Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Rifles and Shotguns > Smith & Wesson M&P15 Rifles

Notices

Smith & Wesson M&P15 Rifles Dedicated to the Smith & Wesson M&P-15 Rifles


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-06-2012, 10:38 PM
PunisherBane's Avatar
PunisherBane PunisherBane is offline
Member
probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but....  
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 195
Likes: 4
Liked 79 Times in 56 Posts
Default probably a stupid question but....

was watching an episode of NCIS that sparked what i believe is a good question in my head.... in an AR... its the upper reciever that puts any type of identifying marks on the bullet when fired.... but why is it that the lower is the only thing thats regulated and need registered... only thing the lower really does is present the round for loading.. and the actual hammer stoke to fire.... idunno maybe i missed something but thought id ask anyways
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-06-2012, 10:42 PM
JaPes's Avatar
JaPes JaPes is offline
Member
probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but....  
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: NW Suburbs, Illinois
Posts: 4,013
Likes: 3,272
Liked 3,961 Times in 1,871 Posts
Default

It's whatever part of the firearm the BATFE considers to be the "destructive device" that counts. The lower is the base on which the entire AR functions. It's similar to a pistol frame. I can buy every part of a pistol, but have to go through an FFL for the serialized frame.

My best guess is that the BATFE considers the portion of the firearm that houses the parts that initiate ignition of the round of ammunition as the destructive device
__________________
-John

Last edited by JaPes; 05-06-2012 at 10:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-06-2012, 10:57 PM
oneyeopn's Avatar
oneyeopn oneyeopn is offline
Member
probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but....  
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Ford, Ks
Posts: 4,216
Likes: 5,343
Liked 2,270 Times in 1,273 Posts
Default

Still doesnt make sense to me!!!
__________________
Grover Oathkeeper
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-07-2012, 07:10 AM
rebs081 rebs081 is offline
Member
probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but....  
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 507
Likes: 58
Liked 191 Times in 109 Posts
Default

doesn't make much sense to me either since the upper or just the barrel can be changed at any time. They trace the bullet to the barrel and or the firing pin mark but they still do not have a serial number to identify with.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-07-2012, 02:08 PM
Gatorade's Avatar
Gatorade Gatorade is offline
US Veteran
probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but....  
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 56
Likes: 15
Liked 33 Times in 18 Posts
Default

The bottom line is that BATFE and crime investigation folks have different priorities. BAFTE wants to track the manufacture and sale of the "destructive device" part (like JaPes was saying), but doesn't care all that much about investigation of individual crimes committed with weapons, so the serialized part is the part that houses most of the mechanism rather than the part that leaves forensic evidence.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #6  
Old 05-08-2012, 12:51 PM
RainDodger's Avatar
RainDodger RainDodger is offline
Member
probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but....  
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Great Northwest
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Liked 47 Times in 21 Posts
Default

You shouldn't be watching NCIS anyway.... I was an NCIS Special Agent, and real life 'aint nothin' like the show. Believe me.
__________________
Roger
USN, Retired, NRA Lifer
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-08-2012, 12:58 PM
daledut daledut is offline
Member
probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but....  
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Swanton, Ohio
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

WOW! Say it aint so, TV distorts what it is like to be an NCIS agent. At least CSI is still accurate right ?

That's sarcasm BTW
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-08-2012, 02:25 PM
oneyeopn's Avatar
oneyeopn oneyeopn is offline
Member
probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but....  
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Ford, Ks
Posts: 4,216
Likes: 5,343
Liked 2,270 Times in 1,273 Posts
Default

My sister is an NCIS person....I would hate to have her after me!!!LOL
__________________
Grover Oathkeeper
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-08-2012, 02:35 PM
OK Hog Shooter's Avatar
OK Hog Shooter OK Hog Shooter is offline
Member
probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but....  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Central OK
Posts: 2,326
Likes: 610
Liked 420 Times in 263 Posts
Default

I don't want anyone after me at all!
__________________
Isaiah 55:8-9
Phil. 4:13
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #10  
Old 05-08-2012, 08:55 PM
PunisherBane's Avatar
PunisherBane PunisherBane is offline
Member
probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but....  
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 195
Likes: 4
Liked 79 Times in 56 Posts
Default

i watch ncis just because its a good show... actually im kinda ticked that FOX cancelled Terra Nova.... not happy about that...

ANYWAYS... NCIS occasionally has some factual content like how every barrel has its own unique rifling marks on bullets.. thats what sparked the question
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-08-2012, 08:59 PM
SicSemper SicSemper is offline
Banned
probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but....  
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Hoscton GA
Posts: 49
Likes: 3
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Come-on man
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-08-2012, 09:47 PM
longhornfan69's Avatar
longhornfan69 longhornfan69 is offline
Member
probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but....  
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 206
Likes: 104
Liked 54 Times in 35 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=PunisherBane;136505949]i watch ncis just because its a good show... actually im kinda ticked that FOX cancelled Terra Nova.... not happy about that...

I was pretty ticked too, thought it was a good show myself




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #13  
Old 05-09-2012, 10:49 AM
Capt Crunch's Avatar
Capt Crunch Capt Crunch is offline
Member
probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but....  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 321
Likes: 79
Liked 105 Times in 55 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=longhornfan69;136506063]
Quote:
Originally Posted by PunisherBane View Post
actually im kinda ticked that FOX cancelled Terra Nova.... not happy about that...
I couldn't get through the first episode of Terra Nova, any show that starts with global warming has an uphill battle in my book anyhow but the characters and plot was all just so overdone and predictable. Maybe it got better after but impressions you know...
__________________
This Signature is too Short!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-09-2012, 09:56 PM
JaPes's Avatar
JaPes JaPes is offline
Member
probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but....  
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: NW Suburbs, Illinois
Posts: 4,013
Likes: 3,272
Liked 3,961 Times in 1,871 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PunisherBane View Post
i watch ncis just because its a good show... actually im kinda ticked that FOX cancelled Terra Nova.... not happy about that...
Terra Nova was an entertaining show, and I was miffed that FOX canceled it. I was not as ticked off with the cancellation of Terra Nova as when FOX canceled Firefly. Now that was a good show.

At least Falling Skies is on soon. It's nice change of pace to watch a show on TV with the premise that Armageddon is predicated on alien invasion rather than zombies.
__________________
-John
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-09-2012, 10:03 PM
PunisherBane's Avatar
PunisherBane PunisherBane is offline
Member
probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but....  
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 195
Likes: 4
Liked 79 Times in 56 Posts
Default

firefly was an epic show... i miss that show badly...joss whedon wrote that shoe very nicely....
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-12-2012, 01:09 AM
arizona98tj's Avatar
arizona98tj arizona98tj is offline
US Veteran
probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but.... probably a stupid question but....  
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 733
Likes: 62
Liked 265 Times in 146 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JaPes View Post
It's whatever part of the firearm the BATFE considers to be the "destructive device" that counts. The lower is the base on which the entire AR functions. It's similar to a pistol frame. I can buy every part of a pistol, but have to go through an FFL for the serialized frame.

My best guess is that the BATFE considers the portion of the firearm that houses the parts that initiate ignition of the round of ammunition as the destructive device
The upper (barrel, receiver, bolt) on a Ruger Mk1 pistol (.22 LR semi-auto) is the part that is registered, not the frame.

I believe the BATFE simply goes by whichever part has the serial number on it. On the Mk1, the upper has the serial #.
__________________
Stu
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
ruger, sile, silencer


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stupid question! Big Arm S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 16 01-05-2015 04:42 AM
Probably another stupid question olympicmotors S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 11 03-16-2014 04:09 PM
A Stupid Question RonJ The Lounge 2 09-01-2012 10:55 PM
Stupid question? maybe... goste Smith & Wesson SD & Sigma Pistols 3 10-02-2011 05:27 PM
Possible stupid CCW question. Krull Concealed Carry & Self Defense 27 01-08-2011 01:45 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:05 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)