952 vs PPC9 Is there a clear cut accuracy winner

SW CQB 45

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2002
Messages
3,362
Reaction score
1,057
Location
Victoria, Texas
I have never held either, but if I had to guess

they are basically the same gun, except for sights and frame allowing for single and double stack mags.

Yes there are going to be other differences, but the action should be the same, same barrels, same fitted slide to frames.

so accuracy should be the same.

I was told by a SW CS that the PPC9 has more hand fitting than the 952.

correct me if I am wrong...
both are made by the PC
both are hand fitted
both have the same barrels
both have the same actions

for those who have both and have shot them, is one more accurate than the other.

This may be difficult to answer due to the PPC's sight, however I will take a stab at it.

At 25 yds, 15 yds, which holds a tighter group?

I bet they are the same, its just the grip and sight differences.

Of course the price of the 952 will exceed the LEO price of the PPC (another guess)

thanks in advance
 
Register to hide this ad
I have never held either, but if I had to guess

they are basically the same gun, except for sights and frame allowing for single and double stack mags.

Yes there are going to be other differences, but the action should be the same, same barrels, same fitted slide to frames.

so accuracy should be the same.

I was told by a SW CS that the PPC9 has more hand fitting than the 952.

correct me if I am wrong...
both are made by the PC
both are hand fitted
both have the same barrels
both have the same actions

for those who have both and have shot them, is one more accurate than the other.

This may be difficult to answer due to the PPC's sight, however I will take a stab at it.

At 25 yds, 15 yds, which holds a tighter group?

I bet they are the same, its just the grip and sight differences.

Of course the price of the 952 will exceed the LEO price of the PPC (another guess)

thanks in advance
 
Will you take a second hand (but eyewitness) report as a single data point?

Friend of mine is a Governor's 20 PPC shooter. He was in the market for a S&W automatic, largely because he could not get (would not pay for) the combination of accuracy and reliability he wanted out of a 1911 pattern gun. He was able to borrow a sample of each, M952-1 and PPC-9 for several weeks trial.

In his hands, with the several brands of ammo shot, the PPC-9 was noticeably more accurate than the M952. Also the 952 did not have enough range of sight adjustment for a neck hold.
Which he considered a pity, he really preferred the single stack grip of the 952.
 
I was under the impression that the PPC guns use the same double-stack 5906 mags; they are just blocked to 10 rounds like those during the AWB. So you can use 15-round 5906 mags in them. I recall threads where members who bought PPC guns recalled their "arguing" with S&W about this - wanting 15-round mags sent instead of 10-rounders.
 
Originally posted by Jim Watson:
Will you take a second hand (but eyewitness) report as a single data point?

Friend of mine is a Governor's 20 PPC shooter. He was in the market for a S&W automatic, largely because he could not get (would not pay for) the combination of accuracy and reliability he wanted out of a 1911 pattern gun. He was able to borrow a sample of each, M952-1 and PPC-9 for several weeks trial.

In his hands, with the several brands of ammo shot, the PPC-9 was noticeably more accurate than the M952. Also the 952 did not have enough range of sight adjustment for a neck hold.
Which he considered a pity, he really preferred the single stack grip of the 952.

Jim, thanks for the info.

I wonder if the sights make it not a fair challenge.

definitely when it comes to distance (50yds) shots.

I really believe they are the same, just dbl and single stack with different sights.

I bet a 952 with aristocrat sight set up would be just as accurate.

this style of shooting requires 6 round stages, so mag capacity is a non issue,

however I bet single stack 952 mags are outragiously priced...

more opinions appreciated.
 
FWIW I have both and I find the PPC9 to be more accurate. S&W also includes a test target for the PPC9 pistols not so for the 952.
Copy%20of%20112_1262.JPG
 
I have 2 and both are 5". I did have S&W send me new front sights that are not as wide as the one that comes installed from the factory. I like more daylight on the sides of my front sight than the factory setup provided. The PPC 9 is less expensive than the 952. I think I paid $1125.00 each back in 2004. Only catch is you have to be LEO or know one that will place the order for you which is what I did.
112_1265.JPG
 
LAH, thanks for the info.

what is the front sight width on a standard PPC?

and what do you have on their now (width)?

also the rear notch, .90", .100" or .110"?

thanks in advance
 
Rear width is .110. My pistols came with .125 width front sights and I changed them out to .110 width that S&W sent to me free of charge. I just called the performance center and spoke to Tom Gordon, however I don't believe that Tom is still there.
 
thanks again LAH

.125" front...could you see any light with the .110" rear?

I am assuming you have a sight tool?
 
Very little. It would be better with a 6" barrel. Sight tool? Yes, a padded vise, a brass punch and a small ball peen hammer. I actually did a better job than the factory did. Just go slow and be very careful. Oh, I also took a small amount of metal off of the bottom of the new front sight and liberally lubricated the sight and dovetail.
 
OK, good deal.

I guess I need to invest in a heavy vise.

what pad inserts do you use?

thanks in advance
 
Convince me!

Having only owned and fired two examples of the old blued 952s that equaled and even surpassed T/Cs and S&W 41s, it's hard to imagine a more accurate handgun.

Minute of angle was easy, will the newer six inch give half minute? What ammo?
 
Very little. It would be better with a 6" barrel. Sight tool? Yes, a padded vise, a brass punch and a small ball peen hammer. I actually did a better job than the factory did. Just go slow and be very careful. Oh, I also took a small amount of metal off of the bottom of the new front sight and liberally lubricated the sight and dovetail.
__

Hello, the mine of 5" when firing dryfire, the hammer falls fully but after bouncing back to half cock. I don't have a problem when shooting, but because this happens?
Thank you very much advance
 
I was under the impression that the PPC guns use the same double-stack 5906 mags; they are just blocked to 10 rounds like those during the AWB. So you can use 15-round 5906 mags in them. I recall threads where members who bought PPC guns recalled their "arguing" with S&W about this - wanting 15-round mags sent instead of 10-rounders.
Both my PPC9s shipped with 15-round magazines, LEO marked (before the sunset of the AW ban). Which technically means I have to dispose of the magazines before I retire next year, in order to remain NY legal. BTW, the 5906 magazines are the correct ones for the PPC9, and they are cheap and plentiful on the used market, unlike the 952/639 magazines.
PPC9.jpg
 
According to Mas Ayoob, the PPC9 is the most accurate, guaranteed to shoot 1" at 25 yards from the factory. He also stated that the PC5906 aka DPA5906 is the next most accurate and then followed in 3rd place by the 952.

IF I could just get a hold of a PPC9 I would have the trifecta...
icon_biggrin.gif
 
ss,
I have a used 5" on the way, bought new this year, and the pics look like the configuration of lah1940's. It came with 3 - 10 rd.mags and S&W is no longer supplying test targets, according to the previous owner
 
My apologies if this is off topic.

I came into possession 3 magazines which is now clearly identified as magazines for M39s. Are these interchangeable with the 952s?

I shoot a Model 52-2 for Bulluseye and can't use them. Please see previous posting for more info.

Can I use my 52 if the iron is put back on for PPC? Like to use what I have for more than one "game".

http://smith-wessonforum.com/eve/forums?a=tpc&f=520103904&m=1021039623

Bob
 
Back
Top