Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Semi-Automatic Pistols > Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols

Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols Other Smith & Wesson Semi-Automatic Pistols from the 1950's to Present


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-28-2011, 11:02 PM
heavyjim heavyjim is offline
Member
.22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion?  
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: SE PA
Posts: 92
Likes: 3
Liked 64 Times in 16 Posts
Default .22 Conversion?

New owner of a S&W 1911. Was wondering if there is a recommended kit? Or anyone had personal experience successful or other with any? This my first 1911 and have no experience with this.

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-01-2011, 10:05 PM
40cal's Avatar
40cal 40cal is offline
Member
.22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion?  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Default

If you have a full size 1911 (5") in .45 cal. then a Marvel or Wilson Combat kit will work great with 22LR high velocity ammo. Semi-auto rimfires can be picky with ammo.
Welcome to the furum.
__________________
2nd Admen.-Right to bear AR 's
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-01-2011, 10:25 PM
ditrina's Avatar
ditrina ditrina is offline
Moderator
.22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion?  
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Beach Side West Florida
Posts: 12,104
Likes: 27,007
Liked 19,469 Times in 4,104 Posts
Default

Kimbers conversion kit works well..
Good luck and welcome
__________________
SWCA #2306
DAV in honor of POP
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-02-2011, 03:36 PM
Ken Cerney Ken Cerney is offline
Member
.22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion?  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Blue River,WI
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I have a new 1911 E series and put on a Wilson Combat 22 conversion. I have not found an ammo that will feed yet. I'm going to polish the feed ramp and start over on my ammo search. If anyboby has suggestions let me know. Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-02-2011, 06:37 PM
akviper's Avatar
akviper akviper is offline
Member
.22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion?  
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Valdez, Alaska, USA
Posts: 632
Likes: 535
Liked 176 Times in 78 Posts
Default

I have a few Ceiner kits. One required a send back to work right and they do not hold the slide after the last shot. I have a Colt conversion unit for a 1970 series. It isn't that accurate and requires careful, frequent cleaning to insure function.

My favorite is an Advantage Arms. It is very accurate and functions flawlessly with most any hi speed ammo. The 22 conversion operates exactly like the regular pistol including the slide stop. I also bought two more Advantage Arms units for my Glocks.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-02-2011, 06:42 PM
ericlw ericlw is offline
Member
.22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion?  
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Liked 41 Times in 21 Posts
Default

my father has an advantage arms. long as you use the right ammo it works and its VERY picky about ammo. long as remmington never stops making golden bullets i think its ok.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-03-2011, 09:09 AM
novalty's Avatar
novalty novalty is offline
Member
.22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion?  
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 13,611
Likes: 491
Liked 1,883 Times in 987 Posts
Default

My brother-in-law has a Ciener I believe, and he seems to be having pretty good luck with it. Wouldn't mind getting one for my S&W 1911, but haven't been able to justify the cost over getting another .22 handgun. Anywho, the top three that I see get the most praise are (and in no particular order): Marvel Unit 1, Advantage Arms, and Tactical Solutions. The Advantage Arm ones are apparently hard to get as last I read on the net was their were in heavy production of Glock .22 conversion kits and 1911 kits have been put on the back burner.

Last edited by novalty; 03-03-2011 at 09:12 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-03-2011, 12:45 PM
madmikeb's Avatar
madmikeb madmikeb is offline
SWCA Member
.22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion?  
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Southern Arizona
Posts: 1,576
Likes: 2,182
Liked 2,358 Times in 626 Posts
Default

I've got a Kimber conversion for my Smith 1911 and have had good luck with it.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-03-2011, 01:52 PM
Big Cholla Big Cholla is offline
Member
.22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion?  
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 5,932
Liked 5,259 Times in 1,732 Posts
Default

I have two Ciener conversions. One for a full sized Colt 1911 and one for a Commander sized 1911. Both have worked perfectly from day one with any ammo tried and are very accurate. I purchased additional magazines from Ciener and they too have worked perfectly. Mr. Ciener is IMHO, an odd duck that marches to the sound of his own drums. I met him at a SHOT Show and started to tell him how much I liked his product; I got out no more than, "I have two of your conversions and.....". Mr. Ciener gave a, "humpf" and walked off. :-) ......... Big Cholla
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-03-2011, 02:03 PM
ohioseabee's Avatar
ohioseabee ohioseabee is offline
US Veteran
.22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion?  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 278
Likes: 124
Liked 525 Times in 139 Posts
Default Ciener

describing him as an "odd duck" is sorta like describing a Nimitz class carrier as a "big boat".

He is rude and abrasive on the phone often.

That being said, I like his products.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-03-2011, 02:32 PM
Bruce51's Avatar
Bruce51 Bruce51 is offline
Member
.22 Conversion?  
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Left coast
Posts: 1,442
Likes: 446
Liked 629 Times in 304 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ericlw View Post
my father has an advantage arms. long as you use the right ammo it works and its VERY picky about ammo. long as remmington never stops making golden bullets i think its ok.
I have the Advantage Arms target model. It favors CCI 40 grain round nose bullets. Hollow points such as W 333 will tend to hit the feed ramp.
It works great and when it does bobble it just needs a little oil.
AA's web site states it is not making the target model any more. I purchased mine from a member on this board.

Bruce

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-03-2011, 04:15 PM
TSQUARED TSQUARED is offline
Member
.22 Conversion? .22 Conversion?  
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 2,164
Likes: 2
Liked 117 Times in 85 Posts
Default

I have a Ciever, two Marvels, a Jarvis and a Tactical Solutions conversion kit. I also did have an original Colt unit.

The original Colt unit is all steel, plinker in terms of accuracy and has a floating chamber which is a pain in the neck to clean.

My Ciener unit came with a smoothbore barrel which they replaced. It has functioned well with several ammo brands. Accuracy wise it is slightly better than the original Colt unit. Customer service is nonexistent as I found out with my Ciener Glock17 unit. The Ciener magazines are well made.

The Marvel unit#1 is a favorite of the bullseye shooters, superbly accurate, extremely reliable with SV ammo, slide is aluminum and does not lock back after firing the last round. This is my favorite unit. I have one set up with iron sights and the other with a red dot. You can purchase an extra heavy recoil spring and use the Federal copper washed bulk pack HV HP ammo.

The Jarvis unit is all steel, prefers CCI MiniMag or Remington Golden Bullet, slide does lock back after last round, it has been discontinued. Accuracy better than Ciener or Colt but nowhere near that of Marvel #1.

The Tactical Solutions unit is an improvement on the original Jarvis, superbly machined from steel, somewhat picky in terms of ammo preference, CCI MiniMags work very well, some problems with getting the slide to lock back after the last round. The barrel rib extention does case an occassional ejection failre. Accuracy is on a par with the afformentioned Jarvis unit.

I have an Advantage Arms unit for the Glock-17. It will function reliably with CCI MiniMags or Remington Golden - you have to put up with the usual ignition failures using Remington Golden.

Hope the above helps you choose an appropriate unit.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-03-2011, 05:19 PM
Murdock Murdock is offline
Member
.22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion?  
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Down East Maine
Posts: 997
Likes: 1,169
Liked 1,791 Times in 473 Posts
Default Colt Conversion Unit

Mine is a '70's era Colt unit. It is the second one I have owned, and I have been pleased with both.

Extra magazines are pricey (over $40), but work well. In fact, the newer Colt conversion mags seem to work a bit better than the old ones, and you can remove the floor plates for easier cleaning than the older ones.

Contrary to the experience of others, I get a few hundred rounds (over 300 anyway) out of mine before cleaning is needed to ensure reliable function. Wally World Federal bulk works fine, but the hotter the ammo, the better for reliability and reduced fouling.

All steel construction provides weight in the hand that duplicates the .45 for heft and handling from the leather. Locks open on the last round, so reloading practice is the same.

The floating chamber does not truly duplicate .45 ACP recoil, but does come fairly close to 9mm/.38 Super. Enough for realism, anyway, and far better than units that rely upon an aluminum slide to enable the piddly .22LR energy to provide sufficient energy to ensure function.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-05-2011, 08:42 AM
RADAR 1 RADAR 1 is offline
Member
.22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion?  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Here are mine, a Kimber Rimfire Target, a Kimber Pro Carry II with a Commander size Marvel Unit 1, and a Taurus PT1911 with a Kimber conversion.

The Kimber's took a couple hundred rounds to loosen up, but will shoot about anything now. They love CCI Blazers.
The Marvel likes CCI SV and Fed AutoMatch.
Kimbers will shoot 1.5" at 25 from a rest, the Marvel cuts that in half.
I like shooting them all, best of luck on your choice!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-05-2011, 10:40 AM
heavyjim heavyjim is offline
Member
.22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion? .22 Conversion?  
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: SE PA
Posts: 92
Likes: 3
Liked 64 Times in 16 Posts
Default

Thank you all for the responses and excellent information.

I will let you know what I end up with and report back on function

Thanks again
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-05-2011, 11:06 AM
robctwo robctwo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Albany, OR
Posts: 458
Likes: 6
Liked 58 Times in 27 Posts
Default



I have the Ceiner platinum set up on a SA black stainless. Very accurate and reliable with almost all ammo. My favorite is the Federal bulk pack. Mags hold 15. Slides doesn't lock back.

My friend has the Marvel, it has been to the factory and still doesn't run worth beans.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
1911, 22lr, bullseye, ceiner, colt, commander, fouling, glock, kimber, leather, lock, platinum, remington, rimfire, tactical, taurus


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
M&P .40/.357 Sig Conversion Don Alvarez Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols 10 05-19-2016 06:01 AM
586 CONVERSION williamlayton S&W-Smithing 0 06-10-2011 02:12 PM
.40 to 9 mm conversion, its been done. not 9c1 lover Smith & Wesson SD & Sigma Pistols 6 06-08-2011 07:32 PM
M&P 40 -> 9mm conversion some_guy Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols 3 03-08-2011 05:10 AM
38/44 HD conversion vs. HE bubbajoe45 S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 18 12-17-2009 01:26 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:32 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)