Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Semi-Automatic Pistols > Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols

Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols Other Smith & Wesson Semi-Automatic Pistols from the 1950's to Present


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 07-28-2017, 10:17 AM
redlightrich redlightrich is offline
Member
Update, Current production Model 41 Update, Current production Model 41 Update, Current production Model 41 Update, Current production Model 41 Update, Current production Model 41  
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 4 Posts
Default Update, Current production Model 41

Hello all, I felt it necessary to write a follow up to my recent Model 41 purchase, as my first post was bordering on negative.

At any rate, I have now taken her for 2 range outings. I have also bought 3 more new mags, for what I feel are reasonably priced. I own many pistols, and the mags for this gun, are very low priced.

The replacement mags, seem to be identiacal to the new ones provided with the gun. The mag spring is very strong, however, they seem to function well out of the package. I usually let mags sit for several days, loaded to capacity, however, I didn't have the time, and luckily, there was no need.

At the range, I started by feeding it the recommended diet, of CCI SV 40g LRN. She runs like a champ. I had one FTE, which was my first round, and none others to date. Even the very first trip out had zero feed or eject issues. I will chalk that up to tight, cold chamber, or simply new gun.

The "repair" that I made to the pin, ( #69 in schematic) has been trouble free.
Smith and Wesson did send me 2 new pins, but I will not change it until I need to.

The accuracy is beyond good. I have a lot of 1911 experience, and due to that, the gun points very naturally for me. The grips are a tad thicker than I normally would like, but based on how well I have been shooting it, I am reluctant to change them.
I am able to get accuracy from open sights, that I would require a dot sight from anything else. For example, my Ruger Target, with which I have shot over 10k rounds, has a dot sight. It is extremely accurate, and based on familiarity, I shoot it well.
I used them both side by side, and I was as accurate, or even more so, with my 41. I found this surprising, based on the fact that the 41 is so new to me, and my Ruger is like an old comfortable shoe. The trigger is night and day. I like the small amount of take up, and the light, creep free pull. My guess is that it is near 2# currently. I will put a gauge on it, after it has a thousand rounds or so on it. No need at present.

The mag release is a little tucked behind the grip. I may like an extended version if one is available. It's not horrible, but for me, I could use some more length to it. Also, the mags don't drop cleanly. You sort of hit the release, then dig it out. My guess is the mag disco is working against a clean release.
Do the older model 41's also sport a mag disco? Is it possible to disconnect the disconnector?

Also the safety is a touch on the stiff side. I took off the grip, oiled it up, and started working it. I am sure that will loosen up.

As far as cycling ammo, I use CCI SV 40g LRN, which I intend to keep feeding it, but I also tried others. I used Federal Auto Match, which is 40g LRN. It is not full HV, but it is faster than SV. It fed, chambered, ejected and cycled 100%. For the heck of it, I also fed CCI 36g CPHP HV ammo, as well as Federal Game Shock, 38G CPHP. All ammo worked fine for slow fire, and rapid fire.
I will not use HV ammo as a rule, but I wanted to see how picky this pistol is. So far, it ate everything well.

All in all, this appears to be a high quality pistol. As far as Smith and Wesson using "worn out tooling" as I have read, I am not sure if this has any truth. The finish is good, and the fit is also good. Maybe on the tight side, but I prefer tight when new, than a sloppy mess that can only get worse.

I am glad I bought this gun. I am also glad, I bought it last, as opposed to getting it as my first 22lr pistol. If I had, everything else would be somewhat of a disappointment. Is it my favorite? I can't answer that for a year or so. I happen to like some of my other pistols a lot too, even though they are not up to this gun's standards.

In closing, even though the earlier guns were better done, the new ones are not poorly made at all. If you were to compare any manufactured product, you would see changes along the way. This is no different.

I also appreciate that the slide is drilled and tapped for optics, if I choose to go that way.

I believe this gun, the Smith and Wesson Model 41 is still relevant. Yes, there are less expensive guns to buy, but if you compare, you will see where the additional cost goes.

Kind regards

Rich

Everything on the gun seems to be settling in.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
 


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Current Production Model 67 Kit (Some shop work required) NH Old School S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 4 02-21-2015 10:05 PM
How do current production model 629's perform with cast lead? SLT223 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 13 12-19-2014 10:17 PM
Current production S&W M&P's (Update) C4IGrant Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols 10 10-07-2013 06:46 PM
WTB current production S&W model 67 grips dhv WANTED to Buy 0 09-01-2013 10:40 PM
Would you have any hesitation in reccomending a current production Model 64? GatorFarmer S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 21 09-21-2012 05:10 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:37 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)