bruce381
Member
got a nice 66-2 is a 3 inch are they same or more common or rarer than a 2 1/2?
3" also has the advantage of a full length ejector rod. I only have 3" Model 66-2, 66-3 and 66-4. There were 3" 66-5s and possibly in the original Model 66 as well.In the pre-lock model 66 in general, the 3 inch is much rare than the 2 1/2 inch
Yep, and the redesign got rid of the lock on the ejector rod tip, moving that lock to the crane, and they changed the frame and barrel design and eliminated the thin spot at the bottom of the barrel shank/forcing cone area.Something of a holy grail for 66 collectors. With the 66-8 they went 2 3/4 inch, which still gives a full length guide rod.
Maybe, but I think with moving the front lock to the crane, a 2 3/4" barrel not only retained a full length ejector rod, but also perfectly split the difference between the 2 1/2" and 3" barrels of previous versions, thus reducing the need to produce two barrel lengths for the concealed carry market.I've always wondered if S&W did the 2.75" 66's to comply with the NRA PPC rules on short barreled revolvers in PPC competitions?
I knew there was a dust up between Ruger (2.75") revolvers and S&W (2.5") revolvers when S&W came out with the 3" K frames and they were not allowed.I doubt that the 2.75 had anything to do with the off duty match. That rule has been in effect for many years and for years now most shoot some sort of semi-auto in the off duty match anyway. Would have liked to have had a 2.75 all the years I shot it with a 2.5 inch 19 and had to deal with extraction. I even shot it with a shorty 9 the last 5 years or so before 2017 when I retired.