|
|
05-09-2013, 08:16 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
9mm S&W Shield Adequate?
Thanks for reading. I'm getting ready to buy a Shield for self defense.
I want to preface this by saying that I'm not one of those people who thinks 9mm is inadequate. I am, however, concerned whether 9mm out of such a short barrel is adequate with standard hollow point ammo. Seems like velocity of a 9mm bullet out of the Shield's short barrel may not provide enough penetration and expansion.
As a side note, I'm not interested in the .40, because I heard it has problems and that it's snappy. I also don't want to use +p in a 9mm Shield, because the online instruction manual advises against it -- this is why my question concerns standard ammo.
Thanks again for your thoughts.
|
05-09-2013, 08:19 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Baton Rouge, La
Posts: 2,326
Likes: 68
Liked 1,431 Times in 655 Posts
|
|
.40 GAME OVER!!!!!!!
Problems (what problems?).
Snappy? someone lied to you.
|
05-09-2013, 08:33 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Sarasota FL
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 3
Liked 517 Times in 297 Posts
|
|
With the right ammunition the 9mm is plenty good for close range self defense. Were talking handgun, not rifle power. I used to only carry 9mm, but have now upgraded to the more powerful 40 S&W. There are advantages and disadvantages to all the different calibers. It ends up to what is right for you.
Bob
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-09-2013, 08:39 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 1,771
Liked 548 Times in 311 Posts
|
|
There are a number of folks who for years have been carrying a variety of 9mm loads in G26s and such and I never heard of any problems with performance from short barrels. I read about it, but I never hear of real world horror stories (except from liberal trauma surgeons and family members of departed criminals). While there is no magic bullet, I do not think that the shorter barrel of the shield would effect the expansion of a non +P bullet that much. Nevertheless, 9mm bullets of most all modern loadings all seem to perform well, or as I said above, I never hear much in the way of complaints. I personally believe that confidence in whatever you're carrying and accurate shot placement are what gets you home safe. To hedge your bet anyway, consider a standard pressure 124 for 147 grain Gold Dot, Remington Golden Saber, or Federal HST. My personal choice would be anything Gold Dot.
Does S&W discourage the use of +P or is it +P+?
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-09-2013, 08:51 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by walkin' trails
There are a number of folks who for years have been carrying a variety of 9mm loads in G26s and such and I never heard of any problems with performance from short barrels. I read about it, but I never hear of real world horror stories (except from liberal trauma surgeons and family members of departed criminals). While there is no magic bullet, I do not think that the shorter barrel of the shield would effect the expansion of a non +P bullet that much. Nevertheless, 9mm bullets of most all modern loadings all seem to perform well, or as I said above, I never hear much in the way of complaints. I personally believe that confidence in whatever you're carrying and accurate shot placement are what gets you home safe. To hedge your bet anyway, consider a standard pressure 124 for 147 grain Gold Dot, Remington Golden Saber, or Federal HST. My personal choice would be anything Gold Dot.
Does S&W discourage the use of +P or is it +P+?
|
Both.
I would like to use +p but if Smith discourages it, I won't -- I don't want to be in a defensive situation and have some sort of malfunction
|
05-09-2013, 08:55 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Utah
Posts: 953
Likes: 43
Liked 395 Times in 207 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmhgv2
Thanks for reading. I'm getting ready to buy a Shield for self defense.
I want to preface this by saying that I'm not one of those people who thinks 9mm is inadequate. I am, however, concerned whether 9mm out of such a short barrel is adequate with standard hollow point ammo. Seems like velocity of a 9mm bullet out of the Shield's short barrel may not provide enough penetration and expansion.
As a side note, I'm not interested in the .40, because I heard it has problems and that it's snappy. I also don't want to use +p in a 9mm Shield, because the online instruction manual advises against it -- this is why my question concerns standard ammo.
Thanks again for your thoughts.
|
I pack Gold Dot 124 grain jhp +P short barrel.
From my reading short barrel has powder that burns faster so there is little to no powder leaving the short barrel.
I understand you don't want +p and I am certain there are some good regular rounds available.
I can't speak for 40 but I enjoy shooting my Shield 9mm over my full size XD 45.
Good luck
Russ
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-09-2013, 09:01 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RussC
I pack Gold Dot 124 grain jhp +P short barrel.
From my reading short barrel has powder that burns faster so there is little to no powder leaving the short barrel.
I understand you don't want +p and I am certain there are some good regular rounds available.
I can't speak for 40 but I enjoy shooting my Shield 9mm over my full size XD 45.
Good luck
Russ
|
I guess I might consider the Gold Dot +p, but as I mentioned previously, I really don't want the gun to malfunction if and when I need it.
|
05-09-2013, 09:09 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: IL
Posts: 127
Likes: 8
Liked 58 Times in 29 Posts
|
|
I have shot regular and +p ammo without any problems in my Shield. The manual says no +P+ rounds, +P is okay (says may increase wear).
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-09-2013, 09:11 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: IL
Posts: 127
Likes: 8
Liked 58 Times in 29 Posts
|
|
Quote from the manual:
“Plus-P” (+P) ammunition generates pressures in excess of the
pressures associated with standard ammunition. Such pressures
may affect the wear characteristics or exceed the margin of safety.
Use of “Plus-P” ammunition may result in the need for more
frequent service.
“Plus-P-Plus” (+P+) ammunition must not be used in Smith &
Wesson firearms. This marking on the ammunition designates that
it exceeds established industry standards, but the designation
does not represent defined pressure limits and therefore such
ammunition may vary significantly as to the pressures generated
and could be DANGEROUS.
|
05-09-2013, 09:38 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 292
Liked 641 Times in 345 Posts
|
|
So, as you can see, +P is fine with the Shield.
Good choices are the 124+P Federal HST and the Speer Gold Dot.
Now you are positively more than adequate.
__________________
USAF, 69-92
Vietnam, 72-73
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-09-2013, 09:47 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 225
Likes: 66
Liked 43 Times in 29 Posts
|
|
+P is perfectly fine with the M&P - I would not shoot 1000 rounds of it though. I also think it plenty adequate. I would hate to get hit with a bb at 1000 fps much less a 9mm round, perfectly expanded or even mildly expanded.
I use 124+p gold dots in my Shield and have no concerns if I ever needed to use it. HST are good as well, which ever you see available in 50 round boxes that are nominally priced.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-09-2013, 10:05 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 21
Likes: 11
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Lehigh Defense 105 gr appears to be a favorable round. View its ballistic videos. It's expensive, but as mentioned earlier, what price do you put on your life?
Bob.
|
05-09-2013, 10:09 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,925
Likes: 3,525
Liked 6,759 Times in 2,632 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmhgv2
Thanks for reading. I'm getting ready to buy a Shield for self defense.
I want to preface this by saying that I'm not one of those people who thinks 9mm is inadequate. I am, however, concerned whether 9mm out of such a short barrel is adequate with standard hollow point ammo. Seems like velocity of a 9mm bullet out of the Shield's short barrel may not provide enough penetration and expansion.
As a side note, I'm not interested in the .40, because I heard it has problems and that it's snappy. I also don't want to use +p in a 9mm Shield, because the online instruction manual advises against it -- this is why my question concerns standard ammo.
Thanks again for your thoughts.
|
One company advertises ammo designed to expand from short barrels. You might look into the Speer Gold Dot Short Barrel line.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-09-2013, 10:32 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SWFL
Posts: 636
Likes: 368
Liked 197 Times in 94 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmhgv2
Thanks for reading. I'm getting ready to buy a Shield for self defense.
I want to preface this by saying that I'm not one of those people who thinks 9mm is inadequate. I am, however, concerned whether 9mm out of such a short barrel is adequate with standard hollow point ammo. Seems like velocity of a 9mm bullet out of the Shield's short barrel may not provide enough penetration and expansion.
As a side note, I'm not interested in the .40, because I heard it has problems and that it's snappy. I also don't want to use +p in a 9mm Shield, because the online instruction manual advises against it -- this is why my question concerns standard ammo.
Thanks again for your thoughts.
|
Adequate? How about another "A" word. Absolutely.
Have you ever seen ballistics testing of Speer Gold Dot 124+P or Federal HST 147gr+P
Trust me. You're well armed with a 9mm. Get one extra round, easier to shoot (which usually equates to better accuracy) Faster follow up shots.
Never forget this: ONLY HITS COUNT
__________________
40c FS,9Shield(2)40,9Pro
|
05-09-2013, 11:07 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Washington
Posts: 421
Likes: 622
Liked 371 Times in 145 Posts
|
|
I use the lighter round for summer time and the heaver one for winter time, more clothing requires more punch. If the weather is very cold I use a larger caliber...
__________________
Retired Marine Gunny
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-09-2013, 11:09 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Baton Rouge, La
Posts: 2,326
Likes: 68
Liked 1,431 Times in 655 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger S&W
Never forget this: ONLY HITS COUNT
|
The FIRST one is the most important one. Make it count and there should be no need for follow ups.
|
05-10-2013, 12:13 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Utah
Posts: 953
Likes: 43
Liked 395 Times in 207 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmhgv2
I guess I might consider the Gold Dot +p, but as I mentioned previously, I really don't want the gun to malfunction if and when I need it.
|
Jmhgv2
I do not make it a habit of range shooting with +P ammo.
Gold Dot 124 grain jhp +P short barrel is $25 for 20 shells.
Unless you found that pot of Gold Dots at the end of the rainbow the cost will keep you from shooting a truck load +P through your Shield. (Shield will be just fine with +P occasionally)
I enjoy target shooting and that is why my Shield 9 mm is such a delight.
I can shoot 100 rounds of light load Federal Champion 115 grain through her and feel no effects from the recoil but when I pack I load her up with some serious ammo in the Gold Dot +P
She will not break. I have shot her 1,200 times in 1 year and many more have exceeded that mark many times over with no problems.
Trust us the Shield is a great weapon.
Russ
|
05-10-2013, 01:37 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: U.P. Mi
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 8,963
Liked 1,270 Times in 693 Posts
|
|
If I was carrying a 9mm shield it would be with Speer 124 gr+p gold dot short barrel, only because smith advises against the +p+ 127 gr Ranger LE I carry in a 5946, but I SELDOM carry a 9mm. I do like shooting the sub sonic 158 gr Fiocchi in a glock with a liberty Mystic suppressor. As stated before, First shot is the most important, and only hits count. Be Safe,
__________________
I BACK OUR BLUE
|
05-10-2013, 02:08 AM
|
Suspended
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: (outside) Charleston, SC
Posts: 31,038
Likes: 41,730
Liked 29,302 Times in 13,853 Posts
|
|
Right ammo, close range
With the right ammo, the very likely close range and enough range time to hit your target in the center it won't be just 'adequate'.
|
05-10-2013, 02:10 AM
|
Suspended
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: (outside) Charleston, SC
Posts: 31,038
Likes: 41,730
Liked 29,302 Times in 13,853 Posts
|
|
Shoot it enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmhgv2
I guess I might consider the Gold Dot +p, but as I mentioned previously, I really don't want the gun to malfunction if and when I need it.
|
Shoot enough with the ammo of your choice to be sure that it works all the time.
|
05-10-2013, 07:56 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 212
Likes: 43
Liked 59 Times in 45 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert_W
Lehigh Defense 105 gr appears to be a favorable round. View its ballistic videos. It's expensive, but as mentioned earlier, what price do you put on your life?
Bob.
|
Do you want to roll the dice on a round that has virtually no actual street data or credible outside testing and is not used by one single LEO or Federal agency?
There are several proven choices like HST, Gold Dot, and Ranger.
These are all available in 147g standard velocities which works awesome at the lower velocities of subcompact guns(like the shield)
Last edited by jeffhughes; 05-10-2013 at 07:58 AM.
|
05-10-2013, 08:14 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 606
Likes: 179
Liked 438 Times in 208 Posts
|
|
I wouldn't worry too much about +P ammo in your Shield, I am required to carry 115gr +P+ in my 9c, and was also required to carry the +P+ in a S&W 39-2, a Beretta 92FS and a S&W 915 all without mishaps. In addition, in my department at one time we were allowed to carry (almost) any 9mm and with several different manufacturer's weapons being used, not one had a single ammo related problem. In my case, like in yours, the HOT ammo only need be used during an "encounter" and standard pressure ammo used for practice. After all, it's not like you're going to be shooting a year's worth of matches with the hot rounds, just a few here and there, maybe a magful to see how they work in your gun and if you have an "encounter" a few rounds then.
If it makes anyone feel better, I will write S&W to get an official answer.
__________________
Don
|
05-10-2013, 08:42 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 377
Likes: 83
Liked 101 Times in 65 Posts
|
|
I use 9mm for the simple fact that I can practice more with the 9mm round then I do for the same cost as practicing with a 40. If you can't hit your target, it doesn't matter what you shoot.
|
05-10-2013, 08:42 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Land of the Bean&the Cod
Posts: 430
Likes: 36
Liked 122 Times in 66 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smitty357
The FIRST one is the most important one. Make it count and there should be no need for follow ups.
|
The bold part is humor, right? Are you guaranteeing one-shot stops?
|
05-10-2013, 08:43 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Montana
Posts: 576
Likes: 392
Liked 109 Times in 79 Posts
|
|
The 9 is fine for selfdefense and will get the job done at SD distances if you do your job. Todays 9 mm HP ammo isn't what it was years ago and SD performance has improved 10 fold. I also don't feel the need for a .40 or +P 9mm. I feel 100% confident that my Shield 9 loaded with Federal Tactical 124gr HST will deter any threat to my person if I do my part with being to able to put bullets on target in a SD situation. No need for anything else. Of course this is all IMHO.
__________________
44 Garrett Defender Ammo 4 me.
|
05-10-2013, 11:48 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 90
Liked 366 Times in 193 Posts
|
|
When I still had my Shield, I tried several brands of 124gr. +P through though it with zero malfunctions. Test with whatever ammo you intend to carry and you'll be GTG.
|
05-10-2013, 03:02 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 24
Likes: 3
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Seven shots to the chest from a 9mm shield is plenty!
|
05-10-2013, 05:50 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Baton Rouge, La
Posts: 2,326
Likes: 68
Liked 1,431 Times in 655 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JNewell
The bold part is humor, right? Are you guaranteeing one-shot stops?
|
I never said the first shot was a guaranteed stop. But u can bet after the first shot is placed correctly the follow ups (if needed be) will come with ease. You wont have to get in a hurry to blast off all ur ammo. For the fact the perp will likely not be going anywhere fast.
Of course if the first shot isnt placed correctly. Then u'll likely be shooting at a perp like he's a scared rabbit jumping around trying to dodge bullets. Of course in this case, u'll likely need follow ups and even more so u'll likely need about 3 more mags. But the problem here is the "shooter". Lack of training with his/her defense weapon.
Last edited by Smitty357; 05-10-2013 at 05:52 PM.
|
05-11-2013, 10:18 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Yep, like others have said... I would worry more about shot placement then what caliber to use.
If you shoot 9 well then go with it.
Remember people don't typically fall over dead from being shot from a pistol round.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-12-2013, 03:10 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 126
Likes: 10
Liked 16 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
I chose a .40 because
1) I already have a .40 FS and love it
2) I don't want to "stock pile" another type of ammo.
3) .40 ammo was available in my area when 9mm was not.
4) I could get my hands on a .40 shield when the 9mm was not available anywhere.
Just get good defensive loads and empty the magazine into whoever is coming at you. You'll get one extra shot with the 9mm. I wouldn't want to be shot repeatedly with either a 9mm or a .40.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-13-2013, 10:42 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 740
Likes: 209
Liked 318 Times in 184 Posts
|
|
The 9mm is inadequate....If you don't hit the target. Otherwise, you should be fine. And if you can't hit the target with a 9mm, you're not likely to do any better with a 40.
|
05-13-2013, 11:00 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Utah
Posts: 953
Likes: 43
Liked 395 Times in 207 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayhawkhuntclub
The 9mm is inadequate....If you don't hit the target. Otherwise, you should be fine. And if you can't hit the target with a 9mm, you're not likely to do any better with a 40.
|
+1
Horseshoes and hand grenades about it for scoring points when you miss.
Russ
|
05-13-2013, 04:50 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Liked 28 Times in 15 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smitty357
I never said the first shot was a guaranteed stop. But u can bet after the first shot is placed correctly the follow ups (if needed be) will come with ease. You wont have to get in a hurry to blast off all ur ammo. For the fact the perp will likely not be going anywhere fast.
Of course if the first shot isnt placed correctly. Then u'll likely be shooting at a perp like he's a scared rabbit jumping around trying to dodge bullets. Of course in this case, u'll likely need follow ups and even more so u'll likely need about 3 more mags. But the problem here is the "shooter". Lack of training with his/her defense weapon.
|
Only if you put one through their brain, or sever the spinal cord between the throat and nipple region. Any other hit, even dead COM, guarantees nothing.
But yeah, you're right that the first shot is most important. Or better said, he who hits first usually has the best chance.
|
05-13-2013, 06:16 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 66
Likes: 18
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
You could stop someone with a .22 if you shoot right.
|
05-13-2013, 07:09 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 400
Likes: 493
Liked 171 Times in 104 Posts
|
|
Dump a mag of 9mm on an offender and if that doesn't work, you have bigger problems (no pun intended) and I assure you that having one caliber higher wouldn't have mattered either.
OK, all you "bigger is better advocates," argue against that one.
|
05-13-2013, 07:30 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Land of the Bean&the Cod
Posts: 430
Likes: 36
Liked 122 Times in 66 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayhawkhuntclub
The 9mm is inadequate....If you don't hit the target. Otherwise, you should be fine. And if you can't hit the target with a 9mm, you're not likely to do any better with a 40.
|
Almost spat out what I was drinking. Right on target.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-13-2013, 08:03 PM
|
Suspended
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: (outside) Charleston, SC
Posts: 31,038
Likes: 41,730
Liked 29,302 Times in 13,853 Posts
|
|
They make cartridges and bullets....
Some ammo brands have the powder loads optimized for short barrels. And some bullet makers produce bullets that are designed to perform at lower velocities.
Ammo makers have cartridges that have both aspects. Speer makes 'Gold Dot Short Barrel' ammo as well as separate bullets for reloading and they have short barrel bullet/powder combinations in their reloading manual.
Oh, and is it adequate? Well you ain't trying it out on me!
Last edited by rwsmith; 05-13-2013 at 08:07 PM.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|