|
|
03-05-2012, 11:58 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
First 9mm choice
Like the look,feel,and features of the 5906, but feel it might be a bit heavy for me, being a light-weight male with relatively small hands. Would like opinions of the 5906 vs the 6906 vs the 3913. Does the 3913 have a lot of recoil ? I plan to use the pistol for home/business defense, but might at some point conceal carry(legal here in VT). Thanks for any input.
|
03-05-2012, 12:22 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,426
Likes: 296
Liked 785 Times in 356 Posts
|
|
The 5906 (steel) is a heavy beast, while the almost identical 5903 (alloy frame) is noticably lighter in weight. The other thing to consider is grip shape; arched grips make the gun feel much bigger to me than the flat grips.
All that being said the 3913 is definitely a slimmer and lighter option to both, and if you may CC it down the road is a very good option. Recoil and muzzle flip with the 3913 is very manageable and probably has less than any other gun in it's size class.
|
03-05-2012, 12:27 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NORTH CAROLINA.
Posts: 1,711
Likes: 280
Liked 1,072 Times in 241 Posts
|
|
I would say the 3913 would be a great gun for what you say its for.
__________________
God save the SOUTH
|
03-05-2012, 12:53 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Thanks for your prompt reply.I appreciate the input.
|
03-05-2012, 01:46 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: CA
Posts: 42
Likes: 4
Liked 18 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
From the needs you described, the 3913 would be great. I have carried a 908S for years. It is in essence another version of the 3913. I have shot countless rounds through it with absolutely no hiccups. I consider the recoil minimal. I recently picked up a CS9 which is a little smaller for CC. I also have a 5905 and find it quite a bit heavier when carrying it.
In my opinion you can not go wrong with a 3rd Generation S&W handgun. Good luck and post some pics when you pick something up.
Last edited by quitsnivln; 03-05-2012 at 01:54 PM.
Reason: added text
|
03-05-2012, 02:04 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: South
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 2,026
Liked 1,451 Times in 555 Posts
|
|
I have a 908S and a 6906. Either are good carry options, the 6906 is no where near too big or heavy for CC. The 908 is easier to carry, but you give up 4 rounds in doing so. The 6906 is smaller and lighter than say a 1911, P228 etc. The 5906 though, is a little big for CC. Great business and HD gun though.
|
03-05-2012, 02:11 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 96
Likes: 14
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
I personally love the 6906/6946 frame size and weight for carry, and it is still very shootable. That said, I have larger hands and like the way a double stack magazine fits my hand. A 3913 would make an excellent choice for someone with smaller hands (due largely to its single stack magazine), and its size and weight are also excellent for carry.
|
03-05-2012, 03:09 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Mountlake Terrace, WA
Posts: 2,139
Likes: 1,139
Liked 1,477 Times in 594 Posts
|
|
If you are ever going to carry it concealed, the 3913 or 908 are the way to go in 9mm. Perhaps even a 3953 - double action only, so no protruding decocking lever(s).
If it will be strictly range and home defense work, then the 5903 is a good, lighter weight alternative to the all steel 5906, presuming the double-stack magazine isn't too large for your hand.
|
03-05-2012, 11:13 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 531
Likes: 1,143
Liked 474 Times in 130 Posts
|
|
I like the 3953. Being a revolver guy at heart, this little pistol has no levers, etc. Just load it and pull the trigger. I like it alot.
|
03-05-2012, 11:22 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: N.E. OHIO
Posts: 509
Likes: 44
Liked 28 Times in 15 Posts
|
|
For your needs by what I am reading.....The 3913 would be a great choice
G
__________________
**Big Dog Grips**
|
03-06-2012, 02:53 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 2,291
Liked 394 Times in 221 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StatesRightist
I have a 908S and a 6906. Either are good carry options, the 6906 is no where near too big or heavy for CC. The 908 is easier to carry, but you give up 4 rounds in doing so. The 6906 is smaller and lighter than say a 1911, P228 etc. The 5906 though, is a little big for CC. Great business and HD gun though.
|
I'm only 5'5",130 lbs, and I carry a 6906 the vast majority of the time.
I find that the 6906 is very comfortable to shoot, because of the thicker grip.
While the 3913 is less wide, and thus somewhat easier to conceal, I like the 13 round capacity of the 6906.
I also shoot it it better than the 3914 (blued version of the 3913) that I owned many years ago. It may have been that particular 3914, but my groups with the 6906 were always better.
A great many people like the 3913 for CC, so my opinion may be in the minority.
|
03-06-2012, 09:54 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 135
Likes: 3
Liked 115 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
I have small hands, and the double stack S&W's are a touch big for me.
The single stacks, (3913/14, CS9) are pure heaven.
Really nice guns to shoot, mine have been accurate and reliable.
|
03-06-2012, 02:20 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 68
Likes: 30
Liked 10 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
I have a 5906 and 3913. I also have smaller hands. I can handle the 5906 well now that I removed the hogue grips that we're on it and replaced them with the original flat grips. I use it now as my range and steel match gun. My CCW is the 3913, also with the flat grips. The recoil is fine (I don't shoot +P ammo) and I love the slimness of the grip. Reminds me of a 1911.
|
03-06-2012, 02:38 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: franklin park illinois
Posts: 62
Likes: 8
Liked 5 Times in 1 Post
|
|
can't go wrong with 669 & cost less than most 9mm, light& flat. great fun to use
|
03-06-2012, 09:44 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: GA
Posts: 275
Likes: 13
Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BaldEagle1313
If you are ever going to carry it concealed, the 3913 or 908 are the way to go in 9mm. Perhaps even a 3953 - double action only, so no protruding decocking lever(s).
If it will be strictly range and home defense work, then the 5903 is a good, lighter weight alternative to the all steel 5906, presuming the double-stack magazine isn't too large for your hand.
|
I'll second that. A 5903TSW is another good option if maybe one of your LGS has some police trade ins. I have one and I favor it over my 5906. The 5906 is a beast, built like a tank, totally reliable but DEFINITELY NOT something you would want to conceal carry.
|
|
Tags
|
1911, 3913, 3914, 3953, 5906, 669, 6906, ccw, concealed, cs9, hogue, p228, smith & wesson, smith and wesson |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|