|
|
04-30-2011, 02:42 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Moon Township, PA
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
S&W 4516 vs Sig P239
I have a recently acquired 4516 (love it btw - incredibly accurate!) but I am also curious about the Sig P239. Does anyone have a picture comparison of the two? I have two other Sigs, a P226 and P220, and they are fabulously reliable so I would expect the same thing from the P239 in .40.
If no picture comparos, does anyone have a side by side comparison of the dimensions? The P239 dimensions are easy but I am having trouble finding the 4516.
Thanks,
Grumpa
|
04-30-2011, 04:55 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: East river South Dakota
Posts: 678
Likes: 6
Liked 107 Times in 57 Posts
|
|
Grumpa,
Congrats on your 4516.
I do have to wonder though, how can the dimensions of the 4516 you just got be hard to come by?
Cat
__________________
Think for yourself.
|
04-30-2011, 04:58 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Moon Township, PA
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catshooter
Grumpa,
Congrats on your 4516.
I do have to wonder though, how can the dimensions of the 4516 you just got be hard to come by?
Cat
|
Because I am sitting in a hotel room right now, surfing the internet and trying to do a comparison without actually holding either pistol in my hand! It is a good question though and I had to laugh at the initial sound of it. I do have the Sig website handy I am not finding the information on the S&W web site.
|
04-30-2011, 05:15 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 3,528
Likes: 1,902
Liked 5,631 Times in 1,544 Posts
|
|
The Sig 239 is a very large pistol for what it does. It's about the same size as a 39-2, and a hair heavier. I would get a 39xx WAY before going to the top-heavy sig. It's meant to be their "compact" 9mm, and is the size of many near duty-sized guns.
I dumped my 239 a long time ago and never looked back. (Pricey too)
congrats on your 4516. I'm looking for one now.
|
04-30-2011, 06:51 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: In the weeds, AZ
Posts: 747
Likes: 3
Liked 103 Times in 66 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by squidsix
the top-heavy sig. .
|
Before I even read this I was going to say that in comparison to a 4516 a 239 will feel top-heavy, even though it's lighter. The grip will feel smaller and shorter as well. As far as he dimensions, I can't help. I've owned both in the past, they're both nice guns, but there's something about a 4516 that makes it very comfy to shoot.
|
04-30-2011, 09:30 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 86
Likes: 3
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
I looked at a P239 SAS 9mm today. I didn't get it, though it was nice. I think that my 4513TSW is better for for concealed carry. Concealed carry is a bunch of compromises; cartridge, firepower, weight, size, shape,...My 4513TSW (minus the rail) is what I keep going back to now. Now a P239 in 357SIG...I don't know...nah, 4513.
__________________
Thanks,
KPSqured
Last edited by KPSqured; 04-30-2011 at 09:33 PM.
|
04-30-2011, 10:03 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: AZ
Posts: 2,066
Likes: 2,608
Liked 2,128 Times in 787 Posts
|
|
You might find what your looking for at this web site.
Modern Firearms & Ammunition: assault, sniper and tactical rifle, handgun, pistol, revolver, shotgun, submachine gun, machine gun, ammunition, bullet, grenade launcher
Good luck.
__________________
Don't tread on me
|
05-02-2011, 05:00 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Moon Township, PA
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete99004
You might find what your looking for at this web site.
Modern Firearms & Ammunition: assault, sniper and tactical rifle, handgun, pistol, revolver, shotgun, submachine gun, machine gun, ammunition, bullet, grenade launcher
Good luck.
|
That worked.
thank you.
|
05-02-2011, 06:00 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 6,928
Likes: 179
Liked 4,308 Times in 2,113 Posts
|
|
Not really pertanent but I have the 40 caliber P239 and I have to tell you that it's my favorite semi to just go shooting with. As for why, because it fits my hands so darned well that accuracy is automatic. In addition with 2500 rounds downrange I've not had one single malfunction. As for concealing it, it's no problem at all, even under a light T Shirt as long as it's a bit loose fitting and a darker color. Finally, because it's in current production I don't have to worry about shooting the snot out of it, if a spring or other part needs to be replaced, all I have to do is log onto my computer and order whatever I need. Yeah, I'm a fan and it's because of it's positive attributes.
As for the muzzle jump, when I've been drilling regularly shooting a 4 inch group at 30 feet with a .4 second split is easy. If I've been slacking off on my shooting, a .5 second split comes in at the 3rd or 4th magazine. Yeah, that won't set any speed records but it'll usually do the job if your not missing, and it's pretty rare for me to miss at anything under 50 feet.
|
05-04-2011, 12:49 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Citrus County, Florida
Posts: 2,073
Likes: 21
Liked 218 Times in 110 Posts
|
|
I had a 4516 and P239 concurrently, I have since sold the 4516 to another member and have the P239 up for sale.
I think the comparison should be between the P239 and the 3913 or 4040. These three are in fact almost exactly the same shape except for the trigger guard and shoot the same rounds. The SIG is thicker through the slide and grip area by about .8”otherwise similar.
The 4516 after all is a compact .45.
__________________
Ipsis Rebus Dictantitbus
|
05-04-2011, 08:07 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 707
Likes: 173
Liked 213 Times in 120 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldRoger
The SIG is thicker through the slide and grip area by about .8”otherwise similar.
The 4516 after all is a compact .45.
|
Should that be .08" instead of .8"?
Bill
|
05-05-2011, 07:11 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: McAlester, Oklahoma
Posts: 488
Likes: 9
Liked 47 Times in 29 Posts
|
|
Closest I can do for you is a pic of my 3913 with my P225. The 3913 is the smaller of the two.
|
05-05-2011, 01:10 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Citrus County, Florida
Posts: 2,073
Likes: 21
Liked 218 Times in 110 Posts
|
|
Bill;
Of course you are correct, actually closer to .09" than .08" depending on where. My P239 is the same width through the slide as my P220.
Roger
__________________
Ipsis Rebus Dictantitbus
|
05-05-2011, 07:38 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 129
Likes: 45
Liked 49 Times in 18 Posts
|
|
I own one sig (239) and a Smith Model 910. Love them both.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|