|
|
03-28-2017, 08:24 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Install magazine disconnect safety?
Please go easy on me. I know some people will say "why would you want to add a mag disconnect?". Well, I have a couple of reasons and won't bore you with that now.
Is it possible to install the mag disconnect safety mechanism to an M&P pistol that never had one? If so, can those mechanisms be purchased from S&W? Thanks!
|
03-28-2017, 08:35 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 192
Likes: 18
Liked 88 Times in 48 Posts
|
|
What model are you putting it on? I took one off my MP 9c the whole sear housing
Having said that I think it is one of the most UNSAFE things you could ever have on a carry weapon.
|
03-28-2017, 08:55 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,504
Likes: 465
Liked 1,574 Times in 700 Posts
|
|
As a peace officer it is one of the most valuable features to have on my pistol. If a bad guy gets my gun, all I have to do it press the magazine release button. It can save a lot of lives. I have it on my duty pistol, and my carry pistol.
Last edited by KSDeputy; 03-28-2017 at 08:56 AM.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-28-2017, 09:07 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 192
Likes: 18
Liked 88 Times in 48 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KSDeputy
As a peace officer it is one of the most valuable features to have on my pistol. If a bad guy gets my gun, all I have to do it press the magazine release button. It can save a lot of lives. I have it on my duty pistol, and my carry pistol.
|
Yes I stand corrected...for LEO it's very important...for civilians the worst invention ever
I wasn't thinking of that context. When I had my FFL/SOT and trained officers it was an important addition. When we trained civilians it was a disaster
Last edited by gqllc007; 03-28-2017 at 09:09 AM.
|
03-28-2017, 09:12 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 24
Likes: 19
Liked 14 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
I don't understand what this does.
Also, if a bad guy gets a hold of your gun, how do you ouch the mag releas?
Not trying to be a smarty ***, I really just do not understand.
|
03-28-2017, 09:41 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 192
Likes: 18
Liked 88 Times in 48 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cfuzzkennedy
I don't understand what this does.
Also, if a bad guy gets a hold of your gun, how do you ouch the mag releas?
Not trying to be a smarty ***, I really just do not understand.
|
The magazine disconnect prevents the gun from firing when the magazine is not inserted. In LEO there can be a struggle for the pistol, if the officer can hit the mag release and drop the mag the pistol cannot be fired by the offending person. This occurs when the "bad" guy is trying to get the officer's gun during an altercation
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-28-2017, 10:44 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 608
Likes: 63
Liked 630 Times in 243 Posts
|
|
That just doesn't make much sense. To many variables and adrenaline to even think " it's time to press the mag release" while fighting for your life. In a CQ situation you would be better served using empty hand and/or knife tactics. With the current technology of retention holsters if he has your gun your probably not in good shape enough to hit the mag release. It's all debatable and my 2 cents.
"(Note: 1980-2014) In the last 10 years the average number of officers killed with their own gun was . . .
2.2 per year. According to the FBI UCR numbers, the average of all officers feloniously killed is 50. Gun grabs account for 4.4 percent of officers feloniously killed in the last 10 years with their own weapons. The number of sworn police officers in the United States in that period has averaged about 523 thousand a year. So the rate of police open carriers who are killed with their own guns is about .42 per 100,000. It’s not zero, but it is low.”
Officers Killed with own Gun vs Officers Feloniously Killed 1980 - 2014 - The Truth About Guns
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
__________________
Improvise, Adapt, Overcome
Last edited by Kodiakco; 03-28-2017 at 10:52 AM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-28-2017, 10:48 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 192
Likes: 18
Liked 88 Times in 48 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kodiakco
That just doesn't make much sense. To many variables and adrenaline to even think " it's time to press the mag release" while fighting for your life. In a CQ situation you would be better served using empty hand and/or knife tactics. With the current technology of retention holsters if he has your gun your probably not in good shape enough to hit the mag release. It's all debatable and my 2 cents.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
|
There are ton of reasons NOT to have a magazine disconnect for civilians. I can't think of one reason why to have one for non LEO. You could say for the children but no one should ever be leaving out a pistol that children can reach to begin with.
|
03-28-2017, 10:55 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 608
Likes: 63
Liked 630 Times in 243 Posts
|
|
With current stats I don't see it serving LEO very much either. At the current rate it's not going to save "lots of lives" either.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
__________________
Improvise, Adapt, Overcome
|
03-28-2017, 10:55 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 6
Likes: 84
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
I personally know an officer who got in a struggle, bad guy got his steel frame S&W 45. Couldn't get it to fire, safety was on. Officer then had time to get back in the fight for the gun and dumped the mag.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
03-28-2017, 10:56 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 585
Likes: 296
Liked 1,182 Times in 374 Posts
|
|
Magazine disconnect is not for me ...
If there is a bullet chambered and a struggle ensues over possession of the weapon I'd prefer to send that round into the attacker using my trigger finger rather than trying to deactivate the firearm by dropping the mag with a movement of my gripping thumb to the mag release button.
Just trying to release the magazine involves loosening my grip on it to press my thumb on the magazine release button. The gun may be wrenched from my hand before I manipulate the mag release, giving the assailant possession of a loaded weapon.
Not having a magazine disconnect allows a reload to a full magazine if cover and opportunity presents itself, while still being able to fire a chambered round if needed.
I'm not going to let anyone get close enough to grab my weapon from my hands without putting a few rounds into them before they get that close.
Just my thoughts on this, YMMV
digiroc
|
03-28-2017, 11:53 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Kommiefornia
Posts: 848
Likes: 2,216
Liked 2,541 Times in 518 Posts
|
|
My preference would be not to have a mag disconnect from the perspective of a tactical top off (assuming you know how many rounds you fired, & have cover).
More focus on gun retention techniques, tactical blade, etc. An argument could be made either way. Tough call!
Similar to having external safety or not. See Glock!
|
03-28-2017, 12:17 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 608
Likes: 63
Liked 630 Times in 243 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad Trapper
I personally know an officer who got in a struggle, bad guy got his steel frame S&W 45. Couldn't get it to fire, safety was on. Officer then had time to get back in the fight for the gun and dumped the mag.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
So it was the safety that saved him and not the mag disconnect. OK, I could see that as it requires no action on the officers part in disabling the gun.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
__________________
Improvise, Adapt, Overcome
|
03-28-2017, 12:24 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gqllc007
What model are you putting it on? I took one off my MP 9c the whole sear housing
Having said that I think it is one of the most UNSAFE things you could ever have on a carry weapon.
|
This is for an M&P 2.0 9mm and M&P 9mm Shield.
|
03-28-2017, 12:27 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: CONUS
Posts: 112
Likes: 40
Liked 81 Times in 39 Posts
|
|
My agency carried S&W pistols with the magazine disconnect for years. If any pressure is applied to the trigger as the magazine release is pressed the disconnect will not work and the pistol will still fire.
We also had the issue of a few service pistols that would not fire when the disconnect malfunctioned. Fortunately, that occurred on the range during training.
To respond to the OP's question, the best way to acquire a magazine disconnect for a defensive pistol is to purchase a pistol that was originally designed and manufactured that way. That would ensure a greater likelihood that the disconnect and pistol will function correctly and would be the most cost effective.
That may not be the answer the OP was hoping to read, but when a person is looking for specific features on a defensive pistol, such as safety devices, the safest bet is to purchase a firearm that has those features as OEM.
__________________
Train to win
Last edited by T2C; 03-28-2017 at 12:29 PM.
|
03-28-2017, 12:44 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by T2C
My agency carried S&W pistols with the magazine disconnect for years. If any pressure is applied to the trigger as the magazine release is pressed the disconnect will not work and the pistol will still fire.
We also had the issue of a few service pistols that would not fire when the disconnect malfunctioned. Fortunately, that occurred on the range during training.
To respond to the OP's question, the best way to acquire a magazine disconnect for a defensive pistol is to purchase a pistol that was originally designed and manufactured that way. That would ensure a greater likelihood that the disconnect and pistol will function correctly and would be the most cost effective.
That may not be the answer the OP was hoping to read, but when a person is looking for specific features on a defensive pistol, such as safety devices, the safest bet is to purchase a firearm that has those features as OEM.
|
Thanks. That was kinda what I was thinking. If I wanted that feature, I should have bought the pistol with it. Thanks to everyone for their comments.
|
03-28-2017, 01:02 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,426
Likes: 296
Liked 785 Times in 356 Posts
|
|
This thread is ridiculous, if he wants one he wants one. Nothing more needs to be said. All you have to do is get a sear housing with a mag disconnect safety and install it in your gun. It's a very easy process to make the swap and it will work just fine. Let me dig around in my armorers kit, I might have a housing with a mag disconnect in there as I have taken a few out of guns from people who did not want them and installed a few into guns for people who did.
ETA: I have one for a M&P 1.0. Cannot advise if it will work in a 2.0 or not.
Last edited by mlk18; 03-28-2017 at 01:08 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-28-2017, 01:34 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 522
Likes: 313
Liked 523 Times in 249 Posts
|
|
I agree if he wants one it's his choice.
I'm not a fan of mag safeties myself but Mas Ayoob and others have documented cases of officer's lives being saved by activating the release during a fight for the gun.
|
03-28-2017, 01:45 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 6
Likes: 84
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kodiakco
So it was the safety that saved him and not the mag disconnect. OK, I could see that as it requires no action on the officers part in disabling the gun.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
|
Safety kept him from getting shot after the bad guy almost knocked him out. Gave him time to re engage and while fighting over the gun dumped the mag so it couldn't fire.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
03-28-2017, 02:14 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 608
Likes: 63
Liked 630 Times in 243 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad Trapper
Safety kept him from getting shot....
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
Yes, exactly. If there had been no safety the mag disconnect wouldn't have mattered.
Approximately .42 per 100,000 LEO get murdered with their own gun. While it may be department policy, it's not a very good and/or well thought out one.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
__________________
Improvise, Adapt, Overcome
|
03-28-2017, 02:29 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Baton Rouge, La.
Posts: 6,874
Likes: 7,481
Liked 8,136 Times in 3,679 Posts
|
|
Bought a Star Model PS 45 acp in late 1970's , the magazine disconnect it had was never any kind of problem. I'm not sure why all the dislike for it . I found nothing to object to .
What I liked most about the gun was NO grip safety.....now that feature I liked.
Retro fitting a pistol not designed for one might be costly and would it work properly ?
Gary
|
03-28-2017, 03:05 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: CONUS
Posts: 112
Likes: 40
Liked 81 Times in 39 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mlk18
This thread is ridiculous, if he wants one he wants one. Nothing more needs to be said. All you have to do is get a sear housing with a mag disconnect safety and install it in your gun. It's a very easy process to make the swap and it will work just fine. Let me dig around in my armorers kit, I might have a housing with a mag disconnect in there as I have taken a few out of guns from people who did not want them and installed a few into guns for people who did.
ETA: I have one for a M&P 1.0. Cannot advise if it will work in a 2.0 or not.
|
I have to agree that if a person wants one for whatever reason, they should have one.
__________________
Train to win
Last edited by T2C; 03-28-2017 at 03:14 PM.
|
03-28-2017, 09:59 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 6
Likes: 84
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kodiakco
Yes, exactly. If there had been no safety the mag disconnect wouldn't have mattered.
Approximately .42 per 100,000 LEO get murdered with their own gun. While it may be department policy, it's not a very good and/or well thought out one.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
|
Yes initially the safety kept him from being murdered. During the fight for the gun, dropping the mag kept him from being shot. I'm sure he's thankful that he didn't end up being one of the .42.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
03-28-2017, 11:19 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 504
Likes: 241
Liked 310 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RoosterDude11
This is for an M&P 2.0 9mm and M&P 9mm Shield.
|
SpeedShooterSpecialties.com has the magazine disconnect parts for the M&P1.0, but I do not know if they work with the 2.0 or Shield.
I had two pistols with magazine disconnects and had them disabled.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-29-2017, 10:14 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Thank you!
|
03-29-2017, 10:15 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by V0OBWxZS16
SpeedShooterSpecialties.com has the magazine disconnect parts for the M&P1.0, but I do not know if they work with the 2.0 or Shield.
I had two pistols with magazine disconnects and had them disabled.
|
Great! Thanks so much!
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|