Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Semi-Automatic Pistols > Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols

Notices

Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols Other Smith & Wesson Semi-Automatic Pistols from the 1950's to Present


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-30-2011, 02:42 PM
Grumpa72 Grumpa72 is offline
Member
S&W 4516 vs Sig P239 S&W 4516 vs Sig P239  
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Moon Township, PA
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default S&W 4516 vs Sig P239

I have a recently acquired 4516 (love it btw - incredibly accurate!) but I am also curious about the Sig P239. Does anyone have a picture comparison of the two? I have two other Sigs, a P226 and P220, and they are fabulously reliable so I would expect the same thing from the P239 in .40.

If no picture comparos, does anyone have a side by side comparison of the dimensions? The P239 dimensions are easy but I am having trouble finding the 4516.

Thanks,
Grumpa
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-30-2011, 04:55 PM
Catshooter Catshooter is offline
Member
S&W 4516 vs Sig P239 S&W 4516 vs Sig P239 S&W 4516 vs Sig P239 S&W 4516 vs Sig P239 S&W 4516 vs Sig P239  
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: East river South Dakota
Posts: 678
Likes: 6
Liked 107 Times in 57 Posts
Default

Grumpa,

Congrats on your 4516.

I do have to wonder though, how can the dimensions of the 4516 you just got be hard to come by?


Cat
__________________
Think for yourself.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-30-2011, 04:58 PM
Grumpa72 Grumpa72 is offline
Member
S&W 4516 vs Sig P239 S&W 4516 vs Sig P239  
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Moon Township, PA
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Catshooter View Post
Grumpa,

Congrats on your 4516.

I do have to wonder though, how can the dimensions of the 4516 you just got be hard to come by?


Cat
Because I am sitting in a hotel room right now, surfing the internet and trying to do a comparison without actually holding either pistol in my hand! It is a good question though and I had to laugh at the initial sound of it. I do have the Sig website handy I am not finding the information on the S&W web site.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-30-2011, 05:15 PM
squidsix squidsix is offline
Member
S&W 4516 vs Sig P239 S&W 4516 vs Sig P239 S&W 4516 vs Sig P239 S&W 4516 vs Sig P239 S&W 4516 vs Sig P239  
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 3,528
Likes: 1,902
Liked 5,630 Times in 1,544 Posts
Default

The Sig 239 is a very large pistol for what it does. It's about the same size as a 39-2, and a hair heavier. I would get a 39xx WAY before going to the top-heavy sig. It's meant to be their "compact" 9mm, and is the size of many near duty-sized guns.
I dumped my 239 a long time ago and never looked back. (Pricey too)
congrats on your 4516. I'm looking for one now.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-30-2011, 06:51 PM
RufusG RufusG is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: In the weeds, AZ
Posts: 747
Likes: 3
Liked 103 Times in 66 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by squidsix View Post
the top-heavy sig. .
Before I even read this I was going to say that in comparison to a 4516 a 239 will feel top-heavy, even though it's lighter. The grip will feel smaller and shorter as well. As far as he dimensions, I can't help. I've owned both in the past, they're both nice guns, but there's something about a 4516 that makes it very comfy to shoot.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-30-2011, 09:30 PM
KPSqured KPSqured is offline
Member
S&W 4516 vs Sig P239 S&W 4516 vs Sig P239 S&W 4516 vs Sig P239 S&W 4516 vs Sig P239 S&W 4516 vs Sig P239  
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 86
Likes: 3
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

I looked at a P239 SAS 9mm today. I didn't get it, though it was nice. I think that my 4513TSW is better for for concealed carry. Concealed carry is a bunch of compromises; cartridge, firepower, weight, size, shape,...My 4513TSW (minus the rail) is what I keep going back to now. Now a P239 in 357SIG...I don't know...nah, 4513.

__________________
Thanks,
KPSqured

Last edited by KPSqured; 04-30-2011 at 09:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-30-2011, 10:03 PM
Pete99004's Avatar
Pete99004 Pete99004 is offline
Member
S&W 4516 vs Sig P239 S&W 4516 vs Sig P239 S&W 4516 vs Sig P239 S&W 4516 vs Sig P239 S&W 4516 vs Sig P239  
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: AZ
Posts: 2,065
Likes: 2,606
Liked 2,128 Times in 787 Posts
Default

You might find what your looking for at this web site.

Modern Firearms & Ammunition: assault, sniper and tactical rifle, handgun, pistol, revolver, shotgun, submachine gun, machine gun, ammunition, bullet, grenade launcher

Good luck.
__________________
Don't tread on me
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-02-2011, 05:00 PM
Grumpa72 Grumpa72 is offline
Member
S&W 4516 vs Sig P239 S&W 4516 vs Sig P239  
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Moon Township, PA
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default

That worked.
thank you.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-02-2011, 06:00 PM
scooter123 scooter123 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 6,926
Likes: 179
Liked 4,301 Times in 2,112 Posts
Default

Not really pertanent but I have the 40 caliber P239 and I have to tell you that it's my favorite semi to just go shooting with. As for why, because it fits my hands so darned well that accuracy is automatic. In addition with 2500 rounds downrange I've not had one single malfunction. As for concealing it, it's no problem at all, even under a light T Shirt as long as it's a bit loose fitting and a darker color. Finally, because it's in current production I don't have to worry about shooting the snot out of it, if a spring or other part needs to be replaced, all I have to do is log onto my computer and order whatever I need. Yeah, I'm a fan and it's because of it's positive attributes.

As for the muzzle jump, when I've been drilling regularly shooting a 4 inch group at 30 feet with a .4 second split is easy. If I've been slacking off on my shooting, a .5 second split comes in at the 3rd or 4th magazine. Yeah, that won't set any speed records but it'll usually do the job if your not missing, and it's pretty rare for me to miss at anything under 50 feet.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-04-2011, 12:49 PM
oldRoger oldRoger is offline
US Veteran
S&W 4516 vs Sig P239 S&W 4516 vs Sig P239 S&W 4516 vs Sig P239 S&W 4516 vs Sig P239 S&W 4516 vs Sig P239  
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Citrus County, Florida
Posts: 2,073
Likes: 21
Liked 218 Times in 110 Posts
Default

I had a 4516 and P239 concurrently, I have since sold the 4516 to another member and have the P239 up for sale.
I think the comparison should be between the P239 and the 3913 or 4040. These three are in fact almost exactly the same shape except for the trigger guard and shoot the same rounds. The SIG is thicker through the slide and grip area by about .8”otherwise similar.
The 4516 after all is a compact .45.
__________________
Ipsis Rebus Dictantitbus
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-04-2011, 08:07 PM
Dot_mdb's Avatar
Dot_mdb Dot_mdb is offline
Member
S&W 4516 vs Sig P239  
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 707
Likes: 173
Liked 213 Times in 120 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oldRoger View Post
The SIG is thicker through the slide and grip area by about .8”otherwise similar.
The 4516 after all is a compact .45.

Should that be .08" instead of .8"?

Bill
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-05-2011, 07:11 AM
ldp4570's Avatar
ldp4570 ldp4570 is offline
US Veteran
S&W 4516 vs Sig P239 S&W 4516 vs Sig P239 S&W 4516 vs Sig P239 S&W 4516 vs Sig P239 S&W 4516 vs Sig P239  
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: McAlester, Oklahoma
Posts: 488
Likes: 9
Liked 47 Times in 29 Posts
Default

Closest I can do for you is a pic of my 3913 with my P225. The 3913 is the smaller of the two.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-05-2011, 01:10 PM
oldRoger oldRoger is offline
US Veteran
S&W 4516 vs Sig P239 S&W 4516 vs Sig P239 S&W 4516 vs Sig P239 S&W 4516 vs Sig P239 S&W 4516 vs Sig P239  
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Citrus County, Florida
Posts: 2,073
Likes: 21
Liked 218 Times in 110 Posts
Default

Bill;
Of course you are correct, actually closer to .09" than .08" depending on where. My P239 is the same width through the slide as my P220.
Roger
__________________
Ipsis Rebus Dictantitbus
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-05-2011, 07:38 PM
mg2112 mg2112 is offline
Member
S&W 4516 vs Sig P239 S&W 4516 vs Sig P239 S&W 4516 vs Sig P239 S&W 4516 vs Sig P239 S&W 4516 vs Sig P239  
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 129
Likes: 45
Liked 49 Times in 18 Posts
Default

I own one sig (239) and a Smith Model 910. Love them both.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
3913, 4516, cartridge, concealed, p226, s&w, sig arms, submachine, tactical


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New to me Sig P239 .40 S&W ColbyBruce Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics 2 05-02-2016 08:46 PM
FS in AZ Only: Excellent ++++ S&W 4516-2, 4516-1 & 1066 Leiden GUNS - For Sale or Trade 0 07-17-2011 06:08 PM
4516-1 take 4516-2 dual recoil springs? Leiden Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 9 09-03-2010 04:16 PM
Sig p239 JcMack Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 21 07-14-2010 10:22 PM
WTS Sig P239 *Klutch* GUNS - For Sale or Trade 6 05-18-2010 08:18 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:09 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)