RDub
Member

Hello
Most of the 9mm reviews that I did were shot with two guns.
A SIG 365 SAS, with a 3.1 inch barrel and a Taurus G3 with a 4 inch barrel.
First I do forensic exam of the ammunition. Next I shoot a group while chronographing with each gun. 10 yards with the SIG, three rounds and 15 yards with the G3, five rounds. Chronograph is a Oehler 35P
Then the ammunition is shot out of each gun into a 55 gallon plastic barrel of water. The bullets are then recovered, photographed and then measured for expansion. In cases where the bullet fragments and loses its jacket, a weight is taken with all the recovered material and also a weight taken with just the lead core.
Here is the link to all the photos of the review;
9mm Grizzly 124gr JHP +P+ — Postimages
Data Sheet

As the label implies this ammunition will deliver above average performance. Accuracy was very good considering. The 4 inch gun didn't produce anything close to the advertised velocity. Both guns produced a Standard Deviation of 13, which at this performance level is pretty good. Expansion was interesting. At the velocity the Taurus produced there was quite a bit of fragmentation resulting in a final core weight of 87grs. While at the slower velocity the SIG produced, the bullet held together well. Perhaps velocity is not always your friend.. Recoil was above average as well. Both guns shot the ammunition in stride. No concerns with the guns or the brass. Should you shoot this in your gun(s)? I'll leave that up to you.