Loading them is a beautiful thing.

Shooting my home loaded 30.06 in my 1944 Winchester M1 Garand is always a good day.
Back in the '60s I was a young pup wanting a first hunting
rifle. I considered all the whiz-bang calibers of the time.
I was taught to reload by an old, grizzled, native american
(Not kidding).
When I asked him for input he said "Boy, get a 30-06 and don't
look back". Then he gave me 400 30-06 empties.
That old codger has gone to his reward. I am now an old codger
that happily loads 30-06 for my 4 rifles, 2 of which are M1s.
Ah, the stories I could tell.
There is nothing in North America that can walk away from the 30-06
Or a .280 Remington, .270 Winchester, .35 Whelen, or, ...or, ...or... my sometime favorites 6.5 x 55mm Swedish, 7mm Mauser etc. In truth there are few, if any, of the new "Super Whiz Bang" cartridges introduced in the past fifty years or more that can really be justified as 'Needed" or offering any real advantage for medium to large game hunting anywhere in 95% of the World.![]()
Back in the '60s I was a young pup wanting a first hunting
rifle. I considered all the whiz-bang calibers of the time.
I was taught to reload by an old, grizzled, native american
(Not kidding).
When I asked him for input he said "Boy, get a 30-06 and don't
look back". Then he gave me 400 30-06 empties.
That old codger has gone to his reward. I am now an old codger
that happily loads 30-06 for my 4 rifles, 2 of which are M1s.
Ah, the stories I could tell.
PS I noted that the OP has the bullets seated a little behind the cannelure.
everything but the big bears here in North America. The only other one I really love to hunt with is my 9.3x62.
He was pretty much spot on.
you might like the velocity of the 22-250, but the 30-06 will work anywhere it does, and well beyond those applications where the 22-250 get's over taxed.
There is nothing in North America that can walk away from the 30-06