|
|
04-13-2010, 02:41 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Wow - now I'm embarrassed to say I've never considered one of these. But I like the looks. I've got my SW 3913 (which is all I can afford right now - unemployed) but have been considering (i.e., daydreaming about)an M&P 9c (or 40c). Why have the Sigmas gotten a bad rap? Are there quality issues?
__________________
--Quicksabre
|
04-13-2010, 04:28 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Dallas / Forth Worth Area
Posts: 385
Likes: 3
Liked 50 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
They truely are nice.
Some people do not like the trigger pull - it's long and very firm - kinda like a revolver being shot in double action (imho).
Very sleek and easy to conceal carry.
|
04-14-2010, 11:21 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: North West Kansas
Posts: 138
Likes: 157
Liked 29 Times in 19 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuickSabre
Wow - now I'm embarrassed to say I've never considered one of these. But I like the looks. I've got my SW 3913 (which is all I can afford right now - unemployed) but have been considering (i.e., daydreaming about)an M&P 9c (or 40c). Why have the Sigmas gotten a bad rap? Are there quality issues?
|
Because early on Sigmas had some teething problems. But everything has been worked out with the newer models. Also,some folks can't handle the trigger....it's like a DA revolver. I think it it perfect for CCW.
|
04-22-2010, 12:32 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Perris, California
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Last edited by domestic.terrorist; 04-22-2010 at 12:34 AM.
|
|
Tags
|
1911, 22lr, 380, 3913, 639, bianchi, ccw, colt, concealed, crimson, duracoat, fobus, glock, gunsmith, hogue, pachmayr, saa, sigma, springfield, sw40ve, sw9ve, tacticool, titanium |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:21 PM.