This an open forum. I'm open foruming.
This an open forum. I'm open foruming.
lol
I open forumed several times and it got me time on the beach.![]()
My guess is that he would not have. I saw him on the news talking about how in the movie biz they rely on experts to tell them what to do....All of the above leads me to this: If the scene called for Baldwin to place the muzzle to his temple and fire, would he have checked the gun himself before . . . ?.
Baldwin's latest "Roadside Chat" in Vermont didn't help him much, according to the legal experts. Consensus is that he should have stayed far away where the press couldn't interview him.
My guess is that he would not have. I saw him on the news talking about how in the movie biz they rely on experts to tell them what to do.
I bet in the future, if ever called to shoot at someone or his own head in a movie, he'll think pretty carefully about it.
Actors should at least be taught how to distinguish a live round from a blank/dummy, and taught how to check the guns they use themselves. (Fine to have an armorer or AD or whatever looking over your shoulder. Better yet, let the guy being shot at check the gun, too.)
My guess is that he would not have. I saw him on the news talking about how in the movie biz they rely on experts to tell them what to do.
Sorry, I must have misunderstood the question.Those statements don't square up with what I asked . . .
Sorry, I must have misunderstood the question.
****
Re shooting one's self in the head, years ago, probably close to forty, I read in the news of a guy who was, per the article, playing with his .357 revolver in front of his young daughter and her friend. The friend became nervous, and asked of he were sure the gun was unloaded.
He replied, "If it were loaded, would I do this?!," and put the gun to his head, pulled the trigger and blew his brains out.