638-3 crack

rusty68

Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2016
Messages
11
Reaction score
2
I have a 638-3 airweight that has seen some use. After shooting today, I noticed a small hairline crack at the bottom of the window where the hand rests. I have emailed S&W (was on hold for 15 minutes, figure an email they can get to it when they get to it) about it to see what they think/see if it needs repair/replacement.
What do you all think? I don't think the gun will stop working or anything, but more likely than not if I keep shooting it the crack will become bigger and a failure may happen.

Also I've noticed frame wear under the barrel where the ring on the yoke is making an indentation on the frame. Doesn't seem to affect back and forth movement of the cylinder at all, but it seems to have been more noticable lately. I mentioned in the email, figured I'd mention it here too, see what y'all think.
 

Attachments

  • 26B76915-E052-4A4E-99B4-887FF264696D.jpg
    26B76915-E052-4A4E-99B4-887FF264696D.jpg
    40 KB · Views: 475
  • 24F1D780-A819-4576-A642-2934805410BA.jpg
    24F1D780-A819-4576-A642-2934805410BA.jpg
    48.4 KB · Views: 403
Register to hide this ad
Hey Rusty, there isn't any "thinking" about that one. Get a shipping label from SW and get that out to them. The crack isn't abundantly obvious in your image (could just be my eyes, or my relatively suboptimal monitor), but when there is a crack where there shouldn't be one, it has to go back.
 
Last edited:
Three or four years ago, I emailed them a question about the frame battering you are seeing under the barrel extension. It's caused by the yoke moving forward during recoil, after overcoming the spring tension in the new yoke retention screw.

They characterized the damage in the photos I sent them as "normal".....and the example I sent was much worse than yours. The resulting peening damage by the yoke is more evident on alloy frames.
 
Last edited:
Rusty - Sorry to hear about the possible frame crack - I also cannot see it with my monitor. I've seen it mentioned here many times before - those Airweights are best for prolly 96% carry and 4% shooting. I have two 637's - and I'm wearing one out now carrying it most mornings when I walk. Well, not really wearing it out since I'm pocket-carrying it which should cause very minimal wear & tear. Statement of the obvious follows: I shoot my 640 and SP-101's when I want to go to the range with a snubby. The Airweights are test-fired only and not often.
 
The yoke batter looks kinda normal. I have some with more pronounced marks.
The crack is interesting tho. I would send it in for that.
abfab898d33761bc259805f2fe2526bf.jpg
 
This!

With the cylinder open, pull the thumb piece rearward and pull the trigger to see the operation of the hand.

That "crack" looks like the hand in "park"!

Please report back with your finding....:)'s
 
Last edited:
I looked at mine and at your picture. I'm having a tough time seeing Much of a difference. I'd take it to a gunsmith first and get his opinion.
 
The "crack" at the hand slot is normal for J frames. It's cut in at the factory. My 49, 649, and 63 all have that small notch.
Also, they all have the same mark at the yoke. The 49 has been shot the most and with a lot of +P ammo. You can just barely feel a slight indent.
Those are all steel frame J frames so I would expect an alloy to have just a bit more wear. As long as there's no excessive end shake where you are having light primer strikes and misfires I wouldn't worry about it. It's all normal.
 
With the cylinder open, pull the thumb piece rearward and pull the trigger to see the operation of the hand.

That "crack" looks like the hand in "park"!

Please report back with your finding....'s

Yes, I did that when I first discovered it is not a part of the hand.
 
I think there maybe some confusion at what part of the photograph I'm referring to (which I apologize for the quality, my phone didn't want to focus when put closer to the gun).

It's the small black line that starts from the bottom (in the photos perspective) of the hand window/cutout. If you look closer at the enhance photo Lou_the_welder put up, following the small dark line from right to left, it ventures upward slightly. So it is most definitely a crack.

We shall see what S&W says. I'm in no rush. It's a backup piece and I have other ones that can take it's place in the meantime.
 
Well, I concur with "send it back." I took a photo of that area on my 638-3, and no mark/crack/scratch like yours. I also took a photo for comparison of my 640, again nothing. The 638 is the dirtier one, BTW.
 

Attachments

  • 20200610_182135.jpg
    20200610_182135.jpg
    51.4 KB · Views: 146
  • 20200610_182224.jpg
    20200610_182224.jpg
    50.1 KB · Views: 130
Thanks for the comparison pic GerSan69. No crack on either. I'm assuming that once I get a return email/call they'll send me a label
 
Well, I concur with "send it back." I took a photo of that area on my 638-3, and no mark/crack/scratch like yours. I also took a photo for comparison of my 640, again nothing. The 638 is the dirtier one, BTW.

Your 638 picture upsets my OCD very much
 
OK, The comparison pic does show what the window should look like without the crack.

S&W will replace the frame if it doesn't meet their Q/C.

I had a frame replaced by S&W for a "window issue" 20+ years ago. What was weird was it was shipped directly back to me with a new serial number different from the original!

Smiles,
 
OK, The comparison pic does show what the window should look like without the crack.

S&W will replace the frame if it doesn't meet their Q/C.

I had a frame replaced by S&W for a "window issue" 20+ years ago. What was weird was it was shipped directly back to me with a new serial number different from the original!

Smiles,

Not "weird" at all., ATF allows that when it is a direct replacement of a firearm.
 
To me the crack is obvious and I would be sending that puppy back to S&W.
I'll be checking mine as soon as I've had my coffee and the sun comes up and I put my pants on.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top