

How do the three compare as to durability and reliability? Are any of them fussy about ammo?
 
OK , * If * I am comprehending you plans & inquiries , you have already aquired a G17 , and are pending on your purchase of M&P Sport ll . You current inquiries are regarding an understudy .22lr AR- 15 shaped firearm . If that's close :

G17 is perfectly servicable in stock form .

M&P Sport ll is generally adaquate budget entry level AR .

A .22lr understudy rifle is a good concept , plus all the uses for a .22 rimfire generally . Either of your choices would be adaquate. All .22lr is dirty to a degree . During the present ammunition crunch , and maximum output to keep up with demand , all mfg are putting quanity over QC for rimfire ammo . Use what you can get , and don't overly obsess . If it gets dirty , clean it . If it malfunctions occasionally , well you're practicing on the range , not defending your self .

AR-15 are very versatile , but specifically for defense accross the room at 5yds, I favor the shotgun . 870 are in short supply ? Lots of other viable pump shotgun options , starting with Mossberg .

At 5 yards , in SoCal where burglars and home invaders probably won't be wearing 5 layers of heavy clothes under a Carhart or leather jacket , 4 Buck will be adaquate if wall penetration is concern .

Is .22lr rifle or a shotgun highest priority for next aquisitions ? You'll have to decide for yourself .

*****************

And Welcome !

Thanks.

Yes, what you wrote about my situation is correct.

I have never seen a Remington 870 in the store or on-line for sale.

It's my understanding that pump-action shotguns are more reliable, ie fewer misfeeds, than semi-automatic. Is that correct?

What model(s) of Mossberg do you recommend?
 
Thanks.

How do the three compare as to durability and reliability? Are any of them fussy about ammo?

Can't speak on Hk's durability. Once I saw how it was built on a common action Umerex uses on most of their rifles and it was just dressed up to look they way it did, I sold it. (after shooting it of course :D )

The oldest Tippmann I have is 2 years old and nothing has broken on it yet. It has seen north of 60k fired. The firing pin is starting to look tired tho.

The 15-22 are durable for the most part. Their Achilles heel are the OEM firing pins. It will break and need to be replaced if you do any high volume shooting. (12-20k depending on luck of the draw)

The Tippmann and 15-22 will eat any bulk pack ammo that I feed them. But I have to add I will not use any Cascade International, Remington or Winchester produced bulk pack ammo, "Zero" quality control. I didn't own the Hk long enough to give it a fair shake.
 
Last edited:
M500 will be most common , and more economical than the Remington . The tang mounted safety is right/ left hand neutral , and many people prefer them . Any version that has a real buttstock , and 20 inch - ish bbl . Plain bead front sight is perfectly adaquate . Also frequently found in a combo pack with two bbls of different flavors , at a small upcharge over just a single bbl
So long as one of them is a 20 inch- ish ( 18 in ok , 22 in ok ) it will meet your needs . Some models will have the standard 5+1 magizine , others a full length 8 or 10 round . Any will meet your needs .

The M590 is upgraded mil spec - ish , harder to find and more $$ . They're nice guns and have a following , but not a requirement . The Maverick 88 is a Mossberg subsidiary , that is essentially a Mossberg M500 , assembled in Mexico of US parts , at screaming low price . Only meaningful difference is a Remington style pushbutton safety instead of the Mossberg style tang safety . Once again any variant with short- ish smoothbore bbl will meet your requirements .

************

I'm not Bama , but their are some common thought processes to recommend a handgun over long gun for your outlined situiation :

Within 5 yards , you won't require 300 yards capabilities of an AR ( or 25-50 yd capabilities of shotgun) .
With a modicum of handgun proficiency, you'll have plenty of accuracy at those distances .

That's probably describing an appointment or small house . With furniture , doorways , hallways , etc . If there's any possibility of ever needing to maneuver within , a handgun is easier to maneuver than a +/- 30 inch long weapon that needs two hands to use .

If your plan is to hole up in a stationary position while waiting for the Cavalry to arrive , it is viable to have a Long Gun , also . But if you only have/ deploy for inside defense , have a handgun .

Additionally , for suspicious circumstances worthy of preparation , but you don't yet * Know * is about to be a gun fight , a handgun can be discretely held behind your back , in case the loud pounding on your door in the night is a Girl Scout aggressively marketing cookies instead of home invader trying to kick it in .

Or , if you need to carry a child , Sheppard a loved one , rescue your Krrugrands , whatever , with one hand , you can still shoot your handgun one handed .
 
Shotgun

At my LGS, I found this Rock Island Armory VRPA 12 gauge, pump action, with 5, 9, and 19 round mags; this shotgun comes with 5 round mags, but the 9 round mags are California legal. My LGS doesn't have a website, so I found a link to the shotgun at PSA's website:

Attention Required! | Cloudflare

Googling problems revealed shell compression, resulting in misfeeds can occur when shells are left in the magazines for more than a month.

What are your thoughts about this one?
 
Last edited:
As an under study firearm I would go with either the 15-22 or Tippmann. Both mimic the controls of its bigger brother perfectly. The Hk's bolt hold open paddle doesn't function and is only there for looks. Also everything on the Hk is proprietary where the 15-22 and Tippmann can be modified to a degree. The 15-22 has more aftermarket support then the other 2.

I owned all 3, I still have several 15-22's and Tippmanns. The Hk was promptly sold off since it didn't meet my needs.


CJT50 nailed it. If an understudy is your plan for an AR- formatted .22, then I’d stick with the 15-22, Tipmann or the CMMG conversion.

I have a 15-22 Pistol that has been fantastic, I spent the $30 for a Volquartsen firing pin and extractor before ever shooting it stock. It has run perfectly. I know that won’t be an option for you but a CA-Compliant version should be great.

The Tipmann and CMMG are both great in that they have a lot more metal in their builds. Which better replicates the weight of an AR and makes a better trainer in my mind. The S&W is very light due to the polymer receiver and lower.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Thanks; Sooooo Much to Learn

CJT50 nailed it. If an understudy is your plan for an AR- formatted .22, then I’d stick with the 15-22, Tipmann or the CMMG conversion.

I have a 15-22 Pistol that has been fantastic, I spent the $30 for a Volquartsen firing pin and extractor before ever shooting it stock. It has run perfectly. I know that won’t be an option for you but a CA-Compliant version should be great.

The Tipmann and CMMG are both great in that they have a lot more metal in their builds. Which better replicates the weight of an AR and makes a better trainer in my mind. The S&W is very light due to the polymer receiver and lower.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thanks. What are the advantages of having a Volquartsen firing pin and extractor? Where did you get yours from?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top