Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Semi-Automatic Pistols > Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols

Notices

Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols Other Smith & Wesson Semi-Automatic Pistols from the 1950's to Present


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-05-2012, 11:58 AM
Rasmus21 Rasmus21 is offline
Member
First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice  
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default First 9mm choice

Like the look,feel,and features of the 5906, but feel it might be a bit heavy for me, being a light-weight male with relatively small hands. Would like opinions of the 5906 vs the 6906 vs the 3913. Does the 3913 have a lot of recoil ? I plan to use the pistol for home/business defense, but might at some point conceal carry(legal here in VT). Thanks for any input.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-05-2012, 12:22 PM
mlk18's Avatar
mlk18 mlk18 is offline
Member
First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice  
Join Date: May 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,426
Likes: 296
Liked 785 Times in 356 Posts
Default

The 5906 (steel) is a heavy beast, while the almost identical 5903 (alloy frame) is noticably lighter in weight. The other thing to consider is grip shape; arched grips make the gun feel much bigger to me than the flat grips.

All that being said the 3913 is definitely a slimmer and lighter option to both, and if you may CC it down the road is a very good option. Recoil and muzzle flip with the 3913 is very manageable and probably has less than any other gun in it's size class.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-05-2012, 12:27 PM
sw44spl's Avatar
sw44spl sw44spl is offline
Member
First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice  
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NORTH CAROLINA.
Posts: 1,711
Likes: 280
Liked 1,072 Times in 241 Posts
Default

I would say the 3913 would be a great gun for what you say its for.
__________________
God save the SOUTH
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-05-2012, 12:53 PM
Rasmus21 Rasmus21 is offline
Member
First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice  
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for your prompt reply.I appreciate the input.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-05-2012, 01:46 PM
quitsnivln's Avatar
quitsnivln quitsnivln is offline
Member
First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: CA
Posts: 42
Likes: 4
Liked 18 Times in 8 Posts
Default

From the needs you described, the 3913 would be great. I have carried a 908S for years. It is in essence another version of the 3913. I have shot countless rounds through it with absolutely no hiccups. I consider the recoil minimal. I recently picked up a CS9 which is a little smaller for CC. I also have a 5905 and find it quite a bit heavier when carrying it.

In my opinion you can not go wrong with a 3rd Generation S&W handgun. Good luck and post some pics when you pick something up.




Last edited by quitsnivln; 03-05-2012 at 01:54 PM. Reason: added text
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-05-2012, 02:04 PM
StatesRightist StatesRightist is offline
Banned
First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice  
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: South
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 2,026
Liked 1,451 Times in 555 Posts
Default

I have a 908S and a 6906. Either are good carry options, the 6906 is no where near too big or heavy for CC. The 908 is easier to carry, but you give up 4 rounds in doing so. The 6906 is smaller and lighter than say a 1911, P228 etc. The 5906 though, is a little big for CC. Great business and HD gun though.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-05-2012, 02:11 PM
JTA JTA is offline
Member
First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 96
Likes: 14
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

I personally love the 6906/6946 frame size and weight for carry, and it is still very shootable. That said, I have larger hands and like the way a double stack magazine fits my hand. A 3913 would make an excellent choice for someone with smaller hands (due largely to its single stack magazine), and its size and weight are also excellent for carry.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-05-2012, 03:09 PM
BaldEagle1313's Avatar
BaldEagle1313 BaldEagle1313 is offline
Member
First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice  
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Mountlake Terrace, WA
Posts: 2,139
Likes: 1,139
Liked 1,477 Times in 594 Posts
Default

If you are ever going to carry it concealed, the 3913 or 908 are the way to go in 9mm. Perhaps even a 3953 - double action only, so no protruding decocking lever(s).

If it will be strictly range and home defense work, then the 5903 is a good, lighter weight alternative to the all steel 5906, presuming the double-stack magazine isn't too large for your hand.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-05-2012, 11:13 PM
smitty_bs smitty_bs is offline
Member
First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice  
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 531
Likes: 1,143
Liked 474 Times in 130 Posts
Default

I like the 3953. Being a revolver guy at heart, this little pistol has no levers, etc. Just load it and pull the trigger. I like it alot.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-05-2012, 11:22 PM
BIG DOG's Avatar
BIG DOG BIG DOG is offline
Member
First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: N.E. OHIO
Posts: 509
Likes: 44
Liked 28 Times in 15 Posts
Default

For your needs by what I am reading.....The 3913 would be a great choice
G
__________________
**Big Dog Grips**
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-06-2012, 02:53 AM
goldenlight goldenlight is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 2,291
Liked 394 Times in 221 Posts
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by StatesRightist View Post
I have a 908S and a 6906. Either are good carry options, the 6906 is no where near too big or heavy for CC. The 908 is easier to carry, but you give up 4 rounds in doing so. The 6906 is smaller and lighter than say a 1911, P228 etc. The 5906 though, is a little big for CC. Great business and HD gun though.

I'm only 5'5",130 lbs, and I carry a 6906 the vast majority of the time.

I find that the 6906 is very comfortable to shoot, because of the thicker grip.

While the 3913 is less wide, and thus somewhat easier to conceal, I like the 13 round capacity of the 6906.

I also shoot it it better than the 3914 (blued version of the 3913) that I owned many years ago. It may have been that particular 3914, but my groups with the 6906 were always better.

A great many people like the 3913 for CC, so my opinion may be in the minority.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-06-2012, 09:54 AM
wrench wrench is offline
Member
First 9mm choice  
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 135
Likes: 3
Liked 115 Times in 27 Posts
Default

I have small hands, and the double stack S&W's are a touch big for me.
The single stacks, (3913/14, CS9) are pure heaven.
Really nice guns to shoot, mine have been accurate and reliable.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-06-2012, 02:20 PM
DesertZig DesertZig is offline
Member
First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 68
Likes: 30
Liked 10 Times in 7 Posts
Default

I have a 5906 and 3913. I also have smaller hands. I can handle the 5906 well now that I removed the hogue grips that we're on it and replaced them with the original flat grips. I use it now as my range and steel match gun. My CCW is the 3913, also with the flat grips. The recoil is fine (I don't shoot +P ammo) and I love the slimness of the grip. Reminds me of a 1911.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-06-2012, 02:38 PM
lalodad's Avatar
lalodad lalodad is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: franklin park illinois
Posts: 62
Likes: 8
Liked 5 Times in 1 Post
Default

can't go wrong with 669 & cost less than most 9mm, light& flat. great fun to use
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-06-2012, 09:44 PM
586nickel 586nickel is offline
Member
First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice First 9mm choice  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: GA
Posts: 275
Likes: 13
Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BaldEagle1313 View Post
If you are ever going to carry it concealed, the 3913 or 908 are the way to go in 9mm. Perhaps even a 3953 - double action only, so no protruding decocking lever(s).

If it will be strictly range and home defense work, then the 5903 is a good, lighter weight alternative to the all steel 5906, presuming the double-stack magazine isn't too large for your hand.
I'll second that. A 5903TSW is another good option if maybe one of your LGS has some police trade ins. I have one and I favor it over my 5906. The 5906 is a beast, built like a tank, totally reliable but DEFINITELY NOT something you would want to conceal carry.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
1911, 3913, 3914, 3953, 5906, 669, 6906, ccw, concealed, cs9, hogue, p228, smith & wesson, smith and wesson


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
M60 choice joe44va S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 10 01-15-2016 06:15 PM
GUN CHOICE. Edknn123 Smith & Wesson SD & Sigma Pistols 15 01-14-2016 07:45 PM
Choice Between SW 15-4 and Pre 15 magnum62 S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 11 07-05-2013 08:42 AM
CZ P06 vs M&P choice help please johnfl Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols 12 04-29-2011 07:56 PM
Choice between a 28-2 or 38/44 HD? Engine49guy S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 22 05-04-2010 07:05 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:07 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)