Well Armed
Member
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2014
- Messages
- 1,127
- Reaction score
- 1,392
My observation may be entirely incorrect, but it seems that the popularity of a 2" revolver for carry is largely limited to the J Frame. K Frame carry favors the 3" or 4" barrel over a 2". The 2" K models, 10, 15, and 64, have much to offer as 2" carry pieces. One more shot than the J, more weight to mitigate recoil, larger grip surface for control and quicker repeat shots and not too much more difficult to conceal than the J. You may have noticed that the 2.5" Model 66 is not on the list. Kind of trying to compare 38 Spl in both frame sizes.
Are there folks here who utilize the snub K Frame routinely? Why or why not?
I say go for it for all the reasons you mentioned. I had the same quandary a few years back between a 6 round K-frame or 7 round L-frame snubby. The weight and size was negotiable, so I went with the L-frame. Between the J and K frames, the main difference will be the slightly larger cylinder size; however, the cylinder has never been an issue for me with printing or concealment. If IWB, the cylinder will be a below the waistline non-issue. OWN concealed, I also never had printing issue, and it's not going to give anyone the appearance or thought of a firearm if it did print. It's typically the grip that is the issue. I'm not a tall man, I have a small frame, and I wear medium off the rack t-shirts. I'm able to easily conceal an L-frame 357 days a years even IWB with shorts and a M t-shirt in the summer with a spilt-six speedloader pouch on my weak side.