NFrameFred
Member
I am a layman when it comes to this, but it seems that staggering loads in one magazine could alter point of impact. I can see the possible need for different magazines, each with it's entirety loaded with separate ammo types. Loading different ammo types within the same magazine doesn't seem like a good idea. I'll further go out on a liberal limb and say the average citizen doesn't need to carry a pistol with a capacity of more than 10-11 rounds. The caveat would be home defense and those living within states be invaded by our neighbors from the south of the border.
I addressed all this (in my above opinion) except the capacity issue you bring up.
I never owned a hi-cap nine until I had planned a vacation with my wife and new-born daughter, and started reading about the drug war between rival biker gangs that was then taking place on the Interstate corridor I had to travel. The prospect of breaking down somewhere to look up and find several hostiles in close proximity to my family prompted me to buy the only option available at the time I could afford, a model 59, the latest and greatest in wonder-nine technology. With a fully loaded mag in the gun and two spares I was carrying almost a box of ammo. Didn't need it, as it turned out (the way it usually does), but I wanted it, it was legal, it was available, and the idea that magazine capacity has any real bearing on anything that a bad guy can do that he can't do without it is a straw dog. I'm no Jerry Miculek, but decades later I can still crank out dozens of rounds in less than a minute with a pocketful of HKS 6 round speed loaders and a magnum wheel gun. Doesn't take a lot of practice to get proficient at it. The divisiveness among gun owners who should know better hurts us all.