Range finder?

crracer_712

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2011
Messages
1,206
Reaction score
404
Location
SE Kansas
I don't know if this is the right place to post this, but I'm looking to buy a range finder and was wondering what others who used them might recommend?

I've looked at and tried out the Nikon Pro Staff 5 and 7, both seem pretty nice, but just wanted to see what others were using.
 
The Prostaff 5 is supposed to be good for 600 yards on reflective targets, which means about 400 yards on non-reflective. It's over 400 yards that range finders really become needed.

I've got an older Leica 1000 that should be good to 800 yards or more. If that price is more than you want to spend, consider one of the Bushnells or look for a used Leica.
 
The main key to consider is what MichiganScott mentioned. The max range that range finders have is based on a reflective target, so a non-reflective will be a lesser range. So, if you want to be able to reach out to 600 yards or whatever your ammunition and rifle's limitations are, you will want a range finder that has a longer range. Many sellers and manufacturers don't mention the max non-reflective range, so you will have to go with the methodology MichiganScott mentioned.
 
I use a Zeiss Victory 8x26 PRF and have ranged steel targets at 1200+ yards during my precision rifle course. Picked it up one day at Cabela's. With the 8x optic in it, it makes for a pretty good monocular when hunting.
 
Last edited:
Nikon Prostaff 550.
It can detect solid isolated targets well into the edges of 600yards. It DEFINITELY grabs accurate distances on good objects to 550+ yards. For softer, smaller targets, ideally you range a solid object close by.
Take a coyote for instance: I can range a dog at 150yards on flat open ground. Beyond that, I need to hit a tree, rock, hill to get a read. But a deer, I can ping a deer at 250yds, even 300 if the animal is still and in the open. (Denser, heavier body, elevated off the ground, and shorter fur to reflect the signal.) I can range a cow or a horse at a full blown 500+ yards.

While I have used rangefinders of 1000yd when shooting, and 10,000yds in the past, they are just not real practical for hunting and target shooting, for a couple reasons: 1. A deer, elk, moose is a maybe for a hit out to 1000 yards. A moose, you can read that. But smaller animals are not dense enough to give a good reading. (Hogs, deer, and anything smaller.) 2. When target shooting, you generally know your range if you are looking into shooting anywhere near 1000 yards. You tend to set it up in advance. (For that purpose, the rangefinder IS the ideal way to do it.) But for saying "I'd like to shoot that rock way out there, wonder how far it is..." When you are looking into those kinds of distances, there are many more factors to accurate shooting, so the rangefinder becomes slightly less relevant.

An absolutely amazing tool, when hunting and working the 300-600yd range. The Nikon is well worth the price; affordable and works.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top