-
Forum Update: We've upgraded the software to improve security, performance, and the overall experience.
👉 Read why we made the change | Support the Forum
9mm reloading data
- Thread starter Sha_dow
- Start date
Register to hide this ad
Fortunately.......
....231 is a very good general use powder. In case you don't know, while you are looking at the Hodgdon site you'll notice that HP-38 and Win 231 are the exact same powder with the same load date.
Since Hodgdon now owns Winchester, they maintain the two due to 'brand loyalty' as some people swear 231 is great and HP-31 is junk and vice versa.
THE IS ONLY TRUE FOR A FEW POWDERS.
....231 is a very good general use powder. In case you don't know, while you are looking at the Hodgdon site you'll notice that HP-38 and Win 231 are the exact same powder with the same load date.
Since Hodgdon now owns Winchester, they maintain the two due to 'brand loyalty' as some people swear 231 is great and HP-31 is junk and vice versa.
THE IS ONLY TRUE FOR A FEW POWDERS.
Huskerguy
Member
This^^^^^^
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2006
- Messages
- 19,321
- Reaction score
- 30,266
YUP! ^^^^^^ These days there is little need for a hard copy of loading data as everything is now online. I have 4 Reloading manuals that seldom get opened anymore - just go on the manufacturers website.
For a decade or more, my pistol powder has been Titegroup, but came across a few pounds of W231 and H38 the other day at a Cabela's, so loaded up some mid-power 124 gr plated with 4.4 gr of the latter, and shot some this week. What amazed me was the huge fireball as seen from behind the sights. I am sure from the side, it would have looked like a Star War's Blaster. No issue with it, but a fiery load. Maybe a slow burning powder.
Load what you have.
All the best and stay safe.... SF VET
Load what you have.
All the best and stay safe.... SF VET
You should have no problem with that combination. 231 is all I use for 9mm and it works fine.
Are your bullets copper jacketed hollow points, lead or coated?
Speer data Handgun Data
FWIW; Hodgdon publishes an annual reloading manual for around $10.00. I prefer hard copy, published manuals so I can look at one page/section and compare load data with various powders without switching pages/sites on my computer. I can even find data where I have no computer! 
I'm not "old school" behind the time old geezer and I do have a new "smart" phone, but I'm not married to it. Sometime I even have to hunt for it because I left it somewhere (often it the little boy's room where I was playing games while sitting there
).
I'm not "old school" behind the time old geezer and I do have a new "smart" phone, but I'm not married to it. Sometime I even have to hunt for it because I left it somewhere (often it the little boy's room where I was playing games while sitting there
).
Last edited:
W231 is a "Medium powder" that almost get to a full load in a 9mm.
A lot depends on bullet weight, amount of powder and the OAL of the load.
With a 124 gr Gold Dot bullet at 1.12" OAL my chrony said;
3.5" barrel at 1068 fps ............. Unique at 1140 fps.
5" barrel, 124 HAP at 1.075" OAL .......... 1166 fps.
I could not get it to reach +P speeds in my pistols but it is very accurate
with target and standard load speeds.
Good luck.
A lot depends on bullet weight, amount of powder and the OAL of the load.
With a 124 gr Gold Dot bullet at 1.12" OAL my chrony said;
3.5" barrel at 1068 fps ............. Unique at 1140 fps.
5" barrel, 124 HAP at 1.075" OAL .......... 1166 fps.
I could not get it to reach +P speeds in my pistols but it is very accurate
with target and standard load speeds.
Good luck.
Last edited:
Dragonwing
Member
I use W 231 for my 9mm, 45acp and 44mag. I get consistent case loads with this ball powder out of my RCBS Pro 2000. I load jacketed bullets only and get very accurate results on target. It's a economical powder using only 4 to 5.5 grains. I'm very thankful I've got 1 sealed 8 lb keg and 3.5 lbs on hand.
Last edited:
ArchAngelCD
Moderator, SWCA Member, Absent Comrade
+P has nothing to do with bullet speed, it denotes higher pressures.
I use almost nothing other than W231/HP-38 for the 9mm. It's very accurate for me in 3 different pistols.
HP-38 is my go-to pistol powder and find it to work best in the upper half of the load data table. Below that it tends to get sooty and leaves some unburnt powder--especially in my 9mm Mak load. Never really noticed an flash.
STORMINORMAN
Member
Uh, doesn't higher pressure (referring to one powder & one bullet) not generate higher fps...?
There is a point......
There is a point of diminishing returns where adding a lot of powder doesn't translate into proportionally higher velocity and also accuracy usually suffers.
There is a point of diminishing returns where adding a lot of powder doesn't translate into proportionally higher velocity and also accuracy usually suffers.
muddocktor
Member
Yes, generally you do get higher bullet speed as you get on the upper range of a particular powder's load, but some powders will yield higher bullet speed without exceeding SAAMI pressures. As an example, from the Speer website, their data shows that the 124 grain GDHP will get 1199 ft/sec with a charge of 6.0 grains of Alliant BE-86 powder. For the same bullet but using Win 231 powder instead of BE-86, a max load of 4.5 grains of 231 only yields a bullet speed of 998 ft/sec. So, if you are looking for a harder hitting faster round, powder selection is a big consideration.
I use 231 in my 9mm 1911 loads, which as other say is the same as HP38.
Using a 124 gn plated RN bullet I loaded 4.2 gn, .2 gn below maximum, for use in my Kimber 1911. I needed 1010 fps to make a 125 PF for use in IPSC. The local factory produced 9mm/124 gm ammo was pushing 1100 FPS/136 PF through the same gun.
At 4.2 gn I could not make PF and had to go above the 4.4 gn recommended maximum, which also did not make PF, to match the factory ammo. This matches a load recommended to me by my shooting mentor. He has used it in his 1911 for many years. I ended up backing his load off by .1 gn which placed the load between minimum PF and the factory ammo in my pistol.
COL is 1.150" which is right for my pistol and magazines. Any shorter and there are feeding issues even with RN bullets. Any longer and velocity drops off.
Last edited:
4barrel
Member
Why don't you just look it up on line?
gwpercle
Member
You mean those pesky details make a difference ?
When asking for load data you can't expect us to " Harry Houdini " and mind read the details .
Bullet construction and shape , even the maker of them , is critical in working up load data... (we aren't baking cakes and I'm not Julia Child , so I like the term "load data" not recipe )
So bullet wise ... what cha got , Jacketed , Plated , Coated , Cast Lead ... those pesky details matter if you want a proper answer .
Gary
