Tell me why sport 2 versus Ruger 556

F

Flyingfool

Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2016
Messages
542
Reaction score
344
Location
Wisconsin
Thinking of getting first AR. I have never been an AR fan. But Im lookimg to diversify my collection and home defense. I was leaning towards a s&w revolver. But I already have revolvers and a S&W shield and shot guns. So in this day and age, I thought an AR made sense.

I am complete newbie to AR so want a off the shelf simple AR on a budget (under about $600).

My nephew has a sport 2, and it appears the main competitor in the market is the Ruger 556 at about the exact same price point. I realize this is a Smith site, not Ruger, but I thought I'd get some opinions here what others thought.

So what say you AR folks?
 
Buy the Smith. No regrets. Warranty and service after the sale.

Mine so far in the first 100 rounds is operating flawlessly. It's the Indian that needs work, not the arrow.
 
Ruger uses an old design for their bolt carrier group that was driven by Colt trying to appease the anti gunners... They use an unshrouded firing pin, which overtime and use will cause excessive wear on the firing pin and can damage the firing pin retaining pin. S&W uses a shrouded firing pin.
 
Last edited:
You do know this is the Smith&Wesson forum, right?

Just kidding.

In my opinion, flip a coin or buy whichever you can get for the lowest price. Either one will do the job, and both makers will stand behind their product.
 
I've had both, currently have the Sport II. Ruger isn't a bad gun but proprietary parts make small upgrades a hassle.
 
I need another AR-15 like I need a hole in my head, but the other day I was in my LGS when I was comparing the S&W, Ruger, and the SA Saint. The saint was better built ,but way more money. Out of the S&W and the Ruger, I would pick the S&W. It felt better was a little cheaper, and I still haven't forgiven Bill Ruger or his company for his letter to congress that helped fuel the AWB.
 
I recently got my SWmp15, and i looked at the ruger as well. I chose the SW. like others said, proprietary parts, firing pin etc... But to me it was the reviews i watched on line and here. There is very little negative on the SW. Seems everyone thinks its a great AR. I have read a few negative on the ruger.
 
I have a Sport 1 and have had no issues with it at all. I have an anderson lower on it, with some unknown trigger, and it is just sweet. The Sport II is nicer than mine, but I have no reason to upgrade.
 
I look at both. Both looked cheap to me, so I saved my money and bought another COLT. It is a model 6940 LE. You do get what you pay for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CH4
I would say to look at both in person if possible and see if there is anything you like better about one over the other. I have seen and shot both at the range, and you can’t go wrong with either rifle. They were both good deals two years ago at $599; today at less than $500 they are both steals.

As for some of the previous comments, yes, the Ruger does have some parts on it that are different from “standard” basic AR’s, but all of them are just that-parts that can be switched out for other AR parts.

The Ruger has a pistol grip that’s more like a Magpul grip. It also has a nicer front sight/gas block. The Delta ring is proprietary, and is actually pretty cool, as it makes for much easier removal of the handguards. Again, if a person doesn’t want/like it, they can easily put a “milspec” one on the rifle.

The Smith has a trigger guard that’s integrated into the cast lower, while the Ruger has a removable one that’s pinned into “ears” and is actually more “standard.”

It’s probably kind of a Ford/Chevy thing in the end. If you like Smiths, you will likely prefer it over the Ruger, and vice versa.
 
Flyingfool wrote:
I am complete newbie to AR so want a off the shelf simple AR on a budget (under about $600).
Click to expand...

First, let me congratulate you for looking to get your first AR as a completed rifle rather than trying to do it as parts. I think you'll be happier in the long run. After you are familiar with the platform, then you can start playing around with building them yourself.

Second, yes, this is S&W forum and I bought S&W ARs for both of my sons. I am an S&W fan and would not hesitate to recommend them to you. You probably won't have any issues with the rifle, but S&W's customer service is very good if you do.

Still, I can't really say anything against the Ruger. Yes, it does use some non-standard parts that will cause some problems if you decide to start modifying it to make it look more macho. But, if you wanted more than an "entry level" AR, why didn't you just buy one in the first place?

If you are just going to take them out, shoot them and enjoy them, then the S&W Sport II or Ruger 556 should provide you with many years of safe, reliable and (to the limits of the platform) accurate service.
 
HelpingHarvey said:
All of the items that were stated in the comments above about the Ruger can be replaced.
Click to expand...

Why would I buy a rifle like the Ruger to just spend $100 more to replace the BCG, when I could get one with a shrouded firing pin to begin with?

I'll be honest though... I'm fairly interested in the new Ruger AR-556 MPR... that one I could see buying, even with the unshrouded firing pin.
 
My Sport has amazed me with the accuracy it has. I haven't shot a Ruger but I would be very surprised if it shot better. I had my Sport out shooting groups of about 6" at 200 yards standing and shooting off hand. I have to tell you that's very good for any rifle. I have rifles that will shoot better but not off hand. That's a whole other thing. I have another AR that was built of quality parts. It won't shoot nearly as accurate as the Sport will.
 
C J said:
My Sport has amazed me with the accuracy it has. I haven't shot a Ruger but I would be very surprised if it shot better. I had my Sport out shooting groups of about 6" at 200 yards standing and shooting off hand. I have to tell you that's very good for any rifle. I have rifles that will shoot better but not off hand. That's a whole other thing. I have another AR that was built of quality parts. It won't shoot nearly as accurate as the Sport will.
Click to expand...

I normally have a Vortex Spitfire 3X on my sport 2, but I tried a friend's Vortex Crossfire 3X12 on it, just to see what it would do. I have done some trigger work on it to get it to break clean at 4 pounds. I was able to bench rest nickel sized groups, with no flyers, at 200 yards, using IMI 55 grain FMJ on a near zero windage day. Target accuracy from a low cost rifle, with factory ammo.
 
I'd point out that the SPORT series from Smith has a longer track record than the Ruger. The late Pat Rogers of EAG tactical, know for being hard on rifles, commented on several occasions on how surprisingly reliable the Sport was for a budget rifle. No knock on the Rug
 
Last edited:
HelpingHarvey said:
cyphertext, you make a good point there. Don't think any less of me when I tell you that I'm going to replace the S&W's semi auto BCG for a full auto Nitride BCG made by Toolcraft. Why? Because Nitride is slicker, and I want to. As I stated before, I did plenty of research on the Sport II and I think by making a few tweaks in certain areas on it will appease me. I would have chosen a COLT BCG, but the TC is the same as the COLT, for a bunch less money.
I still haven't decided if I want to add BCM or MAGPUL furniture. What is the consensus on that idea? Thank You.
Click to expand...
In the past I would have said that you were nuts and should look at other models than the Sport... However, with prices where they are, you can come out ahead buying the Sport and changing everything... But if you are planning to change out the BCG and furniture anyway, have you looked at the Ruger AR-556 MPR? Gets you a free float rail, plus Magpul furniture.
 
OK,

So I went to LGS and held several base models. Dpms, ruger 555 and sport 2, as well as a few higher priced AR's. I did like the sport 2 the best until getting over $300 plus more than the sport 2.

So...

Has anyone ever ordered, or did busines with, Smokey Mountain guns and ammo?

They have current price on the sport 2 of $490 and free shipping!

Smoky Mountain Guns & Ammo - Smith and Wesson 10202 M&P15 SPTII 556NATO 16" 30RD BLK

Unless someone can find a cheaper or more reliable source.
 
Last edited:
HelpingHarvey said:
cyphertext, you make a good point there. Don't think any less of me when I tell you that I'm going to replace the S&W's semi auto BCG for a full auto Nitride BCG made by Toolcraft. Why? Because Nitride is slicker, and I want to. As I stated before, I did plenty of research on the Sport II and I think by making a few tweaks in certain areas on it will appease me. I would have chosen a COLT BCG, but the TC is the same as the COLT, for a bunch less money.
I still haven't decided if I want to add BCM or MAGPUL furniture. What is the consensus on that idea? Thank You.
Click to expand...

This is not necessary. I felt the same way when I bought my Sport II and bought a fancy WMD NiB BCG to replace the semi auto stock one. I fired both and could not tell any difference.

I replaced the stock one and somehow the WMD grew into a new rifle I built myself with specific chosen parts. Weights less than 6 pounds and will shoot perfectly, just like my sport II.

The Sport is now the HD rifle, (since it's so reliable), and my home built is on a stand in my office to show off how good I am at building an AR15.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Sport III-carry handle
Replies
2
Views
313
lunger
lunger
P
M&P Sport II
Replies
2
Views
249
ColbyBruce
C
J
Sport 3 tools
Replies
3
Views
875
WR Moore
W
lunger
Sport 3
Replies
4
Views
1K
Eric300
Eric300
M
Sport 3 "Compliant" stock replacement
Replies
12
Views
2K
mscampbell2734
M

Latest posts

Back
Top