357 Magnum carbine defense ammo

Cal44

Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2013
Messages
3,600
Reaction score
6,465
Location
Northern California
I have recently acquired a Marlin 1894C.

It's a 357 Magnum lever gun with an 18 inch barrel and a 9 round magazine tube.

I'm thinking of keeping it loaded and handy for defending our home.

What would you recommend for a defense load.

I'm talking factory loads.
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
Saw test on youtube.....

I'm trying to remember where I saw it just recently. I'm pretty sure it was Paul Harrell, where he tested pistol caliber carbines in gel and probably his 'meat target'. The jist of it was that pistol bullets pushed past pistol velocities don't perform well. I can't remember what calibers he tested, but .357 magnums are pretty stout out of a revolver and I'm not sure that extra velocity from a carbine would be that much.

Anyway, I prefer pistol caliber carbines as being the easiest to handle and I was put on notice to check out how the bullet performs at the velocities that they will be used.

I don't really have a carbine that I would trust in SD duty. I have a semi auto Kel tec sub 2000 in 9mm. I don't use it for SD but I'm much more natural and comfortable and I'm thinking about getting something a little more suitable for the purpose than a 'fun gun'. Maybe a Beretta PX4 Storm carbine. or at least the Ruger carbine.

PS: I can't imagine a .357 magun out of a carbine not being 'effective'.
 
Last edited:
I have a Rossi 92 in .357 MAG and find it groups best with 180 grain hardcast stuff, so that is what I use in it. If you practice enough, you can get 5-6 empty shells in the air at once. The most fun I have gotten out of gun money in many many years. Mine is shortened a hair, bringing it to 32.25 inches overall. Very handy little sucker.
 

Attachments

  • 151C59C6-97EB-4984-8D89-F069101ADDF0.jpeg
    151C59C6-97EB-4984-8D89-F069101ADDF0.jpeg
    118.6 KB · Views: 64
Last edited:
158 grain Federal SJHP Personal Defense loads.

Will be screaming from that carbine barrel. Devastating.

The 125 grain version had a stellar reputation from 4” revolver barrels. Might have too much expansion in a carbine. I’d go with the 158 grain or even 180 grain in a carbine.
 
Last edited:
I like the Federal 158 gr JSP in either it's American Eagle or Champion loadings (never been able to see any difference). They produce 2 MOA accuracy at 100 yards and produce 1820 fps in a 20" barrel.

They expand poorly at revolver velocities, but are very effective at the 1800 fps carbine/rifle velocities.
 
Last edited:
A Rossi 92 in .357 is my HD choice. My utility round is the .357 American Eagle 158gr JSP, AE357A, in 50 round boxes.

It performs great from my Rossi at the range, and isn't an unnecessarily expensive specialized round. I believe our forum member Faulkner uses this round in a lever rifle, for taking deer in the Ozarks.
 
I have a Marlin 1894. In the event I need it to protect my family I'll use my deer hunting handload of a Remington 158 JSP which exits the barrel at 1890 FPS.

If I were to select a factory load specifically to defend with it would be a 158 grain JHP from a reputable manufacturer (Remington, Federal, Hornady etc....)
 
Something heavy for caliber, 180gr.. it is a rifle and velocity will be there.

I have a Ruger 44 Carbine and it adds punch to an already potent round..
 
I'm trying to remember where I saw it just recently. I'm pretty sure it was Paul Harrell, where he tested pistol caliber carbines in gel and probably his 'meat target'. The jist of it was that pistol bullets pushed past pistol velocities don't perform well. I can't remember what calibers he tested, but .357 magnums are pretty stout out of a revolver and I'm not sure that extra velocity from a carbine would be that much.

Anyway, I prefer pistol caliber carbines as being the easiest to handle and I was put on notice to check out how the bullet performs at the velocities that they will be used.

I don't really have a carbine that I would trust in SD duty. I have a semi auto Kel tec sub 2000 in 9mm. I don't use it for SD but I'm much more natural and comfortable and I'm thinking about getting something a little more suitable for the purpose than a 'fun gun'. Maybe a Beretta PX4 Storm carbine. or at least the Ruger carbine.

PS: I can't imagine a .357 magun out of a carbine not being 'effective'.
FWIW, according to data posted at Ballistics By The Inch most 357 ammo seems to hit peak velocities out of about a 16" barrel, and that peak is approximately 400 fps or 20%-25% faster than the same ammo out of a 4" barrel.

Velocity Data
BBTI - Ballistics by the Inch :: .357 Mag Results

That increase in velocity results in an approximate doubling of the muzzle energy from around 600ft/lbs to 1100-1200 ft/lbs

Muzzle Energy Data
Ballistics by the inch

Seems like some pretty significant increases to me.
 
American Eagle 158 grain JSP is my choice for my 1894C as the best all around cartridge for range, deer hunting, etc..
Easy to find in most stores, rock solid round out to 100 yards.
 
I have killed a number of whitetails with a .357 rifle. All were one shot kills. All bullets were complete pass throughs. Tissue damage was impressive in all cases. I had great blood trails in all cases. I used the Hornady 158 grain XTP hollow point over 16.7 grains of H110. Note that I have been solemly advised that the hollow point XTP would explode on a deer when fired from a carbine. I completely disagree. I consider a .357 rifle to be an excellent choice for deer hunting at ranges less than 100 yards when the shooter can shoot. If I were choosing a .357 rifle for self defense in an urban setting, I would be feeling very well armed. I have absolutely no confidence in jello tests.
 
FWIW, according to data posted at Ballistics By The Inch most 357 ammo seems to hit peak velocities out of about a 16" barrel, and that peak is approximately 400 fps or 20%-25% faster than the same ammo out of a 4" barrel.

Velocity Data
BBTI - Ballistics by the Inch :: .357 Mag Results

You have to take the BBTI data with a huge grain of salt, especially when it comes to barrel length for peak velocity.

The problem is their methodology. They shoot 3 rounds of each type of ammo in each barrel length, but shoot it across two chronographs placed in line to get 6 data points. That isn't 6 data points, it's still 3 data points now confused by 2 chronograph measurements a few fps apart. Even if it were 6 data points, that's about 1/3 rd the number you need to start getting reasonably reliable (repeatable) data.

Let's demonstrate this with the numbers for the Federal 158 grain load. First, let's look at the 7", 8", 9" and 10" data:

7" = 1517 fps, SD = 10.3 fps
8" = 1570 fps, SD = 14.6 fps
9" = 1563 fps, SD = 37.9 fps
10" = 1630 fps, SD = 13.1

You see a 53 fps increase between 7" and 8", then a 7 fps loss between 8" and 9" followed by a 67 fps increase between 9" and 10". The average velocity for just 3 shots at 8" was probably higher than would have been the case with a reasonable sample size of 10-15 rounds. Conversely, the average of the 3 rounds fired at 9" was probably lower than would be the case with a reasonable sample size.

You are also seeing the other effect of small sample size, where the standard deviation in velocity far exceeds the difference between velocities in adjacent barrel lengths, particularly in the 7", 8" and 9" length data.

Next let's look at the 11+ to 14" data. You see a 9 fps increases between 11" and 12" and a 20 fps increases between 12" and 13", and then a huge increase of 58 fps from 13" to 14", with a large SD in the 14" data.

Most of this is probably due to small sample size errors, but some of the data in some of the lengths may be due to variation in bore size along the bore. Tighter sections of bore will produce more velocity per inch than looser sections of bore, and BBTI isn't using high quality air gauged barrels hand lapped for consistency.

As background on Standard Deviation, that 23.4 fps SD means that the expected range in velocity over 100 shots with that load/barrel length would be +/- 3 SD, or in other words 6 times the SD, or 140.4 fps. Here, in the 3 shot data collected at 14" there was a range of 59 fps. Normally, you'd expect 68 out of 100 shots to fall within 1 SD of the mean, but the odds are that you'll get a shot 2 SD from the mean about 27 shots out of a 100 and 5 times out of 100 you'll get one that falls in the 3rd SD from the mean. Which means about 1/3rd of the time using 3 shot samples, you'll get a shot that screws up your average.

You see that here in the 14", 15" and 16" data and you are seeing it again in the 16", 17" and 18" data.

11" = 1643 fps, SD = 9.8 fps
12" = 1654 fps, SD = 12.1 fps
13" = 1674 fps, SD = 5.23 fps
14" = 1732 fps, SD = 23.4 fps
15" = 1708 fps, SD = 18.8 fps
16" = 1739 fps, SD= 19.5 fps
17" = 1689 fps, SD = 16.4 fps
18" = 1719 fps, SD = 20.5 fps

Even if all the shots fall within 1 SD at 18" you can expect a spread of 40 fps, which is greater than the difference between the 17" average velocity the 18" velocity. Similarly, at 16" the expected spread at 1 SD is still 39 fps, and that's again greater than the difference between the 17" velocity and the 15" velocity.

That means that even at the relatively low 1 SD, 68% confidence interval there is no significant difference between the 16" and 17" velocities or the 17" and 18" velocities.

In short, that means there is no evidence in the data that a peak velocity has occurred. And then of course BBTI data starts at 18" so they never collected data for the .357 Mag in longer barrels.

I happen to own Rossi 92 rifles in 20" short rifle and 24" rifle patterns and I happen to have collected 30 shot sample data at each barrel length with this same Federal load.

Interestingly enough I get an average velocity of 1807 fps in the 20" barrel and 1820 fps in the 24" barrel. That's only 13 fps over a 4" change in barrel length but:

1) it's reliable data;
2) it's still an increase per inch; and
3) it's a lot higher than the 16" and 18" BBTI data showing that there is indeed an increase past 16", and a large enough difference to offset any bore related differences.

----

Now...there is a point of diminishing returns for each cartridge and load combination where you get less velocity per inch, and that extra barrel length stops being worth the extra length and weight. In the case of the .357 Magnum, I'll agree 4" more barrel for 13 fps more velocity is not worth it (although balance of the rifle, a slightly lower SD in velocity, etc might still cause someone to choose a longer barrel).

In the .223 Stoner used an 18" tube in the AR-18 and AR-180, Ruger used an 18" barrel on the Mini-14, and the Israelis used an 18" barrel on the Galil, in large part because 18" is the sweet spot for the 55 gr .223. You can get more velocity at 20" and still more velocity at 24" and 26", but it's generally agreed that the rate of velocity increase per each additional inch of barrel starts to decline after 18". The velocity still increases, just not as much per inch as it did at shorter barrel lengths.

Conversely the rate of loss of velocity per each inch of reduction in barrel length increases as the barrel gets shorter than 18" in the .223.

Unfortunately, many shooters misunderstand what that means and start saying things that are totally incorrect, like "a .357 Magnum bullet will start slowing down in barrels longer than 16 inches", or more often " a .22 LR bullet will start slowing down in barrels longer than 16 inches."

Even in .22 LR that's not the case, I have 16", 18" 20" 24" 26" and even 28" .22 LR rifles and the velocity of even standard velocity ammo will continue to increase, just at progressively smaller amounts per inch. However, the SD also decreases in those longer barrels, so you get more consistent velocities, and that in combination with a longer sight radius is why you seen longer barrels on smallbore match and target rifles.

With the .22 rimfire, a .22 CB cap powered only by the primer compound might start slowing down in long barrel. However, for just about everything else, the distance in the barrel where the combined resistance of the bore and the pressure of the air in front of the bullet is greater than pressure of the gas behind the bullet is measured in yards, not inches.
 
I have killed a number of whitetails with a .357 rifle. All were one shot kills. All bullets were complete pass throughs. Tissue damage was impressive in all cases. I had great blood trails in all cases. I used the Hornady 158 grain XTP hollow point over 16.7 grains of H110. Note that I have been solemly advised that the hollow point XTP would explode on a deer when fired from a carbine. I completely disagree. I consider a .357 rifle to be an excellent choice for deer hunting at ranges less than 100 yards when the shooter can shoot. If I were choosing a .357 rifle for self defense in an urban setting, I would be feeling very well armed. I have absolutely no confidence in jello tests.

The XTP bullets were all designed for moderate expansion to around 1.5 to 1.55 times their starting diameter and the produce a more traditional mushroom shape. That really prevents them from over expanding and under penetrating, and they are a very good choice for a general purpose hunting and self defense bullet in a carbine.
 
I happen to own Rossi 92 rifles in 20" short rifle and 24" rifle patterns and I happen to have collected 30 shot sample data at each barrel length with this same Federal load.

Interestingly enough I get an average velocity of 1807 fps in the 20" barrel and 1820 fps in the 24" barrel. That's only 13 fps over a 4" change in barrel length but:

1) it's reliable data;
2) it's still an increase per inch; and
3) it's a lot higher than the 16" and 18" BBTI data showing that there is indeed an increase past 16", and a large enough difference to offset any bore related differences.

Thanks for posting the results of your careful research. It's good to see the velocity numbers from the 24 inch Rossi 92 .357, which is my preferred home defense firearm.

The "seat of the pants" experience with the 92 told me it put more "zip" in the rounds, but that is not why I liked it for home defense. The long barrel takes what is normally a very loud cartridge in my revolvers, and reduces it to a relative whisper. It makes my favorite .357 cartridge also my quietest.

Optionally, it seems to add enough velocity to .38SPL, that it puts it in the potent energy realm for home defense of the magnum from a handgun, while being even quieter.
 
Back
Top